YourLawyer.com 1-800-LAW-INFO (1-800-529-4636)

Glitch prompts recall of Boston Sci Defibrillators

Apr 10, 2007 | Pioneer Press

Boston Scientific is recalling about 73,000 implantable cardiac defibrillators because of a problem with some device batteries, but a company official said Tuesday that the issue might affect just a small subset of patients with the devices.

A notice posted Tuesday about the recall by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration also noted, "Most patients will not be affected by this recall."

The devices in question contain a faulty capacitor that can cause batteries to deplete sooner than expected. The problem has resulted in no serious injuries or deaths, the company says, and the early battery depletion issue can safely be handled with increased monitoring by physicians.

ICDs are $30,000 implanted devices that can shock a failing heart back into rhythm. Boston Scientific manufactures implantable defibrillators and pacemakers at a facility in Arden Hills.

The local division was rocked by a series of high-profile product recalls in 2005 and 2006, when Indianapolis-based Guidant Corp. owned it. Doctors said the latest recall, by comparison, raises a minor issue for patients.

"I think this problem is manageable and poses minimum risk for patients provided they have adequate follow-up," said Dr. Robert Hauser, a cardiologist with the Minneapolis Heart Institute. "It is less worrisome than earlier recalls because the battery depletion can be detected and corrective action (replacement) taken before the ICD fails."

While the clinical impact of the latest recall
Advertisement
seemed small, Tim Nelson, an analyst with Piper Jaffray Cos. in Minneapolis, said he worried that the news would add to the string of negative reports about implantable defibrillators, nonetheless.

"A lot of patients are going to be notified, and there's a potential fear factor that could arise as the media starts to publicize this," Nelson said. "The real impact could be on the length of time it takes for the industry to start growing again."

In a letter sent to physicians April 5, Boston Scientific asked doctors to check the voltage level and age of the potentially affected devices. That process should determine large groups of patients for whom the product advisory does not apply, said Annette Ruzicka, spokeswoman for Boston Scientific's Arden Hills division.

The remaining patients will need to be checked more frequently and, ultimately, could require replacement devices a few months earlier than normal, Ruzicka said.

"We actually have a recommendation for physicians that eliminates patient risk," she said. "Most of the patients who have these devices will never even be affected or need to know about this."

Nonetheless, Boston Scientific also sent letters to patients, notifying them about the battery-depletion problem. The issue has surfaced in 19 devices since the last quarter of 2006, the company says.

"There is a very low likelihood that a component within your defibrillator may cause the battery in your device to use energy faster than expected, which could reduce the amount of time available for replacement," the company wrote in the letter to patients. "No patients have been harmed; however, some devices have required early replacement."

Natick, Mass.-based Boston Scientific purchased Guidant last year. The controversy involving earlier ICD recalls involving the local division dates back to 2005, but continues to depress the market for implantable cardiac defibrillators.

The current recall includes various models of Guidant's Contak Renewal 3 device, as well as five versions of its Vitality ICD product. The recall is unrelated to a May 2006 recall at Guidant that also dealt with a faulty capacitor, according to the FDA notice.

The agency encouraged patients with recalled devices to contact their doctors about what steps to take next.

"In some cases, more frequent device checks may be advised," the FDA said. "Only in rare cases will a device need to be removed prematurely from a patient."
Guidant Defibrillators
* Denotes required field.

Title

* First Name

* Last Name

* Email Address

* Phone Number

Cell Phone Number

Office Phone Number

Street Address

Apartment/Suite

City

State

Zip Code

Please provide the best method and times to contact you:

Date of birth of person injured
(mm-dd-yyyy):

Which Guidant cardiac defibrillator was implanted?









If other, what is the name of the defibrillator that was implanted?

Date the device was implanted:

Is the device still implanted?


What medical condition prompted the use of the device?

Please describe any problems or injuries caused by the device:

Other Info:

No Yes, I agree to the Parker Waichman Alonso LLP disclaimers.Click here to review all.

Yes, I would like to receive the Parker Waichman Alonso LLP monthly newsletter, InjuryAlert.

please do not fill out the field below.

Bad Med
 
 

News Feeds

WE ALSO OFFER OUR FIRM NEWS AS RSS/XML FEEDS.
LEARN MORE ABOUT RSS

Home | Defective Drugs | Medical Devices | Toxic Substances | Accidents | Product Liability | Malpractice | Diseases
Nursing Home Negligence | Food Poisoning | Other Topics | Contact
Statement of Clients' Rights | Site Map | ReNu with MoistureLoc | Vioxx | Mesothelioma | Permax | Dostinex | Composix Kugel Mesh X Large Patch
Ortho Evra | Fosamax | Personal Injury Lawyer | Fusarium Keratitis | Stevens Johnson Syndrome

© 2002-2008 YourLawyer.com. All Rights Reserved.

Please note that you are not considered a client until you have signed a retainer agreement and your case has been accepted by us.
Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter.
Attorney Advertising

Parker Waichman Personal Injury News