YourLawyer.com 1-800-LAW-INFO (1-800-529-4636)

J&J unit DePuy loses suit dismissal bid

Apr 13, 2007 | UPI

U.S. Johnson & Johnson unit DePuy Spine has lost a bid to quash suits claiming its spinal device has defects, plaintiffs' counsel said.

A Massachusetts state court earlier this week refused to dismiss four lawsuits filed against DePuy alleging the company's Charite Artificial Disc used to replace diseased or damaged spinal discs as an alternative to spinal fusion -- doesn't work for its intended purpose.

The plaintiffs in the four cases alleged the spinal device failed, causing serious and lasting damage.

The court refused to buy DePuy's defense that approval of the product by the Food and Drug Administration insulated the company from lawsuits based on product defect, a legal strategy known as pre-emption.

"In short, DePuy was claiming that since the FDA gave its approval for the disc's use, it was inoculated against claims of defect or negligence in its design," said one of the law firms representing the plaintiffs. "We demonstrated to the court that the pre-emption defense in this case went well beyond the pale."

In its ruling, the court said, "There is evidence to support the device does not perform in the manner which DePuy represented to the FDA that it must perform."

The plaintiff also cited promotional materials used by DePuy that they said misleadingly claimed, "The Charite Artificial Disc has a clinical history spanning 17 years. Its safety, efficiency and remarkable durability have been proven through thousands of implants worldwide," and that "Natural Motion is Back."

The plaintiffs also charged that DePuy failed to notify the FDA that it had modified the design of the Charite disc sold in Europe because of safety and effectiveness concerns, yet told the agency the changes were made for physician convenience.
Charite Spinal Discs
* Denotes required field.

Title

* First Name

* Last Name

* Email Address

* Phone Number

Cell Phone Number

Office Phone Number

Street Address

Apartment/Suite

City

State

Zip Code

Please provide the best method and times to contact you:

Date of birth of person injured
(mm-dd-yyyy):

Date the device was implanted:

Is the device still implanted?


What medical condition prompted the use of the device?

Please describe any problems or injuries caused by the device:

Other Info:

No Yes, I agree to the Parker Waichman Alonso LLP disclaimers.Click here to review all.

Yes, I would like to receive the Parker Waichman Alonso LLP monthly newsletter, InjuryAlert.

please do not fill out the field below.

Bad Med
 
 

News Feeds

WE ALSO OFFER OUR FIRM NEWS AS RSS/XML FEEDS.
LEARN MORE ABOUT RSS

Home | Defective Drugs | Medical Devices | Toxic Substances | Accidents | Product Liability | Malpractice | Diseases
Nursing Home Negligence | Food Poisoning | Other Topics | Contact
Statement of Clients' Rights | Site Map | ReNu with MoistureLoc | Vioxx | Mesothelioma | Permax | Dostinex | Composix Kugel Mesh X Large Patch
Ortho Evra | Fosamax | Personal Injury Lawyer | Fusarium Keratitis | Stevens Johnson Syndrome

© 2002-2008 YourLawyer.com. All Rights Reserved.

Please note that you are not considered a client until you have signed a retainer agreement and your case has been accepted by us.
Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter.
Attorney Advertising

Parker Waichman Personal Injury News