YourLawyer.com 1-800-LAW-INFO (1-800-529-4636)

Stryker Hip Implant Recall, Warning Letters Point to Serious Problems

Feb 5, 2008 | Parker Waichman Alonso LLP

Stryker Corp. issued a recall of its Trident Hip Implants last month, just days after the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) posted a warning letter on its website chastising Stryker for deficiencies at its New Jersey manufacturing plant.  The Stryker hip implant components involved in the January recall were manufactured at the company’s manufacturing facility in Ireland, which was also the subject of an FDA warning letter earlier this year.

The FDA decided to take a hard look at Stryker after receiving an unusually high number of complaints from recipients of Stryker hip implants.  Since 2005, Styker hip implant patients have reported a range of problems, including pain, difficulty walking and “squeaky” joints, and some have had pieces of implant parts break off or wear down unevenly.  Those complaints prompted the FDA to inspect both the Mahwah, New Jersey and Cork, Ireland plants where most of the Stryker hip implants sold in the US are made.  Those inspections resulted in the FDA issuing Stryker two warning letters.

The first, a seven-page letter dated March 15, 2007, cited several violations at the Ireland plant, including missed deadlines to fix failures in following procedures for testing problematic products and documenting risk.  The heavily redacted letter refers to an earlier voluntary recall of “hip fracture stems” which appears to be related to the problems.  It also cited several instances where the “root cause” of problems that caused that particular recall was not determined.

Then Stryker received another letter regarding the New Jersey facility.  That letter, dated November 28, 207 said that the deficiencies uncovered during an inspection at the Mahwah, New Jersey facility had contributed directly to the manufacture of faulty hip implants.  The FDA letter described a range of deficiencies, including “clusters” of Staphylococcus bacteria, the pathogen that causes staph infections, that was found throughout the plant.  The November 28 letter states repeatedly that Stryker “failed to perform corrective and preventive actions in order to prevent the recurrence of nonconforming product or other quality problems.”    For instance, in regards to the bacterial contamination, the letter states that Stryker “has not identified the root causes of the microorganism contamination and has not executed corrective and preventive action to prevent recurrence.”

Stryker’s problems came to a head on January 22, 2007, when the company issued a recall for more hip implant components made in the Cork, Ireland plant.  The latest Stryker Hip Implant component recall involved two hip replacement cups – the Trident Acetabular PSL Cup and the Trident Hemispherical Cups – made at the Stryker facility in Cork, Ireland.  Acetabular Cups are used in the socket portion of replacement hip components.  The PSL version is the most commonly used Stryker cup in the U.S.

The Trident Hip Implant cup recall was implemented by Stryker amid concerns that the components could be contaminated with “manufacturing residuals” at levels that exceed company standards.  However, Stryker maintained that the problems did not affect the sterility of the components, and claimed that patients who have received the recalled Trident components will not need to have them replaced.   

Just a few days after the Stryker hip implant recall, Stryker President and CEO, Stephen P. MacMillan assured investors that there was no clinical evidence to suggest safety problems with the company’s products.  In his remarks, MacMillan did not mention all of the complaints Stryker received from its hip implant recipients.  Still, even he had to concede there are serious problems at Stryker. “You don’t get two letters in nine months and feel good,” MacMillan told his audience.

Stryker Hip Replacements
* Denotes required field.

Title

* First Name

* Last Name

* Email Address

* Phone Number

Cell Phone Number

Office Phone Number

Street Address

Apartment/Suite

City

State

Zip Code

Please provide the best method and times to contact you:

Date of birth of person injured
(mm-dd-yyyy):

Date hip replacement surgery occurred:

Please describe any adverse symptoms related to replacement:

Did adverse reaction make another hip replacement necessary?


If yes, date of additional replacement surgery:

If yes, why was another hip replacement surgery necessary?

Other Info:

No Yes, I agree to the Parker Waichman Alonso LLP disclaimers.Click here to review all.

Yes, I would like to receive the Parker Waichman Alonso LLP monthly newsletter, InjuryAlert.

please do not fill out the field below.

Bad Med
 
 

News Feeds

WE ALSO OFFER OUR FIRM NEWS AS RSS/XML FEEDS.
LEARN MORE ABOUT RSS

Home | Defective Drugs | Medical Devices | Toxic Substances | Accidents | Product Liability | Malpractice | Diseases
Nursing Home Negligence | Food Poisoning | Other Topics | Contact
Statement of Clients' Rights | Site Map | ReNu with MoistureLoc | Vioxx | Mesothelioma | Permax | Dostinex | Composix Kugel Mesh X Large Patch
Ortho Evra | Fosamax | Personal Injury Lawyer | Fusarium Keratitis | Stevens Johnson Syndrome

© 2002-2008 YourLawyer.com. All Rights Reserved.

Please note that you are not considered a client until you have signed a retainer agreement and your case has been accepted by us.
Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter.
Attorney Advertising

Parker Waichman Personal Injury News