YourLawyer.com 1-800-LAW-INFO (1-800-529-4636)

Stryker Gets Another FDA Warning Letter

May 5, 2008 | Parker Waichman Alonso LLP

Stryker Corp. has been hit with another Food & Drug Administration (FDA) warning letter, the medical device maker's second since last November, and the third in a little over a year.  This time, the FDA took Stryker's biotech division to task for quality systems and compliance issues at its Hopkinton, Massachusetts, location.  One of the issues cited by the FDA warning letter involves falsification of hospital-approval documents used under an FDA rule that allows device sales on a very limited basis.

The past year or so has been a rough one for Stryker.  In January, Stryker recalled some of its hip implant components made under the popular Trident line because of possible contamination issues.  The Stryker Hip Implant component recall involved two hip replacement cups – the Trident Acetabular PSL Cup and the Trident Hemispherical Cups – made at the Stryker facility in Cork, Ireland.  Acetabular Cups are used in the socket portion of replacement hip components.  The PSL version is the most commonly used Stryker cup in the U.S.

The recall came after Stryker received two FDA warning letters about conditions at the Ireland plant, as well as a factory in New Jersey that also makes hip implants.  The first, a seven-page letter dated March 15, 2007, cited several violations at the Ireland plant, including missed deadlines to fix failures in following procedures for testing problematic products and documenting risk.  The heavily redacted letter referred to an earlier voluntary recall of “hip fracture stems” which appeared to be related to the problems.  It also cited several instances where the “root cause” of problems that caused that particular recall was not determined.

Then Stryker received another letter regarding the New Jersey facility.  That letter, dated November 28, 2007 said that the deficiencies uncovered during an inspection at the Mahwah, New Jersey facility had contributed directly to the manufacture of faulty hip implants.  The FDA letter described a range of deficiencies, including “clusters” of Staphylococcus bacteria, the pathogen that causes staph infections, that was found throughout the plant.  The November 28 letter states repeatedly that Stryker “failed to perform corrective and preventive actions in order to prevent the recurrence of nonconforming product or other quality problems.”    For instance, in regards to the bacterial contamination, the letter states that Stryker “has not identified the root causes of the microorganism contamination and has not executed corrective and preventive action to prevent recurrence.”

This third warning letter involves the company's biotech division, a small segment of Stryker's business that makes products to promote bone growth.  The letter concerns observations made during an inspection that began in September 2007.  The letter cites issues relating to the division's handling of a past clinical study, its quality system, including medical device reporting procedures, and the falsification of hospital Institutional Review Board documentation used to approve implantation of Humanitarian Use Device. No products have been recalled as a result of the letter.

Stryker says it is taking the FDA warning "very seriously" and has already taken steps to deal with the problems.  The small number of field sales employees behind the falsified documents are no longer with the company, Stryker said. The company said it also launched a company-wide 'quality action plan' aimed at strengthening oversight.

Stryker Hip Replacements
* Denotes required field.

Title

* First Name

* Last Name

* Email Address

* Phone Number

Cell Phone Number

Office Phone Number

Street Address

Apartment/Suite

City

State

Zip Code

Please provide the best method and times to contact you:

Date of birth of person injured
(mm-dd-yyyy):

Date hip replacement surgery occurred:

Please describe any adverse symptoms related to replacement:

Did adverse reaction make another hip replacement necessary?


If yes, date of additional replacement surgery:

If yes, why was another hip replacement surgery necessary?

Other Info:

No Yes, I agree to the Parker Waichman Alonso LLP disclaimers.Click here to review all.

Yes, I would like to receive the Parker Waichman Alonso LLP monthly newsletter, InjuryAlert.

please do not fill out the field below.

Bad Med
 
 

News Feeds

WE ALSO OFFER OUR FIRM NEWS AS RSS/XML FEEDS.
LEARN MORE ABOUT RSS

Home | Defective Drugs | Medical Devices | Toxic Substances | Accidents | Product Liability | Malpractice | Diseases
Nursing Home Negligence | Food Poisoning | Other Topics | Contact
Statement of Clients' Rights | Site Map | ReNu with MoistureLoc | Vioxx | Mesothelioma | Permax | Dostinex | Composix Kugel Mesh X Large Patch
Ortho Evra | Fosamax | Personal Injury Lawyer | Fusarium Keratitis | Stevens Johnson Syndrome

© 2002-2008 YourLawyer.com. All Rights Reserved.

Please note that you are not considered a client until you have signed a retainer agreement and your case has been accepted by us.
Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter.
Attorney Advertising

Parker Waichman Personal Injury News