YourLawyer.com® 1-800-LAW-INFO (1-800-529-4636)

Defibrillator Leads Need Monitoring, Doctor Group Says

May 14, 2009 | Parker Waichman Alonso LLP

Defibrillator lead wires, such a those  involved in the 2007 Medtronic Sprint Fidelis lead recall, need better surveillance to detect defects, a group of heart doctors has said.  The Heart Rhythm Society also called on hospitals to train doctors in the delicate procedure of removing such wires from patients.

A lead is a wire that connects an implantable defibrillator to the heart. If a lead breaks, the defibrillator can emit a massive and painful shock. And in the worse case scenario, the fractured lead can prevent a defibrillator from sending a necessary, lifesaving shock to the heart.

Medtronic Inc.'s Sprint Fidelis lead was removed from the market in October 2007, following reports of 5 deaths due to lead fractures. As we reported in March, Medtronic recently sent a letter to doctors informing them that the faulty wires were a “possible or likely contributing factor” in as many as 13 deaths. Four of the deaths occurred when doctors tried to remove defective Sprint Fidelis leads from patients.

Before the recall, Sprint Fidelis leads had been implanted with 90% of Medtronic’s defibrillators. According to the Wall Street Journal, 268,000 defective Sprint Fidelis leads had been implanted worldwide, and about 235,000 people still had these leads in their chests when the recall was issued. According to The New York Times, around 150,000 people are still implanted with a Sprint Fidelis lead.

Replacing a lead is not an easy procedure, as the invasive surgery can cause the tissue of the blood vessels and heart to tear. In fact, replacing a defibrillator lead is so risky that patients with Sprint Fidelis leads were told to leave the defective components in place unless they fracture.

The Heart Rhythm Society, meeting in Boston this week,  pointed to the Sprint Fidelis recall in its call for a surveillance system to track lead performance in order to spot defective devices earlier. According to Reuters.com, the group's new policy guidelines cover pre-market evaluation and post-market monitoring of the devices, the threshold for action and communication after abnormal lead performance is identified.

According to  the Associated Press, the group also said hospitals need to train more doctors to remove faulty defibrillator leads.   They said physicians should perform at least 40 extractions under expert supervision before operating on their own. Supervising physicians should have performed at least 75 extractions with a high rate of success, the group states.  They also recommended that such training take place only medical centers that perform a large number of lead extractions each year should train physicians to perform the surgery.

The Heart Rhythm Society also called for tracking the success and failure rates of removal procedures in a national database to give physicians a clearer picture of best practices for the difficult procedures, the Associated Press said.

Finally, the Associated Press said the group called on the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) to require that new defibrillator leads be tested in humans before they are approved.  Currently, most leads are approved through the agency's fast track process, which is reserved for devices that are considered modifications of existing products.  The fast track process does not require human studies.

Medtronic Defibrillators
* Denotes required field.

Title

* First Name

* Last Name

* Email Address

* Phone Number

Cell Phone Number

Office Phone Number

Street Address

Apartment/Suite

City

State

Zip Code

Please provide the best method and times to contact you:

Date of birth of person injured
(mm-dd-yyyy):

Which Medtronic Defibrillator was implanted?

If other, what is the name of the defibrillator that was implanted?

Date the device was implanted:

Is the device still implanted?


What medical condition prompted the use of the device?

Please describe any problems or injuries caused by the device:

Other Info:

No Yes, I agree to the Parker Waichman Alonso LLP disclaimers.Click here to review all.

Yes, I would like to receive the Parker Waichman Alonso LLP monthly newsletter, InjuryAlert.

please do not fill out the field below.

Bad Med
 
 

News Feeds

WE ALSO OFFER OUR FIRM NEWS AS RSS/XML FEEDS.
LEARN MORE ABOUT RSS

Home | Defective Drugs | Medical Devices | Toxic Substances | Accidents | Product Liability | Malpractice | Diseases
Nursing Home Negligence | Food Poisoning | Other Topics | Social Security Disability | Contact
Statement of Clients' Rights | Site Map | Drug Injury Search | Vioxx | Mesothelioma | Permax | Dostinex | Composix Kugel Mesh X Large Patch
Ortho Evra | Fosamax | Personal Injury Lawyer | Fusarium Keratitis | Stevens Johnson Syndrome | Florida Personal Injury Law Firm

© 2002-2009 YourLawyer.com®. All Rights Reserved.

Please note that you are not considered a client until you have signed a retainer agreement and your case has been accepted by us.
Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter.
Attorney Advertising

Parker Waichman Personal Injury News