YourLawyer.com® 1-800-LAW-INFO (1-800-529-4636)

iPhone Class Action Lawsuit Claims Consumers Were Deceived Over MMS Capability

Nov 4, 2009 | Parker Waichman Alonso LLP

An iPhone class action lawsuit has been filed in Alabama by a consumer who claims Apple Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC misrepresented the iPhone's multimedia messaging service (MMS) capabilities. MMS capability is key for sending text messages accompanied by a photo, video or other form of media.

The complaint, which was filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama,  alleges Apple and AT&T representatives have continually misrepresented, concealed, suppressed or omitted material facts to customers in their stores about the MMS functionality for the 3G and 3G-S iPhones.  

The original iPhone and iPhone 3G lacked MMS capability.  But by the time Apple planned to launch the iPhone 3G-S, such functionality was  widely available on other smartphones.  The complaint claims that Apple and AT&T advertised on its Web site and elsewhere that the 3G and 3G-S would allow the MMS functionality.  Because of this advertising, many consumers chose to buy or upgrade to a 3G or 3G-S.

According to the complaint, when the 3G iPhone was launched in July 2008, consumers began to realize that it did not have the MMS functionality.  The complaint claims that the defendant's response to consumer complaints  “was essentially to say 'tough luck.'"  

In early 2009, the lawsuit alleges that AT&T sales reps promised MMS functionality would become available for both 3G and 3G-S when the new iPhone OS Software Update free download would become available in June.  But after downloading the new OS 3.0 Software Update application, MMS still did not work on either the 3G or 3G-S, the complaint says.

It wasn't until September 25, 2009 that the defendants allegedly activated MMS for iPhone 3G and 3G-S users in the U.S. through a software update to iPhone OS 3.1.  According to the complaint, AT&T had never upgraded its towers so as to support the functionality necessary for MMS prior to September 25, 2009,  and so the iPhone could not offer MMS as claimed.  Even after the upgrade, results with MMS activation have been mixed, the complaint says.

The lawsuit alleges that consumers of the iPhone 3G and 3G-S were not informed that  AT&T had not upgraded its towers to support MMS, and would not do so for many months.  It further alleges that Apple's 3.0 and 3.1 software upgrade would not, by itself, solve the problem and make MMS available.

The plaintiff in the iPhone lawsuit is seeking class action status to benefit all Alabama residents who have purchased a 3G or 3G-S model iPhone since July 2008.

Case Review Form
* Denotes required field.

Injury Topic
(Name of Drug or Device)

Title

* First Name

* Last Name

* Email Address

* Phone Number

Cell Phone Number

Office Phone Number

Street Address

Apartment/Suite

City

State

Zip Code

Please provide the best method and times to contact you:

Date of birth of person injured
(mm-dd-yyyy):

Please describe your case:

Date of Incident
(mm-dd-yyyy):

Other Info:

No Yes, I agree to the Parker Waichman Alonso LLP disclaimers.Click here to review all.

Yes, I would like to receive the Parker Waichman Alonso LLP monthly newsletter, InjuryAlert.

please do not fill out the field below.

Bad Med
 
 

News Feeds

WE ALSO OFFER OUR FIRM NEWS AS RSS/XML FEEDS.
LEARN MORE ABOUT RSS

Home | Defective Drugs | Medical Devices | Toxic Substances | Accidents | Product Liability | Malpractice | Diseases
Nursing Home Negligence | Food Poisoning | Other Topics | Social Security Disability | Contact
Statement of Clients' Rights | Site Map | Drug Injury Search | Vioxx | Mesothelioma | Permax | Dostinex | Composix Kugel Mesh X Large Patch
Ortho Evra | Fosamax | Personal Injury Lawyer | Fusarium Keratitis | Stevens Johnson Syndrome | Florida Personal Injury Law Firm

© 2002-2009 YourLawyer.com®. All Rights Reserved.

Please note that you are not considered a client until you have signed a retainer agreement and your case has been accepted by us.
Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter.
Attorney Advertising

Parker Waichman Personal Injury News