State: Women faced exposure to toxins in fields
Grower denies acting illegallyMar 12, 2006 | The News & Observer
Two field workers who gave birth to deformed babies were illegally exposed to pesticides more than 20 times each while they picked tomatoes in Eastern North Carolina, N.C. Department of Agriculture data show.
A third worker, who spent most of her pregnancy working in Florida, was exposed four times during the less than six weeks she worked in North Carolina, the data show.
All worked for Ag-Mart, a Florida-based tomato grower, and they were illegally exposed to a host of chemicals as often as three times a week, the documents show. Three of the 15 chemicals are linked to birth defects in lab animals.
One baby had no arms or legs. Another had a deformed jaw. The third had no nose and no visible sex organs and died soon after birth.
The women's exposures were illegal because they worked fields too soon after pesticides were sprayed, agriculture data show. To protect workers from harmful effects, many pesticides require that workers be out of the fields for anywhere from a few hours to two days after spraying.
Ag-Mart says that none of its workers were illegally exposed to pesticides and that the Agriculture Department misinterpreted its records.
Andrew Yaffa, a lawyer who represents the three women, said the documents tell only part of the story.
"Sometimes it was more than once a day," Yaffa said. "They would come out of the fields covered. Their clothes would be green with pesticides. Their throats would be dry. They would be coughing. They were suffering from skin ailments."
Ag-Mart, which is privately held, grows about 1,100 acres of grape tomatoes in Brunswick and Pender counties, 125 miles southeast of Raleigh. The company employs about 500 people there during the growing season. It sells tomatoes under the brand name Santa Sweets.
State officials have been investigating Ag-Mart for nearly a year. The Agriculture Department has charged the company with 369 violations of state pesticide law, the largest pesticide case in state history. The company will have a hearing before the state Pesticide Board on March 28.
The state Department of Health and Human Services is investigating whether the three babies' deformities are linked to pesticides. That report is expected in the next few weeks.
Until now, the evidence against Ag-Mart has remained private, because neither the state Health Department nor the Agriculture Department has finished its investigation. Last week, the Agriculture Department opened its files to The News & Observer.
State agriculture officials went through reams of data that Ag-Mart provided to determine whether workers went into fields too soon after pesticides were sprayed.
The News & Observer looked at the dates of violations and at the work records of the three mothers to determine how often they were working in fields where violations occurred. The data show that the women frequently worked in fields on days when pesticides were applied.
Ag-Mart spokesman Leo Bottary said last week that pesticides were always applied to sections of the field where workers were not present. He said the company's records aren't detailed enough to show which part of a field each worker was in.
"There's nothing in those records that would put anybody in a particular section" of a field, Bottary said.
The company will keep better records in the future, he said.
State agriculture officials say they can work only with the data the company provided. "We put the burden of proof on them," said Patrick Jones, enforcement manager for the Agriculture Department's pesticide section.
Worker advocates who have spent years following Ag-Mart employees say Ag-Mart often exposes its workers to pesticides.
Greg Schell, a lawyer with Florida Legal Services, said his staff surveyed 89 Ag-Mart workers in June. About half said they had been sprayed with pesticides within the past three months. Some, whose job it was to apply pesticides, said they sprayed fields filled with workers, Schell said.
"We've interviewed applicators who said they did that all the time for Ag-Mart," Schell said. "They just told us all kinds of stories, and I don't think they're all making it up."
Exposed in pregnancy
In 2004, the three women, Francisca Herrera, Sostenes Salazar and Maria De La Mesa Cruz, were among hundreds of Ag-Mart workers who traveled with the harvest, picking tomatoes in the company's fields in North Carolina, Florida, New Jersey and Mexico. All three are illegal immigrants.
Herrera and Salazar became pregnant in April, De La Mesa Cruz in May.
Yaffa said none of the women were available to comment for this story. With Yaffa's help, Herrera filed suit against the company Feb. 28, claiming that pesticide exposure is responsible for her son's deformities. She is asking for an undisclosed amount in damages.
The agriculture records show that Herrera, whose boy was born in December 2004 with no arms and legs, started working in North Carolina in mid-April. During her first trimester, when a baby's limbs form, she was illegally exposed on 11 different days, the Agriculture Department data shows.
By the end of September, she had been exposed on 22 days. On four of those days, records show, she was exposed at least twice -- once at the company's Brunswick County farm and once at the Pender County farm.
Salazar, whose son had a severely underdeveloped jaw, started work in North Carolina in June 2004. She was illegally exposed on 25 days during the next 3 1/2 months, the analysis shows, seven of them during her first trimester.
De La Mesa Cruz, whose child died, didn't start work in North Carolina until mid-September. She was exposed four days by the end of that month, the analysis shows.
Salazar and De La Mesa Cruz also worked in Florida and were exposed to pesticides there during their pregnancies, a Florida study shows. Their babies were born in February 2005.
Among the chemicals that the women were exposed to are Monitor, Agri-Mek and Penncozeb. Ag-Mart has dropped those three because some studies link them to birth defects.
The Collier County (Fla.) Health Department studied the women's exposure there and concluded last fall that there was no definitive link between the deformities and pesticide exposure in that state. That study did not look at the women's exposure in North Carolina.
North Carolina officials say they are looking at the workers' exposures in both states.
Experts say it is nearly impossible to prove that pesticide exposure caused a specific baby's birth defect.
Ted Schettler, a Massachusetts doctor and science director with the Science and Environmental Health Network, an Iowa-based nonprofit that studies the impact of pesticides on health, said medical literature is full of stories about farmworkers with deformed children. But he said he doesn't know of a single completed study in which farmworkers were monitored during their pregnancies. As a result, when a deformed child is born, no one knows what pesticides, if any, were in the mother's bloodstream during her pregnancy.
"Assigning responsibility here is incredibly difficult," Schettler said. "The reality is that we don't know what causes most birth defects."