Contact Us

Paxil
*    Denotes required field.

   * First Name 

   * Last Name 

   * Email 

Phone 

Cell Phone 

Street Address 

Zip Code 

City 

State 

Date you started taking this drug:

Date you stopped taking this drug:

Age of patient when antidepressant(s) prescribed:

What condition was this medication prescribed to treat?

What additional medications were you taking at the time?

Did patient hurt themselves during or after taking the drug?

Did patient become violent during or after taking the drug?

Was suicide attempted?

Was hospitalization or institutionalization required after taking antidepressant(s)?

Did loved one commit suicide?

If patient did attempt or commit suicide, did patient ever attempt suicide previously?

If patient did commit suicide, what was the method of suicide?

Please describe violent or suicidal behavior:

If you ever tried to stop taking Paxil and experienced withdrawal, please describe the withdrawal side effects:

Please further describe side effects:

For verification purposes, please answer the below question:
+
=

No Yes, I agree to the Parker Waichman LLP disclaimers. Click here to review.

Yes, I would like to receive the Parker Waichman LLP monthly newsletter, InjuryAlert.

please do not fill out the field below.


Eliot Spitzer Warns `Arrogant` Glaxo

Sep 1, 2004 | www.business-standard.com

Eliot Spitzer, the New York attorney-general, warned that he would continue to watch GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) closely despite its $2.5 million settlement last week.

Yesterday Spitzer said the the UK pharmaceuticals company and JP Garnier, its chief executive, appeared unrepentant with regard to changing behaviour over disclosure of adverse clinical data. He warned that GSK was still being watched, as were all other pharmaceuticals companies.

“The arrogance of the (GSK) commentary is offensive and problematic,†Spitzer said. “We are going to be watching them with a hawk’s eye to see that they have abided by the terms of the settlement.â€

Spitzer’s lawsuit alleged GSK suppressed negative clinical study data that its antidepressant Paxil/Seroxat was harmful to children. GSK agreed to pay a $2.5 million fine and disclose all clinical trial study data to the public according to a timetable.

But Spitzer said GSK’s comments following the settlement characterised the settlement as another legal annoyance, and showed too little contrition for the substantive evidence he had against it.

In its statement following the settlement last week GSK said: “Although GSK believes the charges made in the litigation by the attorney-general are unfounded, the company has agreed to pay the state of New York $2.5 million to avoid the high costs and time required to defend itself in protracted litigation.â€

Garnier over the past two months has also said Spitzer was “bullying†the company, and blasted the US legal system. Spitzer said: “Garnier’s failure to acknowledge a pattern of withholding data is a problem and problematic.â€

Spitzer’s suit aims at closing a loophole in drugs regulation, where companies can use selective trial data in scientific journals as, in effect, advertising.

Within weeks of Spitzer’s lawsuit, GSK said it would disclose summaries of its clinical trials to the public on the internet, according to a plan it had been developing prior to the suit. It also published data from all its Paxil paediatric studies.

Spitzer’s office believes it had a good trial case against GSK. The attorney-general said GSK did not tell him of previous designs on a clinical trials registry.

He said the GSK disclosure settlement was “sound public policyâ€, and that he was looking into other drug companies and related allegations. GlaxoSmithKline denied not responding to Mr Spitzer’s lawsuit seriously but said: “The issue for us that the attorney-general’s lawsuit charged us with fraud, which we don’t believe is founded.â€


Related articles
Parker Waichman Accolades And Reviews Best Lawyers Find Us On Avvo