Parker Waichman LLP

Gardasil Not Approved for Older Women

Merck & Co. has failed in its quest to convince federal regulators to expand approval of Gardasil for older women.  Yesterday, the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) said it was delaying its  approval of  Merck’s application at this time because it had questions regarding Gardasil’s effectiveness in women ages 27 – 45.  Gardasil is already […]

Merck & Co. has failed in its quest to convince federal regulators to expand approval of <"https://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/gardasil_side_effects">Gardasil for older women.  Yesterday, the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) said it was delaying its  approval of  Merck’s application at this time because it had questions regarding Gardasil’s effectiveness in women ages 27 – 45.  Gardasil is already approved for use in girls and women ages 9 – 26.

Gardasil was approved by the  Food & Drug Administration (FDA) in June 2006. At the time of its approval, Merck & Co. said that clinical trials had proven the vaccine to be between 90-100% effective in preventing the transmission of some strains of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) that cause cervical cancer. The approval of Gardasil was much hyped, with Merck claiming that it had the potential to eventually eliminate most cervical cancers.

Merck has been working on expanding the approved uses of Gardasil in an effort to spur sales growth.  But in a letter to the company, the FDA said there were questions that Merck will need to answer before the agency can complete its review.  Merck would not specify what those questions were, but said it would reply to the FDA’s letter next month.

Some experts have questioned the wisdom of approving Gardasil for the older  group, because most women in that age group who are sexually active have already been exposed to the strains of HPV Gardasil is supposed to prevent.

Merck said it also failed to win FDA approval to expand Gardasil to protect against more strains of HPV, and is dropping those efforts.  However, the company still plans to work to gain approval for Gardasil to be administered to boys.

Gardasil has been the subject of  controversy ever since Merck introduced it.  Just weeks after its approval, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommended that all young girls between the ages of 11 and 12 receive the Gardasil vaccine. Merck was more than happy to echo the CDC recommendations, and actually began an intensive lobbying effort to convince state health authorities to make Gardasil vaccinations mandatory for young girls. Merck has made similar efforts in Europe. Merck’s heavy promotion of Gardasil has been effective, as some analysts estimate that Gardasil could net the company as much as $1.4 billion in its first full year on the market.

But many have questioned Merck’s heavy-handed attempts to make Gardasil mandatory, as well as the company’s claims that it is virtually side effect free.  Earlier this month, the European Medicines Agency reported that two young women died shortly after being administered Gardasil, and three such deaths have been reported in the US.

A 2007 analysis by Judicial Watch of Gardasil adverse event reports revealed that there had been at least 3,461 complaints of adverse reactions to the Gardasil vaccine, and there could have been as many as eight deaths attributable to Gardasil. According to Judicial Watch, in several instances, blood clots were reported to have occurred after the administration of Gardasil. The Gardasil side effect reports also included 28 women who miscarried after receiving Gardasil. Other side effects reported to the FDA included paralysis, Bells Palsy, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, and seizures were also reported. Oddly, Judicial Watch was only able to obtain the FDA’s reports on Gardasil after it filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the agency.

As some have pointed out, Judicial Watch is a conservative organization with an agenda. But Judicial Watch is not along in voicing concerns about the safety of Gardasil.  In May, Dr. Diane Harper, a top expert on the HPV who, while working as a professor at Dartmouth College, served as a researcher on study trials for Gardasil, questioned efforts to make the vaccine mandatory. In an interview with a Florida TV station, Dr. Harper said that there has not been enough post-marketing surveillance of Gardasil to insure that it is free of side effects that could prove particularly dangerous to young girls. “We don’t know yet what’s going to happen when millions of doses of the vaccine have been given and to put in place a process that says you must have this vaccine, it means you must be part of a big public experiment. So we can’t do that until we have more data.” she said.

What Our Clients Say About Us
We have worked with thousands of clients and we appreciate them and their positive reviews. Here are just a few recent client reviews...
5 Star Reviews 150
I have been working with Parker and Wachman for 7 months. The experience has been not only professional but comfortable. Joanne Stevens, the nurse assigned to my case, has been diligent in assisting me with medical issues. She has been responsive to my issues. I am appreciative of this experience.
Treasures from Jones Health and Wellness
5 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
Parker Waichman LLP helped me with my claim and proceeded to fight for what was right, just and fair. Their attorneys and staff were very professional, kind and understanding. I would furthermore like to point out that Benita Rollis was especially kind to me and extremely knowledgeable with explaining the process and what to expect. Thank you.
Gaetano Buttari
10 months ago
5 Star Reviews 150
An amazing Law firm that can explain the most obfuscated and complex issues with ease. The level of expertise and compassion is unparalleled to any I've experienced. From the initial consultation I was able to discern the meticulous attention to detail and the exceptional customer first philosophy. They kept me informed every step of the way, I was so happy that I chose the best law firm for my case. If you need an attorney that has your best interest at heart and more importantly deliver the compensation you deserve hire Parker Waichman LLP.
Angel Maldonado
6 years ago

Why Choose Us to Help You?

We Take Care of Everything
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
No Recovery = No Legal Fees
We work on a contingency-fee basis, meaning that we only get paid from a portion of your settlement or jury award. If you don't get compensation, you owe us nothing.
Decades of Experience
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
Respected by Our Peers
Judges, insurance adjusters, and fellow attorneys all speak highly of our skills, and we've earned numerous accolades, including a flawless rating from AVVO.
We Have Many Locations To Serve You
We have the experience and the skilled litigators to win your case. Contact us and speak with a real attorney who can help you.
Long Island – Nassau
Parker Waichman LLP
6 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY 11050
Long Island – Suffolk
Parker Waichman LLP
201 Old Country Road – Suite 145
Melville, NY 11747
New York
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038
Queens
Parker Waichman LLP
118-35 Queens Boulevard, Suite 400
Forest Hills, NY 11375
Brooklyn
Parker Waichman LLP
300 Cadman Plaza West
One Pierrepont Plaza, 12th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
New Jersey
Parker Waichman LLP
80 Main Street, Suite 265
West Orange, NJ 07052
Florida
Parker Waichman LLP
27299 Riverview Center Boulevard
Suite 108
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
Nationwide Service
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038