Contact Us

*    Denotes required field.

   * First Name 

   * Last Name 

   * Email 


Cell Phone 

Street Address 

Zip Code 



Date you started taking this drug:

Date you stopped taking this drug:

Was suicide attempted?

Did loved one commit suicide?

What condition was this medication prescribed to treat?

What additional medications were you taking at the time?

If patient did commit suicide, what was the method of suicide?

If patient did attempt or commit suicide, did patient ever attempt suicide previously?

Please describe any psychiatric conditions diagnosed before starting Neurontin:

Did Neurontin help the condition that it was prescribed for?

Please further describe side effects:

For verification purposes, please answer the below question:

No Yes, I agree to the Parker Waichman LLP disclaimers. Click here to review.

Yes, I would like to receive the Parker Waichman LLP monthly newsletter, InjuryAlert.

please do not fill out the field below.

Illegal Neurontin Marketing to Cost Pfizer $142.1 Million

Mar 26, 2010 | Parker Waichman LLP

Pfizer Inc. has been ordered to pay  $142.1 million in damages for violating a federal antiracketeering law in its marketing of the epilepsy drug, Neurontin. Plaintiffs Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc. and Kaiser Foundation Hospitals had accused Pfizer of promoting Neurontin for uses not cleared by the Food & Drug Administration, including treatment for migraines and bipolar disorder.

The judge who presided over the Kaiser lawsuit, U.S. District Judge Patti Saris, is overseeing federal lawsuits from throughout the U.S. against Pfizer involving injury claims and allegations of fraudulent sales and marketing of Neurontin. Last year, Judge Saris ruled that fraud findings against Pfizer in the Kaiser case could be binding against it in future trials.

In a verdict rendered yesterday, the jury found that Pfizer’s marketing of Neurontin violated both the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and California’s Unfair Competition Law. The jury awarded Kaiser $47.6 for the RICO violations, which according to that law, are automatically tripled. The outcome of the California charges will be decided by a judge.

In a statement issued yesterday, Kaiser said it was pleased “that justice has been achieved for our members and the physicians, pharmacists and staff who care for them,” and called the jury decision “a victory for evidence-based medicine.”

Kaiser claimed that because of Pfizer’s Neurontin marketing, it was forced to pay $90 million more than it should have for Neurontin. Kaiser is the first insurer to try a Neurontin case against the Pfizer.

This is not the first time Pfizer has faced penalties for the way it marketed Neurontin. In 2004, Pfizer pleaded guilty to criminal charges and agreed to pay $430 million to settle government investigations of Pfizer’s promotion of the drug for off-label uses.

Other articles
Parker Waichman Accolades And Reviews Best Lawyers Find Us On Avvo