Contact Us

PW Case Review Form
*    Denotes required field.

   * First Name 

   * Last Name 

   * Email 


   * Please describe your case:

What injury have you suffered?

For verification purposes, please answer the below question:

No Yes, I agree to the Parker Waichman LLP disclaimers. Click here to review.

Yes, I would like to receive the Parker Waichman LLP monthly newsletter, InjuryAlert.

please do not fill out the field below.

Judge Lets IPO Lawsuits Proceed

Feb 19, 2003 | AP

A federal judge ruled Wednesday that legal claims brought by thousands of investors alleging fraud in initial stock offerings during the technology stock bubble can proceed.

U.S. District Judge Shira A. Scheindlin said the plaintiffs presented "a coherent scheme by underwriters, issuers and their officers to defraud the investing public" by concealing, through misinformation, various tie-in agreements, undisclosed compensation and analyst conflicts to artificially boost the value of the new shares.

If the allegations are true, "this scheme offends the very purpose of the securities laws," said U.S. District Judge Shira A. Scheindlin. "Where insiders conspire to frustrate the efficient function of securities markets by exploiting their position of privilege, they have perpetrated a double fraud: they have manipulated the market, and they have covered up that manipulation with lies and omissions."

In her 238-page ruling, Scheindlin said she had considered the claims and counterclaims made in more than 1,000 lawsuits filed in Manhattan from Jan. 11, 2001 through Dec. 6, 2001.

Investors allege the value of their holdings plummeted as a result of the alleged fraud in connection with 309 initial public offerings of stock, including those of shares in, Global Crossing and

The decision came at the stage of litigation in which defendants attempt to have lawsuits dismissed on the grounds that there are insufficient allegations to put before a jury.

Scheindlin said some of the defendants could be dropped from the case because there was not enough evidence against them, but that most would stand.

The lawsuits named as defendants 55 underwriters, 309 issuers of stock in high technology and Internet-related stocks and thousands of individuals. They target a high percentage of the more than 460 high technology and Internet-related companies that raised capital by selling ownership of their company to the public from January 1998 to December 2000.

Gandolfo V. DiBlasi, a lawyer for the underwriters, which include J.P. Morgan, Salomon Smith Barney, Credit Suisse First Boston, Robertson Stephens and Morgan Stanley, said he could not immediately comment.

"We've obtained a copy and I haven't had a chance to read it yet," DiBlasi said.

Jack C. Auspitz, a lawyer for the issuers, said he had not seen the ruling and could not immediately comment.

Lawyers for the investors did not immediately return telephone messages for comment.

The Securities and Exchange Commission and the National Association of Securities Dealers have investigated for more than a year Wall Street's dealings in IPOs.

Last month, FleetBoston Financial Corp. agreed to pay $28 million to settle allegations that its Robertson Stephens investment bank got inflated commissions in exchange for improperly distributing hot new stocks to customers.

In December 2001, Credit Suisse First Boston agreed to pay $100 million to resolve regulators' allegations of abuses in its distribution of IPOs.

Related articles
Parker Waichman Accolades And Reviews Best Lawyers Find Us On Avvo