Contact Us

Unum Provident Fraud
*    Denotes required field.

   * First Name 

   * Last Name 

   * Email 


Cell Phone 

Street Address 

Zip Code 



Name of insurance company:

Date insurance was purchased:

State where insurance was purchased:

When was claim denied: 

If you received a denial letter from your insurance company, what was the reason listed for denial of your claim?

Did you appeal the claim denial?

Type of policy purchased: 

Face amount of policy: 

What is your disability? 

Do you receive Social Security Disability payments?

Were you denied Social Security Disability benefits?

Do you receive workers compensation benefits?

Are you receiving State Disability insurance?

For verification purposes, please answer the below question:

No Yes, I agree to the Parker Waichman LLP disclaimers. Click here to review.

Yes, I would like to receive the Parker Waichman LLP monthly newsletter, InjuryAlert.

please do not fill out the field below.

Manhattan Judge Declines To Dismiss Suit Against UnumProvident, Chandler

Apr 30, 2003 | The Chattanoogan

A federal judge in Manhattan has declined to dismiss a lawsuit filed against Chattanooga-based UnumProvident last November.

Judge Denise Cote on Tuesday issued a 7-page memorandum that keeps alive the claim by a group of workers who allege the firm had a scheme to deny disability benefits. UnumProvident has denied the charge.

The judge also declined to remove from the case J. Harold Chandler, who was recently ousted as UnumProvident CEO.

The suit seeks class-action status.

It said UnumProvident at one time gave bonuses and promotions to workers who were aggressive in denying claims.

Judge Cote wrote that "these plaintiffs have standing to press these claims."

The judge said the workers "are not seeking benefits. They are seeking reforms to (UnumProvident's) disability claim process."

The action is brought on claims dating back to 1999 when Unum and Provident merged.

Attorney Richard J. Quadrino said the case "seeks to reform the manner in which the company conducts its business, so that claims will be decided on the merit, rather than in accordance with a monthly financial target," Quadrino said.

Regarding defendant Chandler, the judge said a corporate office is liable "for any breaches of fiduciary duty which he personally commits."

Other articles
Parker Waichman Accolades And Reviews Best Lawyers Find Us On Avvo