Parker Waichman LLP

Merck’s Gardasil Claims Questioned

Gardasil, the controversial cervical cancer vaccine developed and marketed by Merck & Co., has been hyped as a means to eliminate almost all types of cervical cancer.  Merck has been so aggressive in its campaign to encourage Gardasil vaccination that roughly 20 states are considering making the vaccine mandatory for young girls.  But a new […]

<"https://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/gardasil_side_effects">Gardasil, the controversial cervical cancer vaccine developed and marketed by Merck & Co., has been hyped as a means to eliminate almost all types of cervical cancer.  Merck has been so aggressive in its campaign to encourage Gardasil vaccination that roughly 20 states are considering making the vaccine mandatory for young girls.  But a new report at foodconsumer.org is questioning many of the claims Merck is making about Gardasil, as well as the company’s efforts to force the vaccine on young girls.

Gardasil was approved by the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) in June 2006. At the time of its approval, Merck & Co. said that clinical trials had proven the vaccine to be between 90-100% effective in preventing the transmission of some strains of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) that cause cervical cancer.  Merck said that would have the effect of eliminating most cervical cancers.  But the foodconsumer.org report takes issue with those claims.  According to the article, Gardasil was only tested against pre-cancerous lesions, which potentially lead to cervical cancer, but not cervical cancer.  Thus, Gardasil trial results offered no direct evidence to prove the vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer.  What’s more, the Gardasil clinical trials were conducted for a short term only.   No one knows if a Gardasil booster is needed after 5, 10, or 20 years.

Merck has also claimed that Gardasil is virtually side-effect free, with pain and swelling at the injection site the most common reactions.  But according to foodconsumer.org, by October, 2007, the US government had received 3,461 reports of side and adverse effects including 11 cases in which women died after receiving Gardasil.  Despite such reports, the FDA has no intention of conducting a safety review for Gardasil.

The foodconsumer.org article also criticizes Merck for its efforts to make Gardasil mandatory for girls ages 11 and 12.  For one thing, the report claims Gardasil clinical trials did not include a large enough number of girls age 11 and 12 for whom the vaccine is recommended.   Because of this, the trial results including efficacy and safety may not be applicable to the age group of girls.

Those concerns echo others raised by Dr. Diane Harper, a top expert on the HPV who, while working as a professor at Dartmouth College, served as a researcher on study trials for Gardasil.  Last week in an interview with a Florida TV station, Dr. Harper criticized Merck’s efforts to make Gardasil mandatory.  In the interview, Dr. Harper said that there has not been enough post-marketing surveillance of Gardasil to insure that it is free of side effects that could prove particularly dangerous to young girls. “We don’t know yet what’s going to happen when millions of doses of the vaccine have been given and to put in place a process that says you must have this vaccine, it means you must be part of a big public experiment. So we can’t do that until we have more data.” she said.

What Our Clients Say About Us
We have worked with thousands of clients and we appreciate them and their positive reviews. Here are just a few recent client reviews...
5 Star Reviews 150
Michelle Josama was absolutely fantastic. Glad we got her for our case. Had a great experience!
Rafael Garcia
5 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
I feel very grateful and happy with the service I received from the Parker Waichman LLP office. The process was very fast and effective. Thanks to Catherine Maryann and Jorge for helping me.Thank you
Hary Orellana
8 months ago
5 Star Reviews 150
What a wonderful experience with this firm... So many questions, so many answers... Thank goodness for being walked through the medical portion from Joanne Stevens, the nurse. Her professionalism and knowledge certainly put me and my family at ease. Top notch AAA
robin waller
5 years ago

Why Choose Us to Help You?

We Take Care of Everything
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
No Recovery = No Legal Fees
We work on a contingency-fee basis, meaning that we only get paid from a portion of your settlement or jury award. If you don't get compensation, you owe us nothing.
Decades of Experience
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
Respected by Our Peers
Judges, insurance adjusters, and fellow attorneys all speak highly of our skills, and we've earned numerous accolades, including a flawless rating from AVVO.
We Have Many Locations To Serve You
We have the experience and the skilled litigators to win your case. Contact us and speak with a real attorney who can help you.
Long Island – Nassau
Parker Waichman LLP
6 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY 11050
Long Island – Suffolk
Parker Waichman LLP
201 Old Country Road – Suite 145
Melville, NY 11747
New York
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038
Queens
Parker Waichman LLP
118-35 Queens Boulevard, Suite 400
Forest Hills, NY 11375
Brooklyn
Parker Waichman LLP
300 Cadman Plaza West
One Pierrepont Plaza, 12th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
New Jersey
Parker Waichman LLP
80 Main Street, Suite 265
West Orange, NJ 07052
Florida
Parker Waichman LLP
27299 Riverview Center Boulevard
Suite 108
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
Nationwide Service
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038