Contact Us

Asbestos
*    Denotes required field.

   * First Name 

   * Last Name 

   * Email 

Phone 

Cell Phone 

Street Address 

Zip Code 

City 

State 

Have you (or the injured party) been diagnosed with:


If lung cancer, please further describe diagnosis and any other factors (i.e.smoking) that may have contributed to lung cancer:

What was the date you were diagnosed with TTP?

Please describe where you think exposure may have occurred:

What month(s) and year(s) do you believe exposure occurred?

If exposure occurred at work, please list name and address of employer:

What was occupation at time of exposure:

For verification purposes, please answer the below question:
+
=

No Yes, I agree to the Parker Waichman LLP disclaimers. Click here to review.

Yes, I would like to receive the Parker Waichman LLP monthly newsletter, InjuryAlert.

please do not fill out the field below.


No more excuses on asbestos payouts, Australia tells James Hardie

Jun 29, 2006 | AFP

The Australian government has warned building products company James Hardie it had run out of excuses for not paying compensation to victims of its asbestos products following a special tax ruling.

On Thursday, the Australian Taxation Office ruled that James Hardie Industries' contributions to its planned asbestos compensation fund will be tax deductable.

James Hardie welcomed the ruling but said the tax office's decision not the grant its compensation fund charitable tax status placed in doubt last year's agreement to pay victims some 4.5 billion dollars (3.3 billion US) in compensation over the next 40 years.

Treasurer Peter Costello said James Hardie had previously tried to cheat victims out of compensation by moving its base to the Netherlands and wanted "every tax rort (loophole) it can find."

"It tried to cheat the victims then cheat the tax man; now that it has got an obligation to pay the victims with full tax deductibility, it has no excuse for not paying," Costello he told public radio.

"Would it like more tax rorts? Of course it would but it has now no excuse whatsoever but to pay the victims and I would say to James Hardie, now is the time to acknowledge that this is an extremely beneficial ruling for it and to get on and pay the victims."

Victims and their supporters also welcomed the tax deductable ruling but said denying the fund charitable status would cut into the money earmarked for those suffering crippling respiratory diseases caused by exposure to asbestos.

"I am very pleased we have got this result because without this we would definitely have had no deal," asbestos campaigner Bernie Banton said.

"But unless we get the charitable status any money generated by the fund will be taxed and over the life of the deal that could amount to billions of dollars. It would leak out like a hole in a bucket."

James Hardie relocated from New South Wales to the Netherlands in 2003, prompting anger in Australia after it was revealed the company had established an under-funded foundation to compensate asbestos victims and attempted to divorce itself from future liabilities.

Under a deal struck last year, James Hardie pledged to pay compensation into a special fund for at least 40 years to meet the personal injury claims of asbestos victims.


Related articles Other articles
Parker Waichman Accolades And Reviews Best Lawyers Find Us On Avvo