Contact Us

Perchlorate
*    Denotes required field.

   * First Name 

   * Last Name 

   * Email 

Phone 

Cell Phone 

Street Address 

Zip Code 

City 

State 

Do you know that Perchlorate is/was in your drinking water?

If a government agency has tested your drinking water, please name the agency and describe the test results:

Date of water test: 

Please describe the injuries suffered due to this toxic substance:

If other people in your neighborhood have experienced related illnesses, please describe:

What do you think was responsible for Perchlorate contamination (for example army base or military manufacturers plant):

For verification purposes, please answer the below question:
+
=

No Yes, I agree to the Parker Waichman LLP disclaimers. Click here to review.

Yes, I would like to receive the Parker Waichman LLP monthly newsletter, InjuryAlert.

please do not fill out the field below.


Water Efforts Get Boost

More State Funds Coming To Clean Up Perchlorate

Feb 4, 2003 | Inland Valley Daily Bulletin A state official Monday told local water purveyors she would recommend they receive additional funding to help them deal with perchlorate pollution of their water supplies.

Assisted by a provision in a state bond measure that provides additional pollution treatment funds to areas with large numbers of minorities or low-income residents, three local agencies were told they are eligible for the extra funding to clean up the problem.

Officials from the cities of Rialto and Colton and the West San Bernardino County Water District met with Diana Robles, an engineer for the state Water Resources Control Board, who said she would recommend to her agency that the regional problem be given the status of an "Environmental Justice Community of Concern."

Under that status, the state share of the treatment of the groundwater problem would increase from 25 percent to 40 percent, said Robles.

Groundwater under Rialto, Fontana and Colton has been found to be contaminated with perchlorate, a compound used in the manufacture of explosives. About 20 wells are closed because of the contamination.

The funds come from the clean water and water quality provision of Proposition 50, passed by California voters last year. The proposition called for the sale of $3.44 billion in bonds to fund a variety of water projects.

"Based on what we heard here today, we will recommend to increase funding for your project under environmental justice provisions," Robles said. "These funds will be used to pay for the facilities needed to take contamination out of the water so that it can be used for the same use it had before it was contaminated. This is a water recycling project."

Robles heard answers to questions about how the quality of life of the area's residents has been impacted by the contamination, and how the purveyors would need to resort to water rationing if they cannot replace the water lost to the contamination.

Officials said they would use the money to install filter systems on some of the wells closed when they discovered high levels of perchlorate in them.

"I think it is because of the low-income levels in our area that we qualify," said Anthony Araiza, general manager of the West San Bernardino County Water District.

Due to the overlap of the water purveyors and the communities, the three groups have applied as a single community of concern.

"I service almost 50 percent of the city of Rialto and the west part of Fontana," Araiza said. "The Fontana Water Company, which services the rest of Fontana, is not eligible for Prop. 50 money under this program."

"Fontana was not eligible for Prop. 50 funds under this program because they are a privately owned company, not a public utility," said Robles.

Related articles
Parker Waichman Accolades And Reviews Best Lawyers Find Us On Avvo