<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="pixel-app" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Yourlawyer.com (Product Liability News)</title>
	<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_area/product_liability</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:09:42 -0800</pubDate>

	<generator>pixel-app</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>Salomon Alpine and Atomic Ski Bindings Recalled</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17308</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About 10,000 Salomon USA Alpine and Atomic Ski Bindings have been recalled due to unexpected release and fall hazard the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) just announced.The defective Salomon Alpine and Atomic Ski Bindings, were made in Romania, imported by Salomon USA, of Ogden, Utah, and manufactured by Salomon SAS, of France.The toe component of the Salomon Alpine and Atomic Ski Bindings could fail to fully secure the ski boot to...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[About 10,000 <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">Salomon USA Alpine and Atomic Ski Bindings</a> have been recalled due to unexpected release and fall hazard the U.S. <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">Consumer Product Safety Commission</a> (CPSC) just announced.<br /><br />The defective Salomon Alpine and Atomic Ski Bindings, were made in Romania, imported by Salomon USA, of Ogden, Utah, and manufactured by Salomon SAS, of France.<br /><br />The toe component of the Salomon Alpine and Atomic Ski Bindings could fail to fully secure the ski boot to the ski binding, causing the binding to release unexpectedly. This could cause the skier to lose control or fall and suffer injuries. To date, the firm has received two reports of injuries, including a broken leg and a knee injury.<br /><br />This recall involves the Salomon Alpine Ski Bindings with models LZ 7, LZ 8, LZ 9, LZ 7 SR, LZ 8 SR, LZ 8 SC, and J LZ 9 and the Atomic Ski Bindings with model Evox 2.8, Evox 2.8+, Evox 2.8++, and FFG 8. &ldquo;Salomon&rdquo; or &ldquo;Atomic&rdquo; and the respective model number are displayed on the ski bindings. The toe components bear a production date code ending in &ldquo;8&rdquo; that can be found on the center plate where the toe of a ski boot contacts the toe component of the bindings.<br /><br />The recalled Salomon Alpine and Atomic Ski Bindings were sold at authorized Salomon USA and Atomic USA ski dealers nationwide from September 2008 through October 2009 for between $90 and $160.<br /><br />The CPSC is advising consumers to immediately stop using these ski bindings and return the Salomon-brand ski bindings to any authorized Salomon ski dealer, or return the Atomic-brand ski bindings to any authorized Atomic ski dealer, for a free inspection and replacement of the toe component.<br /><br />The firm can be contacted, toll-free, at 1-877-789-5111 between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. MT Monday through Friday; by email at qualityinfo.usa@salomon-sports.com; or by visiting the firm&rsquo;s Web sites at www.salomon.com or www.atomicsnow.com.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Stainless Steel Cookware Sets Recalled Due to Burn Hazard</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17310</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cost Plus World Market has recalled about 300 Stainless Steel Cookware sets due to burn hazard, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) just announced.The recalled Stainless Steel Cookware sets were made in India by Kraftwares of Mahalaxmi, Mumbai and were distributed by Cost Plus Inc., of Oakland, CaliforniaThe recall was implemented because the handles on the cookware can break, posing a burn hazard to consumers. To date, no...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Cost Plus World Market has recalled about 300 <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">Stainless Steel Cookware</a> sets due to burn hazard, the U.S. <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">Consumer Product Safety Commission</a> (CPSC) just announced.<br /><br />The recalled Stainless Steel Cookware sets were made in India by Kraftwares of Mahalaxmi, Mumbai and were distributed by Cost Plus Inc., of Oakland, California<br /><br />The recall was implemented because the handles on the cookware can break, posing a burn hazard to consumers. To date, no incidents or injuries have been reported.<br /><br />This recall involves three Stainless Steel Cookware sets; a 4-piece multi-cooker set, a 3-piece steamer set, and a 1.5-quart egg poacher with SKU numbers 422698, 422699, and 422700. The SKU numbers can be found on the sales receipt.<br /><br />The recalled Stainless Steel Cookware sets were sold at Cost Plus World Market stores nationwide in August 2009. The 4-piece multi-cooker was sold for $30, the 3-piece steamer set sold for $15, and the 1.5QT egg poacher sold for $15.<br /><br />The CPSC is advising consumers to immediately stop using the recalled Stainless Steel Cookware sets and return the sets to any Cost Plus or World Market store for a full refund. Cost Plus can be reached, toll-free, at 1-877-967-5362 between 7:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m., Eastern Time, or at the firm&rsquo;s Web site at www.worldmarket.com.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Gas Grills Sold at Lowe's Recalled</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17302</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A large recall of Perfect Flame SLG Series Gas Grills has been initiated over fire and burn hazards, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) just announced. The recall involved about 663,000 Perfect Flame SLG Series Gas Grills in the United States and about 1,700 in Canada.The Perfect Flame SLG Series Gas Grills were imported by L G Sourcing, Inc., of North Wilkesboro, North Carolina and were manufactured by Lucas Innovation Inc., of...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[A large recall of <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">Perfect Flame SLG Series Gas Grills</a> has been initiated over fire and burn hazards, the U.S. <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">Consumer Product Safety Commission</a> (CPSC) just announced. The recall involved about 663,000 Perfect Flame SLG Series Gas Grills in the United States and about 1,700 in Canada.<br /><br />The Perfect Flame SLG Series Gas Grills were imported by L G Sourcing, Inc., of North Wilkesboro, North Carolina and were manufactured by Lucas Innovation Inc., of China. The recall was implemented because the burners can deteriorate, causing irregular flames and the lids of some models to catch fire, posing fire and burn hazards to the consumer. To date, the firm has received about 40 reports of fires from the burners deteriorating and about 23 reports of the lids catching fire. The firm is aware of one report of an eye injury requiring surgery and 21 incidents of minor burns to the hands, arms, or face.<br /><br />The recalled grills are SLG series &ldquo;Perfect Flame&rdquo; brand outdoor propane or natural gas grills. The grills are stainless steel and painted black or gray metal. The model numbers affected by this recall are listed below. The model number can be found in the compartment under the cooking chamber. No other Perfect Flame model numbers are included in this recall. All of the grills in this recall were sold with replacement burners:<br /><br />No replacement lid, model numbers:<br /><br /><ul><li>SLG2006B</li><li>SLG2006BN</li><li>SLG2006C</li><li>SLG2006CN</li><li>SLG2007D</li><li>SLG2007DN</li></ul><br />With replacement lid, model numbers:<br /><br /><ul><li>SLG2007A</li><li>SLG2007B</li><li>SLG2007BN</li><li>SLG2008A</li></ul>The recalled Perfect Flame SLG Series Gas Grills were sold exclusively at Lowe&rsquo;s retail outlets nationwide from September 2005 through May 2009 for between $200 and $550 (U.S.) and in Canada from December 2007 through May 2009 for between $200 and $250 (CAN).<br /><br />The CPSC is advising consumers to immediately stop using the product and contact L G Sourcing to receive free replacement burners and, depending on the model of the grill owned, a free replacement lid. L G Sourcing can be reached, toll-free, at 1-888-840-9590 anytime, or at its Website at www.lowes.com<br /><br />Of note, this is just one of many recalls and issues on which we have written concerning defective products, food, and medicines imported into this country from China. Such defective imports have been making headlines in recent years; the Perfect Flame SLG Series Gas Grills recall is just another of many such issues. In 2008, nearly 80 percent of all product recalls in the U.S. involved imports from China. Products such as dog food, baby formula, toys with lead paint, and even pharmaceuticals like heparin have been found to have been made with toxic materials and other counterfeit ingredients that have long put American consumers at significant risk. Also making news is the ongoing and massive Chinese drywall disaster involving imports from that country.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Children's Hooded Clothing Recalled</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17304</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems as if we&rsquo;re always writing about the issue of dangerous, deadly children&rsquo;s hooded sweatshirts and jackets sold in violation of U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) regulations. Sadly, another recall is being announced.In this case, about 17,000 Youth Hooded Sweatshirts and Jackets are being recalled by Century 21 Promotions, Inc. due to strangulation hazard. The recalled Youth Hooded Sweatshirts and Jackets were...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems as if we&rsquo;re always writing about the issue of dangerous, deadly <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">children&rsquo;s hooded sweatshirts and jackets</a> sold in violation of <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission</a> (CPSC) regulations. Sadly, another recall is being announced.</p><p>In this case, about 17,000 Youth Hooded Sweatshirts and Jackets are being recalled by Century 21 Promotions, Inc. due to strangulation hazard. The recalled Youth Hooded Sweatshirts and Jackets were manufactured and imported by Century 21 Promotions, of Seattle, Washington. To date, no reports of incidents or injuries have been reported.</p><p>The sweatshirts have a drawstring through the hood, which can pose a strangulation hazard to children. In February 1996, the CPSC issued guidelines to help prevent children from strangling or becoming entangled on the neck and waist by drawstrings in upper garments, such as jackets and sweatshirts. In 1997, industry adopted a voluntary standard for drawstrings that incorporated the CPSC guidelines. In May 2006, the CPSC&rsquo;s Office of Compliance issued an announcement that such outerwear with drawstrings at the hood or neck would be regarded as both defective and a substantial risk of injury to young children.</p><p>Unfortunately, the CPSC guidelines are routinely ignored by the clothing industry, and that attitude has had deadly consequences for some children. From January 1985 through January 1999, the CPSC received reports of 22 deaths and 48 non-fatal entanglement incidents involving drawstrings on children&rsquo;s clothing.</p><p>This recall involves children&rsquo;s sweatshirts and jackets sold in sizes XS&ndash;XXL in navy blue, black, brown, pink, red, white, green, grey, blue, yellow, and orange. The recalled garments contain the following embroidered logos: &ldquo;Montauk,&rdquo; &ldquo;Avalon,&rdquo; &ldquo;Stone Harbor,&rdquo; &ldquo;Cape May,&rdquo; &ldquo;Sea Isle,&rdquo; &ldquo;Ocean City,&rdquo; &ldquo;Alaska,&rdquo; &ldquo;Nantucket,&rdquo; &ldquo;Maine,&rdquo; &ldquo;Long Beach Island,&rdquo; &ldquo;Lavallette,&rdquo; &ldquo;Seaside Park,&rdquo; &ldquo;Newport,&rdquo; &ldquo;Monterey,&rdquo; &ldquo;Carmel,&rdquo; &ldquo;Skaneateles,&rdquo; &ldquo;1000 Islands,&rdquo; &ldquo;Block Island,&rdquo; and &ldquo;Seattle.&rdquo;</p><p>The recalled Youth Hooded Sweatshirts and Jackets were sold at Montauk Clothing, Riptide East, Shirt Shops of Cape May, Summer Sweats, Rip Current Sportswear, B&amp;B Department Stores, Trapper Jack&rsquo;s, Annie &amp; The Tees, Emporium, Inc., The Trading Company, Mackerel Jack&rsquo;s, Carmel Classics, Rolands, The Ship Gift Shop, Star Department Store, Seattle Shirt, and Simply Seattle from September 2005 through September 2009 for between $25 and $35. Most stores are located in New England with two stores each in Seattle, Washington, and Alaska.</p><p>The recalled Youth Hooded Sweatshirts and Jackets were made in China and are just one of many recalls and issues on which we have written concerning defective products, food, and medicines imported into this country from China. Such defective imports have been making headlines in recent years; the recalled Youth Hooded Sweatshirts and Jackets recall is just another of many such issues. In 2008, nearly 80 percent of all product recalls in the U.S. involved imports from China. Products such as dog food, baby formula, toys with lead paint, and even pharmaceuticals like heparin have been found to have been made with toxic materials and other counterfeit ingredients that have long put American consumers at significant risk. Also making news is the ongoing and massive Chinese drywall disaster involving imports from that country.</p><p>The CPSC is advising consumers to immediately remove the drawstrings from the sweatshirts to eliminate the hazard, or return the garment to the place of purchase for a full refund. Century 21 Promotions can be reached, toll-free at 1-800-935-2100 between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Pacific Time, Monday through Friday.<br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Lead Found in Barbie, Disney Toys</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17294</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have long been writing that exposure to lead in children can cause brain and nervous system damage, behavioral and learning problems, slowed growth, hearing problems, headaches, mental and physical retardation, and behavioral and other health problems. Now, the Associated Press (AP) is reporting that some toys bearing Barbie and Disney logos have tested with high lead levels, citing the Center for Environmental Health, an advocacy group...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[We have long been writing that exposure to lead in children can cause brain and nervous system damage, behavioral and learning problems, slowed growth, hearing problems, headaches, mental and physical retardation, and behavioral and other health problems. Now, the Associated Press (AP) is reporting that some <a href="http://www.toyinjuries.com/">toys</a> bearing Barbie and Disney logos have tested with high lead levels, citing the <a href="http://www.ceh.org/">Center for Environmental Health</a>, an advocacy group located in California.<br /><br />The Center tested some 250 children&rsquo;s products that were purchased at popular retailers, said AP. Lead levels were found to exceed federal limits in seven of the toys tested, including a Barbie Bike Flair Accessory Kit and a Disney Tinkerbell Water Lily necklace. The Center also found &ldquo;excessive lead&rdquo; levels in a &ldquo;Dora the Explorer Activity Tote, two pairs of children's shoes, a boys&rsquo; belt, and a kids' poncho,&rdquo; said the AP. In response, California&rsquo;s Attorney General, Jerry Brown, wrote to the retailers of the seven products, which include Target and Wal-Mart, issuing a warning that children&rsquo;s products sold in their stores contained lead levels in violation of federal standards and should be immediately removed, reported the AP.<br /><br />Lead is also known to cause cancer and reproductive harm. Once poisoned by lead, no organ system is immune. Of particular concern is the developing brain because negative influences can have long-lasting effects and can continue well into puberty and beyond. Lead is considered by many experts to be one of the most important chronic environmental illnesses affecting children today. Unfortunately, despite efforts to control lead exposure, serious cases still occur.<br /><br />According to the World Health Organization (WHO), about half of all urban children world-wide and under the age of five test with blood lead levels higher than the Center for Disease Control and Prevention&rsquo;s (CDC) safe limit. In the United States, the CDC dropped its &ldquo;level of concern for blood&rdquo; lead levels to 10 micrograms per deciliter, according to the BBC previously.<br /><br />The Center for Environmental Health stated that the Barbie toy was purchased at Tuesday Morning and the Tinkerbell jewelry from Walgreens; other products with high lead levels were purchased form TJ Maxx, Sears, Wal-Mart, and Target, said the AP. Meanwhile, Mattel said it did not manufacture or sell the bike accessory kit and that, in that case, the Barbie name was licensed to Bell Sport. According to Bell Sport, the kit passed safety tests two years prior when lead level requirements were not as stringent; Bell claimed it was unaware the product was still being sold, said the AP. According to Disney, the Tinkerbell necklace was tested by Playmates Toys&mdash;its licensee&mdash;prior to distribution and was allegedly in compliance with all required regulations reported the AP.<br /><br />The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is apparently looking into the situation, said the AP.<br /><br />With the implementation of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA), it is illegal to sell children&rsquo;s products containing lead in specific amounts. The CPSC explained by February 10, 2009, products designed or intended primarily for children 12 and younger may not contain more than 600 ppm of lead; sale of those products can result in significant civil and criminal liability. After August 14, 2009, the level decreases to 300 ppm and, again decreases to 100 ppm on August 14, 2011.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>FDA Orders Safety Review Of Alcoholic Energy Drinks</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17281</link>		
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) just notified about 30 manufacturers of caffeinated alcoholic beverages that it intends to look into the safety and legality of their products.&ldquo;The increasing popularity of consumption of caffeinated alcoholic beverages by college students and reports of potential health and safety issues necessitates that we look seriously at the scientific evidence as soon as possible,&rdquo; said Dr. Joshua...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) just notified about 30 manufacturers of <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">caffeinated alcoholic beverages</a> that it intends to look into the safety and legality of their products.<br /><br />&ldquo;The increasing popularity of consumption of caffeinated alcoholic beverages by college students and reports of potential health and safety issues necessitates that we look seriously at the scientific evidence as soon as possible,&rdquo; said Dr. Joshua Sharfstein, principal deputy commissioner of food and drugs. According to the FDA, of the combined use of caffeine and alcohol among U.S. college students in the few studies on this topic, the prevalence was as high as 26 percent.<br /><br />Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, a substance added intentionally to food, such as caffeine in alcoholic beverages, is deemed &ldquo;unsafe&rdquo; and is unlawful unless its particular use has been approved by <a href="http://www.fda.gov/">FDA</a> regulation, the substance is subject to a prior sanction, or the substance is Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS). The agency has not approved the use of caffeine in alcoholic beverages; therefore, such beverages can be lawfully marketed only if their use is subject to a prior sanction or is GRAS.<br /><br />For a substance to be GRAS, there must be evidence of its safety at the levels used and a basis to conclude that this evidence is generally known and accepted by qualified experts.<br /><br />The FDA alerted manufacturers to the fact that it is considering whether caffeine can lawfully be added to alcoholic beverages. The FDA noted that it is unaware of the basis upon which manufacturers may have concluded that the use of caffeine in alcoholic beverages is GRAS or was &ldquo;prior sanctioned.&rdquo;&nbsp; To date, the FDA has only approved caffeine as an additive for use in soft drinks in concentrations of no greater than 200 parts per million.&nbsp; It has not approved caffeine for use at any level in alcoholic beverages.<br /><br />The FDA requested that, within 30 days, the companies produce evidence of their rationale, with supporting data and information, for concluding that the use of caffeine in their product is GRAS or prior sanctioned. FDA's letter informed each company that if it determines use of caffeine in the firm's alcoholic beverages is not GRAS or prior sanctioned, it will take appropriate action to ensure that the products are removed from the marketplace. &nbsp;<br /><br />In the past year, Anheuser-Busch and Miller agreed to discontinue their popular caffeinated alcoholic beverages, Tilt and Bud Extra and Sparks, and agreed to not produce any caffeinated alcoholic beverages in the future.<br /><br />The federal agency with primary responsibility for regulating alcoholic beverages, the Treasury Department's Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, requires that alcoholic beverages contain only ingredients that satisfy FDA's requirements for use.<br /><br />In late September, the FDA received a letter from 18 Attorneys General and one city attorney expressing concerns about caffeinated alcoholic beverages.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Gander Mountain Tree Stands Recalled Due to Fall Hazard</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17277</link>		
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About 13,000 Hang-On Fixed Position Treestands, imported by Gander Mountain Company of St. Paul, Minnesota and manufactured by StrongBuilt, of Waterproof, Louisiana, have been recalled, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) just announced.The clasp on the Gander Mountain Hang-On Fixed Position Treestands may open unexpectedly if the strap is fastened incorrectly, causing the treestand and user to fall to the ground. To date, Gander...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[About 13,000 Hang-On Fixed Position Treestands, imported by Gander Mountain Company of St. Paul, Minnesota and manufactured by StrongBuilt, of Waterproof, Louisiana, have been <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">recalled</a>, the U.S. <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">Consumer Product Safety Commission</a> (CPSC) just announced.<br /><br />The clasp on the Gander Mountain Hang-On Fixed Position Treestands may open unexpectedly if the strap is fastened incorrectly, causing the treestand and user to fall to the ground. To date, Gander Mountain has received two reports of consumers falling while using the treestands; one sustained unspecified injuries and a second person sustained a broken pelvis and broken arm.<br /><br />Gander Mountain is recalling the 2008 model GMT101 and 2008 model GMT103 Hang-On Fixed Position Treestands. The recalled treestands have wire mesh on the base of the platform to the top of the footrest and a Gander Mountain logo on the front of the seat. In addition, the seat has a camouflage pattern that is branded &ldquo;AP&rdquo; and &ldquo;REALTREE.&rdquo; Model GMT101 has &ldquo;Steel Hang-On With Foot Rest&rdquo; printed in large bold print on the exterior of the box and the GMT103 has &ldquo;Large Steel Hang-On With Foot Rest&rdquo; printed on the exterior of the box. This recall does not affect the 2009 year models GMT101 and GMT103 Hang-On Fixed Position Treestands manufactured by Rivers Edge.<br /><br />The recalled Gander Mountain Treestands were sold only at Gander Mountain stores from July 2008 until July 2009. The GMT101 was sold for about $60 and the GMT103 was sold for about $80. The recalled treestands were manufactured in China.<br /><br />Of note, defective imports from China have been making headlines in recent years; this treestand recall is another of many such issues on which we have been writing. In 2008, nearly 80 percent of all product recalls in the United States involved imports from China. Products such as dog food, baby formula, toys with lead paint, and even pharmaceuticals like heparin have been found to have been made with toxic materials and other counterfeit ingredients that have long been putting United States consumers at significant risk. Also making news is the ongoing Chinese drywall disaster involving imports from that country.<br /><br />The CPSC is advising consumers to immediately stop using the recalled treestands and return them to Gander Mountain for a refund, exchange for a 2009 model, or a store credit. Gander Mountain can be reached toll-free at 1-888-542-6337 Monday through Friday between 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. and Saturday and Sunday between 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Eastern Time, or at the firm&rsquo;s Web site at www.gandermountain.com<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Maclaren Knew About Dangerous Strollers For 5 Years, Took No Action</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17274</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week we&rsquo;ve been following the massive recall of Maclaren strollers that was finally made official following reports of children&rsquo;s fingertips being amputated. Now, it seems, that information is emerging that Maclaren knew&mdash;for an unbelievable five years&mdash;that the strollers could sever children&rsquo;s fingers but did nothing until forced to by the government, the New York Post has reported.Maclaren USA, Inc., of South...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[This week we&rsquo;ve been following the <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">massive recall of Maclaren strollers</a> that was finally made official following reports of children&rsquo;s fingertips being amputated. Now, it seems, that information is emerging that Maclaren knew&mdash;for an unbelievable five years&mdash;that the strollers could sever children&rsquo;s fingers but did nothing until forced to by the government, the New York Post has reported.<br /><br />Maclaren USA, Inc., of South Norwalk, Connecticut issued a recall of about one million Maclaren Strollers because the stroller&rsquo;s hinge mechanism poses a fingertip amputation and laceration hazard to the child when the consumer is unfolding/opening the stroller. To date, Maclaren has received 15 reports of children placing their finger in the stroller&rsquo;s hinge mechanism, resulting in 12 reports of fingertip amputations in the United States.<br /><br />The recall includes every Maclaren stroller sold in the past decade, since 1999. <br /><br />Although Maclaren acknowledged that the fingers of children were amputated as a result of the stroller&rsquo;s hinges, it never advised the U.S. <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml10/10033.html">Consumer Products Safety Commission</a> (CPSC) at the time it was first made aware that a &quot;potential danger,&quot; existed, said the Post. The Post, citing sources, noted that Maclaren, which is based out of Great Britain, could face, at least, upwards of $1 million in fines. Companies are federally mandated to &quot;report to CPSC immediately on learning of a problem with a product that makes it a substantial hazard or poses a potential hazard,&quot; agency spokesman Scott Wolfson said, quoted the Post.<br /><br />In this case, Maclaren was allegedly aware that its stroller hinges could sever fingers since as far back as July 12, 2004, said the Post, when a 23-month-old Connecticut child&rsquo;s right pinky was lopped off by the defective Maclaren stroller hinge, said the Post, citing court papers. The accident happened when Jane DeWinter, the child&rsquo;s mother, was shopping at a Right Start store near Greenwich and was looking at a Maclaren Triumph stroller, said the Post. DeWinter was testing the mechanism when her son, Carlos, put his finger on the defective hinge and experienced a &quot;traumatic amputation,&quot; according to court papers. The pinky was not able to be reattached, although two surgeries were attempted, said the Post.<br /><br />Meanwhile, both Maclaren and Right Start blame the mother&rsquo;s &quot;own negligence,&quot; according to the lawsuit, said the Post. Regardless, Robert Moro, an engineer and former CPSC compliance officer disagreed, based on his 2007 testimony in which he stated that &ldquo;this stroller contains a substantial design defect when compared to other types of designs of strollers intended to be used by children,&quot; quoted the Post. Further, the design and manufacturing of the stroller&mdash;which was made in China&mdash;is in violation of federal guidelines to prevent horrific &ldquo;scissoring effect,&rdquo; according to Moro, said the Post. &quot;Maclaren had a legal obligation to report this,&quot; Moro told The Post. &quot;It's extremely unfortunate a lot of little kids had to get their fingers amputated.&quot; Maclaren and the DeWinters settled for an undisclosed sum, said the Post.<br /><br />Of note, defective imports from China have been making headlines in recent years; this massive stroller recall is another of many such issues on which we have been writing. In 2008, nearly 80 percent of all product recalls in the United States involved imports from China. Products such as dog food, baby formula, toys with lead paint, and even pharmaceuticals like heparin have been found to have been made with toxic materials and other counterfeit ingredients that have long been putting United States consumers at significant risk. Also making news is the ongoing Chinese drywall disaster involving imports from that country.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Gehl Sauce Dispensers Recalled Due to Fire and Burn Hazard</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17265</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gehl Foods just issued a recall of about 115,000 of its HOT TOP2 Nacho Cheese and Chili Sauce Dispensers due to fire and burn hazard. Manufacturer Gehl Foods Inc. is located in Germantown, Wisconsin.The recall was implemented because the HOT TOP2 Nacho Cheese and Chili Sauce Dispenser&rsquo;s fan blade can come into contact with the heater coil, posing fire and burn hazards to consumers. To date, Gehl Foods has received 12 reports of the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Gehl Foods just issued a recall of about 115,000 of its <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">HOT TOP2 Nacho Cheese and Chili Sauce Dispensers</a> due to fire and burn hazard. Manufacturer Gehl Foods Inc. is located in Germantown, Wisconsin.<br /><br />The recall was implemented because the HOT TOP2 Nacho Cheese and Chili Sauce Dispenser&rsquo;s fan blade can come into contact with the heater coil, posing fire and burn hazards to consumers. To date, Gehl Foods has received 12 reports of the dispenser&rsquo;s fan blade malfunctioning and coming into contact with the heater coil, including one report of a fire that caused property damage. No injuries have been reported.<br /><br />This recall includes Gehl Food&rsquo;s commercial Nacho Cheese and Chili Sauce Dispensers, which were manufactured in the United States, bearing model numbers HT2-04 Single, HT2-04 Dual, and HT2-03 APS with serial numbers HT2 164500 through HT2 299689. The model and serial numbers are located on the back of the dispensers. &ldquo;Gehl&rsquo;s&rdquo; is printed on the front of the dispensers.<br /><br />The recalled HOT TOP2 Nacho Cheese and Chili Sauce Dispensers were leased to commercial customers nationwide, including concession and food service establishments, from December 2003 through September 2009.<br /><br />The <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">Consumer Products Safety Commission</a> (CPSC) is advising food establishments and consumers to immediately stop using the recalled HOT TOP2 Nacho Cheese and Chili Sauce Dispensers and contact the firm for a free repair by Gehl, or to receive a free repair kit to be installed by the customer. Gehl Foods can be reached, toll-free, at 1-877-440-4008 between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Central Time, Monday through Friday or at the firms&rsquo; Web site at www.gehls.com<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Appeals Court Revives Cell Phone Cancer Cases</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17266</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cell phone lawsuits alleging that radiation from the devices can&nbsp; cause brain cancer have been given new life.&nbsp;&nbsp; According to Law.com, the Washington D.C. Court of Appeals has reversed a lower court decision that found that cell phone cancer lawsuits were preempted by federal law.The decision came in a case called Murray v. Motorola, and involves Verizon, Motorola, AT&amp;T, Sprint, Nokia and other cell phone providers.&nbsp; The...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">Cell phone lawsuits</a> alleging that radiation from the devices can&nbsp; cause brain cancer have been given new life.&nbsp;&nbsp; According to Law.com, the Washington D.C. Court of Appeals has reversed a lower court decision that found that cell phone cancer lawsuits were preempted by federal law.<br /><br />The decision came in a case called Murray v. Motorola, and involves Verizon, Motorola, AT&amp;T, Sprint, Nokia and other cell phone providers.&nbsp; The plaintiffs had claimed that they or their loved ones suffered illness, including brain cancer, as a result of the use of cell phones manufactured, sold or distributed by the defendants.&nbsp; They also alleged that defendants have long been aware of numerous studies revealing that radio frequency radiation from cell phones can cause tissue destruction, a precursor to cancer.<br /><br />According to Law.com, in 2007, Judge Cheryl Long of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia dismissed the suits, reasoning that the claims, which were made based on D.C. law, were pre-empted by the Federal Communications Act of 1996. &nbsp;<br /><br />Last month, the D.C. Court of Appeals overturned part of Judge Long's ruling&nbsp; While the appeals court ruled that plaintiffs could not pursue claims that they were injured by phones which met the <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/">Federal Communications Commission's</a> (FCC) emissions standards, it ruled that&nbsp; personal injury claims were not pre-empted if they were based on phones that were either built before 1996, when the FCC purportedly began applying its radiation limits to cell phones, or failed to meet the commission's requirements.&nbsp;&nbsp; According to Law.com, the ruling also allows plaintiffs to continue their claims under the D.C. Consumer Protection Procedures Act that the companies had lied or omitted information about potential safety issues.<br /><br />According to Law.com,&nbsp; the ruling could lead to the filing of even more suits against cell phone companies in Washington's trial court. &nbsp;<br /><br />The ruling comes at a time when concerns over the possible health consequences of cell phone use are growing. Last month, we reported that the World Health Organization (WHO) would soon be publishing the results of its groundbreaking Interphone study. A preliminary analysis of the WHO study&rsquo;s data found a &ldquo;significantly increased risk&rdquo; of some brain tumors &ldquo;related to use of mobile phones for a period of 10 years or more.&rdquo; The Interphone project conducted studies in 13 countries, interviewing tumor sufferers and people in good health to see whether their use phone use differed. Interviews were conducted with 12,800 people between 2000 and 2004.<br /><br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Nokia Cell Phone Chargers Recalled</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17256</link>		
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nokia just announced a massive recall of millions of defective cell phone chargers due to a potential shock hazard, Network World reported. The recall program involves Nokia replacing the chargers at no cost to consumers; affected consumers are in the United States and Canada as well as other countries worldwide said Network World.According to the cell phone giant, the Nokia-branded chargers were made by BYD Electronic Company, a third-party...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Nokia just announced a massive recall of millions of <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">defective cell phone chargers</a> due to a potential shock hazard, Network World reported. The recall program involves Nokia replacing the chargers at no cost to consumers; affected consumers are in the United States and Canada as well as other countries worldwide said Network World.<br /><br />According to the cell phone giant, the Nokia-branded chargers were made by BYD Electronic Company, a third-party supplier, said Network World. BYD is located in China.<br /><br />Nokia explained that the charger&rsquo;s plastic casing could come apart, which would expose the chargers internal elements, posing a potential shock hazard, Network World reported. The fault, which was found during a normal quality inspection, has not&mdash;to date&mdash;resulted in any incidents or accidents, according to Network World.<br /><br />Network World wrote that three chargers were affected by the recall, as follows:<br /><br />&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Model number AC-3E manufactured between June 15, 2009 and August 9, 2009<br />&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Model number AC-3U manufactured between June 15, 2009 and August 9, 2009<br />&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Model number AC-4U manufactured between April 13, 2009 and October 25, 2009<br /><br />To determine if a charger is involved, said Network World, check the label that indicates the charger&rsquo;s voltage and manufacturing information. That label should indicate the model number, manufacturer name, and identification number&mdash;comprised of a long series of numbers. Nokia has set up a dedicated Charger Exchange Website at http://chargerexchange.nokia.com/chargerexchange/en/. At that site, enter the charger&rsquo;s model and identification numbers and follow the steps to exchange the charger. Nokia recommends that if the model number matches, to immediately stop using the charger. If there is a question regarding the charger, Nokia can be contacted directly, toll-free, at 1-888-Nokia2U.<br /><br />Network World noted that this is not the first time Nokia has experienced a major product issue that concerned a third-party distributor. In 2007, Nokia released an advisory for &ldquo;potentially faulty batteries,&rdquo; that were manufactured by the Matsushita Battery Industrial Company Limited when it was found that the batteries could overheat. Nokia did not issue a recall but did agree to replace some 46 million batteries, at consumer request.<br /><br />Although Nokia did not release the number of chargers affected in the current recall, Network World said that London&rsquo;s Times said that about 14 million chargers could be impacted.<br /><br />According to Reuters, shares dropped over four percent due to the charger recall and Credit Suisse indicated that the recall could adversely affect BYD Electronic&rsquo;s standing and downgraded the stock from &ldquo;neutral&rdquo; to &ldquo;underperform.&rdquo; BYD Electronic is the battery manufacturing division of BYD Company. BYD will assume the cost of the recall, said Reuters.<br /><br />As we mentioned, the recalled Nokia chargers were manufactured in China. Of note, defective imports from China have been making headlines in recent years; this massive charger recall is another of many such issues on which we have been writing. In 2008, nearly 80 percent of all product recalls in the United States involved imports from China. Products such as dog food, baby formula, toys with lead paint, and even pharmaceuticals like heparin have been found to have been made with toxic materials and other counterfeit ingredients that have long been putting United States consumers at significant risk. Also making news is the ongoing Chinese drywall disaster involving imports from that country.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Maclaren Stroller Recall Official</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17258</link>		
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday we wrote that a massive recall of Maclaren strollers was being considered following reports of children&rsquo;s fingertips being amputated. Now, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced that the recall is in effect.Maclaren USA, Inc., of South Norwalk, Connecticut has issued a recall of about one million Maclaren Strollers because the stroller&rsquo;s hinge mechanism poses a fingertip amputation and laceration...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yesterday we wrote that a massive recall of <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">Maclaren strollers</a> was being considered following reports of children&rsquo;s fingertips being amputated. Now, the U.S. <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">Consumer Product Safety Commission</a> (CPSC) announced that the recall is in effect.<br /><br />Maclaren USA, Inc., of South Norwalk, Connecticut has issued a recall of about one million Maclaren Strollers because the stroller&rsquo;s hinge mechanism poses a fingertip amputation and laceration hazard to the child when the consumer is unfolding/opening the stroller. As of today, Maclaren has received 15 reports of children placing their finger in the stroller&rsquo;s hinge mechanism, resulting in 12 reports of fingertip amputations in the United States.<br /><br />This recall involves all Maclaren single and double umbrella strollers. The word &ldquo;Maclaren&rdquo; is printed on the stroller. The affected models included Volo, Triumph, Quest Sport, Quest Mod, Techno XT, TechnoXLR, Twin Triumph, Twin Techno, and Easy Traveller. The recalled Maclaren strollers were manufactured in China and sold at Babies&ldquo;R&rdquo;Us, Target, and other juvenile product and mass merchandise retailers nationwide from 1999 through November 2009 for between $100 and $360.<br /><br />Yesterday we noted that, according to the Daily News, this recall includes every Maclaren stroller sold in the past decade, since 1999. A carriage hinge appears to be responsible for the injuries.<br /><br />The CPSC is advising consumers to immediately stop using the recalled strollers and contact Maclaren USA to receive a free repair kit. Maclaren USA can be reached, toll-free, at 1-877-688-2326 between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday or visit the firm&rsquo;s Web site at www.maclaren.us/recall<br /><br />The Daily news, which noted that the high-end British strollers are extremely popular worldwide, reported yesterday that, according to a source, &ldquo;Parents should stop using these strollers right away.&rdquo; It seems that Maclaren will be sending protective covers for the hinges, said the Daily News.<br /><br />The recalled Maclaren strollers were manufactured in China. Of note, defective imports from China have been making headlines in recent years; this massive stroller recall is another of many such issues on which we have been writing. In 2008, nearly 80 percent of all product recalls in the United States involved imports from China. Products such as dog food, baby formula, toys with lead paint, and even pharmaceuticals like heparin have been found to have been made with toxic materials and other counterfeit ingredients that have long been putting United States consumers at significant risk. Also making news is the ongoing Chinese drywall disaster involving imports from that country.<br /><br />&nbsp;<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Maclaren Set to Issue Major Stroller Recall</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17252</link>		
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A massive recall of strollers is in the works following reports of children&rsquo;s fingertips being amputated, news media outlets are reporting today.The Daily News reported that Maclaren, a huge stroller maker, is recalling some one million strollers; the recall includes every Maclaren stroller sold in the past decade, since 1999, said the Daily News. A carriage hinge appears to be responsible for the injuries.One dozen children reportedly...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A massive recall of <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">strollers</a> is in the works following reports of children&rsquo;s fingertips being amputated, news media outlets are reporting today.</p><p>The Daily News reported that Maclaren, a huge stroller maker, is recalling some one million strollers; the recall includes every Maclaren stroller sold in the past decade, since 1999, said the Daily News. A carriage hinge appears to be responsible for the injuries.</p><p>One dozen children reportedly suffered amputations linked to the Maclaren strollers, said the Daily news, which noted that the high-end British strollers are extremely popular worldwide. Maclaren will be sending protective covers for the hinges, said the Daily News. &quot;Parents should stop using these strollers right away,&quot; said the Daily News&rsquo; source.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission</a> (CPSC) said this recall involves all Maclaren single and double umbrella strollers. The word &ldquo;Maclaren&rdquo; is printed on the stroller and the affected models included Volo, Triumph, Quest Sport, Quest Mod, Techno XT, TechnoXLR, Twin Triumph, Twin Techno, and Easy Traveller. The CPSC said that the recalled strollers&rsquo; hinge mechanism poses a fingertip amputation and laceration hazard to the child when the consumer is unfolding/opening the stroller. To date, the firm has received 15 reports of children placing their finger in the stroller&rsquo;s hinge mechanism, 12 of these involved amputations in the United States.</p><p>Maclaren USA, Inc., which is located in South Norwalk, Connecticut, can be reached toll-free at 1-877-688-2326 between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m, Eastern Time, Monday through Friday or at its website at www.maclaren.us/recall</p><p>The CPSC reported that the recalled Maclaren strollers, which were manufactured in China, were sold at Babies&ldquo;R&rdquo;Us, Target, and other juvenile product and mass merchandise retailers nationwide from 1999 through November 2009 for between $100 and $360.</p><p>The CPSC Is advising consumers to immediately stop using these recalled strollers and contact Maclaren USA to receive a free repair kit.</p><p>The recalled Maclaren strollers were manufactured in China. Of note, defective imports from China have been making headlines in recent years; this massive stroller recall is another of many such issues on which we have been writing.</p><p>In 2008, nearly 80 percent of all product recalls in the United States involved imports from China. Products such as dog food, baby formula, toys with lead paint, and even pharmaceuticals like heparin have been found to have been made with toxic materials and other counterfeit ingredients that have long been putting United States consumers at significant risk. Also making news is the ongoing <a href="http://www.chinese-drywall-answers.com/">Chinese drywall disaster</a> involving imports from that country.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Feds Playing Catch-up in Chinese Drywall Probe</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17254</link>		
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Florida-State-sponsored Technical Symposium on Corrosive Imported Drywall that took place in Tampa last week is considered, said the Herald Tribune, to be the most complete of its kind. The Symposium was attended by key scientists working on the contaminated Chinese drywall issue plaguing homeowners nationwide.Some 400 people were in attendance to hear about testing and research being conducted by federal, state, and private sector to learn...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Florida-State-sponsored Technical Symposium on Corrosive Imported Drywall that took place in Tampa last week is considered, said the Herald Tribune, to be the most complete of its kind. The Symposium was attended by key scientists working on the <a href="http://www.chinese-drywall-answers.com/">contaminated Chinese drywall </a>issue plaguing homeowners nationwide.<br /><br />Some 400 people were in attendance to hear about testing and research being conducted by federal, state, and private sector to learn what is causing health and corrosion problems in homes outfitted with the allegedly defective product, said the Herald Tribune. Thousands of U.S. homeowners claim that they are becoming sick as a result of defective Chinese drywall, claiming a &ldquo;rotten egg&rdquo; odor; headaches; nausea and vomiting; respiratory problems; and corrosion of metals in the home.<br /><br />The Daily Herald recently wrote that millions of gypsum sheets imported to the U.S. during the housing boom appear to have been contaminated with an array of sulfur compounds. The gypsum in drywall, which typically comes from mines, has recently come from a chemical process involving lime or limestone and gas from coal-fired power plants. Contaminants and sulfur found in power plant smokestacks are supposed to be removed in the process. Failure of proper removal is the cause of foul odors, respiratory complaints, and corrosion, according to some Chinese experts in building supplies. Others say phosphogypsum (calcium sulfate), a radioactive phosphorus substance, is to blame. Banned for use in U.S. construction in 1989, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) says prolonged exposure to this radium-contained element can lead to a higher risk of lung cancer.<br /><br />The Symposium looked at what is releasing the corrosive gases, why and how, said the Herald Tribune. One group&mdash;Environ International&mdash;discussed research that might help with the answer. Environ is a consultant group, explained the Herald Tribune, that has worked for builders involved in the debacle. Tom Gauthier, who works at Environ, said elemental sulfur&mdash;solid sulfur particles&mdash;are likely the &quot;key characteristic&quot; according to the Herald Tribune. &quot;Elemental sulfur is the primary reactant,&quot; Gauthier said, quoted the Herald Tribune &quot;Strontium may be a good indicator for Chinese drywall, but not necessarily corrosive Chinese drywall,&quot; Gauthier added.<br /><br />The reaction between elemental sulfur and carbon monoxide can produce carbonyl sulfide, which could in turn, produce hydrogen sulfide and carbon disulfide, said the Herald Tribune. The compounds have been found in Chinese drywall in a number of privately- and governmentally-sponsored studies.<br /><br />We have been writing about a time-sensitive, one-time offer made by Knauf Plasterboard (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. that is expected to do much to streamline the process for suing the major drywall manufacturer. To take advantage of this one-time offer, Chinese drywall claimants must sign on to an omnibus class action lawsuit by December 2, 2009. To be eligible for the lawsuit, claimants must submit pictures or other proof that they have wallboard made by Knauf Plasterboard in their homes. Any Chinese drywall homeowner interested in becoming a party to this lawsuit must start now by contacting an attorney and arranging to have their home inspected.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/Defective_Chinese_Drywall">Parker Waichman Alonso LLP</a>, the first law firm to file a federal Chinese drywall lawsuit, is offering assistance to any homeowner interested in joining the Knauf Plasterboard lawsuit. Free consultations are available through the firm&rsquo;s website at <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/">www.yourlawyer.com</a>, or by calling 1-800-LAW-INFO (1-800-529-4636).]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Wooden Adventure Playsets Recalled for Fall Hazard</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17239</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adventure Playsets Wooden Play Sets&mdash;about 275,000 in the United States and 6,800 in Canada&mdash;distributed by Adventure Playsets, of Amarillo, Texas have been recalled, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) just announced.The Adventure Playsets Wooden Play Sets have been recalled because the plastic coated lumber on the horizontal ladder (monkey bar/swing beam) can weaken over time due to rotting of the whitewood (spruce,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">Adventure Playsets Wooden Play Sets</a>&mdash;about 275,000 in the United States and 6,800 in Canada&mdash;distributed by Adventure Playsets, of Amarillo, Texas have been recalled, the <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission</a> (CPSC) just announced.</p><p>The Adventure Playsets Wooden Play Sets have been recalled because the plastic coated lumber on the horizontal ladder (monkey bar/swing beam) can weaken over time due to rotting of the whitewood (spruce, pine, and fir species), resulting in a fall hazard. To date, Adventure Playsets has received more than 1,400 reports of rotting ladders involving 16 injuries that resulted in nine emergency room visits. The injuries include two arm fractures, lacerations, scrapes, and bruises to children younger than eight years old. Most of the reported injuries occurred when the swing came out of the monkey bar/ swing beam that had rotted.</p><p>This recall involves wooden play sets with swings, slides, and ladders. Each set has an overhead monkey bar ladder that acts as both the monkey bar and swing beam, and an end ladder coated with cranberry or green plastic. The instruction manual has the name &ldquo;Adventure Playsets&rdquo; and one of the following model numbers printed on the cover:</p><p>&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Bellevue 1-AP048, and 1-AP012*<br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Belmont 1-AP003<br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Dakota 1- AP046<br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Durango 1-AP016 and 1- AP018*<br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;El Dorado 1-AP016<br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Madison 1- AP006 and 1- AP015<br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Sedona 1- AP002<br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Sherwood 1-AP049<br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Tacoma 1- AP017 and 1-AP051*<br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Ventura 1-AP008<br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Yukon 1-AP052<br /><br />*Of note, the Bellevue, Tacoma and Durango swing sets were previously recalled due to detaching frames and a fall hazard. The prior CPSC recall announcement can be seen at: http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml06/06163.html</p><p>The Adventure Playsets Wooden Play Sets, which were manufactured in the United States, were sold at Walmart, Toys R Us, Academy Sports, Menards, and Mill stores nationwide, and online at Walmart.com, ToyRUs.com, Willygoat.com, and through the DMSI catalog from January 2004 through December 2007 for between $300 and $600.</p><p>The CPSC is advising consumers to immediately stop using the swing sets and contact Adventure Playsets to receive a replacement kit. Adventure Playsets can be reached toll-free at 1-877-840-9068 between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Central Time, Monday through Friday, or at the firm's Web site at www.adventureplaysets.com. Consumers can also email the firm at custservice@adventureplaysets.com</p><p>Health Canada&rsquo;s press release can be seen at: http://cpsr-rspc.hc-sc.gc.ca/PR-RP/recall-retrait-eng.jsp?re_id=878<br /><br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Young Artists Easels Recalled for Lead Paint Standard Violations</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17241</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About 10,000 Young Artist Easels, manufactured by MacPherson&rsquo;s of Emeryville, California have been recalled, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) just announced.MacPherson&rsquo;s Young Artist Easels have been recalled because the chalkboard surface coating contains high levels of lead, violating the federal lead paint standard. To date, no incidents or injuries have been reported; however, of note, adverse health reactions...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[About 10,000 <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">Young Artist Easels</a>, manufactured by MacPherson&rsquo;s of Emeryville, California have been recalled, the <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission</a> (CPSC) just announced.<br /><br />MacPherson&rsquo;s Young Artist Easels have been recalled because the chalkboard surface coating contains high levels of lead, violating the federal lead paint standard. To date, no incidents or injuries have been reported; however, of note, adverse health reactions resulting from exposure are not generally immediately evident.<br /><br />As we have often written, lead is considered by many experts to be one of the most important chronic environmental illnesses affecting children today. Exposure to lead in children can cause brain and nervous system damage, behavioral and learning problems, slowed growth, hearing problems, headaches, mental and physical retardation, and behavioral and other health problems. Lead is also known to cause cancer and reproductive harm. Once poisoned by lead, no organ system is immune. Of particular concern is the developing brain because negative influences can have long-lasting effects and can continue well into puberty and beyond.<br /><br />This recall involves a children&rsquo;s art easel, which has a chalkboard surface on one side and a white board surface on the other side. The item number is AA13301 and the UPC number is 082435133010, which can be found on the original packaging. The recalled MacPherson&rsquo;s Young Artist Easels were sold at art supply stores nationwide and online from July 2004 through June 2009 for about $75.<br /><br />The CPSC is advising consumers to immediately take these recalled MacPherson&rsquo;s Young Artist Easels away from children and contact the firm to receive a free replacement chalkboard panel. MacPherson&rsquo;s can be reached toll-free at 1-866-319-5335 between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Pacific Time, Monday through Friday, at the firm&rsquo;s Web site at www.art-alternatives.com/recall, or by email to recall@macphersonart.com<br /><br />The recalled MacPherson&rsquo;s Young Artist Easels were manufactured in China. Of note, defective imports from China have been making headlines in recent years; this recall of defective MacPherson&rsquo;s Young Artist Easels is another of many such issues on which we have been writing.<br /><br />In 2008, nearly 80 percent of all product recalls in the United States involved imports from China. Products such as dog food, baby formula, toys with lead paint, and even pharmaceuticals like heparin have been found to have been made with toxic materials and other counterfeit ingredients that have long been putting United States consumers at significant risk. Also making news is the ongoing <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/Defective_Chinese_Drywall">Chinese drywall</a> disaster involving imports from that country.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Samsung Microwaves Recalled for Shock Hazard</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17243</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About 43,000 Samsung&trade; Over-the-Range Microwave Ovens imported by Samsung Electronics America Inc., of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, have been recalled for shock hazard, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) just announced.If an installation bolt from the recalled Samsung&trade; Over-the-Range Microwave Ovens comes in contact with an electrical component inside the unit and the microwave is plugged into an ungrounded outlet, it...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About 43,000 <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">Samsung&trade; Over-the-Range Microwave Ovens</a> imported by Samsung Electronics America Inc., of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, have been recalled for shock hazard, the <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission</a> (CPSC) just announced.</p><p>If an installation bolt from the recalled Samsung&trade; Over-the-Range Microwave Ovens comes in contact with an electrical component inside the unit and the microwave is plugged into an ungrounded outlet, it could create a shock hazard. To date, no incidents or injuries have been reported.</p><p>The recall involves Samsung 1000-watt over-the-range microwave ovens. The following model and serial numbers are included in this recall:<br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;All SMH9151x produced from January through May 2009 from serial number xxxxxxxS1xxxxxx to serial number xxxxxxxS5xxxxxx<br /><br />Some products in June were also affected, as follows:<br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;SMH9151B from serial number xxxxxxOS600001xxxxxxTS600001 to serial number xxxxxxOS600100xxxxxxTS601100<br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;SMH9151S from serial number xxxxxxTS600001 to serial number xxxxxxTS601386<br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;SMH9151ST from serial number xxxxxxTS600001 to serial number xxxxxxTS600330<br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;SMH9151STE from serial number xxxxxxTS600001 to serial number xxxxxxTS600330<br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;SMH9151W from serial number xxxxxxOS600001xxxxxxTS600001 to serial number xxxxxxOS600200xxxxxxTS602055<br /><br />The recalled Samsung&trade; Over-the-Range Microwave Ovens, which were manufactured in Malaysia,&nbsp; were sold at retail stores nationwide from January 2009 through July 2009 for between $180 and $200.</p><p>The CPSC is advising consumers to immediately unplug and stop using the recalled Samsung&trade; Over-the-Range Microwave Ovens, and contact Samsung to schedule a free repair. Samsung can be reached toll-free at 1-888-402-6974 between 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. Eastern Time, seven days a week, or at the firm's Web site at www.samsung.com/otrrecall<br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Life is Good Travel Mugs Recalled Due to Burn Hazard</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17244</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About 15,000 Fall 2009 Newbury Travel Mugs, imported by the S Group, of Portland, Oregon and manufactured by Pow Can, of Zhejiang, China, have been recalled, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) just announced.The recalled Fall 2009 Newbury Travel Mugs can become excessively hot to the touch when filled with hot liquids, posing a burn hazard to consumers. To date, the firm has received three reports of excessively hot mugs,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About 15,000 <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">Fall 2009 Newbury Travel Mugs</a>, imported by the S Group, of Portland, Oregon and manufactured by Pow Can, of Zhejiang, China, have been recalled, the <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission</a> (CPSC) just announced.</p><p>The recalled Fall 2009 Newbury Travel Mugs can become excessively hot to the touch when filled with hot liquids, posing a burn hazard to consumers. To date, the firm has received three reports of excessively hot mugs, including one complaint of a minor burn to the hand.</p><p>This recall involves Newbury Travel Mugs. The 7&frac12; -inch tall mugs were sold in blue, green, and orange, each with a navy blue lid. The Life is Good trademark is printed on the mug along with a graphic of a heart, peace symbol, or daisy. The recalled Fall 2009 Newbury Travel Mugs were sold at Life is Good and independent retail stores nationwide and online at lifeisgood.com from July 2009 through September 2009 for about $20.</p><p>The CPSC is advising consumers to immediately stop using the recalled Fall 2009 Newbury Travel Mugs and return them to receive a credit or gift certificate for the amount of the purchase price. Life is Good can be reached toll-free at 1-888-339-2987 between 8:30 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Thursday, and 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Friday. Consumers can also visit the firm&rsquo;s Web site at www.lifeisgood.com</p><p>The recalled Fall 2009 Newbury Travel Mugs were manufactured in China. Of note, defective imports from China have been making headlines in recent years; this recall of defective Fall 2009 Newbury Travel Mugs is another of many such issues on which we have been writing.</p><p>In 2008, nearly 80 percent of all product recalls in the United States involved imports from China. Products such as dog food, baby formula, toys with lead paint, and even pharmaceuticals like heparin have been found to have been made with toxic materials and other counterfeit ingredients that have long been putting United States consumers at significant risk. Also making news is the ongoing <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/Defective_Chinese_Drywall">Chinese drywall</a> disaster involving imports from that country.<br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Diet Sodas May Impact Kidney Function</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17228</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Diet sodas have been linked to a reduction in kidney functioning, according to an emerging study cited by WebMD. While diet sodas may help in keeping caloric intake down, the beverages might be doubling the risk of kidney function decline, said WebMD.The research looked at women who consumed two or more diet sodas daily and found they experienced a 30 percent decrease in &ldquo;a measure of kidney function&rdquo; based on a large follow-up, said...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">Diet sodas</a> have been linked to a reduction in kidney functioning, according to an emerging study cited by WebMD. While diet sodas may help in keeping caloric intake down, the beverages might be doubling the risk of kidney function decline, said WebMD.<br /><br />The research looked at women who consumed two or more diet sodas daily and found they experienced a 30 percent decrease in &ldquo;a measure of kidney function&rdquo; based on a large follow-up, said WebMD, referring to research that was just presented at the yearly meeting of the American Society of Nephrology in San Diego, California. &quot;Thirty percent is considered significant,'' said researcher Julie Lin, MD, MPH, assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and a staff physician at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, quoted WebMD. She noted that this is &ldquo;especially true,&rdquo; given that most participants began the study with what were considered well-preserved kidney function levels.<br /><br />The female participants&mdash;3,256 in all, with a median age of 67&mdash;were participating in the <a href="http://www.channing.harvard.edu/nhs/">Nurses' Health Study</a> and had provided dietary details that also included what they ingested in the form of sweet drinks, such as &ldquo;sugar-sweetened drinks, sugar-sweetened soda, and artificially sweetened soda,&rdquo; said WebMD, which explained that sugar-sweetened drinks included &ldquo;soda, fruit juices, punch, and iced tea.&rdquo; The study also provided kidney function measures.<br /><br />The new research reviewed &ldquo;cumulative average beverage intake,&rdquo; that was compiled from &ldquo;food questionnaires completed in 1984, 1986, and 1990,&rdquo; said WebMD and covered frequency of drinking the beverages. Kidney function was compared over time and revealed a 30 percent decline in 372 (11.4 percent) of the participants, connected to consuming at least two artificially sweetened sodas daily, said WebMD. The level looked at was the glomerular filtration rate, a measure of kidney function. ''With natural aging, kidney function declines about 1 mL per minute per year after age 40,&quot; said Lin, reported WebMD.<br /><br />According to the Nephrology Society, some 20 million Americans experience &ldquo;some evidence of chronic kidney disease&rdquo;; such disease diagnoses have seen a doubling in the past 20 years, added CNN.<br /><br />Of note, we have written in the past about the issue of benzene in soft drinks. Unacceptably high levels of benzene, a known carcinogen, were detected in samples of popular soft drinks, at concentrations of up to eight parts per billion (ppb) based on prior international studies.<br /><br />Benzene, a dangerous toxin linked to leukemia and other cancers of the blood, is a component of other carcinogens such as fossil-fuel exhaust fumes. One problem with benzene is that its carcinogenic effects are currently quantified in terms of lifetime exposure. The exact amount of benzene and the duration of exposure needed to produce a serious health risk are far from certain. In minute amounts, the potential for harm is even less definite.<br /><br />The source of benzene contamination in commercially produced drinks is generally the by-product of a few simple chemical reactions between ingredients mixed together in the drinks themselves and occurs on a global scale.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Toyota Accident Details Released</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17215</link>		
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&rsquo;ve been following a tragedy involving the deaths of a family potentially linked to faulty Lexus floor mats. Now, the LATimes writes that a federal report has found that there exists a potential defect in the design of the car&rsquo;s gas pedal. The debacle also involves an earlier recall, a serious government-issued warning, and 11 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) investigations. Last month, the Toyota Motor...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[We&rsquo;ve been following a tragedy involving the deaths of a family potentially linked to <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/defective_vehicle_parts">faulty Lexus floor mats</a>. Now, the LATimes writes that a federal report has found that there exists a potential defect in the design of the car&rsquo;s gas pedal. The debacle also involves an earlier recall, a serious government-issued warning, and 11 <a href="http://www.nhtsa.gov/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> (NHTSA) investigations. Last month, the Toyota Motor Corporation finally agreed to issue a massive recall&mdash;its largest ever&mdash;of nearly four million of its vehicles following the deaths of the off-duty California Highway Patrol Officer Mark Saylor and members of his family.<br /><br />The fatal crash involved Saylor (45); his wife, Cleofe (45); Mahala, their 13-year-old daughter; and Chris Lastrella (38), their brother-in-law; all four perished, said Detroit News previously. Details of the chilling accident that prompted the NHTSA to investigate the crash include the 2009 Lexus plummeting over an embankment and bursting into flames. The family was able to contact a 911 operator, saying they were unable to stop the ES 350; Lastrella advised the operator that the Lexus had no brakes. Most poignantly, the 911 tape, recently made public, included the family asking one another to pray at the recording&rsquo;s end, just before their deaths, said Detroit News.<br /><br />Federal highway safety inspectors recently released details of that deadly crash including a finding that, reports the LATimes, involves a gas pedal design in the Lexus ES 350 sedan that actually increases the likelihood of the pedal being &ldquo;obstructed&rdquo; by a car&rsquo;s floor mat. Including the California fatalities, the NHTSA received 100 complaints involving 17 crashes and five deaths, said Detroit News previously. One-third involved the Lexus ES 350, the Free Press said earlier.<br /><br />Toyota claimed the mat was not properly installed and could have trapped the gas pedal, reported the LATimes. The NHTSA report does not make any conclusion regarding he cause, but does reveal interesting new information, including that the brakes were &ldquo;heavily damaged,&rdquo; which appears to confirm Lastrella&rsquo;s report on the 911 call in which he said, &quot;There's no brakes,&quot; said the LATimes.<br /><br />A Times review of NHTSA documents in an other Lexus investigation indicated that the agency &ldquo;found that the Lexus ES braking system loses power-assist when the throttle is fully opened, increasing braking distance five-fold,&rdquo; reported the LATimes. The recent report says, &quot;Beyond the main pivot, the lever is not hinged and has no means for relieving forces caused by interferences,&quot; quoted the LATimes, citing investigators. The report also revealed that the gas pedal&rsquo;s lower edge was &quot;bonded&quot; to the rubber floor mat that also reveals floor mat damage in the area surrounding the accelerator.<br /><br />Saylor actually owned another Lexus that was being serviced at Bob Baker Lexus in El Cajon; he was given the car involved in the fatal crash as a loaner, said the LATimes. The carmaker claims that the auto dealer incorrectly installed the mats. The NHTSA reported that the Lexus had rubber all-weather floor mats for a Lexus RX400h&mdash;sport utility vehicle&mdash;which were not secured by retaining clips, said the LATimes.<br /><br />NHTSA investigators said one of the two clips pulled out of the carpeting and was found under the mat; the other clip, while attached to the carpeting, was not hooked into the floor mat, said the LATimes. Also, the Lexus&rsquo; &ldquo;brake surfaces&rdquo; indicated wear through &ldquo;heavy braking against the full force of the 272-horsepower Lexus engine,&rdquo; reported the LATimes. &quot;Rotors were discolored and heated, had very rough surfaces, had substantial deposits of brake pad material, and showed signs of bright orange oxidation on the cooling fins consistent with endured braking,&quot; the report said. NHTSA investigators wrote that directions on how to operate the car's keyless ignition&mdash;the Power button must be pressed for three full seconds to switch the engine off when in motion&mdash;were &quot;not indicated on the dashboard,&quot; quoted the LATimes.<br /><br />The recall affects the following Toyota models: 2007 to 2010 Camry, 2005 to 2010 Avalon, 2004 to 2009 Prius, 2005 to 2010 Tacoma, and 2007 to 2010 Tundra. It also affects the following Lexus models: 2007 to 2010 ES 350 and 2006 to 2010 IS 250 and IS 350. <br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Blair Faces Lawsuit Over Flammable Chenille Bathrobes</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17206</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The family of an elderly woman who died after the chenille bathrobe she was wearing caught fire has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Blair LLC.&nbsp; As we reported earlier this week, Blair has issued two recalls for the bathrobes and other chenille products because they failed to meet the federal flammability standard and present a risk of serious burns to consumers if the garments are exposed to an open flame.According to her family's...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The family of an elderly woman who died after the <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">chenille bathrobe</a> she was wearing caught fire has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Blair LLC.&nbsp; As we reported earlier this week, Blair has issued <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml10/10017.html">two recalls</a> for the bathrobes and other chenille products because they failed to meet the federal flammability standard and present a risk of serious burns to consumers if the garments are exposed to an open flame.<br /><br />According to her family's lawsuit, Atwilda Brown, 80, was making her nightly cup of tea in her Connecticut home on Feb. 12, 2005, when the chenille robe she purchased three weeks earlier caught fire.&nbsp; She died two weeks later from her burns. &nbsp;<br /><br />In a written statement released this week, Brown's daughter, Sharon Davis, said she hoped the lawsuit would raise awareness about the deadly chenille robes.<br /><br />&quot;My mother suffered a horrible death and experienced excruciating pain. I would like to know why it took four long years to finally make an official recall take place and see Blair punished for violating federal product safety laws,&quot; she said.<br /><br />Brown's family is seeking $30 million.&nbsp; Their lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court in Hartford, Connecticut.<br /><br />Brown was one of 9 people, most elderly, who died from burns after the Blair chenille robes caught fire.&nbsp; In April 2009, Blair recalled 162,000 Chenille Robes manufactured by A-One Textile &amp; Towel, of Karachi, Pakistan, after it learned of three robes catching on fire, including one report of second degree burns. Blair then received several reports of deaths allegedly due to robes catching fire. This prompted a second news release in June 2009 to again alert consumers to the burn hazard for the chenille robes. <br /><br />After this re-announcement, Blair received four additional reports of deaths allegedly due to the robes catching fire. Three of these victims were cooking and a fourth was tending a pellet stove; three of the four victims were in their 80s and one was in her 70s. According to the CPSC, all nine reported deaths occurred prior to the April 2009 announcement of the recall. <br /><br />Blair also received one report involving one of the additional chenille garments included in the expanded recall catching fire; no injuries have been reported related to these garments. Because of this report, Blair decided this week to expand the recall to include all women&rsquo;s chenille wearing apparel manufactured by A-One Textile &amp; Towel.The expanded recall included an additional 138,000 units.<br /><br />All of the recalled chenille products were sold through Blair catalogs and Web site, and Blair stores in Warren, Pa., Grove City, Pa., and Wilmington, Del., from July, 2000, through April, 2007. Consumers are urged to stop wearing the garments immediately. Contact Blair LLC for information on returning the products and to receive a refund or a $50 gift card for Blair merchandise For more information, call Blair toll-free at (877) 392-7095 between 9 a.m. and 9 p.m. ET Monday through Saturday, visit the firm&rsquo;s Web site at www.blair.com/recall, or contact the firm by e-mail at blairproductrecall@blair.com.<br /><br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Wearing Cell Phones On Hips May Weaken Bones</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17199</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some emerging research is pointing to problems with weakening bones in the area of the body where cell phones are worn. WebMD said that the research suggests that a specific pelvis area could be affected when cell phones are worn on the hip over a period of time.The area of the pelvis involved is that section that is typically used for bone grafting. Researchers from the Suleyman Demireli University located in Turkey used an X-ray technique...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Some emerging research is pointing to problems with weakening bones in the area of the body where <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">cell phones</a> are worn. WebMD said that the research suggests that a specific pelvis area could be affected when cell phones are worn on the hip over a period of time.<br /><br />The area of the pelvis involved is that section that is typically used for bone grafting. Researchers from the Suleyman Demireli University located in Turkey used an X-ray technique commonly employed on patients suffering from osteoporosis to measure male bone density and diagnose osteoporosis, said WebMD, The study team looked at 150 men who routinely wore cell phones on their belts for about 15 hours daily and had been using cell phones for an average of about six years, noted WebMD. The average age of the men was 32.<br /><br />The recent research revealed that the men&rsquo;s &ldquo;bone mineral density&rdquo; measured as being somewhat reduced on the side of the pelvis where the phones were typically carried, versus the side in which the cell phone was not usually carried, said WebMD. Although the difference was not considered statistically significant, the findings could suggest an adverse reaction in bone density due to cell phone electromagnetic transmissions said researcher Tolga Atay, MD, and colleagues, according to WebMD.<br /><br />One concern is that an increased risk of osteoporosis could be seen in older men, said WebMD, a group not studied in this review. The study appears in September&rsquo;s Journal of Craniofacial Surgery and is &ldquo;among the first,&rdquo; said WebMD, to make a connection between long-term cell phone exposure and weakening of the bones.<br /><br />Hundreds of studies have looked at cell phones&rsquo; impact on human health, with a focus on the link between cell phone use and cancer; however, the results have been varied, noted WebMD. Many believe longer-term studies are needed, given that cell phones are a relatively new technology.<br /><br />Concerns over the possible health consequences of cell phone use are growing.&nbsp; Earlier this week, we reported that the World Health Organization (WHO) would soon be publishing the results of its groundbreaking Interphone study.&nbsp; A preliminary analysis of the WHO study&rsquo;s data found a &ldquo;significantly increased risk&rdquo; of some brain tumors &ldquo;related to use of mobile phones for a period of 10 years or more.&rdquo; The Interphone project conducted studies in 13 countries, interviewing tumor sufferers and people in good health to see whether their use phone use differed. Interviews were conducted with 12,800 people between 2000 and 2004.<br /><br />Last year we wrote that researchers from the Cleveland Clinic warned that cell phone use, including hands-free devices, can affect male fertility.&nbsp; The information appeared in the journal Fertility and Sterility.<br /><br />The study researchers warned men to ensure that the devices are not kept in proximity to their testicles. It seems that the men who use hand-free cell phone devices have a tendency to keep the phones in their pants pocket or clipped to the waist belts when the phones are in talk mode. &nbsp;<br /><br />Earlier research from the same group indicated that emitted radiofrequency electromagnetic waves from cell phones can impair sperm quality; last year&rsquo;s study explains why this occurs.&nbsp; It seems that semen exposed to radiofrequency electromagnetic waves emitted from cell phones had higher levels of damaging free radicals, lower sperm motility&mdash;which is the sperm&rsquo;s ability to move and swim and is necessary for procreation&mdash;and lower sperm viability, which relates to the number of live sperm.&nbsp; Exposure may also cause greater oxidative stress.&nbsp; There were no significant differences in DNA damage between the exposed and unexposed groups.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Snowmobiles Recalled By Arctic Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17202</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About 3,000 Arctic Cat Snowmobiles have been recalled due to fire hazard the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, just announced. Arctic Cat is located in Thief River Falls, Minnesota.Oil can leak into the engine compartment, posing a fire hazard to consumers. In addition, the fuel tank can come into contact with the engine, posing a possibility of wearing through and fuel leakage. To date, Arctic Cat has received 33 reports of oil leaks,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[About 3,000 Arctic Cat Snowmobiles have been recalled due to <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">fire hazard</a> the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, just announced. Arctic Cat is located in Thief River Falls, Minnesota.<br /><br />Oil can leak into the engine compartment, posing a fire hazard to consumers. In addition, the fuel tank can come into contact with the engine, posing a possibility of wearing through and fuel leakage. To date, Arctic Cat has received 33 reports of oil leaks, including eight vehicle fires. There have been no reports of fuel leakage from the tank wearing against the engine and no injuries have been reported.<br /><br />The recall involves Model Year 2009 Arctic Cat Z1 Turbo, Z1 Turbo Sno Pro and TZ1 Turbo model snowmobiles. The model name and number are displayed on the side of vehicle as well as in the registration materials/owner&rsquo;s manual.<br /><br />The recalled Arctic Cat Snowmobiles, which were manufactured in the United States, were sold from Arctic Cat dealerships nationwide from June 2008 through July 2009 and retailed for between $12,500 and $14,300.<br /><br />The <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">CPSC</a> is advising consumers to stop using the recalled Arctic Cat Snowmobiles immediately and contact their local Arctic Cat snowmobile dealer to schedule a free repair. Registered owners have been directly notified about this recall by mail. Arctic Cat can be reached toll-free at 1-800-279-6851 between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Central Time, Monday through Friday or at the firm&rsquo;s Website at www.arctic-cat.com.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Sony Recalls AC Adapters</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17203</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About 69,000 VAIO Computer AC Adapters have been recalled over an electrical shock hazard, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) just announced. Sony Electronics Inc. is located in San Diego, California.The insulation inside the recalled VAIO Computer AC Adapter can fail over time, posing an electrical shock hazard to consumers. To date, Sony has received four reports of adapters short circuiting. No incidents occurred in the United...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[About 69,000 VAIO Computer AC Adapters have been recalled over an <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">electrical shock hazard</a>, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) just announced. Sony Electronics Inc. is located in San Diego, California.<br /><br />The insulation inside the recalled VAIO Computer AC Adapter can fail over time, posing an electrical shock hazard to consumers. To date, Sony has received four reports of adapters short circuiting. No incidents occurred in the United States; no injuries have been reported.<br /><br />The recalled AC adapter model is the Sony VGP-AC19V17, which was supplied for use with the following Sony products types and product models:<br /><ul><li>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Product Type: All-in-one VAIO Desktop Computers; Product Model: VGC-LT series and VGC-JS2 series</li><li>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Product Type: VAIO Docking Stations; Product Model: VGP-PRBX1 and VGP-PRFE1</li></ul><br />The recalled Sony VAIO Computer AC Adapters was sold at the SonyStyle stores and Website, authorized electronics retailers, and authorized business-to-business dealers nationwide from September 2005 through October 2009 for between $900 and $3300 for desktop computers and $250 and $300 for docking stations.<br /><br />The recalled Sony VAIO Computer AC Adapters were manufactured in China. Of note, defective imports from China have been making headlines in recent years; this recall of defective Sony VAIO Computer AC Adapters is another of many such issues on which we have been writing.<br /><br />Also making news is the ongoing Chinese drywall disaster involving imports from that country. And, in 2008, nearly 80 percent of all product recalls in the United States involved imports from China. Products such as dog food, baby formula, toys with lead paint, and even pharmaceuticals like heparin have been found to have been made with toxic materials and other counterfeit ingredients that have long been putting United States consumers at significant risk.<br /><br />The CPSC is advising consumers to turn off their computer, unplug it, and stop using the recalled AC adapters immediately and contact Sony to arrange for a free replacement of the affected AC adapter. Sony can be reached toll-free at 1-877-361-4481 anytime, or at the firm&rsquo;s Web site at esupport.sony.com/ac19adapter.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Target Recalls Halloween Flashlights</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17204</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Halloween-themed&nbsp; flashlights sold at Target stores are being recalled today because they pose a burn hazard.&nbsp; About 610,000 Halloween flashlights are included in this recall.This recall involves two types of Halloween-themed flashlights: the mini flashlights and flashlights sold with stencils. Mini Flashlights - The mini flashlights have a key ring extending from the bottom and were sold in a pack of three colors: orange, green and...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">Halloween-themed&nbsp; flashlights</a> sold at Target stores are being recalled today because they pose a burn hazard.&nbsp; About 610,000 Halloween flashlights are included in this recall.<br /><br />This recall involves two types of Halloween-themed flashlights: the mini flashlights and flashlights sold with stencils. <br /><br /><ul><li>Mini Flashlights - The mini flashlights have a key ring extending from the bottom and were sold in a pack of three colors: orange, green and black. The orange and purple packaging has &ldquo;Mini Flashlights (3 Pack)&rdquo; printed on the front and &ldquo;DGI&rdquo;, &ldquo;Made in China&rdquo; and &ldquo;DPCI# 234-02-1813&rdquo; printed on the back. </li><li>Standard Size Flashlights - Also included in the recall are standard sized flashlights with a black handle and an orange top. The flashlights were sold with six stencils in various colors and images: a pumpkin, ghost, spider, cat, witch and skull &amp; cross-bones. &ldquo;Flashlight with Stencil&rdquo; is printed on the front and &ldquo;Tien Hsing,&rdquo; &ldquo;Made in China&rdquo; and &rdquo;234 02 1838&rdquo; is printed on the back of the packaging.</li></ul><br />The recalled Halloween flashlights were sold at Target stores nationwide from August 2009 through September 2009.&nbsp; The mini flashlights sold for $1, and the flashlights with stencils sold for $2.50.<br /><br />There have been eight reports of these flashlights overheating and melting, including one report of burns to the hand.<br /><br />Consumer should immediately stop using the flashlights and return the product to any Target store for a full refund. Consumers seeking additional information should contact Target at (800) 440-0680 between 7 a.m. and 6 p.m. CT Monday through Friday, or visit the firm&rsquo;s Web site at www.target.com.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Shock Hazard Prompts Recall of SurgeMaster Surge Protectors</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17197</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Belkin International is recalling SurgeMaster Surge Protectors because of a shock hazard.&nbsp; According to the Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC), about 68,700 SurgeMaster Surge Protectors are involved in the recall.This recall involves the SurgeMaster Surge Protector, models F9G930-10, F9G930v10, F9G930-10-W and F9G930-10-SN, all manufactured in 2003. The model number and date of manufacture are located on the underside of the unit....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Belkin International is recalling SurgeMaster Surge Protectors because of a <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">shock hazard</a>.&nbsp; According to the <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">Consumer Products Safety Commission</a> (CPSC), about 68,700 SurgeMaster Surge Protectors are involved in the recall.<br /><br />This recall involves the SurgeMaster Surge Protector, models F9G930-10, F9G930v10, F9G930-10-W and F9G930-10-SN, all manufactured in 2003. The model number and date of manufacture are located on the underside of the unit. They were sold through independent distributors nationwide and the internet by www.belkin.com from September 2003 through December 2007 for about $50.<br /><br />Grey models F9G930-10-GRY and F9G930fc10G-CL are not a part of this recall.<br /><br />According to the recall notice, the molding of the plastic 360 degree rotating plug, which allows for easy cord movement, can crack or detach from the plug assembly, posing a shock hazard to consumers.&nbsp; Belkin has received seven consumer complaints about cracking of the plug molding. No injuries were reported.<br /><br />Consumers should stop using these power strips immediately and contact Belkin for a new replacement unit. &nbsp;<br /><br />For more information,&nbsp; consumers should contact Belkin toll-free at 800-952-1465 between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. PT Monday through Friday or visit the firm&rsquo;s Web site at www.belkin.com/recall.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Blair Expands Chenille Robe Recall, More Deaths Reported</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17171</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following reports of additional deaths, Blair LLC is expanding a recall of Chenille Robes that pose a fire hazard.&nbsp; According to the Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC), the expanded recall also includes three other chenille products sold by Blair.In April 2009, Blair recalled 162,000 Chenille Robes manufactured by A-One Textile &amp; Towel, of Karachi, Pakistan, after it learned of three robes catching on fire, including one report...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Following reports of additional deaths, Blair LLC is expanding a recall of Chenille Robes that pose a <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">fire hazard</a>.&nbsp; According to the Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC), the expanded recall also includes three other chenille products sold by Blair.<br /><br />In April 2009, Blair recalled 162,000 Chenille Robes manufactured by A-One Textile &amp; Towel, of Karachi, Pakistan, after it learned of three robes catching on fire, including one report of second degree burns. Blair then received several reports of deaths allegedly due to robes catching fire. This prompted a second news release in June 2009 to again alert consumers to the burn hazard for the chenille robes. After this re-announcement, Blair received four additional reports of deaths allegedly due to the robes catching fire. Three of these victims were cooking and a fourth was tending a pellet stove; three of the four victims were in their 80s and one was in her 70s. According to the CPSC, all nine reported deaths occurred prior to the April 2009 announcement of the recall.<br /><br />Blair has also received one report involving one of the additional chenille garments included in the expanded recall catching fire; no injuries have been reported related to these garments. Because of this report, Blair decided to expand the recall to include all women&rsquo;s chenille wearing apparel manufactured by A-One Textile &amp; Towel.<br /><br />The expanded recall includes an additional 138,000 units.&nbsp; The following products are included in Blair's expanded recall:<br /><br /><ul><li>Full Length Women's Chenille Robe: One-piece garment made of plush sculpted chenille. The robe has a shaped stand collar, horizontal chenille front and back yolks and cuffs, a full-button front with seven matching button closures, long sleeves with self cuffs, a straight bottom with self hem, and two side seam pockets.</li><li>Women's Chenille Jacket:&nbsp; One-piece garment made of plush sculpted chenille. The jacket has three front buttons, pointed lapels, long sleeves, and two front patch pockets.</li><li>Women's Chenille Lounge Jacket: One-piece garment made of plush sculpted chenille. The jacket has a shaped stand collar, and horizontal chenille front and back yolks and cuffs, a full-button front with five matching button closures, long sleeves with self cuffs, a straight bottom with self hem, and two side seam pockets.</li><li>Women's Chenille Top:&nbsp; One-piece, pullover garment made of plush sculpted chenille. The top has a rounded neckline, long sleeves, a straight bottom with side vents, and ribbed binding at the neckline and cuffs.</li></ul><br />A list of colors and item numbers for these products can be found <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml10/10017.html">here</a>.&nbsp;&nbsp; The recalled items were sold through Blair catalogs and Web site, and Blair stores in Warren, Pa., Grove City, Pa., and Wilmington, Del., from July, 2000, through April, 2007.<br /><br />Consumers are urged to stop wearing the garments immediately. Contact Blair LLC for information on returning the products and to receive a refund or a $50 gift card for Blair merchandise&nbsp; For more information, call Blair toll-free at (877) 392-7095 between 9 a.m. and 9 p.m. ET Monday through Saturday, visit the firm&rsquo;s Web site at www.blair.com/recall, or contact the firm by e-mail at blairproductrecall@blair.com.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Bad Boy Buggy Off-Road Utility Vehicles Recalled</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17165</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About 3,900 Classic Buggies manufactured by Bad Boy Enterprises LLC, of Natchez, Mississippi have been recalled the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), just announced. The off-road utility vehicles were recalled due to crash hazard.The Bad Boy Classic Buggies can accelerate without warning, posing a risk of injury to the user and/or bystander. To date, Bad Boy Enterprises has received 32 reports of unexpected acceleration, including...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[About 3,900 Classic Buggies manufactured by Bad Boy Enterprises LLC, of Natchez, Mississippi have been recalled the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), just announced. The off-road utility vehicles were recalled due to <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">crash hazard</a>.<br /><br />The Bad Boy Classic Buggies can accelerate without warning, posing a risk of injury to the user and/or bystander. To date, Bad Boy Enterprises has received 32 reports of unexpected acceleration, including reports of injuries such as a fractured toe, a rotator cuff injury, and sore muscles.<br /><br />This recall involves Bad Boy Buggy Standard model off-road utility vehicles. The Bad Boy Buggy Standard model has one row seat that allows two persons&mdash;driver and passenger&mdash;to sit side-by-side while the vehicle is operated. The Standard model is equipped as an open-air design&mdash;no doors or windows&mdash;and does have a roof. The Bad Boy Buggy Standard models come in Realtree camouflage pattern, Hardwoods camouflage pattern, and hunter green, red, and black colors. The affected models have serial numbers between 85004828 and 95010404. The serial number is located on a sticker in a cubby on the driver&rsquo;s side.<br /><br />The recalled Bad Boy Buggies, which were manufactured in the United States, were sold by authorized dealers nationwide from June 2007 through July 2009 and retailed for about $10,000.<br /><br />The <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">CPSC</a> is advising consumers to immediately stop using the recalled Bad Boy Buggies and contact their Bad Boy Buggy dealer for a free repair. Bad Boy Enterprises can be reached toll-free at 1-866-678-6701 between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Central Time,&nbsp; Monday through Friday, or at the firm&rsquo;s Web site at www.badboyenterprises.com<br /><br />Off-highway and off-road vehicles are involved in hundreds of accidents every year and we have been following this issue for some time. Recently, the Wall Street Journal reported that the CPSC has recommended it set mandatory rules to &ldquo;regulate recreational off-highway vehicles.&rdquo;<br /><br />The move anticipates regulators stepping up some consumer safety issues under President Obama, who has called for increased consumer protections since he was sworn into office. The five agency commissioners, who just received a written recommendation, are mandated to now propose a rulemaking, which must be in place prior to rule implementation, said the Journal.<br /><br />Poor design and regulation have both been blamed for the rising accident and fatality toll on these types of vehicles and include rider injury and death due to speed, the large size of the vehicles, and their propensity to rollover, among other cited problems said Reuters recently. And, while advocates blame industry and government, industry argues that consumers are operating the vehicles recklessly and the vehicles are safe when used properly.<br /><br />Not so in this case, at least, given the Bad Boy Buggys&rsquo; defective and unexpected acceleration.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Haunted House Candle Holders Sold by Yankee Candle Recalled</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17166</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About 7,800 Haunted House Candle Holders are being recalled today by Coyne&rsquo;s &amp; Company, of Minneapolis, Minn.&nbsp; The Haunted House Candle Holders were sold by Yankee Candle.According to the Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC), window panes on the candle holder screen can ignite, posing a fire hazard.&nbsp; Coyne &amp; Company has received three reports of the window pane catching fire. No injuries have been reported.This...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[About 7,800 <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">Haunted House Candle Holders</a> are being recalled today by Coyne&rsquo;s &amp; Company, of Minneapolis, Minn.&nbsp; The Haunted House Candle Holders were sold by Yankee Candle.<br /><br />According to the <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">Consumer Products Safety Commission</a> (CPSC), window panes on the candle holder screen can ignite, posing a fire hazard.&nbsp; Coyne &amp; Company has received three reports of the window pane catching fire. No injuries have been reported.<br /><br />This recall involves haunted house screen tea light holders made of black metal with a transparent coating on the glass windows. The haunted house measures 15-inches wide by 15-inches high by 4-inches deep and can hold up to six tea lights. Tea light candles are not involved in this recall.&nbsp; They were sold at Yankee Candle stores nationwide and online at YankeeCandle.com between August 2009 and September 2009 for about $25.<br /><br />Consumers should immediately stop using the candle holders and contact Coyne&rsquo;s &amp; Company or Yankee Candle for a full refund.&nbsp; For more information, contact Coyne&rsquo;s &amp; Co. at (800) 336-8666 between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. CT Monday through Thursday or visit the firm&rsquo;s Web site at www.coynes.com. Consumers can also email the firm at custserv@coynes.com.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Idea Village Wireless Light Switches Recalled for Fire Hazard</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17167</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About 1.3 million Handy Switch Wireless Light Switches distributed by Idea Village Products Corp., of Wayne&mdash;formerly of Fairfield&mdash;New Jersey, have been recalled the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) just announced.The light switch receiver, which fits into a wall outlet, can overheat and pose a fire hazard to consumers. To date, the firm has received 14 reports of overheating, including nine reports of fire, five of...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[About 1.3 million <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">Handy Switch Wireless Light Switches</a> distributed by Idea Village Products Corp., of Wayne&mdash;formerly of Fairfield&mdash;New Jersey, have been recalled the U.S. <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">Consumer Product Safety Commission</a> (CPSC) just announced.<br /><br />The light switch receiver, which fits into a wall outlet, can overheat and pose a fire hazard to consumers. To date, the firm has received 14 reports of overheating, including nine reports of fire, five of which involved property damage such as minor damage to curtains, bedding or walls.<br /><br />The recalled Handy Switch is a white plastic wireless remote light switch with model number KS-080 printed on the back of the receiver. A blue electroluminescent nightlight is on the front of the receiver.<br /><br />The recalled Handy Switch Wireless Light Switches were sold at mass merchandisers and drug store chains nationwide, and were also marketed and sold through television infomercials and the Internet from March 2007 through July 2009 for between $10 and $15.<br /><br />The recalled wireless Handy Switch was manufactured in China. Of note, defective imports from China have been making headlines in recent years; this recall of defective wireless Handy Switch Light Switches is just one of many such issues.<br /><br />Also making news is the ongoing Chinese drywall disaster involving imports from that country. And, in 2008, nearly 80 percent of all product recalls in the United States involved imports from China. Products such as dog food, baby formula, toys with lead paint, and even pharmaceuticals like heparin have been found to have been made with toxic materials and other counterfeit ingredients that have long been putting United States consumers at significant risk.<br /><br />The CPSC is advising consumers to immediately unplug and stop using the recalled Handy Switch Light Switch and contact IdeaVillage to learn about free remedy options. Idea Village can be reached toll-free at 1-888-655-4339 between 5:00 am and 6:00 pm Pacific Time, Monday through Friday, or at the firm's Web site at www.handyswitchrecall.com.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Rotating Sports Table Lamps Recalled for Fire, Burn Hazard</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17156</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About 145 Rotating Sports-Themed Table Lamps have been recalled by Wincraft Inc. due to fire, burn, and shock hazards, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) just announced. Wincraft Inc. is located in Winona, Minnesota.Although no injuries or incidents have been reported, an electrical problem with the lamps can pose fire, burn and shock hazards to consumers, the CPSC warned.The recalled Rotating Sports Themed Table Lamps feature...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About 145<a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability"> Rotating Sports-Themed Table Lamps</a> have been recalled by Wincraft Inc. due to fire, burn, and shock hazards, the <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission</a> (CPSC) just announced. Wincraft Inc. is located in Winona, Minnesota.</p><p>Although no injuries or incidents have been reported, an electrical problem with the lamps can pose fire, burn and shock hazards to consumers, the CPSC warned.</p><p>The recalled Rotating Sports Themed Table Lamps feature logos from a professional or college sports team and rotate 360 degrees so that the logo can be easily seen. Lamps feature team logos from the NFL, MLB, NBA, NHL, NCAA, and NASCAR and have a black base with a light. The lamps measure about six inches wide and 13 inches high.</p><p>The lamps, which were manufactured in China, were sold at sports memorabilia and other specialty stores during August 2009 for about $40.</p><p>Defective imports from China have been making headlines in recent years; this recall of defective lamps is just one of many such issues. Also making news is the ongoing Chinese drywall disaster involving imports from that country. And, in 2008, nearly 80 percent of all product recalls in the United States involved imports from China. Products such as dog food, baby formula, toys with lead paint, and even pharmaceuticals like heparin have been found to have been made with toxic materials and other counterfeit ingredients that have long been putting United States consumers at significant risk.</p><p>The CPSC is advising consumers to immediately stop using the recalled lamps and contact Wincraft for instructions on how to receive a free replacement lamp. Wincraft is directly contacting consumers who purchased the lamps. Wincraft can be reached toll-free at 1-800-533-8006 between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday; at the firm&rsquo;s Web site at www.wincraft.com; or by email at sseverson@wincraft.com<br /><br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Quantum Office Chairs Recalled Due to Fall Hazard</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17145</link>		
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Raynor Marketing has recalled About 150,000 Quantum Realspace PRO&trade; 9000 Series Mid-Back Multifunction Mesh Chairs and Multifunction Mesh Chairs with Headrests due to fall hazard, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) just announced. Raynor Marketing Limited is located in West Hempstead, New York.The bolts attaching the seatback on the recalled Quantum Realspace PRO&trade; 9000 Series Mid-Back Multifunction Mesh Chair and...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Raynor Marketing has recalled About 150,000 Quantum Realspace PRO&trade; 9000 Series Mid-Back Multifunction Mesh Chairs and Multifunction Mesh Chairs with Headrests due to <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">fall hazard</a>, the U.S. <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">Consumer Product Safety Commission</a> (CPSC) just announced. Raynor Marketing Limited is located in West Hempstead, New York.<br /><br />The bolts attaching the seatback on the recalled Quantum Realspace PRO&trade; 9000 Series Mid-Back Multifunction Mesh Chair and Multifunction Mesh Chair with Headrest can loosen and detach, posing a fall and injury hazard to consumers. To date, Raynor has received reports of 33 seatback detachments and 14 injuries involving bumps and bruises.<br /><br />This recall involves the Quantum Realspace PRO&trade; 9000 Series Mid-Back Multifunction Mesh Chair SKU # 510830 and the Quantum Realspace PRO&trade; 9000 Series Mesh Chair with Headrest SKU # 690690. The Realspace PRO&trade; Mesh Guest Chair is not involved in this recall. The recalled office chairs were sold exclusively at Office Depot stores nationwide and on the Web at www.OfficeDepot.com from May 2006 through August 2009. The Quantum Realspace PRO&trade; 9000 Series Mid-Back Multifunction Mesh Chair sold for about $300 and the Multifunction Mesh Chair with Headrest sold for about $350.<br /><br />The recalled Quantum chairs were manufactured in China by Comfort Office Furniture, LTD also known as Evergood Co. Ltd.<br /><br />Defective imports from China have been making headlines in recent years; this recall of defective office equipment is just one of many such issues. Also making news is the ongoing Chinese drywall disaster involving imports from that country. And, in 2008, nearly 80 percent of all product recalls in the United States involved imports from China. Products such as dog food, baby formula, toys with lead paint, and even pharmaceuticals like heparin have been found to have been made with toxic materials and other counterfeit ingredients that have long been putting United States consumers at significant risk.<br /><br />The CPSC is advising consumers to immediately stop using the recalled office chairs and contact Raynor to receive a free repair kit. For additional information and to receive a free repair kit, Raynor can be reached toll-free at 1-866- 244-8180 between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time. Monday through Friday or at the firm's Web site at www.Quantumchair.com/recall.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Divers Death Leads to Diving Suit Hose Recall</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17148</link>		
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About 65,000 Diving Air Hoses for Dry Suits have been recalled by SI Tech AB, of Brastad, Sweden, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) just announced. The suits&rsquo; hose contains an insert that can dislodge during diving and restrict airflow to the diver, posing a drowning hazard.To date, SI Tech has received six reports of hose inserts dislodging, including one that was involved in the death of a diver in Los Angeles,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[About 65,000 <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">Diving Air Hoses for Dry Suits </a>have been recalled by SI Tech AB, of Brastad, Sweden, the U.S. <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">Consumer Product Safety Commission</a> (CPSC) just announced. The suits&rsquo; hose contains an insert that can dislodge during diving and restrict airflow to the diver, posing a drowning hazard.<br /><br />To date, SI Tech has received six reports of hose inserts dislodging, including one that was involved in the death of a diver in Los Angeles, California.<br /><br />This recall involves a dry suit inflation hose that connects a diver&rsquo;s dry suit to the air supply and allows for the pumping of air into the suit to set up a positive pressure arrangement to help keep the suit watertight. The hose contains an airflow-restricting insert that may be black, blue, or green in color. The batch code is stamped on the threaded metal end of the hose. The hoses were sold with dry suits and were also sold separately.<br /><br />The CPSC reported that SI Tech can be contacted directly for a list of batch codes included in this recall and can be reached via its Website at www.sitech.se, toll-free and any time at 1-877-348-3529, and by email at recall@sitech.se<br /><br />The defective Diving Air Hose for Dry Suits were sold at diving equipment retailers and distributors nationwide from July 2006 through February 2009 for about $45.<br /><br />The CPSC is advising consumers to immediately stop using diving equipment that contains the recalled low-pressure inflation hoses and contact SI Tech for the location of an authorized dealer for a free repair, which involves removal of the hose insert, or to receive instructions on how to repair the hose.<br /><br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>iPod Fire Reports Prompt CPSC Probe</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17127</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reports of Apple iPods overheating and catching fire have caught the attention of the Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC).&nbsp; According to a&nbsp; report on KPHO-TV, the commission is investigating 18 such iPod incidents.The 18 cases being investigated by the CPSC include: &bull;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;In 2002, an iPod in a 14-year-old Michigan boy's bedroom set off a smoke alarm in the middle of the night.&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;In 2006,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Reports of <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">Apple iPods overheating and catching fire</a> have caught the attention of the Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC).&nbsp; According to a&nbsp; report on KPHO-TV, the commission is investigating 18 such iPod incidents.<br /><br />The 18 cases being investigated by the <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">CPSC</a> include: <br /><br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;In 2002, an iPod in a 14-year-old Michigan boy's bedroom set off a smoke alarm in the middle of the night.<br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;In 2006, an iPod started smoking and sparking in the middle of the night at one Illinois residence. It was so hot that it burned the stereo it was sitting on.<br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;In 2007, a 4-inch flame shot out of an iPod while it was charging in Washington, D.C.<br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Also in 2007, a man's shirt caught fire in Atlanta when the iPod in his pocket overheated.<br /><br />According to KPHO-TV, other iPod fires have been reported in New York, Washington state and Portland, Ore.&nbsp; The station's investigative reporter uncovered many cases of iPods, iPod Touches and iPhones overheating, catching fire and, in some cases, exploding.&nbsp; Some of these incidents resulted in bodily injuries.<br /><br />KPHO also reported that lithium batteries appeared to be behind the iPod fires.&nbsp;&nbsp; As we reported previously, in October 2008, Sony recalled thousands of lithium batteries used in used in Hewlett-Packard, Toshiba and Dell laptop computers because they could overheat and cause a fire hazard.<br /><br />Several consumers who claim to have experienced iPod fires told KPHO that Apple's response to their complaints was less than adequate.&nbsp; Apples responded to the KPHO investigation with the following statement:<br /><br />&quot;iPods are incredibly well designed and safety is the highest priority for Apple. The number of confirmed incidents of batteries overheating is less that 0.0001 percent of all iPods sold, which is an incredibly small percentage and none of those incidents caused serious injury or serious property damage. If a customer has any concerns about their battery they should contact AppleCare.&quot; <br /><br />This isn't the first time we've heard of Apple iPod fires.&nbsp; In August 2008, we reported that Japanese officials said they were investigating several reported iPod Nano fires in that country. In all of the fires, the iPods began to overheat while they were being recharged.&nbsp; Apple blamed the fires on defective batteries from a single supplier.&nbsp; That same month, Apple offered to replace lithium batteries in some of its iPod Nano devices following reports that they had caught fire while charging.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Mattel Agrees to Toy Recall Settlement</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17128</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mattel Inc. has agreed to settle virtually all claims related to its massive 2007 toy recalls.&nbsp; According to the Associated Press, if the Mattel class-action settlement is approved by the court, it could end up costing the company upwards of $50 million. &nbsp;As we've previously reported, Mattel and its Fisher-Price Division issued six separate recalls of lead-tainted toys in 2007.&nbsp; In total, around 2 million toys were recalled.&nbsp;...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Mattel Inc. has agreed to settle virtually all claims related to its <a href="http://www.toyinjuries.com/">massive 2007 toy recalls</a>.&nbsp; According to the Associated Press, if the Mattel class-action settlement is approved by the court, it could end up costing the company upwards of $50 million. &nbsp;<br /><br />As we've previously reported, Mattel and its Fisher-Price Division issued six separate recalls of lead-tainted toys in 2007.&nbsp; In total, around 2 million toys were recalled.&nbsp; The recalls included popular Sesame Street toys, Dora the Explorer and Diego toys made by Fisher-Price, as well as Mattel toys, such as Batman, Polly Pocket, Barbie accessories, and Sarge cars.<br /><br />The US banned lead from paint used on toys in 1978, but as companies&nbsp; moved more of their toy manufacturing operations overseas to places like China, lead exposure from toys once again became a problem. Foreign factories are under a great deal of pressure to produce goods at the lowest cost possible, a situation that causes many of these manufacturers to use cheaper materials, such as lead paint.&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />The unprecedented number of toy recalls issued in 2007 - dozens of companies and 21 millions toys were involved - prompted the U.S. Congress to pass a new law - the CPSIA- which set strict limits for lead, lead paint and phthalates in children's products.&nbsp; According to the Associated Press, the law mandates third party testing for companies making products for children under 12.&nbsp; However, as we reported previously, the <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">Consumer Products Safety Commission</a> has quietly exempted Mattel from the testing requirement and is allowing the toymaker to use its own testing labs.<br /><br />According to the Associated Press, the Mattel toy settlement would resolve 22 lawsuits against the company.&nbsp; The terms of the settlement would:<br /><br /><ul><li>Provide toy buyers who are part of the class-action lawsuit either 50 percent of the total amount of vouchers Mattel has sent out following the recalls or $10, whichever is greater.</li><li>Provide consumers&nbsp; who didn't participate in the recalls but have a recalled toy or proof of purchase of a recalled toy with a check or a voucher in the amount of the toy.</li><li>Provide those who declare they bought or acquired a recalled toy but destroyed it after the recall with a voucher for the amount of the toy for up to three toys, totaling up to $10 million for the class.</li><li>Provide consumers who bought or acquired some recalled toys in which only one standalone piece of the toy was affected with refunds up to $12.</li><li>Allow members of the settlement to recover all out-of-pocket expenses incurred for lead testing, up to $600,000 for the class.</li><li>Require Mattel to create a quality assurance program, overseen by the court, and donate $275,000 to the National Association of Children's Hospitals and Related Institutions, a not-for-profit group of 150 children's hospitals and pediatric units.</li></ul><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>5,000 Schwalbe Ultremo R Bicycle Tires Recalled</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17132</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About 5, 000 Schwalbe Ultremo R Bicycle Tires have been recalled because of a fall hazard.&nbsp; According to the Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC), the bicycle tires were manufactured by Ralf Bohle GmbH, of Germany, and imported by Moser Enterprises, of Canada.The recalled bicycle tires were sold by bicycle specialty stores and on the Web at www.schwalbetires.com from April 2009 through May 2009 for about $75.&nbsp;...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[About 5, 000 Schwalbe Ultremo R Bicycle Tires have been recalled because of a <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">fall hazard</a>.&nbsp; According to the Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC), the bicycle tires were manufactured by Ralf Bohle GmbH, of Germany, and imported by Moser Enterprises, of Canada.<br /><br />The recalled bicycle tires were sold by bicycle specialty stores and on the Web at www.schwalbetires.com from April 2009 through May 2009 for about $75.&nbsp; &ldquo;Schwalbe&rdquo; and &ldquo;Ultremo R&rdquo; are printed on the sidewall of the tires.<br /><br />According to the <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml10/10009.html">recall notice</a>, the tire layers could separate causing the inner tube to rupture, posing a fall hazard to consumers.&nbsp; No injuries or accidents have been reported in relation to this defect.<br /><br />Consumers should immediately stop using bicycles with the recalled tires and contact their local bicycle dealer for a free replacement set of tires.&nbsp; For more information, contact Moser Enterprises toll-free at (888) 700-5860 between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. PT Monday through Friday, or visit the firm&rsquo;s Web site at www.schwalbetires.com.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>More Fords Recalled Over Cruise Control Switch, Fire Hazard</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17119</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ford Motor Co. is recalling another 4.5 million vehicles over a faulty cruise control switch that can cause a fire.&nbsp; According to CNN.com, this Ford recall is the eighth since 1999 involving the defective cruise control switch.&nbsp; So far, a total of 16 million vehicles have been affected.The Ford vehicles involved in this recall include:1992-2003 Econoline vans2000-2003 Excursion sport utility vehicles1995-2002 Explorer SUVs1993-1997 and...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ford Motor Co. is recalling another 4.5 million vehicles over a <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/Ford_Cruise_Control_Switch">faulty cruise control switch</a> that can cause a fire.&nbsp; According to CNN.com, this Ford recall is the eighth since 1999 involving the defective cruise control switch.&nbsp; So far, a total of 16 million vehicles have been affected.<br /><br />The Ford vehicles involved in this recall include:<br /><br />1992-2003 Econoline vans<br />2000-2003 Excursion sport utility vehicles<br />1995-2002 Explorer SUVs<br />1993-1997 and 1999-2003 F-Series Super Duty pickup trucks<br />1994 F53 motor-home chassis<br />1995-1997 and 2001-2003 Ranger pickups<br />1995-2003 Windstar minivans<br />1995-2002 Mercury Mountaineer SUVs.<br /><br />According to the <a href="http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/">National Highway Transportation Safety Administration</a> (NHTSA), the cruise-control switch, made by Texas Instruments Inc., can leak hydraulic fluid and then overheat, smoke or burn.&nbsp;&nbsp; According to a letter Ford sent to the NHTSA on October 9, the risk of fire is greatest for the Windstar.&nbsp; The other vehicles being recalled&nbsp; don't pose an &quot;unreasonable risk to safety,&quot; but do have the&nbsp; Texas Instrument switch.&nbsp; A spokesperson for the automaker told CNN they were being recalled to &quot;reassure customers and prevent future recalls.&quot;<br /><br />According to CNN, the NHTSA is advising Ford drivers to look for warnings of possible imminent fires, including malfunctioning cruise control systems and brake lights and antilock braking system and brake light warnings on the dashboard. Difficulty in getting the vehicle out of the park mode should also be treated as a warning.<br /><br />Over the past ten years, Ford has issued six recalls of cars and trucks with cruise control switches that can&nbsp; develop a short circuit and spark a raging fire, usually when the car is parked and unattended. The faulty cruise control switch was also suspected as the cause of several house fires. At least three wrongful death suits have been filed as a result of such fires.<br /><br />Some of the&nbsp; Ford vehicles that have been recalled since 1999 include 1993-2004 Ford F150 trucks, 1994-2002 F250 through F550 Super Duty trucks with gasoline engines, and 1998-2001 Ford Explorer and Mercury Mountaineer SUVs, all of which were among the best-selling vehicles in the nation during those years.&nbsp; In February 2008, Ford issued a seventh recall of&nbsp; about 225,000 vehicles that had already been repaired because some wiring harnesses appeared to be defective.<br /><br />Ford will begin notifying owners of the latest recall on October 26. Owners will be instructed to bring their vehicles to a Ford or Lincoln/Mercury dealer for installation of a fused wiring harness to eliminate the potential risk of fire<br /><br />For additional information, owners may contact Ford at 1-800-392-3673 or NTHSA's vehicle safety hotline at 1-888-327-4236 or visit http://www.safercar.gov.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>New Standards Wanted for Yamaha Rhino, Other ROVs</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17126</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Off-highway and off-road vehicles are involved in hundreds of accidents every year and we have been following this issue for some time. Now, the Wall Street Journal is reporting that the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is recommending it set mandatory rules to &ldquo;regulate recreational off-highway vehicles,&rdquo; such as the Yamaha Rhino.The move anticipates regulators stepping up some consumer safety issues under President...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Off-highway and off-road vehicles are involved in hundreds of accidents every year and we have been following this issue for some time. Now, the Wall Street Journal is reporting that the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is recommending it set mandatory rules to &ldquo;regulate recreational off-highway vehicles,&rdquo; such as the <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/Yamaha-Rhino-Recall">Yamaha Rhino</a>.<br /><br />The move anticipates regulators stepping up some consumer safety issues under President Obama, who has called for increased consumer protections since he was sworn into office. The five agency commissioners, who just received a written recommendation, are mandated to now propose a rulemaking, which must be in place prior to rule implementation, said the Journal. A vote on the rulemaking could take place as early as next Wednesday.<br /><br />Off-highway vehicles, or ROVs, are typically outfitted with at least four low-pressure tires and seat at least one person, said the Journal. ROVs are generally meant for recreation and are new to the market but have been a huge seller with over 416,000 in use at year-end 2008, said the Journal. In 2003, less than 45,000 ROVs were in use. With the rise in sales, however, came a correlative increase in ROV accidents with 181 taking place since 2003 and until this August with 152 injuries and 116 fatalities, said the Journal, citing <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">CPSC</a> data.<br /><br />Of concern is that ROVs are not required to follow the same safety standards that are in place for ATVs&mdash;all-terrain vehicles&mdash;which have been on the market longer, said the Journal, due to some specific differences in the design of the two vehicle types. But even ATVs with their more stringent safety standards still have their problems and can be very dangerous vehicles, even in the best of circumstances. According to data collected by the CPSC, ATVs killed more than 500 people in 2006 and of those victims, nearly one in five was a child. In addition to ATV deaths, accidents involving these vehicles sent 146,600 people to hospital emergency rooms that same year. <br /><br />ATV standards, which were previously voluntary, became mandatory in 2009 following implementation of the recent broad federal product safety law, said Reuters. The law focused on children&rsquo;s toys and products among other popular items. While most products follow industry standard guidelines, which are voluntary, the CPSC will mandate standards for those products the have proven to create significant hazards to consumers, explained Reuters. By mandating these standards, regulators can respond to issues such as recalls, quicker.<br /><br />Poor design and regulation have both been blamed for the rising toll on ROV rider injury and death with speed, the large size of the vehicles, and their propensity to rollovers, among cited problems said Reuters. And, while advocates blame industry and government, industry argues that consumers are operating the vehicles recklessly and the vehicles are safe when used properly.<br /><br />Recreational vehicles, such as the Yamaha Rhino, have been linked to a high number of accident and death reports, as well as the high number of product liability suits. Critics allege the Yamaha Rhino is even more likely to be involved in deadly rollover accidents, saying that the Rhino is top heavy, and has tires that are extremely narrow. Allegedly, these design defects make it far more likely that the Yamaha Rhino will tip and rollover while going through a turn, even when the vehicle is traveling at a slow speed and is on a flat surface. These critics also charge Yamaha Rhino is designed in such a way that passengers&rsquo; legs are unprotected in the event of a rollover accident. Over 100,000 Rhinos have been recalled over design defect issues.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Daiso Wooden Toys Recalled for Choking Hazard</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17095</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daiso has issued another recall of more defective toys. This time, about 430 Daiso Wooden Toys are being recalled over a choking hazard, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced. Daiso California LLC is located in Burlingame, California.The Daiso Wooden Toys have small parts that can break and detach, posing a choking hazard to young children. To date, no incidents or injuries have been reported.This recent recall involves...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Daiso has issued another recall of more <a href="http://www.toyinjuries.com/">defective toys</a>. This time, about 430 Daiso Wooden Toys are being recalled over a choking hazard, the U.S. <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">Consumer Product Safety Commission</a> (CPSC) announced. Daiso California LLC is located in Burlingame, California.<br /><br />The Daiso Wooden Toys have small parts that can break and detach, posing a choking hazard to young children. To date, no incidents or injuries have been reported.<br /><br />This recent recall involves four models of Daiso wooden toys including Penguin Handbell, Pull Doll, Alligator Pull Toy, and Rolling Animals. The Penguin Handbell has a small metal bell inside its hollow interior. The Pull Doll&rsquo;s limbs move up and down when the string is pulled. The Alligator Pull Toy is green and yellow and will move in an undulating fashion when pulled. The Rolling Animals are in the forms of a dog, rabbit, cat, and mice; the toys&rsquo; tails are connected to the bodies by metal springs. Daiso is printed on the product&rsquo;s packaging.<br /><br />The defective Daiso Wooden Toys were manufactured in China and were sold at Daiso stores in California from December 2008 through May 2009 for between $1 and $4.<br /><br />We have long been writing about the myriad problems associated with imports entering the United States from China. In recent years, imports from China have been at the center of safety worries in the United States and other countries with Chinese-made products impacting everything from medications, to toys, to consumer products, to pet food, to tooth paste. Both recent Daiso recalls involve a variety of toys made in China.<br /><br />The CPSC is advising consumers to immediately take the recalled toys away from children and contact Daiso for a free replacement toy or a full refund. Daiso can be reached toll-free at 1-888) 580-8841 between 9:30 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. Pacific Time, Monday through Friday, or at the firms&rsquo; Web site at www.daisorecall.com<br /><br />Yesterday we wrote that about 130 Children&rsquo;s Toys, Purses, and Pen Cases were recalled by Daiso due to violation of lead paint and phthalate limits. The surface paint on the balancing toys and zippers of the purses and pen cases contain excessive levels of lead, violating the federal lead paint ban. The inflatable baseball bat toys contain excessive levels of DEHP, violating the federal phthalate standard. To date, no incidents or injuries have been reported; however in the case of lead and phthalate exposure, reactions may take some time to appear.<br /><br />Exposure to lead in children can cause brain and nervous system damage, behavioral and learning problems, slowed growth, hearing problems, headaches, mental and physical retardation, and behavioral and other health problems. Lead is also known to cause cancer and reproductive harm. Once poisoned by lead, no organ system is immune. Of particular concern is the developing brain because negative influences can have long-lasting effects and can continue well into puberty and beyond. Phthalates are chemicals that enable flexibility in plastics and vinyls and which are known in laboratory testing to cause reproductive disturbances such as decreased sperm count, infertility, and reproductive tract malformation.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Pressure Washers, Air Compressor Recall Reannounced Following Reports of More Injuries</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17097</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DeVilbiss Air Power Company, of Jackson, Tennessee, has reannounced a recall of about 620,000 pressure washers and 72,000 compressors that were previously recalled in December 2006, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) just announced. The defective DeVilbiss Pressure Washers and Air Compressors were recalled due to fracture and laceration hazards; the recall has been reannounced due to additional injuries. The pressure washers and...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[DeVilbiss Air Power Company, of Jackson, Tennessee, has reannounced a recall of about 620,000 pressure washers and 72,000 compressors that were previously <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">recalled</a> in December 2006, the U.S. <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">Consumer Product Safety Commission</a> (CPSC) just announced. <br /><br />The defective DeVilbiss Pressure Washers and Air Compressors were recalled due to fracture and laceration hazards; the recall has been reannounced due to additional injuries. The pressure washers and air compressors have pneumatic tires with plastic hubs that can burst, posing fracture and laceration hazards to consumers.<br /><br />To date, DeVilbiss has received more than 100 injury reports, including hand and finger fractures and lacerations and reports of minor property damage and damage to vehicles. The December 2006 recall announcement reported more than 26 reports of injuries and can be accessed at: http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml07/07060.html<br /><br />The recalled pressures washers and air compressors were sold under the following brands and model numbers:<br /><br /><strong>Pressure Washers:<br /></strong><ul><li>Delta Brand with model numbers: DTH2450, DTH2450-1, D2750H, D2400H-2, D2400H-3, D2700K-1, DTT2450</li><li>Excell brand with model numbers: XR2750-1, XR2600, XR2600-1, XR2600-2, XR2500-1</li><li>Porter-Cable brand with model numbers: PCV2250-2, PC2525SP-1, PCE1700-3, PCH2401-1, PCK3030SP-1, PCV2500, PCH2800C, PCE1700-2, PCH2425-2</li><li>Pressure Wave brand with model numbers: PWH2500, PWH2500K</li><li>Water Driver brand with model number: WHAB2627-1</li></ul><br /><strong>Air Compressors:<br /></strong><ul><li>Porter-Cable brand with model numbers: CFFR350B-1, C3151-1, C3551-1, PTA51 Service Kit</li></ul>The pressure washers&rsquo; brand, model number and manufacturing date are located on the nameplate on the rear of the engine base. On the air compressors, the brand, model number. and manufacturing date are located on the front of the motor housing. Only pressure washers and compressors with pneumatic tires with plastic tire hubs are affected; pressure washers and compressors with solid tires or metal tire hubs are not affected.<br /><br />The recalled DeVilbiss Pressure Washers and Air Compressors were manufactured in the United States and sold at home centers and hardware stores nationwide. Recalled pressure washers were sold from January 2004 through November 2005 for between $300 and $1,400. The recalled air compressors were sold between December 2004 and October 2006 for between $300 and $500.<br /><br />The CPSC is advising consumers to stop using these products immediately and contact DeVilbiss to obtain the location of the nearest service center to receive a free replacement of the tires. DeVilbiss can be contacted toll-free at 1-866-323-9867 between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday or at the firm&rsquo;s Web site at www.devap.com.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Ocean Technology Diving Masks Recalled</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17099</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ocean Technology has recalled about 900 Guardian Full-Face Diving Masks due to visor separation hazard, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) just announced.The recalled Guardian Full-Face Masks were manufactured by Undersea Systems International Inc., which also does business as Ocean Technology Systems, of Santa Ana, California.When significant pressure is applied vertically to the top and bottom of the visor clamp, the clear...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ocean Technology has <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">recalled</a> about 900 Guardian Full-Face Diving Masks due to visor separation hazard, the <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission</a> (CPSC) just announced.<br /><br />The recalled Guardian Full-Face Masks were manufactured by Undersea Systems International Inc., which also does business as Ocean Technology Systems, of Santa Ana, California.<br /><br />When significant pressure is applied vertically to the top and bottom of the visor clamp, the clear plastic visor may dislodge causing the mask to flood. To date, Ocean Technology Systems has received three reports of visors dislodging. No injuries have been reported.<br /><br />This recall involves the Guardian Full-Face Mask, which is a scuba diving mask that incorporates the second stage regulator into the mask, allowing it to cover the diver&rsquo;s full face. The recalled Guardian Full-Face Mask was manufactured in the United States and sold for $800 at direct sales and diving equipment retailers nationwide from March 2009 through August 2009.<br /><br />The CPSC is advising consumers to immediately stop using the diving masks and contact Ocean Technology Systems to receive a free repair. Ocean Technology Systems is providing consumers stainless steel clamps to secure the plastic visor.<br /><br />For additional information, consumers can contact Ocean Technology Systems toll-free at 1-877-270-1984 anytime, or visit the firm&rsquo;s Web site at www.otscomm.com. Consumers also can email the firm at OTSrecall@otscomm.com.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Chairs Sold at Lowe's Stores Recalled</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17090</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About 84,000 Folding Director's Chairs sold at Lowe's Stores have been recalled because of&nbsp; a fall hazard. The recalled Folding Director's Chairs were made by White Tiger Traders Co. Ltd, of Taiwan and imported by L G Sourcing Inc., of North Wilkesboro, N.C.According to the recall notice, back supports on these chairs can break, posing a fall hazard to consumers. Lowe&rsquo;s and White Tiger have received 10 reports of chairs breaking. No...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[About 84,000 Folding Director's Chairs sold at Lowe's Stores have been recalled because of&nbsp; a <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">fall hazard</a>. The recalled Folding Director's Chairs were made by White Tiger Traders Co. Ltd, of Taiwan and imported by L G Sourcing Inc., of North Wilkesboro, N.C.<br /><br />According to the recall notice, back supports on these chairs can break, posing a fall hazard to consumers. Lowe&rsquo;s and White Tiger have received 10 reports of chairs breaking. No injuries have been reported.<br /><br />This recall, which is being conducted by White Tiger, involves red and blue folding director&rsquo;s chairs with white frames. &ldquo;Garden Treasures&rdquo; is printed on the chair&rsquo;s packaging. They were sold at Lowe&rsquo;s stores nationwide from June 2009 through July 2009 for about $40.<br /><br />Consumers should immediately stop using the recalled chairs and return them to any Lowe&rsquo;s store for a full refund. For additional information, contact White Tiger at (877) 251-5558 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. PT, or visit www.lowes.com.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Toyota Officially Launches Recall</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17078</link>		
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Toyota Motor Corp. has officially recalled nearly four million of its vehicles. The recall, said Detroit News, is being issued following a number of accidents and serious incidents&mdash;one involving the deaths of a California state trooper and three members of his family&mdash;over allegedly faulty floor mats.&nbsp; This is the second time since 2007 that Toyota has issued a recall over floor mats.Including the California fatalities, the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Toyota Motor Corp. has officially recalled nearly four million of its vehicles. The recall, said Detroit News, is being issued following a number of accidents and serious incidents&mdash;one involving the deaths of a California state trooper and three members of his family&mdash;over allegedly <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/defective_vehicle_parts">faulty floor mats</a>.&nbsp; This is the second time since 2007 that Toyota has issued a recall over floor mats.<br /><br />Including the California fatalities, the <a href="http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/">National Highway Transportation Safety Administration</a> (NHTSA) received 100 complaints that involve 17 crashes and five deaths, said Detroit News. One-third of those incidents involved the Lexus ES 350, the Free Press said previously. But, Toyota argues it &quot;has not determined that the vehicles ... contain a safety-related defect,&quot; quoted Detroit News, but agreed to initiate its largest United States recall saying it was &quot;willing to identify this campaign as a safety recall,&quot; according to a quote from a letter the car giant wrote to the NHTSA.<br /><br />The recall was made official following Akio Toyoda&rsquo;s&mdash;Toyota&rsquo;s recently placed president&mdash;abject apologies and seemingly heartfelt and emotional condolences last week. &quot;Four precious lives have been lost. I offer my deepest condolences&hellip;. Customers bought our cars because they thought they were the safest. But now we have given them cause for grave concern. I can't begin to express my remorse,&quot; quoted Detroit News citing press reports from Toyoda&rsquo;s announcement late last week. Just last week. the United States government issued a so-called &ldquo;urgent&rdquo; warning to consumers to remove the driver floor mats in certain vehicles, over safety issues in which the mats could jam and result in the accelerator pedal to remain open and cause a car to speed uncontrollably.<br /><br />The fatal crash involved off-duty highway patrol officer Mark Saylor (45); his wife, Cleofe (45); Mahala, their 13-year-old daughter; and Chris Lastrella (38), their brother-in-law; all four family members perished, said Detroit News. Details of the chilling accident that prompted the NHTSA to investigate the crash include the 2009 Lexus plummeting over an embankment and bursting into flames. The family was able to contact a 911 operator, saying they were unable to stop the ES 350; Lastrella advised the operator that the Lexus had no brakes. Most poignantly, the 911 tape, just made public, included the family asking one another to pray at the recording&rsquo;s end, just before their deaths, said Detroit News.<br /><br />The recall announced today includes 2007-2010 model year Toyota Camry, 2005-2010 Toyota Avalon, 2004-2009 Toyota Prius, 2005-2010 Tacoma, 2007-2010 Toyota Tundra, 2007-2010 Lexus ES350 and 2006-2010 Lexus IS250/IS350.<br /><br />Toyota spokesman, Brian Lyons, said the car maker is not planning on replacing the floor mats, but will make a &ldquo;vehicle fix,&rdquo; reported Detroit News. The fix could entail replacing the accelerator pedal or some other amendment to remove the chance of the mat jamming under the pedal, said Detroit News. Whatever the fix, Toyota is not certain when it will be in place. Lyons said, &quot;It will not just be the floor mat,&quot; reported Detroit News. Lyons would not provide details, but said &ldquo;engineering teams&rdquo; in Japan and North America are involved.<br /><br />The NHTSA said that issues related to the accidents involve unsecured mats, &ldquo;accelerator pedal configuration&rdquo; and some keyless ignition vehicle shut-off procedures, said the Detroit News.<br /><br />As we reported previously, in 2007, the automaker recalled 55,000 Camrys and Lexus ES 350s in the U.S., replacing floor mats it said could slip forward and snag the gas pedal, causing uncontrolled acceleration. At that time, the problem was implicated in eight crashes that injured 12 people.<br /><br />Had Toyota not agreed to the recall, the agency would have opened its own investigation.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Small Batteries A Risk To Children</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17081</link>		
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have been advocating stronger safety regarding a vast variety of consumer products; however, few issues are more important than the safety of our children, who are often the most seriously at risk. One of the hidden dangers in many consumer products are those small button batteries found in a wide array of products, even toys.WebMD noted that so-called &ldquo;button-type batteries are used in items such as &ldquo;vibrating teethers&rdquo; and...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[We have been advocating stronger safety regarding a vast variety of consumer products; however, few issues are more important than the safety of our children, who are often the most seriously at risk. One of the hidden dangers in many consumer products are those small <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">button batteries</a> found in a wide array of products, even toys.<br /><br />WebMD noted that so-called &ldquo;button-type batteries are used in items such as &ldquo;vibrating teethers&rdquo; and &ldquo;musical touch-and-learn baby books.&rdquo; These ubiquitous &ldquo;tiny&rdquo; batteries present serious dangers to children; however research indicates, said WebMD, that neither parents nor physicians really understand the potential and significant issues.<br /><br />Button batteries are those very small, round batteries that are no larger than the average adult thumbnail which can also be found in hearing aids, watches and calculators, and musical and voice greeting cards, in addition to many, many children&rsquo;s toys and products, according to Web MD.<br /><br />Citing a study presented at the largest meeting of ENT professionals&mdash;ENTs are physicians who specialize in the ears, nose, and throat&mdash;it seems that children ingest small disc batteries quite often by either swallowing the dangerous, tiny pieces or by stuffing them in their nasal cavities or ears, said Web MD. The researchers understand why children behave in this way and that hey can be orally fixated; the real surprise is that adults don&rsquo;t understand how dangerous the practice is to children, reported Web MD. The research looked at a decade of &ldquo;pediatric hospital case studies and related literature,&rdquo; Web MD noted.<br /><br />According to the <a href="http://www.poison.org/">National Capital Poison Center</a>, over 3,000 people swallow button batteries every year, with the majority&mdash;62 percent&mdash;representing children younger than the age of five, with most between one and two years of age, reported Web MD.<br /><br />Ingesting or inhaling these small batteries can lead to long-term health problems, said Web MD. For instance, batteries will typically exit the body with a bowel movement; however, the battery can become lodged in the body and result in &ldquo;internal bleeding, tissue burns,&rdquo; or windpipe holes, to name a few of the serious health problems, noted Web MD; voice loss or the need for feeding or breathing tubes can also occur.<br /><br />We have long written about issues with imported and domestic toys posing dangers to young children. In addition to dislodged magnets that can cause dangerous and fatal consequences, toys made with parts that can be removed pose hazardous, deadly choking and strangulation dangers to children. There are myriad dangers facing children such as lead poisoning; phthalate and bisphenol A exposure; clothing with illegal ties that can cause strangulation hazards and have led to a number of deaths; chemicals that can lead to rashes and other skin disorders; defective cribs and bassinets that have injured and killed many young children; combustible batteries; and hazardous pool drains, to name just some of the perils facing children today.<br /><br />Web MD advised that in the event of battery ingestion or inhalation&mdash;or finding that a child has placed a battery in his/her ear, the following should be contacted immediately: The National Battery Ingestion Hotline at 1-202-625-3333 (the hotline accepts collect calls) or the National Poison Control Center, toll-free, at 1-800-222-1222. Both numbers are available 24 hours a day, seven days a week.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Safety Group Wants Jeep Grand Cherokees Recalled, Cites Fuel Tank Fires</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17072</link>		
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A consumer safety group has called for a recall of Jeep Grand Cherokees, claiming that the vehicles have defective fuel tanks that are prone to causing fires.In a letter to the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA), the Center for Auto Safety said a search of the NHTSA Fatality Analysis Reporting System&nbsp; revealed that 1993-2004 Jeep Grand Cherokees were involved in 172 fatal fire crashes with 254 fatalities between...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[A consumer safety group has called for a recall of Jeep Grand Cherokees, claiming that the vehicles have <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/defective_vehicle_parts">defective fuel tanks</a> that are prone to causing fires.<br /><br />In a <a href="http://www.autosafety.org/sites/default/files/JeepGrandCherokeeDefectPetition.pdf">letter</a> to the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA), the Center for Auto Safety said a search of the NHTSA Fatality Analysis Reporting System&nbsp; revealed that 1993-2004 Jeep Grand Cherokees were involved in 172 fatal fire crashes with 254 fatalities between 1992 and 2002. With an additional known fatal fire crash in 2009, there have been at least 44 crashes with 64 fatalities where the &quot;Most Harmful Event&quot; was a fire, the group said.&nbsp; Nearly all of the fires and fatalities occurred in Grand Cherokees made before the 2005 model year.<br /><br />The Center for Auto Safety claims that the 1993-04 Grand Cherokee has a fatal crash fire occurrence rate that is about four times higher than SUVs made by other companies. The group is calling for a recall of&nbsp; all 1993-2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee with a fuel tank located behind the rear axle.&nbsp; According to the letter sent to the NHTSA, the fuel tank of the Grand Cherokee is plastic and extends below the rear bumper so there is nothing to protect the tank from a direct hit in a rollover or by a vehicle with a low front profile or one lowered by pre-impact braking. An optional Jeep skid plate to cover the gas tank and protect it during off-road driving reduces the danger, the letter said.<br /><br />The letter points out that in 2005, after Chrysler merged with Mercedes, DaimlerChrysler moved the fuel tank in board of the rear axle in 2005 and shielded it. Since the relocation of the fuel tank in 2005 and later Grand Cherokees, there has only been one fatal fire crash in the redesigned vehicle, the group said.&nbsp; That fire occurred after both occupants had been ejected in a rollover of a 2008 Grand Cherokee,&nbsp; so that the deaths were not caused by fire.&nbsp; According to the letter, &quot;the defective old Grand Cherokee has a fatal fire rate six times higher than the new Grand Cherokee.&quot;<br /><br />The Center for Auto Safety letter alleges that the design is so bad that that Chrysler frequently settles lawsuits without extensive discovery and subject to confidentiality agreements.&nbsp; It also points out that when Chrysler filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy earlier this year, the automaker tried &quot;to escape liability for all future Grand Cherokee crashes occurring after the bankruptcy where the vehicle was sold before the bankruptcy.&quot;&nbsp; Under intense public pressure,&nbsp; Chrysler relented and agreed to cover future product liability losses.&nbsp; However, according to the letter, the automaker is still refusing to accept responsibility for fatal crashes that occurred prior t the bankruptcy.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Toyota Apologizes For Fatal Crash Linked To Floor Mats</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17075</link>		
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Toyota shocked businesses and consumers with a recent announcement it made regarding the death of a family in a fatal accident that led to a massive vehicle recall. Freep.com reported that the president of Toyota Motor Corporation&mdash;Akio Toyoda&mdash;who is also the grandson of Toyota&rsquo;s founder, publicly apologized for the family&rsquo;s death in a crash that was likely the result of faulty floor mats.Toyoda said, quoted Freep.com,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Toyota shocked businesses and consumers with a recent announcement it made regarding the death of a family in a fatal accident that led to a massive vehicle recall. Freep.com reported that the president of Toyota Motor Corporation&mdash;Akio Toyoda&mdash;who is also the grandson of Toyota&rsquo;s founder, publicly apologized for the family&rsquo;s death in a crash that was likely the result of <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/defective_vehicle_parts">faulty floor mats</a>.<br /><br />Toyoda said, quoted Freep.com, that Toyota is &quot;grasping for salvation.&quot; The recall of 3.8 million Toyota and Lexus vehicles is the automaker&rsquo;s largest in United States history and is being conducted to remove floor mats, said the Detroit Free Press last week. It is believed the floor mats jammed the car&rsquo;s accelerator, which led to the fatal crash that killed a California family. Lexus is the automaker&rsquo;s luxury brand.<br /><br />Last month we reported that Toyota advised its Lexus and Toyota dealers to inspect the installation of floor mats in certain vehicles. The warning was issued following the fatal accident in San Diego, California that involved a Lexus ES 350 sedan. The accident killed a California state trooper and three of his family members.<br /><br />Speaking in Tokyo, Toyoda said, &quot;Four precious lives have been lost. I can't begin to express my remorse,&quot; quoted Freep.com. &quot;We have to listen to our customers and make better cars,&quot; he added. Toyota is the largest automaker and Toyoda&mdash;53&mdash;became president at the carmaker this June, noted Freep.com.<br /><br />Toyota and Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood are urging owners of the seven vehicle lines involved&mdash;2007-2010 Camry, 2005-2010 Avalon, 004-2009 Prius, 2005-2010 Tacoma,2007-2010 Tundra, 2007-2010 ES 350, and 2006-2010 IS 250 and IS 350&mdash;to immediately remove driver side floor mats, particularly if they are unsecured.<br /><br />According to the <a href="http://www.nhtsa.gov/">National Highway Transportation Safety Administration</a> (NHTSA), it has, to date, received reports of 102 incidents in Toyota vehicles from 2004-09 model years involving floor mats interfering with pedals. One-third of those incidents involved the Lexus ES 350, the Free Press said previously.<br /><br />This is not be the first time Toyota has recalled vehicles because of a floor mat issue. As we reported previously, in 2007, the automaker recalled 55,000 Camrys and Lexus ES 350s in the U.S., replacing floor mats it said could slip forward and snag the gas pedal, causing uncontrolled acceleration. At the time of the recall, there were some 40 complaints concerning all-weather floor-mats in certain vehicles not being secured and slipping under the acceleration pedal. The problem was implicated in eight crashes that injured 12 people.<br /><br />According to the Free Press, the NHTSA has opened 11 investigations into sudden acceleration issues at Toyota since 2003.<br /><br />Last month, Toyota requested a seal on a U.S. lawsuit filed by a former in-house attorney, said Freep.com. The attorney claimed Toyota allegedly crash data; a judge denied the request saying the lawsuit was already &ldquo;irreversibly public,&rdquo; reported Freep.com.<br /><br />Toyota is expected to face record losses of $5 billion this fiscal year, said Freep.com, over and above a $4.4 billion loss from its last fiscal year.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Halcyon Diving Equipment Recalled for Drowning Hazard</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17070</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About 20,399 units of Halcyon Diving Equipment&mdash;manufactured by Halcyon Manufacturing Inc. of High Springs, Florida&mdash;has been recalled due to drowning hazard, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) just announced.The over pressure valves (OPVs) in the diving equipment could fail, allowing the buoyancy compensator devices (BCDs) and the diver lift inflatable devices to leak, posing a drowning hazard to divers. To date no...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[About 20,399 units of Halcyon Diving Equipment&mdash;manufactured by Halcyon Manufacturing Inc. of High Springs, Florida&mdash;has been recalled due to <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">drowning hazard</a>, the U.S.<a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/"> Consumer Product Safety Commission</a> (CPSC) just announced.<br /><br />The over pressure valves (OPVs) in the diving equipment could fail, allowing the buoyancy compensator devices (BCDs) and the diver lift inflatable devices to leak, posing a drowning hazard to divers. To date no incidents or injuries have been reported.<br /><br />This recall involves Halcyon diving equipment, including the Halcyon Explorer, Eclipse, CCR35, Evolve, and Pioneer Buoyancy Compensator Devices (BCDs) and Halcyon Surface Marker Buoys (SMBs), Lift Bags, Diver Alert Markers (DAMs) Surf Shuttle, and Diver Lift Raft Inflatable Devices. &ldquo;Halcyon&rdquo; is printed on the recalled diving equipment.<br /><br />The recalled Halcyon Diving Equipment was sold at diving equipment retailers and distributors from January 2006 through December 2008 for between $350 and $450 for the BCDs and between $50 and $275 for the inflatable devices. All of the recalled Halcyon Diving Equipment was manufactured in the United States.<br /><br />The CPSC is advising consumers to immediately stop using the recalled diving equipment and return it to an authorized Halcyon distributor or dealer for a free inspection and, if necessary, free replacement of the overpressure valve spring. Halcyon can be reached, toll-free at 1-800-425-2966 between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday; at the firm's Web site at www.halcyon.net/opv-recall; or via email at techservices@halcyon.net.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>John Deere Recalls Compact Tractors</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17064</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About 90 Deere &amp; Company, of Moline, Illinois John Deere Compact Utility Tractors have been recalled for collision and injury risk, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) just announced.An incorrectly sized differential was installed in the John Deere Compact Utility Tractors&rsquo; transaxle, affecting the engagement of the differential lock and causing the tractor to turn to the left when braking. This defect causes the vehicle...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[About 90 Deere &amp; Company, of Moline, Illinois John Deere Compact Utility Tractors have been recalled for <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">collision and injury risk,</a> the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) just announced.<br /><br />An incorrectly sized differential was installed in the John Deere Compact Utility Tractors&rsquo; transaxle, affecting the engagement of the differential lock and causing the tractor to turn to the left when braking. This defect causes the vehicle to veer left when the brake is applied, which poses a risk of collision and injury to the operator and bystanders. To date, no injuries have been reported.<br /><br />The recalled John Deere Compact Utility Tractors have model numbers 3032E and 3038E painted on the side of the tractor. The serial number plate is on the tractor frame above the front wheel and to the right of the operator. The recalled John Deere Compact Utility Tractors, which were manufactured in the United States, were sold by John Deere dealers nationwide from July 2009 through August 2009 for between $13,000 and $15,000.<br /><br />The recall includes the following tractor models and serial numbers:<br /><br /><ul><li>Tractor Model: 3032E; Serial Numbers: LV3032E111981 - LV3032E111988, LV3032E111990 - LV3032E111993, LV3032E111996, LV3032E111999 - LV3032E11200, LV3032E112003 - LV3032E112019, LV3032E112022 - LV3032E112024, LV3032E112029, LV3032E112031 - LV3032E112032, LV3032E112046 - LV3032E112047, LV3032E112049, LV3032E112052, and LV3032E140285.</li><li>Tractor Model: 3038E; Serial Numbers: LV3038E111798, LV3038E111804 - LV3038E111805, LV3038E111808, LV3038E111810, LV3038E111815, LV3038E111817 - LV3038E111818, LV3038E111820 - LV3038E111823, LV3038E111825 - LV3038E111827, LV3038E111829 - LV3038E111832, LV3038E111835 - LV3038E111840, LV3038E111842, LV3038E111844 - LV3038E111850, LV3038E111853 - LV3038E111854, LV3038E111856, LV3038E111871 - LV3038E111872, LV3038E111875 - LV3038E111876, LV3038E111879 - LV3038E111881, LV3038E111883 - LV3038E111884, LV3038E111888 - LV3038E111889, LV3038E140226, and LV3038E140234.</li></ul><br />The <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">CPSC</a> is advising consumers to immediately stop using the recalled vehicles and contact a John Deere dealer to schedule a free repair. John Deere tractor dealers were notified of this recall; registered owners of the recalled tractors will be contacted directly by the firm. Deere &amp; Company can be reached toll-free at 1-800-537-8233 Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. and on Saturdays from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time, or at the firm&rsquo;s Web site at www.johndeere.com.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Toyota Set to Issue Massive Recall Over Deadly Floor Mats</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17052</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Toyota is poised to recall 3.8 million Toyota and Lexus vehicles because of defective floor mats.&nbsp; According to the Detroit Free Press, the recall will be the&nbsp; automaker's largest ever U.S. safety recall.Earlier this month, we reported that Toyota had advised its Lexus and Toyota dealers to inspect the installation of floor mats in certain vehicles.&nbsp; The warning was issued following a fatal accident in San Diego, California...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toyota is poised to recall 3.8 million Toyota and Lexus vehicles because of <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/defective_vehicle_parts">defective floor mats</a>.&nbsp; According to the Detroit Free Press, the recall will be the&nbsp; automaker's largest ever U.S. safety recall.<br /><br />Earlier this month, we reported that Toyota had advised its Lexus and Toyota dealers to inspect the installation of floor mats in certain vehicles.&nbsp; The warning was issued following a fatal accident in San Diego, California that&nbsp; may have occurred when a floor mat in a Lexus ES 350 sedan was caught in the vehicle's gas pedal, leading to an unintended acceleration.&nbsp; The accident killed a California state trooper and three of his family members.<br /><br />According to the Free Press, Toyota will be issuing the massive recall once the automaker determines how best to implement it.&nbsp; But the company and Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood are urging owners of seven vehicle lines to immediately remove driver side floor mats, particularly if they are unsecured.&nbsp; The vehicles affected by this issue are:</p><p>2007-2010 Camry<br />2005-2010 Avalon<br />2004-2009 Prius<br />2005-2010 Tacoma<br />2007-2010 Tundra<br />2007-2010 ES 350<br />2006-2010 IS 250 and IS 350</p><p>According to the <a href="http://www.nhtsa.gov/">National Highway Transportation Safety Administration</a> (NHTSA), it has received reports of 102 incidents in Toyota vehicles from 2004-09 model years involving floor mats interfering with pedals.&nbsp; A third of those incidents involved the Lexus ES 350, the Free Press said.<br /><br />This will not be the first time Toyota has recalled vehicles because of a floor mat issue.&nbsp; As we reported previously, in 2007, the automaker recalled 55,000 Camrys and Lexus ES 350s in the U.S., replacing floor mats it said could slip forward and snag the gas pedal, causing uncontrolled acceleration.&nbsp; At the time of the recall, there were some 40 complaints concerning all-weather floor-mats in certain vehicles not being secured and slipping under the acceleration pedal. The problem was implicated&nbsp; eight crashes that injured 12 people.<br /><br />According to the Free Press, the NHTSA has opened 11 investigations into sudden acceleration issues at Toyota since 2003.<br /><br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Chinese-Made Tires Often Dangerous</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17051</link>		
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have long been covering the issue of consumer products, foods, and medications imported to the United Sates from China that have made news for toxins, high lead levels, bogus ingredients, and general defectiveness. Now, MSNBC has reported that Chinese-made tires can be included in the mix.The two countries are arguing over trade tariffs for the tires, but some consumers are also concerned about tires coming from a country that has shown an...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have long been covering the issue of <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">consumer products</a>, foods, and medications imported to the United Sates from China that have made news for toxins, high lead levels, bogus ingredients, and general defectiveness. Now, MSNBC has reported that Chinese-made tires can be included in the mix.</p><p>The two countries are arguing over trade tariffs for the tires, but some consumers are also concerned about tires coming from a country that has shown an abysmal track record for product safety. MSNBC noted that tire imports from China have increased from 15 million in 2006 to 46 million in 2008, citing the United Steelworkers union. The union&mdash;which represents rubber industry workers&mdash;has accused China of unfair trade practices, saying tire imports from China have jumped this year by an astounding 57 percent based on the weight of tires brought into U.S. docks, said MSNBC.</p><p>President Barack Obama agreed with the union, ordering higher taxes on tires imported from China in the hopes of stemming some of the imports unions say have cost thousands of Americans jobs, reported MSNBC. President Obama met with President Hu Jintao of China this week to discuss a number of issues, including trade, at the United Nations for the General Assembly meeting.</p><p>We have long been writing about the myriad problems associated with imports entering the United States from China. In recent years, imports from China have been at the center of safety worries in the United States and other countries with Chinese-made products impacting everything from medications, to toys, to consumer products, to pet food, to tooth paste. Now, some consumers might be concerned tires imported from that country are defective, posing serious safety issues.</p><p>According to tests cited by MSNBC, there could be a significant difference between tires manufactured in China for prominent brands such as Goodyear or Michelin and Chinese-made and &ndash;labeled tires and private store labels. Tire manufacturers argue that &ldquo;production techniques and materials&rdquo; are no different and that Chinese-made tires are of the same quality as tires made elsewhere, said MSNBC. According to Roy Littlefield, executive vice president of the Tire Industry Association, &ldquo;The Chinese tires coming into this country for the most part have been safe tires&hellip;. All the tires have to be tested before they come here,&quot; MSNBC quoted.</p><p>But, last year, the <a href="http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> (NHTSA) investigated defective tire valve stems produced by a subsidiary of Shanghai Baolong Automotive Corp., which sold 300 million valve stems linked to one death over the product&rsquo;s susceptibility to cracking, which could deflate the tire, said MSNBC. Also, two deaths were linked to defective tires&mdash;due to tread separation&mdash;manufactured by Hangzhou Zhongce Rubber Co.; 450,000 tires were recalled for that issue, according to MSNBC.</p><p>Chinese-branded Ling Long tires, which were tested by Car and Driver magazine found that the braking distances and cornering grip were much worse for the Ling Long than other tires tested and required about 22 additional feet, similar to one and a-half car lengths, to stop from a speed of 50 miles per hour.<br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Product Liability Lawyer Defective Auto Recall Attorney</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_area/product_liability</link>		
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_area/product_liability</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every year, thousands of consumers sustain serious injuries from defective products. Parker Waichman Alonso LLP has successfully represented hundreds of plaintiffs in lawsuits against manufacturers and distributors of defective or unsafe consumer products including: automobiles, tires, electronics, appliances and household goods.&nbsp; Please choose a product liability topic below to explore the legal remedies available to your family and you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every year, thousands of consumers sustain serious injuries from defective products. Parker Waichman Alonso LLP has successfully represented hundreds of plaintiffs in lawsuits against manufacturers and distributors of defective or unsafe consumer products including: automobiles, tires, electronics, appliances and household goods.&nbsp; <strong>Please choose a product liability topic below to explore the legal remedies available to your family and you.<br /></strong></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
		
	</channel>
</rss>