<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="pixel-app" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Yourlawyer.com (Toxic Substances News)</title>
	<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_area/toxic_substances</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:25:41 -0700</pubDate>

	<generator>pixel-app</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>More Chinese Drywall Lawsuits Set for Trial</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17626</link>		
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[              Another lawsuit regarding the ongoing Chinese drywall debacle is set to begin sometime next week. The lawsuit involves four Manatee County, Florida homes, said Bradenton.com.  Taylor Woodrow Homes and Taylor Morrison Homes filed suit against Scottsdale Insurance Company on February 23 claiming Scottsdale should pay for replacing defective drywall in homes that were built in the subdivisions of Aberdeen, Crystal Lakes, Greenbrook,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[       <!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>  <o :DocumentProperties>   </o><o :Template>Normal</o>   <o :Revision>0</o>   <o :TotalTime>0</o>   <o :Pages>1</o>   <o :Words>580</o>   <o :Characters>3018</o>   <o :Lines>47</o>   <o :Paragraphs>8</o>   <o :CharactersWithSpaces>4062</o>   <o :Version>11.1287</o>    <o :OfficeDocumentSettings>   <o :AllowPNG/>  </o> </xml>< ![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>  <w :WordDocument>   </w><w :Zoom>0</w>   <w :DoNotShowRevisions/>   <w :DoNotPrintRevisions/>   <w :DisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery>0</w>   <w :DisplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery>0</w>   <w :UseMarginsForDrawingGridOrigin/>   </xml>< ![endif]-->  <!--  /* Font Definitions */ @font-face 	{font-family:"Times New Roman"; 	panose-1:0 2 2 6 3 5 4 5 2 3; 	mso-font-charset:0; 	mso-generic-font-family:auto; 	mso-font-pitch:variable; 	mso-font-signature:50331648 0 0 0 1 0;} @font-face 	{font-family:Arial; 	panose-1:0 2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2; 	mso-font-charset:0; 	mso-generic-font-family:auto; 	mso-font-pitch:variable; 	mso-font-signature:50331648 0 0 0 1 0;}  /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal 	{mso-style-parent:""; 	margin:0in; 	margin-bottom:.0001pt; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:12.0pt; 	font-family:"Times New Roman";} table.MsoNormalTable 	{mso-style-parent:""; 	font-size:10.0pt; 	font-family:"Times New Roman";} p.ParkerWaichman, li.ParkerWaichman, div.ParkerWaichman 	{mso-style-name:"Parker Waichman"; 	mso-style-update:auto; 	margin-top:0in; 	margin-right:0in; 	margin-bottom:6.0pt; 	margin-left:0in; 	mso-pagination:none; 	mso-layout-grid-align:none; 	text-autospace:none; 	font-size:12.0pt; 	font-family:Arial; 	color:black;} p.PW, li.PW, div.PW 	{mso-style-name:PW; 	mso-style-update:auto; 	margin-top:0in; 	margin-right:0in; 	margin-bottom:6.0pt; 	margin-left:0in; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:12.0pt; 	font-family:Arial; 	color:black;} @page Section1 	{size:8.5in 11.0in; 	margin:.7in .7in .7in .7in; 	mso-header-margin:.5in; 	mso-footer-margin:.5in; 	mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 	{page:Section1;} -->   <!--StartFragment-->  <p class="ParkerWaichman">Another lawsuit regarding the ongoing <a href="http://www.chinese-drywall-answers.com/">Chinese drywall debacle</a> is set to begin sometime next week. The lawsuit involves four Manatee County, Florida homes, said Bradenton.com.</p>  <p class="ParkerWaichman">Taylor Woodrow Homes and Taylor Morrison Homes filed suit against Scottsdale Insurance Company on February 23 claiming Scottsdale should pay for replacing defective drywall in homes that were built in the subdivisions of Aberdeen, Crystal Lakes, Greenbrook, and Oakley Place, said Bradenton.com. This lawsuit is just one of many hundred that have been consolidated with a federal drywall proceeding in New Orleans.</p>  <p class="ParkerWaichman">The Taylor suit alleges that the builders hired Nu Way Drywall LLC to supply and install drywall in the four Manatee homes, said Bradenton.com. In one of the cases, a homeowner sued Taylor Morrison, which then agreed to remove and replace the drywall and pay damages; remediation is about 50-percent complete, added Bradenton.com. Meanwhile, Taylor Morrison said that Scottsdale provided liability coverage to Nu Way but did not defend it in the lawsuit, despite that it was mandated to do so and was also required to cover replacement costs for drywall, said Bradenton.com.</p>  <p class="ParkerWaichman">At least 3,000 people from across the country have filed suit over defective Chinese drywall. All of the Chinese drywall lawsuits filed in federal courts have been consolidated in the US District Court in New Orleans under Judge Eldon E. Fallon as part of a multidistrict litigation. The first trial is scheduled for March 15 and involves a Louisiana family, said Bradenton.com.</p>  <p class="ParkerWaichman">We recently wrote that nine people living in homes with Chinese drywall have died from various ailments and, now, several lawmakers are demanding answers. According to a report in the New Orleans Times-Picayune, the <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/info/drywall/index.html">U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission</a> (CPSC) said death reports were among the Chinese drywall complaints it has received; however, it has not found direct scientific evidence to support a link between the deaths and the drywall. The death reports were first uncovered by the Scripps Howard News Service, which filed a freedom of information request to receive copies of 2,700 drywall complaints filed with the agency, the Times-Picayune said.</p>  <p class="ParkerWaichman">Now, said Bradenton.com, a number of federal agencies are probing the deaths and the agencies and the federal judge are expected to issues protocols for the removal and replacement of defective Chinese drywall, said Bradenton.com.</p>  <p class="PW">Since late 2008, the CPSC has received about 3,000 reports from residents in 37 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico regarding defective Chinese drywall. Gases emitted from Chinese drywall are being blamed for significant property damage, including damage to HVAC systems, smoke detectors, electrical wiring, metal plumbing components, and other household appliances. These gases also produce a sulfurous odor that permeates homes, and cause metals, including air conditioning coils and even jewelry, to corrode. People living with Chinese drywall have also suffered eye, respiratory, and sinus problems that may be linked to the gases.</p>  <p class="PW">Meanwhile, some Virginia homeowners, plaintiffs in the first federal Chinese drywall trial, recently gave testimony about the toll the disaster has taken on their lives. In that case, the plaintiffs are arguing that the only way to truly fix their homes is to gut them down to the studs. The costs calculated for remediation itself, based on bids solicited independently from two Virginia builders, averaged about $86 per square foot, or roughly $172,000 for a typical 2,000- square-foot home. Those plaintiffs are seeking $2.5 million, with about $1.2 million covering remediation, and at least another $1.3 million for damages beyond remediation.</p>  <!--EndFragment--> ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Wisconsin Law Limits BPA</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17624</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[              States; counties; and other entities, including some manufacturers, such as baby bottle makers; Canada; and the European Union, have taken matters into their own hands regarding the controversial chemical, bisphenol A&mdash;BPA&mdash;by banning the estrogenic chemical in a variety of uses and for certain demographics. Now, reports the Associated Press (AP), Wisconsin is banning BPA in some children&rsquo;s items sold in that state....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[       <!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>  <o :DocumentProperties>   </o><o :Template>Normal</o>   <o :Revision>0</o>   <o :TotalTime>0</o>   <o :Pages>1</o>   <o :Words>547</o>   <o :Characters>2847</o>   <o :Lines>44</o>   <o :Paragraphs>8</o>   <o :CharactersWithSpaces>3832</o>   <o :Version>11.1287</o>    <o :OfficeDocumentSettings>   <o :AllowPNG/>  </o> </xml>< ![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>  <w :WordDocument>   </w><w :Zoom>0</w>   <w :DoNotShowRevisions/>   <w :DoNotPrintRevisions/>   <w :DisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery>0</w>   <w :DisplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery>0</w>   <w :UseMarginsForDrawingGridOrigin/>   </xml>< ![endif]-->  <!--  /* Font Definitions */ @font-face 	{font-family:"Times New Roman"; 	panose-1:0 2 2 6 3 5 4 5 2 3; 	mso-font-charset:0; 	mso-generic-font-family:auto; 	mso-font-pitch:variable; 	mso-font-signature:50331648 0 0 0 1 0;} @font-face 	{font-family:Arial; 	panose-1:0 2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2; 	mso-font-charset:0; 	mso-generic-font-family:auto; 	mso-font-pitch:variable; 	mso-font-signature:50331648 0 0 0 1 0;}  /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal 	{mso-style-parent:""; 	margin:0in; 	margin-bottom:.0001pt; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:12.0pt; 	font-family:"Times New Roman";} table.MsoNormalTable 	{mso-style-parent:""; 	font-size:10.0pt; 	font-family:"Times New Roman";} p.PW, li.PW, div.PW 	{mso-style-name:PW; 	mso-style-update:auto; 	margin-top:0in; 	margin-right:0in; 	margin-bottom:6.0pt; 	margin-left:0in; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:12.0pt; 	font-family:Arial; 	color:black;} @page Section1 	{size:8.5in 11.0in; 	margin:.8in .9in .8in .9in; 	mso-header-margin:.5in; 	mso-footer-margin:.5in; 	mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 	{page:Section1;} -->   <!--StartFragment-->  <p class="PW">States; counties; and other entities, including some manufacturers, such as baby bottle makers; Canada; and the European Union, have taken matters into their own hands regarding the controversial chemical, bisphenol A&mdash;<a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">BPA</a>&mdash;by banning the estrogenic chemical in a variety of uses and for certain demographics. Now, reports the Associated Press (AP), Wisconsin is banning BPA in some children&rsquo;s items sold in that state. Governor Jim Doyle signed the bill into law this week, said the AP.</p>  <p class="PW">The Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Chicago bans apply to bottles and sippy cups for children aged three and younger; the Connecticut law does not have an age limit, said the AP.</p>  <p class="PW">Doyle said that as more and more states continue to place bans on the industrial chemical, more and more manufacturers will likely stop using it, as well, reported the AP. As we&rsquo;ve previously written, six key baby bottle makers&mdash;Avent, Disney First Years, Gerber, Dr. Brown, Playtex, and Evenflow&mdash;no longer use the polycarbonate plastic in the manufacturer of those products.</p>  <p class="PW">Countless established and emerging reports continue to confirm that the chemical appears to cause significant disruption to the body&rsquo;s endocrine system and has been linked to cardiovascular disease, intestinal problems, and brain cell connection interference. BPA has also been connected to increased risks of reproductive and immune system diseases and disorders; problems with liver function testing; interruptions in chemotherapy treatment; links with serious health problems; and erectile dysfunction and other sexual problems in males. In urine tests, BPA is found in the overwhelming majority of Americans, more than 93 percent and, significantly, the chemical is found in 90 percent of all newborns. &ldquo;British scientists have linked BPA to heart disease, diabetes and liver-enzyme abnormalities,&rdquo; said Reuters.</p>  <p class="PW">Industry has long argued that scientists and advocates exaggerate BPA&rsquo;s adverse effects, continually citing two industry studies; however, at last count, over 900 peer-reviewed studies found links between BPA and such effects. Also, studies have overwhelmingly found BPA to have negative effects at doses lower than current FDA standards; retention in the body longer than was previously believed; leeching into liquids being held in containers regardless of the containers&rsquo; temperature; and longer lasting damage, which some feel can be passed to future generations. Now, states; counties; and other entities, including some manufacturers; Canada; and the European Union, are taking matters into their own hands by banning the estrogenic chemical in a variety of uses and for certain demographics.</p>  <p class="PW">Recently, the <a href="http://www.fda.gov/">U.S. Food and Drug Administration</a> (FDA) reversed its position that BPA was safe for all saying it has &ldquo;some concern&rdquo; about BPA&rsquo;s effects on the brain; behavior; and prostates of fetuses, infants, and young children, said the Journal Sentinel. But, on the heels of a meeting between chemical industry lobbyists and Obama administration officials, federal regulators at the EPA are doing what seems to be a bit of a back track regarding the inclusion of BPA in its regulation of dangerous chemicals.</p>  <p class="PW">The FDA has earmarked about $30 million to fund additional studies over two years, said AP, which noted that when the Wisconsin ban becomes effective in June retail outlets and manufactures must state the targeted products are free of the chemical; wholesalers, retailers, and manufacturers could face fines and jail time if found to be in violation of the ban.</p>  <!--EndFragment--> ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Camp Lejeune Contractor Underreported Benzene</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17580</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not too long ago, we wrote that a man raised at the Camp Lejeune Marine base told lawmakers that his breast cancer resulted from contaminated base water. This was not the first time allegations were made regarding contaminated water and cancer diagnoses linked to that base. Now, the Associated Press (AP) is reporting that an environmental contractor &ldquo;dramatically underreported&rdquo; the amount of benzene, a known carcinogen, found in tap...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not too long ago, we wrote that a man raised at the Camp Lejeune Marine base told lawmakers that his breast cancer resulted from contaminated base water. This was not the first time allegations were made regarding contaminated water and cancer diagnoses linked to that base.</p> <p>Now, the Associated Press (AP) is reporting that an environmental contractor &ldquo;dramatically underreported&rdquo; the amount of <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/benzene">benzene</a>, a known carcinogen, found in tap water at the Camp and, worse, completely omitted its presence in information when the base was preparing for a federal health review, said the AP. Ten years prior, the Marine Corps was warned about the &ldquo;dangerously high&rdquo; benzene levels that originated from &ldquo;massive&rdquo; fuel tank leaks at the base, said the AP, citing studies and its review.</p> <p>Last year, we wrote that Michael Partain (42) was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2007 and, speaking to the Senate Committee on Veterans&rsquo; Affairs, pointed out that his parents were stationed at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina when he was born. No less than 40 more U.S. Marines, or sons of Marines, who lived at the Marine base have been diagnosed with breast cancer, considered relatively rare in men, said CNN previously. Partain said that when his mother was pregnant with him, his family was subjected to high levels of tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, dichloroethylene, benzene, and vinyl chloride in Camp Lejeune&rsquo;s tap water wrote CNN, previously.</p> <p>Partain is not the only one. Marines have long been citing Camp Lejeune as the origin of cancer and other illnesses in their families, pointing to water contaminated by dry cleaning solvents, said the AP, adding that accusations of a military cover-up are not new.</p> <p>Benzene was found in the Camp&rsquo;s water in 1984 at levels indicating the concentration &ldquo;far exceeds&rdquo; the federal safety limit, said the AP. In 1991, as water studies were continuing, a different contractor issued another warning to the Navy about adverse health reactions known to be linked to high benzene levels. The following year, the federal Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease, part of the Department of Health and Human Services, conducted a health risk assessment and a different&mdash;the third&mdash;contractor, the Michael Baker Corp., issued a draft feasibility report to correct the problem, reported the AP.</p> <p>Among other problems, the report changed the massive finding of 380 parts per billion (ppb) of benzene found in the water to a more reasonable 38 ppb; by the time the final report was issued, mention of benzene was completely removed, said the AP. Sadly, benzene levels have worsened and testing conducted from June 2007 to August 2009 revealed benzene levels at a horrifying 3,490 ppb, said the AP, citing a fourth contractor.</p> <p>A veteran enforcement officer at the <a href="http://www.epa.gov/">Environmental Protection Agency</a>, Kyla Bennett, who was later an ecologist and environmental attorney, looked at the various reports and concluded that it was not easy to believe that so-called &ldquo;innocent mistakes&rdquo; occurred in the documents submitted by Baker Corp. &ldquo;It is weird that it went from 380 to 38 and then it disappeared entirely,&rdquo; she said. &ldquo;It does support the contention that they did do it deliberately,&rdquo; quoted the AP.</p> 	 					 	]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Target Stops Selling Lead-Tainted Valentine Bears</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17561</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A letter from the California Attorney General has prompted Target to pull two Valentine's Day &quot;Message Bears&quot; from its shelves. &nbsp; Earlier this week, the Center for Environmental Health (CEH) announced that its tests of the &ldquo;Message Bears&rdquo; found&nbsp; high levels of lead.Lead poisoning is considered the greatest environmental health threat to children under the age of six. In children and fetuses, lead exposure can...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A letter from the California Attorney General has prompted Target to pull two Valentine's Day &quot;Message Bears&quot; from its shelves. &nbsp; Earlier this week, the <a href="http://www.ceh.org/">Center for Environmental Health</a> (CEH) announced that its tests of the &ldquo;Message Bears&rdquo; found&nbsp; high levels of lead.</p><p><a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">Lead poisoning</a> is considered the greatest environmental health threat to children under the age of six. In children and fetuses, lead exposure can cause brain and nervous system damage, behavioral and learning problems, slowed growth, hearing problems, headaches, mental and physical retardation, and behavioral and other health problems. Lead is known to cause cancer and reproductive harm and, in adults, can damage the nervous system. Experts agree that there is no safe level of lead.  Most noteworthy, children under the age of six face these great risks because their growing bodies absorb lead more easily than adult bodies do. </p><p>According to CEH,&nbsp; the inflated vinyl Valentine&rsquo;s Day love messages (eg, &ldquo;I love U&rdquo;) the &quot;Message Bears&quot; were carrying had lead levels that were nearly 10 times higher than what is allowed under federal law. Results of the CEH tests prompted California Attorney General Jerr Brown to send a letter to Target requesting a recall of the bears. A spokesperson for Target told the Associated Press that the retailer has received that letter, and is conducting an internal investigation. The officials said Target is removing the toy bears from shelves as well as hard-locking them at the registers.</p><p>The action involves two &ldquo;Message Bears.&rdquo; One is a pink stuffed bear with &ldquo;XOXO&rdquo; across the chest and the other a brown stuffed bear with &ldquo;I Love U&rdquo; across the chest, with &ldquo;love&rdquo; represented by a heart. The bears were made in China and sold exclusively by Target stores.</p>  <p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p> 	 					 	]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Study Finds Flame Retardant Chemicals May Impact Ability to Conceive</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17530</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chemicals used on&nbsp; foam furniture, electronics, fabrics, carpets, plastics and other common household products to make them flame retardant may adversely affect female fertility.&nbsp; Researchers at the University of California, Berkeley found that women with higher blood levels of PBDEs (polybrominated diphenyl ethers) were 30 to 50 percent less likely to become pregnant in any given month than women with lower levels.&nbsp; Their study...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chemicals used on&nbsp; foam furniture, electronics, fabrics, carpets, plastics and other common household products to make them flame retardant may adversely affect female fertility.&nbsp; Researchers at the University of California, Berkeley found that women with higher blood levels of <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">PBDEs (polybrominated diphenyl ethers)</a> were 30 to 50 percent less likely to become pregnant in any given month than women with lower levels.&nbsp; Their <a href="http://berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2010/01/26_fertility.shtml">study</a> was published this month in Environmental Health Perspectives.</p><p>The study was limited to women who were &ldquo;sub-fertile&rdquo; and eventually did become pregnant. The researchers surmised that had they included infertile couples in the study, it is possible that they would have seen an even stronger effect from PBDE exposure.</p><p> To determine the impact PBDE&rsquo;s might have on a woman&rsquo;s ability to conceive, researchers at Berkeley measured PBDE levels in blood samples from 223 pregnant women who took part in a study at the Center for the Health Assessment of Mothers and Children of Salinas, which looked at environmental exposures and reproduction. Among these women, concentrations of PBDEs were slightly lower than in the general U.S. population, which could be attributed to the fact that many of the women grew up in Mexico, where exposure to the chemical is more limited.</p><p>Among women who were trying to become pregnant, those with high levels of PBDE in their blood were half as likely to do so in any given month. In fact, for every tenfold increase in blood levels of PBDEs, the odds of becoming pregnant were reduced 30 percent. Even after the researchers took into account other factors, such as exposure to pesticides, irregular menstrual cycles, frequency of intercourse, weight, use of birth control pills in the year before conception, smoking, and alcohol and caffeine use, the results were the same.</p><p>PBDEs have been used in consumer products since the 1970&rsquo;s, when new fire safety standards were imposed in the U.S.&nbsp; Animal studies have found that PBDEs can harm neurodevelopment, lower thyroid hormones and change levels of sex hormones. They can leach into the environment and be stored in fat cells. Dust containing PBDE&rsquo;s has been found in homes, and studies have found that 97 percent of Americans have detectable levels of the chemicals in their blood.</p><p>Three PBDE&rsquo;s &ndash; pentaBDE, octaBDE and decaBDE &mdash; have been developed for commercial use as flame retardants. PentaBDE and octaBDE have both been banned in several states but are still in products made before 2004. Last month, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced that three major manufacturers of decaBDE will phase out this product by 2013. </p>  <p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p> 	 					 	]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Toxins from Parking Lot Sealants May Make Their Way Into House Dust</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17496</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some potentially toxic contaminants found in house dust may be coming from a type of sealant used on parking on lots and other paved surfaces. Sealcoat products are widely used in the U.S., both commercially and by homeowners on their driveways. The products are commonly applied to parking lots of commercial businesses (including strip malls and shopping centers); apartment and condominium complexes; churches, schools, and business parks;...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some potentially <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">toxic contaminants</a> found in house dust may be coming from a type of sealant used on parking on lots and other paved surfaces.</p><p> Sealcoat products are widely used in the U.S., both commercially and by homeowners on their driveways. The products are commonly applied to parking lots of commercial businesses (including strip malls and shopping centers); apartment and condominium complexes; churches, schools, and business parks; residential driveways; and playgrounds. The sealcoat wears off of the surface relatively rapidly, especially in areas of high traffic, and manufacturers recommend resealing every three to five years. </p><p>Two kinds of sealcoat products are widely used: coal-tar-emulsion based products and asphalt-emulsion based products. Earlier studies have suggested that coal-tar based sealcoat is more commonly used in the Midwest, the South, and on the East Coast.</p> <p>According to researchers at the U.S. Gelological Survey (USGS), elevated levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in house dust has been linked to coal-tar-based sealcoat, the black, shiny substance sprayed or painted on many parking lots, driveways, and playgrounds. PAHs are an environmental health issue because several are probable human carcinogens and they are toxic to fish and other aquatic life. In the past, several factors have been thought to affect PAH concentrations in house dust, including tobacco smoking and frequency of vacuuming. Researchers have had little success, however, demonstrating a relation between any of those factors and PAH concentrations.</p><p>&nbsp;Coal tar is a byproduct of the coking of coal, and can contain 50 percent or more PAHs by weight. Coal-tar-based pavement sealants therefore have very high levels of PAHs compared to other PAH sources (e.g., soot, vehicle emissions, used motor oil).</p><p>The USGS study found that apartments adjacent to coal-tar-sealcoated parking lots contained concentrations of PAHs in house dust with that were 25 times higher than in house dust from apartments with concrete, asphalt, or asphalt-based sealcoat parking lot surfaces. The study also found that dust directly on the coal-tar-sealcoated parking lots had PAH concentrations that were 530 times higher than in dust on the parking lots without coal-tar sealcoat. Researchers conducting the study surmised that small particles of sealcoat, which contains extremely high concentrations of PAHs, likely are tracked indoors by residents after they walk across the parking lot.</p><p>Previous research by the same group of USGS scientists, published earlier in 2009, demonstrated that dust from sealcoated parking lots in cities east of the Continental Divide had concentrations of PAHs that were about 1,000 times higher than in dust from sealcoated parking lots in cities west of the Continental Divide.</p><p><a href="http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es902533r">The study </a>is published online in Environmental Science and Technology. <br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Cadmium Found in Kids' Jewelry from China</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17482</link>		
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Parents have a new worry when it comes to toxic toys from China.&nbsp; A recent Associated Press investigation has found that much of the children's jewelry imported from that country is made with toxic cadmium.Cadmium is a known carcinogen, and can interfere with brain development in very young children. On the Centers for Disease Control&rsquo;s priority list of 275 most hazardous substances in the environment, cadmium ranks No. 7. Kids can...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Parents have a new worry when it comes to <a href="http://www.toyinjuries.com/">toxic toys</a> from China.&nbsp; A recent Associated Press investigation has found that much of the children's jewelry imported from that country is made with toxic cadmium.<br /></p><p>Cadmium is a known carcinogen, and can interfere with brain development in very young children. On the Centers for Disease Control&rsquo;s priority list of 275 most hazardous substances in the environment, cadmium ranks No. 7. Kids can ingest the cadmium in jewelry by sucking or biting it. </p>  <p>In spite of its high toxicity, there are no restrictions on cadmium content on jewelry, and the sale of these products is perfectly legal. The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 set the first explicit regulation of jewelry, but that only applies to painted toys. And despite periodic complaints about the toxin over the past couple of years, the <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">Consumer Products Safety Commission</a> (CPSC) has never issued a recall because of cadmium. <br /></p> <p>According to the Associated Press, Chinese manufacturers likely switched to using cadmium in the jewelry because they are barred from using lead. </p>All of the jewelry used in the Associated Press investigation were purchased at national and regional retail chains or franchises in New York, Ohio, Texas and California, mostly in November and December.&nbsp; The most contaminated piece analyzed contained a whopping 91 percent cadmium by weight. Other pieces of jewelry tested at 89 percent, 86 percent and 84 percent by weight. Overall, 12 percent of 103 pieces of jewelry contained at least 10 percent cadmium. <p>Some of the pieces with the highest cadmium content included bracelet charms sold at Wal-Mart, at the jewelry chain Claire&rsquo;s and at dollar stores, as well as &ldquo;The Princess and the Frog&rdquo; pendants. Other findings included the fact that the toxic cadmium shed easily from some pieces, increasing the danger to children.</p><p>According to the Associated Press, the CPSC said it would be opening an investigation into the matter immediately. Inez Tenenbaum, head of the agency, also addressed the controversy in taped remarks slated to be delivered Tuesday in Hong Kong, and urged other countries to ensure that manufacturers do not substitute cadmium, antimony or barium in place of lead in children&rsquo;s products. The Associated Press reported that Tenenbaum singled out cadmium, buts stressed that voluntary efforts to restrict its use might not be enough. 	 					 	</p><p>A day after the Associated Press published its report on cadmium tainted jewelry, a Wal-Mart spokesperson said the findings were &ldquo;troubling&rdquo;, and the retailer began pulling the items cited in the Associated Press report. <br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Ban Hydraulic Drilling in Watershed, New York City Says</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17470</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York City is calling for a ban on hydraulic fracturing in the watershed that supplies the city's drinking water.&nbsp; The Catskills watershed sets entirely in New York States' Marcellus Shale region.According to the Associated Press, New York City does not filter its water, which comes from reservoirs in the Catskills, thanks to a waiver from the federal Environmental Protection Agency. Instead, it has spent about $1.5 billion since 1997 to...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York City is calling for a ban on <a href="http://water-contamination-from-shale.com/">hydraulic fracturing</a> in the watershed that supplies the city's drinking water.&nbsp; The Catskills watershed sets entirely in New York States' Marcellus Shale region.</p><p>According to the Associated Press, New York City does not filter its water, which comes from reservoirs in the Catskills, thanks to a waiver from the federal Environmental Protection Agency. Instead, it has spent about $1.5 billion since 1997 to protect the watershed. Building a filtration plant would cost New York City around $10 billion. </p><p>Hydraulic fracturing involves injecting water, sand, and a cocktail of chemicals at high pressure into rock formations thousands of feet below the surface. This opens existing fractures in the rock and allows gas to rise through the wells. The practice makes drilling possible in areas that 10 to 20 years ago would not have been profitable. The major concern with shale gas drilling is the chemicals used in the process, and the wastewater it produces.  </p><p>Late last month, acting Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Commissioner Steven Lawitts issued a <a href="http://www.nyc.gov/html/dep/html/press_releases/09-15pr.shtml">statement</a> on the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation draft regulations for hydraulic drilling the&nbsp; saying the process posed too high a risk to the city's drinking water.&nbsp; According to the Associated Press, consultants to the DEP noted several possible risks from hydraulic fracturing in the watershed. These include damage to the city&rsquo;s water supply infrastructure, especially underground water tunnels, as well as the risk that chemicals used in the hydraulic fracturing process would seep into groundwater, and eventually make their way into the streams that feed reservoirs. </p><p>The city also faulted the state for not analyzing cumulative impacts of the industrial development necessary for drilling and not sufficiently addressing public health concerns, the Associated Press said.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Lead Paint Violation Prompts Recall Of Wooden Toys</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17455</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About 300 Wooden Skill Ball Toys distributed by Kendamaspot LLC, of Redmond, Washington have been recalled, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) just announced.The surface paint coating on the ball contains excessive levels of lead, violating the federal lead paint standard. To date, no incidents or injuries have been reported.This recall involves Oozora and Shin-Fuji Kendama Japanese wooden skill toys. The toys have a ball...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About 300 <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">Wooden Skill Ball Toys</a> distributed by Kendamaspot LLC, of Redmond, Washington have been recalled, the <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission</a> (CPSC) just announced.</p><p>The surface paint coating on the ball contains excessive levels of lead, violating the federal lead paint standard. To date, no incidents or injuries have been reported.</p><p>This recall involves Oozora and Shin-Fuji Kendama Japanese wooden skill toys. The toys have a ball connected by a string to a handle with three cups and spike on top. A Japanese Kendama Association sticker is affixed to the toy. The red and green balls on the Oozora and only the red balls on the Shin Fuji are included in the recall.</p><p>The recalled Wooden Skill Ball Toys were manufactured in Japan and sold at Kendamaspot&rsquo;s Web site and cultural festivals in Washington State from July 2008 through April 2009 for about $20.</p><p>The CPSC is advising consumers to immediately take the recalled toys away from children and contact Kendamaspot to receive a free replacement ball. Kendamaspot can be reached toll-free at 1-866-903-7795 between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time, Monday through Friday, or at the firm&rsquo;s Web site at www.kendamaspot.com</p><p>In 1978, a federal ban was put in place that prohibited toys and other children&rsquo;s articles from having more than 0.06 percent lead&mdash;by weight&mdash;in paints or surface coatings. In 2007, over six million toys were recalled because of lead; the highest number ever due to product defects. Potentially dangerous toys remained on store shelves several times during that year and by the time that year&rsquo;s holiday season hit&mdash;the busiest selling time for toy companies&mdash;the CPSC had recalled 75 brands of toys. Of those, 39 recalls were implemented due to lead exposure. As a result of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008, the regulatory limit for allowable lead was reduced to 0.009 percent on August 14, 2009.</p><p>In children and fetuses, lead exposure can cause brain and nervous system damage, behavioral and learning problems, slowed growth, hearing problems, headaches, mental and physical retardation, and behavioral and other health problems. Lead is known to cause cancer and reproductive harm and, in adults, can damage the nervous system. Once poisoned by lead, no organ system is immune. Lead poisoning is difficult to recognize because it manifests with subtle symptoms and there are no definitive indicators that point to contamination. When faced with peculiar symptoms that do not match any one particular disease, lead poisoning should be considered.<br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>FDA Misses BPA Deadline Again</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17450</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the third time this year, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will miss its own deadline on advising the public on the safety of products manufactured with the controversial chemical bisphenol A&mdash;BPA&mdash;reports the Milwaukee-Wisconsin Journal Sentinel (JSOnline). The estrogenic, industrial chemical is a polycarbonate plastic byproduct found in a large array of products.According to Michael Herndon, agency spokesman, the FDA...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the third time this year, the <a href="http://www.fda.gov/">U.S. Food and Drug Administration</a> (FDA) will miss its own deadline on advising the public on the safety of products manufactured with the controversial chemical <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">bisphenol A&mdash;BPA</a>&mdash;reports the Milwaukee-Wisconsin Journal Sentinel (JSOnline). The estrogenic, industrial chemical is a polycarbonate plastic byproduct found in a large array of products.</p><p>According to Michael Herndon, agency spokesman, the FDA will not make any decision this year, breaking its prior promise of doing so by year-end, said JSOnline, noting that the year-end promise was made after the FDA missed its November 30th deadline.</p><p>&quot;I'm extremely frustrated by the FDA delay, and I'm even more frustrated by their silence about the delay,&quot; said Janet Nudelman, policy director at the Breast Cancer Fund. &quot;Each day it further delays taking action, more newborn babies, children, and pregnant women are left unprotected from this hormone-disrupting compound linked to breast cancer and birth defects,&quot; Nudelman added, quoted JSOnline.</p><p>Developed in the 1930s as an estrogenic mimicker, BPA appears to wreak havoc on the body&rsquo;s endocrine system. In urine tests, BPA is found in the overwhelming majority of Americans, more than 93 percent. Of note, the chemical is found in 90 percent of all newborns; a significant concern given that BPA has been connected to increased risks of brain, reproductive, cardiac, and immune system diseases and disorders; problems with liver function testing; interruptions in chemotherapy treatment; and links with serious health problems. Studies have overwhelmingly found BPA to have negative effects at doses lower than current FDA standards; retention in the body longer than was previously believed; leeching into liquids being held in containers regardless of the containers&rsquo; temperature; and longer lasting damage, which some feel can be passed to future generations. Recent reports link high levels of exposure to BPA to erectile dysfunction and other sexual problems in males.</p><p>Environmental Working Group spokesman, Alex Formuzis, described BPA&rsquo;s risks as &quot;overwhelming.&quot; The group is a health advocacy organization known for conducting tests that looked at BPA exposure. &quot;We believe it's time to act,&quot; said Formuzis, quoted JSOnline.</p><p>Industry argues that scientists and advocates exaggerate BPA&rsquo;s adverse effects, continually citing two industry studies; however, at last count, over 900 peer-reviewed studies found links between BPA and such effects. The FDA has maintained BPA&rsquo;s safety, declaring the chemical safe for all usage as of August 2008, said JSOnline; however, the agency&rsquo;s science board recommended it had not looked at enough of the studies and began its review, setting the original November 30th deadline.</p><p>Previously, JSOnline reported that, based on emails it obtained, it seems the FDA&rsquo;s prior ruling was crafted, in part, by &ldquo;lobbyists for the BPA-makers.&rdquo; The agency&rsquo;s science board concluded that the apparently ignored studies pointing to BPA&rsquo;s harm. Since, FDA director Margaret Hamburg, speaking to Congress, said the agency would take a &quot;fresh look&quot; at the issue, promising an early fall decision that was moved to November 30th, then year-end, said JSOnline. The agency has not issued another deadline and is not saying if consumers should consider the chemical harmful or safe, added JSOnline.</p><p>Earlier this fall, President Obama&rsquo;s administration said it was slating $30 million to the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences to look at BPA&rsquo;s effects. Director Linda Birnbaum told JSOnline that people should find alternatives to BPA-containing products and pregnant women, infants, and children should not ingest BPA.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Natural Gas Industry Slow to Adopt Safer Drilling Methods</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17410</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The natural gas drilling industry has been slow to adopt methods that would make it environmentally safer to use hydraulic fracturing to extract gas from shale.Shale gas drilling involves injecting water, sand, and a cocktail of chemicals at high pressure into rock formations thousands of feet below the surface. This opens existing fractures in the rock and allows gas to rise through the wells. The practice makes drilling possible in areas that...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The natural gas drilling industry has been slow to adopt methods that would make it environmentally safer to use <a href="http://water-contamination-from-shale.com/">hydraulic fracturing</a> to extract gas from shale.<br /><br />Shale gas drilling involves injecting water, sand, and a cocktail of chemicals at high pressure into rock formations thousands of feet below the surface. This opens existing fractures in the rock and allows gas to rise through the wells. The practice makes drilling possible in areas that 10 to 20 years ago would not have been profitable. But the use of toxic chemicals, and the disposal of waste water produced by the hydraulic fracturing process, pose serious environmental hazards.<br /></p><p>According to a recent <a href="http://www.propublica.org/feature/underused-drilling-practices-could-avoid-pollution-1214">ProPublica</a> article, energy companies have figured out how to drill wells with fewer toxic chemicals, and enclose wastewater so it can't contaminate streams and groundwater.&nbsp; The use of &quot;green&quot; chemicals - such as mineral oil - could go a long way to improve the safety of the hydraulic fracturing process.&nbsp; Yet while a few drillers have made such a switch,&nbsp; these safer methods are not used very much in the 32 states where shale gas drilling is currently taking place. In addition, it is still too difficult to gauge how safe any given company's drilling fluid is.&nbsp; According to ProPublica, most companies still keep the exact makeup of their fluids a secret from state and federal regulators.&nbsp; There are also no laws that dictate what chemicals can be used for drilling on U.S. soil. &nbsp;<br /><br />Disposing of the wastewater from hydraulic drilling is another environmental problem that could be addressed with the adoption of safer methods.&nbsp; According to ProPublica, for the most part, waste is now collected in open, dirt-brimmed waste pits where it sits until it's hauled off to treatment facilities or injection wells.&nbsp; While it awaits removal, the toxic water can seep into the ground, or even overflow the pit when there has been heavy rain or snow.<br /><br />According to ProPublica, this hazard can be eliminated through the use of a closed loop system, a series of pipes that gathers the waste as it comes out of a gas well, separates some of the water for reuse, and confines the concentrated leftovers in a steel tank. &nbsp;&nbsp; Yet in spite of the clear advantages of a closed loop system, ProPublica says the drilling industry continues to aggressively fight efforts by states to enact regulations that would encourage their use.<br /><br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>More Brain Tumors Reported in The Acreage</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17412</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two more children in The Acreage have been diagnosed with brain tumors.&nbsp; The news comes just as an investigation into a possible cancer cluster in the Florida community is gearing up. &nbsp;The residents of The Acreage have been concerned about a cancer cluster since several children living in close proximity to each other were diagnosed with brain tumors or brain cancer. Earlier this summer, residents&rsquo; concerns prompted the Florida...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Two more children in The Acreage have been diagnosed with <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/diseases">brain tumors</a>.&nbsp; The news comes just as an investigation into a possible cancer cluster in the Florida community is gearing up. &nbsp;<br /><br />The residents of The Acreage have been concerned about a cancer cluster since several children living in close proximity to each other were diagnosed with brain tumors or brain cancer. Earlier this summer, residents&rsquo; concerns prompted the Florida Department of Health to begin a study of cancer rates in the area. <br /><br />The results of the first phase were unveiled in late August. According to the Palm Beach Post, investigators found 1,369 cases of all types of cancer among residents in The Acreage between 1995 and 2007. A similar-sized area elsewhere in Florida could be expected to have 1,055 cases in that time, the Post said. The report revealed six cases of brain cancer in children 14 and younger from 1997 to 2007. Of those, three were diagnosed in 2008, the report said.<br /><br />Those findings were enough to convince the health department to launch a second phase of the cancer cluster study.&nbsp; That phase began earlier this month,&nbsp; and health officials have been interviewing the families of 13 children previously diagnosed with cancer. All of the children&nbsp; were younger than 18 when diagnosed with a brain tumor or brain cancer from 1993-2008.&nbsp; Interviews are expected to be complete by January 1.<br /><br />According to The Miami Herald, the latest brain tumor victims in The Acreage are a 13-year-old girl and a boy the same age.&nbsp; The girl, who had been suffering from headaches, had a tumor removed before Thanksgiving.&nbsp; The boy's tumor was discovered after he suffered a seizure last Wednesday, and his tumor was removed on Friday.&nbsp; Both families are still waiting results of pathology reports.<br /><br />According to the Herald, these two children are not part of the cancer cluster study.&nbsp; But the health officials will note new cases reported to the <a href="http://fcds.med.miami.edu/">Florida Cancer Data Registry</a>, which gathers reports of tumors from physicians across the state.<br /><br />People in the area have speculated that a nearby Pratt &amp; Whitney jet engine plant and/or citrus groves in the area, which used potentially dangerous pesticides for decades, may have tainted well water in the area. There were also concerns about soil contamination. As we reported previously, tests on wells conducted by the state Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) did not reveal any toxins, but tests on four wells did reveal levels of alpha particles, radium-226 or radium-228, that exceed drinking water standards. Radium-226 and radium-228 are naturally occurring radioactive metals that could cause cancer at elevated levels.<br /><br />The four wells where elevated levels of radium-225 or radium-228 were detected did not appear to be near the locations where residents have reported brain cancer in children. The DEP said the contamination may require homeowners with affected wells to install water treatment systems. Ground water in the community was deemed safe by the DEP.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Zhu Zhu Pets Get OK From CPSC</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17381</link>		
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday we wrote about a U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) investigation into Zhu Zhu Pets toys that might have contained a higher than permissible level of antimony, a heavy metal known to sicken children if injected, according to NBC News.According to a report just out by the Associated Press (AP), the toys, which the AP described as &ldquo;one of the holiday season&rsquo;s hottest toy crazes&rdquo; are not in violation of...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yesterday we wrote about a U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) investigation into Zhu Zhu Pets toys that might have contained a higher than permissible level of <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">antimony</a>, a heavy metal known to sicken children if injected, according to NBC News.<br /><br />According to a report just out by the Associated Press (AP), the toys, which the AP described as &ldquo;one of the holiday season&rsquo;s hottest toy crazes&rdquo; are not in violation of current standards according to the agency. The <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">CPSC</a> told the AP that although it did not test the Zhu Zhu Pets toys, the toy &ldquo;is not out of compliance&rdquo; with the recently enacted Consumer Protection Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA).<br /><br />The TimesOnline described the toy&mdash;which is being rationed due to its intense popularity this season&mdash;as a &ldquo;battery-powered robotic&rdquo; hamster, one of four such toys. The toys is described, said the TimesOnline as: &ldquo;Mr. Squiggles is a true Hamster &lsquo;Prankster.&rdquo;<br /><br />This weekend, GoodGuide, a consumer group out of California, discussed the presence of antimony in the toy hamster named Mr. Squiggles, said the AP. The group claimed its testing found the dangerous heavy metal on the toys fur and nose and said the levels were in violation of the CPSIA mandates, said the AP.<br /><br />Antimony is used to prevent textiles and plastics from catching fire and when one is exposed over a period of time, can suffer adverse reactions, including cancer, to the lung and heart, as well as diarrhea and ulcers, said MSNBC, previously. To be discovered in a popular children&rsquo;s toy is worrisome, especially given that we are in the midst of the popular holiday shopping season. If eaten, antimony can cause vomiting and if inhaled, heart and long issues, added the AP.<br /><br />Yesterday, GoodGuide stated that it received its testing results by using a gun that aims X-rays and provides a reading of heavy metals present in the object, such as antimony, lead, and other substances, said the AP. According to the CPSC, this type of testing is not a recognized method at the agency.<br /><br />The CPSC tests toys by determining how much of a heavy metal would escape from a toy if that toy is sucked or swallowed, and does not look at potential toxins in a toy, explained the AP. &ldquo;While we accurately reported the chemical levels in the toys that we measured using our testing method, we should not have compared our results to federal standards,&rdquo; GoodGuide said in a written release. &ldquo;We regret this error,&rdquo; quoted the AP.<br /><br />Of note, pointed out the AP, the CPSC did not test the toy, but did examine the toy for painted surfaces. Since the toy does not have painted surfaces, it is not subject to the CPSIA&rsquo;s heavy metal testing mandates, said Gib Mullan, the CPSC&rsquo;s director of compliance and field operations, the AP added.<br /><br />That same day, the agency advised the AP it found the toy does not pose a threat. The CPSC said its decision was based on the findings of independent tested conducted by Cepia LLC (St. Louis), the toys&rsquo; maker. The toy sells for about $10. &ldquo;CPSC confirmed today that the popular Zhu Zhu toy is not out of compliance with the antimony or other heavy metal limits of the new U.S. mandatory toy standard,&rdquo; said Scott Wolfson, a CPSC spokesman.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>BPA Study Finds Chemical in Majority of Newborns</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17369</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have been following the issues surrounding bisphenol A&mdash;BPA&mdash;for quite some time now, and have been writing columns problems associated with this toxin almost every week for many months. Now, sadly, the Milwaukee-Wisconsin Journal Sentinel (JSOnline) is reporting that a study released this week revealed that most babies&mdash;nine of 10&mdash;were born with the industrial chemical in their systems.Developed in the 1930s, the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[We have been following the issues surrounding <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">bisphenol A&mdash;BPA</a>&mdash;for quite some time now, and have been writing columns problems associated with this toxin almost every week for many months. Now, sadly, the Milwaukee-Wisconsin Journal Sentinel (JSOnline) is reporting that a study released this week revealed that most babies&mdash;nine of 10&mdash;were born with the industrial chemical in their systems.<br /><br />Developed in the 1930s, the estrogenic mimicker appears to wreak havoc on the body&rsquo;s&rsquo; endocrine system. Today, in urine tests, BPA is found in the overwhelming majority of Americans, more than 93 percent. To also be found in the majority of newborns, is worrisome, at best.<br /><br />BPA has been connected to increased risks of brain, reproductive, cardiac, and immune system diseases and disorders; problems with liver function testing; interruptions in chemotherapy treatment; and links with serious health problems. Studies have overwhelmingly found BPA to have negative effects at doses lower than current FDA standards; retention in the body longer than was previously believed; leeching into liquids being held in containers regardless of the containers&rsquo; temperature; and longer lasting damage, which some feel can be passed to future generations. Recent reports link high levels of exposure to BPA to erectile dysfunction and other sexual problems in males.<br /><br />The recent study was commissioned by the <a href="http://www.ewg.org/">Environmental Working Group</a>, said JSOnline, which noted that scientists randomly selected samples of umbilical cord blood to test for the chemical. This is the first such test that looked at newborn cord blood, said JSOnline. &quot;It's alarming,&quot; Janet Gray, director of the Environmental Risks and Breast Cancer project at Vassar College, said of the study results, quoted JSOnline. &quot;What more evidence do we need to act?&quot;<br /><br />The estrogenic, industrial chemical, a polycarbonate plastic byproduct, is not only of concern over its connection to a wide variety of adverse health events, but also because of the chemical&rsquo;s overwhelming and growing ubiquity. BPA can be found in everything from baby bottles; sippy cup: water bottles; aluminum can linings; eyeglasses; cars; DVD and CD cases; some dental sealants; appliances; windshields; and&mdash;most recently&mdash;common paper receipts, to name just some. On recyclable bottles, BPA, as a component, can be verified if the item contains recycling number 7.<br /><br />BPA recently made JSOnline news when it reported that the U.S. government was stalling its study of BPA&rsquo;s effects; the outlet accused the FDA of endangering consumer health because of its delays on releasing a ruling. The decision, according to Agency officials, said JSOnline, is due within the next two weeks.<br /><br />Industry argues that scientists and consumer advocates exaggerate the chemical&rsquo;s adverse effects, continually citing two industry studies; however, at last count, over 900 peer-reviewed studies found links between BPA and adverse health effects. The FDA has maintained that BPA was safe, basing its finding on these two studies; however, noted JSOnline, the agency&rsquo;s science board recommended it had not looked at enough of the studies and began its review, setting the now-missed November 30th deadline.<br /><br />The Toxic Substances Control Act, passed in 1976, was meant to allow the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to ban toxic chemicals; however, no substance&mdash;including asbestos&mdash;has yet been banned, said JSOnline. Evidently, loopholes have enabled industry to keep details about chemicals, including chemical names, from being released.<br /><br />Many states and municipalities have passed laws banning BPA from certain products, especially children&rsquo;s products. Now, the Wisconsin Assembly is set to meet next Wednesday morning (10:45 am in the State Capitol, Room 300 NE) to discuss a proposed ban, said JSOnline.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Childhood Lead Poisoning Linked To Permanent Brain Damage</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17354</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study has revealed that childhood exposure to lead can lead to permanent brain damage, US News and World Report writes.&quot;What we have found is that no region of the brain is spared from lead exposure. Distinct areas of the brain are affected differently,&quot; study author Kim Cecil, quoted US News. Cecil is an imaging scientist at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and a professor of radiology, pediatrics and neuroscience...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[A new study has revealed that <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/lead_paint_poisoning">childhood exposure to lead</a> can lead to permanent brain damage, US News and World Report writes.<br /><br />&quot;What we have found is that no region of the brain is spared from lead exposure. Distinct areas of the brain are affected differently,&quot; study author Kim Cecil, quoted US News. Cecil is an imaging scientist at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and a professor of radiology, pediatrics and neuroscience at the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, said US News, citing a news release.<br /><br />We have long written that exposure to lead in children can cause brain and nervous system damage, behavioral and learning problems, slowed growth, hearing problems, headaches, mental and physical retardation, and behavioral and other health problems. Lead is also known to cause cancer and reproductive harm. We have also long stressed that, once poisoned by lead, no organ system is immune, particularly the developing brain because negative influences can have long-lasting effects and can continue well into puberty and beyond.<br /><br />The new study looked at 33 adults with an average age of 21, who were all enrolled when they were babies in the long-term Cincinnati Lead Study, said US News. That study analyzed prenatal and early childhood exposure in 376 infants between 1979 and 1987 and who lived in what US News said were high-risk Cincinnati locations. The participants tested with blood lead levels from 5 to 37 micrograms per deciliter&mdash;a mean of 14&mdash;and also tested with IQ deficiencies and were linked to &ldquo;juvenile delinquency and criminal arrests,&rdquo; said US News.<br /><br />Functional MRI scans were used to test the brains of the participants while specific tasks were attempted that relied on attention, decision-making, and impulse control, said US News. Cecil noted that, &quot;&hellip; the area of the brain responsible for inhibition is damaged by lead exposure and that other regions of the brain must compensate in order for an individual to perform, quoted US News. It seems, said Cecil, that the last area of the brain to develop&mdash;the frontal lobe&mdash;appears to receive permanent damage from exposure to the toxin when it is maturing, said Science Daily.<br /><br />&quot;Many people think that once lead blood levels decrease, the effects should be reversible, but, in fact, lead exposure has harmful and lasting effects,&quot; Cecil said, quoted Science Daily.<br /><br />Of concern is that items, including children&rsquo;s toys, keep turning up in the market with lead levels in excess of federally mandated lead standards.<br /><br />For instance, we recently wrote that a public interest group found that some toys being sold at popular retailers violate current mandates. A significant issue given that we are in the midst of the heaviest shopping season of the year. The U.S. Public Interest Research Group (U.S. PIRG) released its report&mdash;&ldquo;Trouble in Toyland&rdquo;&mdash;in which it stated that although many stores and toy makers are in compliance with the laws, some are not. This is problematic because it is virtually impossible for consumers to determine which toys are and are not safe.<br /><br />In 2008, nearly 80 percent of all product recalls in the United States involved imports from China, including a wide array of toys in violation with lead paint standards.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>FDA Reportedly To Delay BPA Decision</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17340</link>		
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has long said it is announcing its ruling on the safety of the plastic-hardening chemical bisphenol A&mdash;BPA&mdash;today, it appears the agency is delaying its self-imposed deadline, reports the Milwaukee-Wisconsin Journal Sentinel (JSOnline).The industrial chemical, a polycarbonate plastic byproduct, has made headlines over its connection to a wide variety of adverse health events, a...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Although the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has long said it is announcing its ruling on the safety of the plastic-hardening chemical <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">bisphenol A&mdash;BPA</a>&mdash;today, it appears the agency is delaying its self-imposed deadline, reports the Milwaukee-Wisconsin Journal Sentinel (JSOnline).<br /><br />The industrial chemical, a polycarbonate plastic byproduct, has made headlines over its connection to a wide variety of adverse health events, a worrisome issue given the chemical&rsquo;s overwhelming ubiquity. BPA recently made JSOnline news when it reported that the U.S. government was stalling its study of BPA&rsquo;s effects; the outlet accused the FDA of endangering consumer health because of its delays on releasing a ruling.<br /><br />BPA can be found in everything from baby bottles, sippy cup, water bottles, aluminum can linings, eyeglasses, and cars, to DVD and CD cases, some dental sealants, appliances, windshields, and common paper receipts, to name some. On recyclable bottles, BPA, as a component, can be verified if the item contains recycling number 7.<br /><br />BPA has been connected to increased risks of brain, reproductive, cardiac, and immune system diseases and disorders; problems with liver function testing; interruptions in chemotherapy treatment; and links with serious health problems. Studies have overwhelmingly found BPA to have negative effects at doses lower than current FDA standards; retention in the body longer than was previously believed; leeching into liquids being held in containers regardless of the containers&rsquo; temperature; and longer lasting damage, which some feel can be passed to future generations. Recent reports link high levels of exposure to BPA to erectile dysfunction and other sexual problems in males.<br /><br />Developed in the 1930s as an estrogenic mimicker, BPA appears to wreak havoc on the body&rsquo;s&rsquo; endocrine system. Today, in urine tests, BPA is found in the overwhelming majority of Americans, more than 93 percent.<br /><br />Now, the <a href="http://www.fda.gov/">FDA</a> is saying it will likely release its ruling on Monday; however, JSOnline said its sources say the agency is likelier to request additional time to enable its scientists to look at the many emerging studies concerning BPA&rsquo;s effects.<br /><br />Industry argues that scientists and consumer advocates exaggerate the chemical&rsquo;s adverse effects, continually citing two industry studies; however, at last count, over 900 peer-reviewed studies found links between BPA and adverse health effects. The FDA has maintained that BPA was safe, basing its finding on these two studies; however, noted JSOnline, the agency&rsquo;s science board recommended it had not looked at enough of the studies and began its review, setting the November 30th deadline.<br /><br />JSOnline reported that, based on emails it obtained, it seems the FDA&rsquo;s prior ruling was crafted, in part, by &ldquo;lobbyists for the BPA-makers.&rdquo; JSOnline reported that FDA scientists looked to chemical industry lobbyists when analyzing BPA&rsquo;s risks, tracking legislation to ban BPA, and when monitoring BPA&rsquo;s media coverage, said JSOnline.<br /><br />Environmental groups are hoping to be able to urge the FDA to implement public health warnings, include mandatory food can labeling, and place interim bans on BPA, said JSOnline.<br /><br />In 2008, said JSOnline, over seven billion pounds of BPA were manufactured in the U.S. Also, said JSOnline, a Consumer Reports study released last month and developed after tests performed by the Journal Sentinel, discovered BPA traces in almost all food cans, most significantly, even in cans marked &ldquo;BPA Free.&rdquo;<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Lawsuit Over Maryland Coal Ash Dump</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17328</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coal ash waste issues have been making headlines ever since the massive and catastrophic Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) fly ash spill last December. The spill&mdash;the largest of its kind&mdash;dumped an incomprehensible 5.4 million cubic yards of toxic coal sludge and associated toxins into Tennessee&rsquo;s Emory and Clinch rivers and the 300 acres surrounding the TVA&rsquo;s Kingston plant.The accident highlighted issues with contaminants...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">Coal ash waste</a> issues have been making headlines ever since the massive and catastrophic Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) fly ash spill last December. The spill&mdash;the largest of its kind&mdash;dumped an incomprehensible 5.4 million cubic yards of toxic coal sludge and associated toxins into Tennessee&rsquo;s Emory and Clinch rivers and the 300 acres surrounding the TVA&rsquo;s Kingston plant.</p><p>The accident highlighted issues with contaminants in coal ash. For instance, we previously wrote that an <a href="http://www.epa.gov/">Environmental Protection Agency</a> (EPA) report stated that some &ldquo;potentially toxic pollutants,&rdquo; such as mercury and arsenic, found in coal ash, could present serious health and environmental problems.</p><p>Now, Environment News Service (ENS) is writing that issues surrounding toxins released from an unlined coal ash waste dump in Washington, DC have prompted action from four environmental groups. The groups gave formal notice that they plan on suing Mirant MD Ash Management, LLC and Mirant Mid-Atlantic, LLC Corporation of Atlanta, Georgia for violations of the Clean Water Act in Maryland, said ENS. The four groups&mdash;Defenders of Wildlife, Sierra Club, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, and Patuxent Riverkeeper&mdash;allege Mirant companies neglected to follow discharge permit mandates at the Brandywine Coal Combustion Waste Landfill, said ENS.</p><p>The groups referred to a March 2009 EPA report in which it stated that coal combustion waste disposal in &ldquo;unlined landfills and surface impoundments is hazardous to human health&rdquo; said ENS. According to the groups, the waste allows &ldquo;unacceptably high risks of cancer and diseases of the heart, lung, liver, stomach, and other organs,&rdquo; said ENS.</p><p>According to ENS, Mirant's coal-fired Chalk Point Power Plant, Maryland&rsquo;s largest power authority, sends its fly and bottom ash to the Brandywine Coal Combustion Waste Landfill. The groups&rsquo; concern is with landfill operations, claiming that Mirant companies are illegally dumping toxins into the Mataponi Creek and tributaries from so-called outfalls as well as leaks at the landfill&rsquo;s &ldquo;disposal cells,&rdquo; said ENS. Mataponi Creek flows through the Merkle Wildlife Sanctuary, the only sanctuary run by that state&rsquo;s Department of Natural Resources and the winter home for thousands of Canadian geese and home to a number of other wildlife species including red fox, groundhogs, white-tailed deer, osprey, heron, hummingbirds, and songbirds, said ENS.</p><p>Earlier this year we wrote about how information pointing to &ldquo;significantly higher cancer risks&rdquo; for those living near coal-fired power plant ash dumps was allegedly covered up by the recent Bush Administration, citing a report by EnvironmentalIntegrity.org. Also, numerous studies concluded that coal dumps leach dangerous toxins into the environment that can cause cancer, birth defects, and other serious health outcomes in water and wildlife populations, including frightening guarantees of developing cancer from drinking contaminated water and suffering damage to the liver, kidney, lungs and other organs from toxic metal exposure, such as cadmium, cobalt, lead, and other pollutants far above levels considered safe,&rdquo; said Environmental Integrity, previously.</p><p>The group noted that the danger to wildlife and ecosystems is &ldquo;off the charts, with one contaminant&mdash;boron&mdash;expected to leach into the environment at levels two thousand times thresholds generally considered to be safe.&rdquo; The toxin has killed aquatic wildlife, contaminated wells, and adversely affected wildlife, according to an earlier Tennessean piece, with the causes linked to coal ash wastewater. The waste has been both accidentally and &ldquo;routinely&rdquo; released as a result of coal-fired plant daily operations, the Tennessean noted. &ldquo;Many of the common pollutants found in coal combustion wastewater (e.g., selenium, mercury, and arsenic) are known to cause environmental harm and can potentially represent a human health risk,&rdquo; said the report, quoted the Tennessean.<br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Toy Tests Find Lead, Other Toxins</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17329</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even with revised laws banning certain chemicals and lowering lead limits in toys, a public interest group has found that some toys being sold at popular retailers violate current mandates. A significant issue given that we are in the midst of the heaviest shopping season of the year.The Washington Post said that the U.S. Public Interest Research Group (U.S. PIRG) released its report&mdash;&ldquo;Trouble in Toyland&rdquo;&mdash;in which it...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even with revised laws <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">banning certain chemicals and lowering lead limits</a> in toys, a public interest group has found that some toys being sold at popular retailers violate current mandates. A significant issue given that we are in the midst of the heaviest shopping season of the year.</p><p>The Washington Post said that the U.S. Public Interest Research Group (U.S. PIRG) released its report&mdash;&ldquo;Trouble in Toyland&rdquo;&mdash;in which it states that although many stores and toy makers are in compliance with the laws, some are not. This is problematic because it is virtually impossible for consumers to determine which toys are and are not safe.</p><p>Both lead and phthalates were issues with toys cited in the U.S. PIRG report. Phthalates, chemicals that make plastics and vinyls more flexible, have been linked to many adverse health events. So much so, that stringent phthalate levels have been imposed as part of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA). Lead levels were also reduced under the Act.</p><p>Exposure to lead in children can cause brain and nervous system damage, behavioral and learning problems, slowed growth, hearing problems, headaches, mental and physical retardation, and behavioral and other health problems. Lead is also known to cause cancer and reproductive harm. Once poisoned by lead, no organ system is immune. Of particular concern is the developing brain because negative influences can have long-lasting effects and can continue well into puberty and beyond.</p><p>&quot;We have seen substantial progress over the last year because of the new law and new leadership at the Consumer Product Safety Commission,&quot; said Elizabeth Hitchcock, public health advocate at U.S. PIRG. &quot;At the same time, we are seeing some products that slip through the cracks.&quot; U.S. PIRG has been releasing the toy safety report each year at the beginning of the holiday season for 24 years, said the Washington Post.</p><p>This report is the first since the revised consumer safety laws were enacted last year, said the Washington Post. The laws were implemented, in part, due to very high levels of lead found in many toys imported into this country from China. The Washington Post also pointed out that not only did Congress vote to reduce lead levels in toys, it also voted to ban phthalates from children&rsquo;s products.</p><p>U.S. PIRG sent 15 children's products for testing at an independent laboratory, which found four contained excessive lead levels, and two contained phthalates, said the Washington Post. A Claire's boutiques charm was found to be 71 percent lead by weight; the legal limit is .03 percent, said the Washington Post. &quot;Big Rex and Friends,&quot; a book bought at Toys R Us, tested at 0.19 percent lead, reported the Washington Post, which noted that Toys R Us stopped selling the book when it learned of the results, but the book can be purchased elsewhere.</p><p>A Pretty Princess Puppy Purse, also from Claire's boutiques, tested with 5.4 percent phthalates, and Elmo lunch bag made by Fast Forward New York had a level of 7.2 percent of another phthalate, said the Washington Post. In both cases, the phthalates involved are banned under the Act.</p><p>According to Inez Tenenbaum, chairman of the <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">Consumer Product Safety Commission</a> (CPSC), toy recalls dropped to 38, to date, in 2009, from 162 in 2008; children&rsquo;s product recalls over excessive lead levels dropped from 85 to 15 in the same time frame, according to the Washington Post.<br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Carbon Monoxide Risk Prompts Gas Range Recall</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17331</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About 900 Electrolux ICON&reg; and Kenmore PRO&reg; 30&rdquo;Gas Ranges have been recalled due to carbon monoxide poisoning hazard the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), just announced. Electrolux Home Products Inc., of Augusta, Georgia, manufactured the recalled ranges.An incorrect part allows more fuel to pass to the range&rsquo;s oven than can be burned efficiently, causing incomplete combustion and the release of carbon...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About 900 <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/product_liability">Electrolux ICON&reg; and Kenmore PRO&reg; 30&rdquo;Gas Ranges</a> have been recalled due to carbon monoxide poisoning hazard the <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission</a> (CPSC), just announced. Electrolux Home Products Inc., of Augusta, Georgia, manufactured the recalled ranges.</p><p>An incorrect part allows more fuel to pass to the range&rsquo;s oven than can be burned efficiently, causing incomplete combustion and the release of carbon monoxide. This poses a risk of carbon monoxide poisoning to consumers. To date, Electrolux has received four reports of incidents involving carbon monoxide being released from the recalled gas range. No injuries have been reported.</p><p>The following Electrolux ICON and Kenmore PRO 30&rdquo; freestanding gas range model and serial numbers are included in this recall. For Electrolux ICON, the model and serial numbers are located on the back of the range. For the Kenmore PRO, the model and serial numbers are located near the base of the range just below the bottom right portion of the oven door and also on the back of the range. Not all serial numbers within these ranges are included in the recall.</p><p><br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Electrolux ICON Gas Range: Model: E30GF74HPS; Serial Number Range: NF83000000 &ndash; NF93633000<br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Kenmore PRO 30&rdquo; Gas Range: Model: 790.76913800 and 790.76913801; Serial Number Range: NF83000000 &ndash; NF93633000<br /><br />The recalled Electrolux ICON and Kenmore PRO 30&rdquo; Free-Standing Gas Ranges, which were manufactured in Canada, were sold at appliance retailers nationwide from August 2008 through October 2009 for between $2,500 and $3,500.</p><p>The CPSC is advising consumers to immediately stop using the range&rsquo;s oven and contact Electrolux for the Electrolux ICON or Sears for the Kenmore PRO to schedule a free repair. Consumers can continue to use the cook-top (top burners) and the broiler as well as any clock and/or timer functions.</p><p>Electrolux can be reached toll-free at (888) 360-8557 between 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday and on Saturdays between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., or at the firm&rsquo;s Web site at www.gasrangeorifice.com. Consumers with Kenmore PRO brand ranges should call Sears toll-free at (800) 733-2299 between 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. ET Monday through Saturday.</p><p>Of note, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently warned that carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning can look a lot like the flu and can kill a person in minutes if exposed to high levels. CO poisoning is responsible for 15,000 emergency room visits and 500 deaths annually. Carbon monoxide is an odorless and colorless gas, the number one cause of poisoning deaths in this country, and is dangerous and deadly when it builds up in improperly vented spaces, said HealthDay News previously.<br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>ADHD Risk Increases With  Exposure To Lead, Tobacco</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17323</link>		
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An emerging study has found a link to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children exposed in-utero to tobacco smoke and during childhood to lead. The research was conducted at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, reported Science Daily.The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) describes ADHD as involving difficulty staying focused, paying attention, and controlling behavior, and hyper- or over-activity.According to...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[An emerging study has found a link to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children exposed i<a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">n-utero to tobacco smoke and during childhood to lead</a>. The research was conducted at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, reported Science Daily.<br /><br />The <a href="http://www.nimh.nih.gov/index.shtml">National Institute of Mental Health</a> (NIMH) describes ADHD as involving difficulty staying focused, paying attention, and controlling behavior, and hyper- or over-activity.<br /><br />According to the research, about 35 percent of childhood ADHD cases involving children between eight and 15 years of age could be minimized by removing exposure to lead and tobacco, said Science Daily. The change could affect about 800,000 children. &quot;Tobacco and lead exposure each have their own important adverse effect,&quot; said Tanya Froehlich, M.D., a physician in the Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics at Cincinnati Children's and lead study author. &quot;But if children are exposed to both lead and prenatal tobacco, the combined effect is synergistic,&quot; quoted Science Daily. The study appears in the online, November 23 issue of Pediatrics.<br /><br />&quot;Although we tend to focus on ADHD treatment rather than prevention, our study suggests that reducing exposures to environmental toxicants might be an important way to lower rates of ADHD,&quot; said Robert Kahn, MD, MPH., a physician and researcher at Cincinnati Children's and the study's senior author, reported Science Daily.<br /><br />According to the research, children exposed to tobacco smoke when in the womb were 2.4 times likelier to be diagnosed with ADHD; children with blood lead levels in the top third experienced a 2.3-fold increase of ADHD, said Science Daily. Of note, these levels are considered well below the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention&rsquo;s (CDC) action level of 10 micrograms per deciliter. The team also found that the risk of ADHD increased by an astounding eight-fold for children exposed to both tobacco and lead, versus children not exposed to either contaminant, said Science Daily.<br /><br />The study looked at information on eight-to-15-year-olds from 2001 through 2004 derived from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), which was from the National Center for Health Statistics at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said Science Daily. NHANES is a nationally representative sample of the U.S. population and was created so that information about the health and diet of Americans can be collected and analyzed. About 8.7 percent of the 3,907 children in the study met the diagnostic criteria for ADHD.<br /><br />Yesterday we wrote than a new report found a link between phthalate concentrations in urine to ADHD, citing Science Daily. Phthalates are chemicals that make plastics and vinyls more flexible. The study found a noteworthy link between phthalate metabolite levels in urine to ADHD test results and symptoms, with increased symptoms connected to increased levels, said Science Daily.<br /><br />Earlier this year we wrote that another study revealed that stimulant medications used to treat ADHD could increase the risk of sudden cardiac death in children, yet the Food &amp; Drug Administration (FDA) opted not to change its recommendations on the way in which such drugs are prescribed. Labeling for drugs like Ritalin, Adderall, Dexedrine, and Concerta already include warnings about the risk of sudden cardiac death in patients with heart problems, but are considered safe for children without pre-existing heart conditions. There have been worries, however, that such stimulants could be risky in children with undiagnosed heart problems. It is not known how often cardiac events occur in children taking these drugs.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Phthalate Exposure Linked To ADHD</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17317</link>		
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Phthalates, chemicals that make plastics and vinyls more flexible, have been linked to many adverse health events. So much so, that stringent phthalate levels have been imposed as part of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA). Now, an emerging report found a link between phthalate concentrations in urine to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), reports Science Daily.The new study, out of Korea and published by Elsevier...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">Phthalates</a>, chemicals that make plastics and vinyls more flexible, have been linked to many adverse health events. So much so, that stringent phthalate levels have been imposed as part of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA). Now, an emerging report found a link between phthalate concentrations in urine to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), reports Science Daily.<br /><br />The new study, out of Korea and published by Elsevier in the November 15th issue of Biological Psychiatry, used computerized testing that measured attention and impulsivity levels and teacher-reported symptoms, said Science Daily. The team found a noteworthy link between phthalate metabolite levels in urine to ADHD test results and symptoms, with increased symptoms connected to increased levels, said Science Daily.<br /><br />According to senior study author Yun-Chul Hong, MD, PhD, &quot;these data represent the first documented association between phthalate exposure and ADHD symptoms in school-aged children.&quot;&nbsp; Also, the Editor of Biological Psychiatry, John Krystal, MD, said, &quot;This emerging link between phthalates and symptoms of ADHD raises the concern that accidental environmental exposure to phthalates may be contributing to behavioral and cognitive problems in children. This concern calls for more definitive research.&quot;<br /><br />The U.S. <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</a> (CPSC), in the Summary of its 2005 Third National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals, stated that &quot;very limited scientific information is available on potential human health effects of phthalates at levels&quot; found in the U.S. population, said Science Daily. The study, conducted on a Korean population, is likely &ldquo;comparable&rdquo; to that in the U.S., Science Daily reported, noting that the Korean study findings, while not proving ADHD symptoms are caused by phthalate exposure, the study offers compelling evidence for more research.<br /><br />The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) describes ADHD as involving difficulty staying focused, paying attention, and controlling behavior, and hyper- or over-activity.<br /><br />Phthalates&mdash;phthalate ester and alcohol&mdash;is an organic compound mixed with synthetic rubber. Ubiquitous in a wide array of consumer products and industry, phthalates are found in cosmetics, personal care products, pharmaceuticals and medical devices, food packaging, and cleaning and building materials, noted the National Academy of Sciences previously. Phthalates can be found in pacifiers and rubber ducks, and foods. The compound is also found in, said Science Daily previously, flooring, cables, and packaging materials and, because of its broad use, can be introduced quite easily into the food chain and the human body. Another study found that even when adopting a healthy eating lifestyle, phthalates are difficult to avoid, reported Science Daily.<br /><br />High phthalate levels during pregnancy were linked to the birth of boys who express less typically masculine behaviors; another study of pregnant women found some phthalates may contribute to this country&rsquo;s increase in premature births. Phthalates have been found to exacerbate dermatitis in tests with mammals. Some studies linked phthalate exposure in lab animals produced effects on the development of the male reproductive system: Infertility, undescended testes, and testicular development; penis and other reproductive tract malformations, such as hypospadias; and reduced testosterone levels. Some phthalates have been associated with liver cancer and problems with the developing fetus and are known to interfere with androgens.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Lead Found in Barbie, Disney Toys</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17294</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have long been writing that exposure to lead in children can cause brain and nervous system damage, behavioral and learning problems, slowed growth, hearing problems, headaches, mental and physical retardation, and behavioral and other health problems. Now, the Associated Press (AP) is reporting that some toys bearing Barbie and Disney logos have tested with high lead levels, citing the Center for Environmental Health, an advocacy group...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[We have long been writing that exposure to lead in children can cause brain and nervous system damage, behavioral and learning problems, slowed growth, hearing problems, headaches, mental and physical retardation, and behavioral and other health problems. Now, the Associated Press (AP) is reporting that some <a href="http://www.toyinjuries.com/">toys</a> bearing Barbie and Disney logos have tested with high lead levels, citing the <a href="http://www.ceh.org/">Center for Environmental Health</a>, an advocacy group located in California.<br /><br />The Center tested some 250 children&rsquo;s products that were purchased at popular retailers, said AP. Lead levels were found to exceed federal limits in seven of the toys tested, including a Barbie Bike Flair Accessory Kit and a Disney Tinkerbell Water Lily necklace. The Center also found &ldquo;excessive lead&rdquo; levels in a &ldquo;Dora the Explorer Activity Tote, two pairs of children's shoes, a boys&rsquo; belt, and a kids' poncho,&rdquo; said the AP. In response, California&rsquo;s Attorney General, Jerry Brown, wrote to the retailers of the seven products, which include Target and Wal-Mart, issuing a warning that children&rsquo;s products sold in their stores contained lead levels in violation of federal standards and should be immediately removed, reported the AP.<br /><br />Lead is also known to cause cancer and reproductive harm. Once poisoned by lead, no organ system is immune. Of particular concern is the developing brain because negative influences can have long-lasting effects and can continue well into puberty and beyond. Lead is considered by many experts to be one of the most important chronic environmental illnesses affecting children today. Unfortunately, despite efforts to control lead exposure, serious cases still occur.<br /><br />According to the World Health Organization (WHO), about half of all urban children world-wide and under the age of five test with blood lead levels higher than the Center for Disease Control and Prevention&rsquo;s (CDC) safe limit. In the United States, the CDC dropped its &ldquo;level of concern for blood&rdquo; lead levels to 10 micrograms per deciliter, according to the BBC previously.<br /><br />The Center for Environmental Health stated that the Barbie toy was purchased at Tuesday Morning and the Tinkerbell jewelry from Walgreens; other products with high lead levels were purchased form TJ Maxx, Sears, Wal-Mart, and Target, said the AP. Meanwhile, Mattel said it did not manufacture or sell the bike accessory kit and that, in that case, the Barbie name was licensed to Bell Sport. According to Bell Sport, the kit passed safety tests two years prior when lead level requirements were not as stringent; Bell claimed it was unaware the product was still being sold, said the AP. According to Disney, the Tinkerbell necklace was tested by Playmates Toys&mdash;its licensee&mdash;prior to distribution and was allegedly in compliance with all required regulations reported the AP.<br /><br />The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is apparently looking into the situation, said the AP.<br /><br />With the implementation of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA), it is illegal to sell children&rsquo;s products containing lead in specific amounts. The CPSC explained by February 10, 2009, products designed or intended primarily for children 12 and younger may not contain more than 600 ppm of lead; sale of those products can result in significant civil and criminal liability. After August 14, 2009, the level decreases to 300 ppm and, again decreases to 100 ppm on August 14, 2011.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Thyroid Cancer Rates Near Indian Point Among Highest in U.S</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17285</link>		
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Communities around the Indian Point nuclear power plant in Westchester, NY have higher-than-normal rates of thyroid cancer, according to a study released Monday.&nbsp; The study found&nbsp; that rates of thyroid cancer&nbsp; in the four counties surrounding the Indian Point nuclear plant&nbsp; - Orange, Putnam, Rockland and Westchester -&nbsp; were the highest in New York state, and among the highest in the United States.The Indian Point nuclear...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Communities around the Indian Point nuclear power plant in Westchester, NY have higher-than-normal rates of <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/diseases">thyroid cancer</a>, according to a study released Monday.&nbsp; The study found&nbsp; that rates of thyroid cancer&nbsp; in the four counties surrounding the Indian Point nuclear plant&nbsp; - Orange, Putnam, Rockland and Westchester -&nbsp; were the highest in New York state, and among the highest in the United States.<br /><br />The Indian Point nuclear power plant is located just north of New York City.&nbsp; The two nuclear reactors there went online in1973 and 1976.&nbsp; The plant, originally run by Consolidated Edison, is now owned and operated by Louisiana-based Entergy, a $13 billion company which runs nuclear plants in four other states.&nbsp; Entergy is awaiting renewal of the licenses for Indian Point's two reactors, one of which expires in 2013 and the other in 2015.<br /><br />According to an article published by anti-nuclear activist Joseph Mangano in the International Journal of Health Services, before the Indian Point reactors began operating, the thyroid cancer rate in the four surrounding counties was 1.5 percent below that of the state.&nbsp; Now they are 54 percent higher.<br /><br />At a news conference yesterday, Mangano&nbsp; called for the facility to be shut down. &ldquo;Indian Point shouldn&rsquo;t be allowed to keep unless it proves that it&rsquo;s safe and it should only address issues such as this,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />To reach his conclusions Mangano analyzed data from the <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/">U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</a>, which he says showed that from&nbsp; 2001-2005, the&nbsp; thyroid cancer rate for the four counties was 66% above the U.S. average&nbsp; The rate of the disease in Rockland County is 106 percent above the national average; 102 percent above in Putnam; 87 percent higher in Orange and 42 percent higher than average in Westchester, Mangano said.<br /><br />Mangano asserted that a major risk factor for thyroid cancer is exposure to radioactive iodine, which is produced only in nuclear weapons and nuclear reactors.<br /><br />Mangano heads the nonprofit Radiation and Public Health Project. Yesterday's event was also attended by representatives of the Indian Point Safe Energy Council, the Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, and the Atlantic chapter of the Sierra Club.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Phthalate Exposure Affects Boys' Behavior</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17286</link>		
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Phthalates, chemicals that enable flexibility in plastics and vinyls, are again, being linked to adverse health outcomes, this time in boys. According to WebMD, women exposed to high phthalate levels during pregnancy may give birth to boys who express behaviors that are less typically masculine.For instance, said WebMD, boys born by women who were exposed to high phthalate levels, tend to play less with &ldquo;trucks and other male-typical toys...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">Phthalates</a>, chemicals that enable flexibility in plastics and vinyls, are again, being linked to adverse health outcomes, this time in boys. According to WebMD, women exposed to high phthalate levels during pregnancy may give birth to boys who express behaviors that are less typically masculine.<br /><br />For instance, said WebMD, boys born by women who were exposed to high phthalate levels, tend to play less with &ldquo;trucks and other male-typical toys or to play fight,&rdquo; citing an emerging study. Phthalates are known in testing to cause reproductive disturbances such as decreased sperm count, infertility, and reproductive tract malformations.<br /><br />Ubiquitous in a wide array of consumer products and industry, phthalates are found in cosmetics, personal care products, pharmaceuticals and medical devices, food packaging, and cleaning and building materials, noted the National Academy of Sciences previously. Phthalates can also be found in pacifiers and rubber ducks, and are turning up in all sorts of foods. The compound is also found in, said Science Daily, flooring, cables, and packaging materials and, because of the toxin&rsquo;s broad use, can be introduced quite easily into the food chain and the human body. A study recently out of ETH Zurich also stated that even when adopting a healthy eating lifestyle, phthalates are difficult to avoid, reported Science Daily. <br /><br />Phthalates have been linked with male genitalia deformities, diabetes, excess weight, and premature births said Science Daily. No small problem given that synthetics are virtually everywhere. Phthalates&mdash;phthalate ester and alcohol&mdash;is an organic compound mixed with synthetic rubber for about five million tons annually, said Science Daily.<br /><br />In the recent study, researchers looked at two phthalates that have been particularly worrisome to environmentalists&mdash;DEHP and DBP&mdash;said WebMD. The researchers conducted urinalysis on expectant mothers in their 28th week of pregnancy; the women were divided into four groups based on phthalate metabolites and product, said WebMD. Their 145 children and their play behavior was also assessed at three and six years of age, added WebMD. The study appears in International Journal of Andrology.<br /><br />There was a correlation between mothers in the high concentration groups and boys with lowered masculinity scores, which were increased five-fold over mothers in the lowest concentration group, said WebMD, citing study researcher Shanna Swan, PhD. Swan is a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Rochester Medical Center's Center for Reproductive Epidemiology, and is also a phthalate expert, said WebMD. ''I'm not saying these boys are feminized &hellip; they are less likely to play in a male-typical manner,&quot; Swan told WebMD. Girls did not exhibit an effect, Swan added.<br /><br />''We now suspect that the phthalate [exposure] affects the entire body, not just the reproductive tract,'' Swan said, quoted WebMD. Swan added that phthalate exposure might decrease testosterone production in embryos during the eighth and 24th week of gestation, considered a particularly significant time in development, reported WebMD, because it is at this time when testes are beginning to &ldquo;function,&rdquo; which alters &ldquo;sexual differentiation in the brain.&rdquo;<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>BPA Linked To Male Sexual Dysfunction</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17260</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The industrial chemical, bisphenol A&mdash;BPA&mdash;has been making news in recent months over its connection to a wide variety of adverse health events, a worrisome issue given the chemical&rsquo;s overwhelming ubiquity.We have long noted that BPA has been connected to increased risks of brain, reproductive, cardiac, and immune system diseases and disorders; problems with liver function testing; interruptions in chemotherapy treatment; and...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The industrial chemical, <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">bisphenol A&mdash;BPA</a>&mdash;has been making news in recent months over its connection to a wide variety of adverse health events, a worrisome issue given the chemical&rsquo;s overwhelming ubiquity.<br /><br />We have long noted that BPA has been connected to increased risks of brain, reproductive, cardiac, and immune system diseases and disorders; problems with liver function testing; interruptions in chemotherapy treatment; and links with serious health problems. Studies have overwhelmingly found BPA to have negative effects at doses lower than current FDA standards; retention in the body longer than was previously believed; leeching into liquids being held in containers regardless of the containers&rsquo; temperature; and longer lasting damage, which some feel can be passed to future generations.<br /><br />Now, the Washington Post is reporting that high levels of exposure to BPA seems to be linked to erectile dysfunction and other sexual problems in males, citing a study published today. The government-funded study appears in the journal Human Reproduction and is, said the Washington Post, the first of its kind to look at the connection between BPA and the human male reproductive system; prior studies looked at rodent reactions to the chemical.<br /><br />Developed in the 1930s as an estrogenic mimicker, BPA appears to wreak havoc on the body&rsquo;s&rsquo; endocrine system<br /><br />In urine tests, BPA is found in the overwhelming majority of Americans, more than 93 percent. Despite this, industry has long argued that scientists and consumer advocates exaggerate the chemical&rsquo;s adverse effects, continually citing two industry studies; however, at last count, over 900 peer-reviewed studies found links between BPA and health effects. The industry group, American Chemistry Council, and the <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/">Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</a> (CDC) also maintain current levels are safe, said FoxNews, previously. New FDA guidelines are expected, as we have been writing, at month&rsquo;s end.<br /><br />The research looked at 634 men who work at four Chinese factories and who were also exposed to increased BPA levels, the men were followed for over five years and findings were compared with those of men who worked at other factories in China in which there was no evidence of BPA, reported the Washington Post. The research found that the men exposed to BPA suffered a four-fold increased rate of erectile dysfunction and a seven-fold increased rate of ejaculation difficulties, according to De-Kun Li, a scientist at the Kaiser Foundation Research Institute, which conducted the study with funds from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, said the Washington Post.<br /><br />The problems, surprisingly, did not occur after years, but was evident in a matter of months, said Li. The workers&rsquo; exposure levels to the chemical were 50 times greater than levels seen in the United States. &ldquo;This was a highly exposed group, and we see the effect,&quot; Li said, quoted the Washington Post. &quot;Now, we have to worry about lower-level exposure,&quot; Li added.<br /><br />Significantly, the findings confirm prior studies that were criticized for being conducted on lab animals and on which proponents of BPA have relied to minimize the chemical&rsquo;s negative effects. &quot;Critics dismissed all the animal studies, saying, 'Show us the human studies,' &quot; Li said. &quot;Now we have a human study, and this can't just be dismissed,&quot; according to the Washington Post.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Light Cigarettes Encourage Smoking</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17238</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Light cigarettes are not all they&rsquo;re cracked up to be when it comes to quitting smoking, according to an emerging study, says WebMD. Experts found that the switch to what Web MD described as &quot;light,&quot; &quot;ultra-light,&quot; or &quot;low-tar&quot; cigarettes could actually undermine well-intentioned smoking cessation attempts.Most cigarettes&mdash;about 84 percent, according to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)&mdash;are labeled...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/light_cigarettes">Light cigarettes</a> are not all they&rsquo;re cracked up to be when it comes to quitting smoking, according to an emerging study, says WebMD. Experts found that the switch to what Web MD described as &quot;light,&quot; &quot;ultra-light,&quot; or &quot;low-tar&quot; cigarettes could actually undermine well-intentioned smoking cessation attempts.</p><p>Most cigarettes&mdash;about 84 percent, according to the <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/">Federal Trade Commission</a> (FTC)&mdash;are labeled as lower in tar and nicotine, reported WebMD.</p><p>The study found smokers who switched from &quot;full-flavored&quot; cigarettes to lower tar or lighter cigarettes had to make more tries to quit and were unable to quit in about half of the cases, said WebMD. &quot;We found that switching for any reason to a so-called lighter cigarette appears to be associated with a lower chance of quitting, especially when people switched with the intent of quitting smoking,&quot; study researcher Hilary Tindle, MD, PhD, told WebMD. Tindle and her team from the University of Pittsburgh Center for Research on Health Care looked at a 2003 survey of smokers sponsored by the <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/">Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</a> (CDC) and the <a href="http://www.cancer.gov/">National Cancer Institute</a>; the sample included some 31,000 current and former smokers, said WebMD.</p><p>According to WebMD, health officials have known that cigarette-packaging indicating lowered tar or nicotine or as being light, mild, or ultra-light, do not offer reduced opportunities for lung cancer, heart disease, or other smoking-related diseases. According to established evidence, smokers who smoke so-called lighter cigarettes generally smoke more and inhale more intensely, reported WebMD.</p><p>Until now, research has not determined switching to lighter cigarettes affected quit smoking rates, noted WebMD. The recent research found the following, said WebMD:</p><ul><li>Of those surveyed, a little over 12,000&mdash;38 percent&mdash;said they had, at one time or another, switched to a lighter cigarette.</li><li>Of those who switched to lighter cigarettes, most&mdash;58 percent&mdash;were likelier to have attempted to quit smoking in the year just before taking the survey.</li><li>Of those who switched to lighter cigarettes&mdash;when compared to smokers who did not switch&mdash;the likelihood of quitting smoking was 46 percent decreased.</li><li>Those smokers who switched to lighter cigarettes to improve their health were the least likeliest to quit smoking.</li></ul><p>Tindle concluded that switching to lighter cigarettes could actually hamper quit smoking efforts. &quot;Unfortunately, a substantial proportion of smokers and nonsmokers still believe these cigarettes are healthier even though we have known for many years this is not true,&quot; quoted WebMD.</p><p>This June, President Barack Obama signed The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act into law allowing the federal government broad authority over tobacco products and regulators to control packaging and marketing and how much nicotine&mdash;the addictive component in cigarettes&mdash;is added in tobacco products, explained the Washington Post previously.</p><p>In addition to bans on flavored cigarettes and a number of other mandates, in July 2010, verbiage including the words &ldquo;light,&rdquo; &ldquo;low,&rdquo; or &ldquo;mild&rdquo; will be banned from tobacco product marketing. Sadly, according to Matt Myers, president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, industry is trying to skirt the law, said WebMD. &quot;The products will no doubt remain, but they will be called something else, Myers told WebMD. RJ Reynolds Tobacco spokesman David Howard said light cigarettes will be sold in blue packaging, while ultra-lights will be orange, a practice followed in other countries, said WebMD. Industry claims the color differentiations better enable consumers to determine what they are purchasing; however, critics disagree. Myers told WebMD the marketing change is simply another way to mislead consumers.<br /><br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>More Homeowners Filing Chinese Drywall Lawsuits</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17247</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems thousands of United States homeowners claim that they are becoming sick as a result of defective Chinese drywall, claiming a &ldquo;rotten egg&rdquo; odor; headaches; nausea and vomiting; respiratory problems; and corrosion of metals in the home, including of jewelry, wiring, air conditioning units, and other appliances.The Daily Herald points out that millions of gypsum sheets imported to the United States during the housing boom...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems thousands of United States homeowners claim that they are becoming sick as a result of <a href="http://www.chinese-drywall-answers.com/">defective Chinese drywall</a>, claiming a &ldquo;rotten egg&rdquo; odor; headaches; nausea and vomiting; respiratory problems; and corrosion of metals in the home, including of jewelry, wiring, air conditioning units, and other appliances.</p><p>The Daily Herald points out that millions of gypsum sheets imported to the United States during the housing boom appear to have been contaminated with an array of sulfur compounds. The gypsum in drywall, which typically comes from mines, has recently come from a chemical process involving lime or limestone and gas from coal-fired power plants. Contaminants and sulfur found in power plant smokestacks are supposed to be removed in the process. Failure of proper removal is the cause of foul odors, respiratory complaints, and corrosion, according to some Chinese experts in building supplies. Others say phosphogypsum (calcium sulfate), a radioactive phosphorus substance, is to blame. Banned for use in U.S. construction in 1989, the <a href="http://www.epa.gov/">Environmental Protection Agency </a>(EPA) says prolonged exposure to this radium-contained element can lead to a higher risk of lung cancer.</p><p>Many hundreds of lawsuits and complaints have been filed and many hundreds more are expected.</p><p>We have been writing about a time-sensitive, one-time offer made by Knauf Plasterboard (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. that is expected to do much to streamline the process for suing the major drywall manufacturer. To take advantage of this one-time offer, Chinese drywall claimants must sign on to an omnibus class action lawsuit by December 2, 2009.</p><p>According to an earlier New Orleans Times-Picayune article, Knauf Plasterboard has agreed not to demand plaintiffs included in that lawsuit to abide by international rules in serving legal papers. Under the agreement, the omnibus lawsuit must be filed by December 9. The Times-Picayune pointed out that the December 2 deadline for filing is a hard deadline; there will be no second chances and the omnibus complaint will not be amended at a later date to add more people. Claimants will also face a second deadline&ndash;December 14&ndash;by which time they must have filled out a profile form.</p><p>To be eligible for the lawsuit, claimants must submit pictures or other proof that they have wallboard made by Knauf Plasterboard in their homes. Any Chinese drywall homeowner interested in becoming a party to this lawsuit must start now by contacting an attorney and arranging to have their home inspected.</p><p><a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/Defective_Chinese_Drywall">Parker Waichman Alonso LLP</a>, the first law firm to file a federal Chinese drywall lawsuit, is offering assistance to any homeowner interested in joining the Knauf Plasterboard lawsuit. Free consultations are available through the firm&rsquo;s website at <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/">www.yourlawyer.com</a>, or by calling 1-800-LAW-INFO (1-800-529-4636).</p><p>Previously, Knauf Plasterboard required that service of process of any lawsuit be made through the Hague Convention, which sets forth the method for the service of process abroad. This had been a major obstacle to many Chinese drywall plaintiffs because The Hague Convention for the Service of Process Abroad requires claimants to pay approximately $15,000 per lawsuit, which allows for the translation of legal documents into Chinese and to have them presented to the appropriate authorities in China to obtain service on the Chinese drywall manufacturers.</p><p>An attorney representing Knauf Plasterboard told the Times-Picayune that the firm decided to waive the international rules in order to get a handle on the scope of the Chinese drywall claims it is facing. The company also hopes its action will spur other drywall manufacturers to take similar steps. Federal litigation involving defective drywall products has been consolidated in the multidistrict litigation, MDL 2047, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, before Judge Eldon E. Fallon. The offer applies to the consolidated federal litigation, not individual cases.<br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>BPA Found in Canned Foods</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17232</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bisphenol A&mdash;BPA&mdash;the ubiquitous, estrogen-mimicking chemical that hardens plastic has, according to another emerging study, been found in some popular canned foods, said FoxNews.According to Consumer Reports&rsquo; December issue, it &ldquo;tested soups, juice, tuna, and green beans,&rdquo; said FoxNews, and discovered &ldquo;19 name-brand foods&rdquo; contain some level of BPA. As we have previously noted, BPA can be found in...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">Bisphenol A&mdash;BPA</a>&mdash;the ubiquitous, estrogen-mimicking chemical that hardens plastic has, according to another emerging study, been found in some popular canned foods, said FoxNews.</p><p>According to Consumer Reports&rsquo; December issue, it &ldquo;tested soups, juice, tuna, and green beans,&rdquo; said FoxNews, and discovered &ldquo;19 name-brand foods&rdquo; contain some level of BPA. As we have previously noted, BPA can be found in everything from baby bottles, sippy cups, water bottles, aluminum can linings, eyeglasses, and cars, to DVD and CD cases and some dental sealants. BPA can also be found in appliances and windshields; on recyclable bottles, BPA, as a component, can be verified if the item contains recycling number 7. We recently wrote that BPA has also been found to be present in common paper receipts. With BPA turning up in carbonless copy and thermal imaging papers, its common usage has grown exponentially.</p><p>FoxNews noted that the canned foods found containing BPA included organic foods, that organic foods did not necessarily have lower levels of the toxin, and that some products contained the toxin despite labeling that the cans were BPA-free. The highest levels were seen in Del Monte Fresh Cut Green Beans Blue Lake, Progresso Vegetable Soup, and Campbell's Condensed Chicken Soup, as well as in Similac Advance Infant Formula and canned Nestle Juicy Juice, reported FoxNews.</p><p>&quot;The BPA levels in our samples of Nestle Juicy Juice, at about 9 parts per billion, were not among the highest in the foods we tested. However, considering how many servings of juice young children may consume daily, a child still could exceed a level that Consumers Union thinks would provide an adequate margin of safety,&quot; said Dr. Urvashi Rangan, director of Technical Policy, at Consumers Union, the nonprofit publisher of Consumer Reports, quoted FoxNews. &quot;The lack of any safety margin between the levels that cause harm in animals and those that people could potentially ingest from canned foods has been inadequately addressed by the FDA to date,&quot; Dr. Rangan added. <a href="http://www.fda.gov/">Food and Drug Administration</a> (FDA) guidelines say 50 micrograms of BPA for each kilogram of body weight is acceptable, said FoxNews.</p><p>In urine tests, BPA is found in the overwhelming majority of Americans, more than 93 percent. Despite this, industry has long argued that scientists and consumer advocates exaggerate the chemical&rsquo;s adverse effects, continually citing two industry studies; however, at last count, over 900 peer-reviewed studies found links between BPA and health effects. The industry group, American Chemistry Council, and the <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/">Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</a> (CDC) also maintain current levels are safe, said FoxNews. New FDA guidelines are expected, as we have been writing, at month&rsquo;s end.</p><p>BPA has long been connected to increased risks of brain, reproductive, cardiac, and immune system diseases and disorders; problems with liver function testing; interruptions in chemotherapy treatment; and links with serious health problems. Studies have overwhelmingly found BPA to have negative effects at doses lower than current FDA standards; retention in the body longer than was previously believed; leeching into liquids being held in containers regardless of the containers&rsquo; temperature; and longer lasting damage, which some feel can be passed to future generations.</p><p>Laws are either in effect or coming into effect in a variety of states and counties in the United States in which the sale of certain products containing polycarbonate has been banned, for instance, in baby bottles, food containers, and sippy cups. Canada was the first country to announce plans to ban BPA, calling it a toxin and some retailers and manufacturers have announced plans to stop making products containing the chemical. Other states are looking into similar measures and a federal ban has been proposed in Congress on all food contact material.<br /><br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Southwest Airlines Faces Suit Over Toxic Airplane Air</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17208</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Southwest Airlines has been hit with a personal injury lawsuit over toxic airplane air.&nbsp; According to Courthouse News Service, the federal complaint was filed by two twin sisters who claim they and other passengers choked on toxic &quot;super-heated&quot; fumes that formed a &quot;mist&quot; in a Southwest airplane during flight.The issue of toxic airplane air is a controversy that has dogged the airline industry for years. Earlier this...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Southwest Airlines has been hit with a personal injury lawsuit over <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/Toxic_Plane_Air">toxic airplane air</a>.&nbsp; According to Courthouse News Service, the federal complaint was filed by two twin sisters who claim they and other passengers choked on toxic &quot;super-heated&quot; fumes that formed a &quot;mist&quot; in a Southwest airplane during flight.<br /><br />The issue of toxic airplane air is a controversy that has dogged the airline industry for years. Earlier this year, a joint investigation by German and Swiss TV networks claimed to have found high levels of a dangerous toxin on board several planes. The chemicals found in the samples included high levels of tricresyl phosphate (TCP), an organophosphate contained in modern jet oil as an antiwear additive, which can lead to drowsiness, headaches, respiratory problems or neurological illnesses. <br /><br />Critics of the airline industry claim that the system used to re-circulate air in airplanes does not remove fumes or vapors from the engine. The process involves combining re-circulated existing cabin air with air bled off the engines. The air pulled into the engines is cooled and compressed before it is pumped into the cabin. If this system malfunctions, chemical contaminants can end up circulating through the airplane, creating a so-called fume event. <br /><br />The United Kingdom&rsquo;s Committee on Toxicity said in 2007 that pilots reported such fume events in 1 percent of flights. The group also said that maintenance inspected and confirmed incidents in 0.05 percent of flights. According to the National Research Council, such fume events could occur on four out of every 1,000 flights. <br /><br />Valerie and Victoria Vaughns' lawsuit claims that&nbsp; that one hour into their flight from Los Angeles, passengers began having trouble breathing.&nbsp; The pilot announced had been a malfunction, and as he engaged the engines for a steep ascent, &quot;super-heated air&quot; blew out of the ventilation system and a &quot;mist&quot; appeared to hang in the cabin. The plane made an emergency landing in Albuquerque, and a fire marshal escorted passengers off the plane, the complaint says.<br /><br />According to Courthouse News Service, the Vaughns claim to have suffered pressure in their heads, nausea, rashes, fatigue, uncontrollable tremors, weight loss and central and peripheral nervous system damage as a result of the incident.&nbsp; The complaint alleges that toxic fumes emitted during the flight were bleed air that was contaminated with hot engine oil when the pilot put the engines on full thrust.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>NIH Plans Major BPA Study</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17200</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The economic stimulus plan is one of the players involved in a large study of bisphenol A&mdash;BPA&mdash;the estrogenic chemical that has been making headlines over the myriad adverse effects that seem to be associated with its exposure.USA Today wrote that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) will be funding some $30 million to study the controversial chemical&rsquo;s safety and noted that nearly half of that money originates with the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The economic stimulus plan is one of the players involved in a large study of <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">bisphenol A&mdash;BPA</a>&mdash;the estrogenic chemical that has been making headlines over the myriad adverse effects that seem to be associated with its exposure.<br /><br />USA Today wrote that the <a href="http://www.nih.gov/">National Institutes of Health</a> (NIH) will be funding some $30 million to study the controversial chemical&rsquo;s safety and noted that nearly half of that money originates with the economic stimulus bill, citing Robin Mackar. Mackar is a spokeswoman for the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS).<br /><br />BPA, the commonly used plastic hardener and polycarbonate plastic byproduct that makes regular headlines for its links to a growing array of adverse health effects, as well as its growing ubiquity, made news recently in a Milwaukee-Wisconsin Journal Sentinel (JSOnline) report that said the United States government is stalling in its study of the toxin&rsquo;s effects.<br /><br />BPA has long been connected to increased risks of brain, reproductive, cardiac, and immune system diseases and disorders; problems with liver function testing; interruptions in chemotherapy treatment; and links with serious health problems. Studies have overwhelmingly found BPA to have negative effects at doses lower than current FDA standards; retention in the body longer than was previously believed; leeching into liquids being held in containers regardless of the containers&rsquo; temperature; and longer lasting damage, which some feel can be passed to future generations.<br /><br />The NIEH sited these outcomes and studies and said the new study will also be looking into lower BPA exposures and links to &ldquo;effects on behavior, obesity, diabetes, reproductive disorders, asthma, cardiovascular diseases, and various cancers&rdquo; and will also research the chemical being passed from parent to child, said USA Today.<br /><br />In urine tests, BPA is found in the overwhelming majority of Americans, more than 93 percent. Despite this, industry has long argued that scientists and consumer advocates are exaggerating the adverse effects the chemical, continually citing two industry studies; however, at last count, over 900 peer-reviewed studies found links between BPA and health effects.<br /><br />The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), is also planning to release its own report, as we have been writing, at the end of next month.<br /><br />&quot;We know that many people are concerned about bisphenol A and we want to support the best science we can to provide the answers,&quot; said Linda Birnbaum, director of the NIEHS, quoted USA today. Jacob, a scientist at the Environmental Working Group, feels that the agency has more than enough data to restrict the chemical, specifically in children and expectant mothers. &quot;We can always learn more about BPA, but we have scores of studies showing that low-dose exposure can increase risks,&quot; Jacob said, according to USA Today.<br /><br />BPA can be found in everything from baby bottles, sippy cups, water bottles, aluminum can linings, eyeglasses, and cars, to DVD and CD cases and some dental sealants. BPA can also be found in appliances and windshields; on recyclable bottles, BPA, as a component, can be verified if the item contains recycling number 7. We recently wrote that BPA has also been found to be present in common paper receipts. With BPA turning up in carbonless copy and thermal imaging papers, its common usage has grown exponentially.<br /><br />Laws are either in effect or coming into effect in coming months in a variety of states and counties in the United States in which the sale of certain products containing polycarbonate has been banned, for instance, baby bottles, food containers, and sippy cups. Canada was the first country to announce plans to ban BPA, calling it a toxin and some retailers and manufacturers have announced plans to stop making products containing the chemical. Other states are looking into similar measures and a federal ban has been proposed in Congress on all food contact material. <br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Formaldehyde Bill Would Limit Chemical In Furniture</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17169</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bill is in the works to place federal limitations on formaldehyde in homes. Industry and environmental groups have backed the proposed bill, according to the Wall Street Journal.Formaldehyde is an invisible gas known to cause cancer, can also cause other illnesses ranging from nosebleeds to chronic bronchitis, and can aggravate asthma. Commonly used in manufactured homes and furniture, formaldehyde can cause respiratory problems and has been...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[A bill is in the works to place federal limitations on <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">formaldehyde</a> in homes. Industry and environmental groups have backed the proposed bill, according to the Wall Street Journal.<br /><br />Formaldehyde is an invisible gas known to cause cancer, can also cause other illnesses ranging from nosebleeds to chronic bronchitis, and can aggravate asthma. Commonly used in manufactured homes and furniture, formaldehyde can cause respiratory problems and has been classified as a carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer and as a probable carcinogen by the <a href="http://www.epa.gov/">Environmental Protection Agency</a> (EPA). The International Agency for Research on Cancer is an arm of the World Health Organization (WHO).<br /><br />The chemical formaldehyde is used in the glues needed in the manufacture of composite wood products in the United States and internationally, noted the Journal. Composite woods are often used to make furniture. In application for decades, formaldehyde is considered by manufacturers to be economical, said the Journal. Of note, formaldehyde can also be found in other common products, such as cosmetics.<br /><br />The bill, which is expected to increase consumer furniture prices was introduced in September by Senator Amy Klobuchar (Democrat-Minnesota) and Senator Mike Crapo, (Republican-Idaho), said the Journal, and seeks to lower indoor formaldehyde emissions. The proposed bill would apply a formaldehyde standard applicable to &ldquo;particleboard, plywood, and medium-density fiberboard,&rdquo; the Journal added.<br /><br />The Journal pointed out that, generally, no federal standard exists for formaldehyde emissions in homes. According to the Journal, the Department of Housing and Urban Development does set limits on the chemical in plywood and particleboard; however, those standards only apply to materials used in the production of prefabricated and mobile homes. The proposed bill would mandate that composite woods sold in the U.S. meet emission standards for the chemical at approximately 0.09 parts per million (ppm). The legislation requires the standards be in place by January 2012, and, noted the Journal, the federal standards would emulate those drafted in 2007 and just adopted in California.<br /><br />Senate bill proponents have expressed concern regarding other side effects from formaldehyde, many of which have come to light following the Toxic FEMA Trailer fiasco in which displaced hurricane Katrina victims were housed in Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) trailers found to be contaminated with high formaldehyde levels. Victims complained of a wide variety of adverse health effects typical of those experienced with exposure to formaldehyde.<br /><br />The Journal explained that, a &ldquo;volatile organic compound,&rdquo; formaldehyde &ldquo;vaporizes and turns into gas at room temperature.&rdquo; According to David Jacobs, director of research at the National Center for Healthy Housing and an adjunct professor in environmental health at the University of Illinois at Chicago, products manufactured with the toxin can release dangerous gas into the air, a phenomenon described as &ldquo;off-gassing,&rdquo; reported the Journal. Because some energy efficient houses offer limited ventilation, this can be problematic, according to Dick Titus, executive vice president of the Kitchen Cabinet Manufacturers Association, a cabinet manufacturers and suppliers trade group.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Lupus, RA Risk May Increase With Insecticide Exposure</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17150</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research has found that insecticides used in homes and&nbsp; gardens could raise the risk of lupus and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the women who use such products.&nbsp; According to an report on WebMD.com, the results of the study provide support for the idea that environmental factors may play some role in the development of autoimmune diseases in some individuals.The study detailed by WebMD.com&nbsp; was conducted by researchers at...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[New research has found that <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">insecticides</a> used in homes and&nbsp; gardens could raise the risk of lupus and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the women who use such products.&nbsp; According to an report on WebMD.com, the results of the study provide support for the idea that environmental factors may play some role in the development of autoimmune diseases in some individuals.<br /><br />The study detailed by WebMD.com&nbsp; was conducted by researchers at <a href="http://www.niehs.nih.gov/">National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</a> in Research Triangle Park, N.C., and presented at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.&nbsp; The researchers used data from the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study of 76,861 postmenopausal, predominantly white women ages 50 to 79.&nbsp; Out of that group, 178 had RA, 27 had lupus an eight had both.&nbsp; The women were surveyed about farming&nbsp; and insecticide use, WebMD said.<br /><br />The authors found that women who used insecticides six or more times a year had nearly two-and-a-half times the risk of developing RA or lupus than those who did not use bug sprays.&nbsp; The risk more than doubled among women who had used insecticides for more than 20 years, WebMD.com said.&nbsp; The study also found that hiring a gardener or commercial company to apply insecticides also doubles risks if they were used long-term. However, a history of working or living on a farm did not appear to increase risk of RA or lupus in the study.<br /><br />One of the study authors told WebMD.com that insecticides are used in about 3/4 of all homes, and that such products were used in 20 percent of all homes in the past month.&nbsp; This type of exposure can be &quot;quite persistent&quot; because pesticides don't break down in homes.<br /><br />Although the study doesn't prove cause and effect, the researches said that it illustrated a &quot;need to start thinking about what chemicals or other factors related to insecticide use&quot; could explain the findings.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>The Acreage Cancer Cluster Meeting Yields Few Answers</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17153</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Few residents of The Acreage who attended a meeting on a possible cancer cluster in the Florida community were satisfied with what they heard.&nbsp; According to a report in The Miami Herald, many attendees were unhappy that an investigator from the Florida Department of Health was unable to provide much more information beyond what they already knew. &nbsp;As we&rsquo;ve reported previously, residents of The Acreage have been concerned about a...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Few residents of The Acreage who attended a meeting on a possible <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/diseases">cancer cluster</a> in the Florida community were satisfied with what they heard.&nbsp; According to a report in The Miami Herald, many attendees were unhappy that an investigator from the Florida Department of Health was unable to provide much more information beyond what they already knew. &nbsp;<br /><br />As we&rsquo;ve reported previously, residents of The Acreage have been concerned about a cancer cluster since several children living in close proximity to each other were diagnosed with brain tumors. People in the area have speculated that a nearby Pratt &amp; Whitney jet engine plant and/or citrus groves in the area, which used potentially dangerous pesticides for decades, may have tainted well water in the area. There were also concerns about soil contamination.<br /><br />Earlier this summer, residents&rsquo; concerns prompted the <a href="http://www.doh.state.fl.us/">Florida Department of Health</a> to begin a study of cancer rates in the area. The results of the first phase were unveiled in late August. According to the Palm Beach Post, investigators found 1,369 cases of all types of cancer among residents in The Acreage between 1995 and 2007. A similar-sized area elsewhere in Florida could be expected to have 1,055 cases in that time, the Post said. The report revealed six cases of brain cancer in children 14 and younger from 1997 to 2007. Of those, three were diagnosed in 2008, the report said.<br /><br />The Florida health department report was not clear as to whether or not the findings pointed to the existence of a &ldquo;cancer cluster&rdquo; in the community. However, the department decided to launch a second phase of its investigation of cancer rates in The Acreage.<br /><br />On Monday evening, Florida State Rep. Carl Domino, R-Juno Beach, hosted a meeting for residents of The Acreage so that they could question the epidemiologist leading the state Department of Health investigation into the possible cluster.&nbsp;&nbsp; According to The Miami Herald, concern over excessive radiation in the community's wells was a major concern.&nbsp; At least 20 families in The Acreage have taken it upon themselves to arrange to have their wells tested for radiation.<br /><br />So far, the Health Department has not found any man made contaminants in The Acreage.&nbsp; The department is getting ready to interview the families of 10 children who were diagnosed with brain tumors between 1995 and 2008.&nbsp; According to The Miami Herald, those interviews should start in the next few weeks.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>This is Lead Poisoning Prevention Week</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17155</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WPCVA has announced that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has declared October 18-24 Lead Poisoning Prevention Week. The move is part of the EPA&rsquo;s efforts to heighten awareness to the toxin and its hazards, said WPCVA.According to the World Health Organization (WHO), about half of all urban children world-wide and under the age of five test with blood lead levels higher than the Center for Disease Control and...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WPCVA has announced that the <a href="http://www.epa.gov/">U.S. Environmental Protection Agency</a> (EPA) has declared October 18-24 <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">Lead Poisoning</a> Prevention Week. The move is part of the EPA&rsquo;s efforts to heighten awareness to the toxin and its hazards, said WPCVA.</p><p>According to the <a href="http://www.who.int/en/">World Health Organization</a> (WHO), about half of all urban children world-wide and under the age of five test with blood lead levels higher than the Center for Disease Control and Prevention&rsquo;s (CDC) safe limit.</p><p>Exposure to lead in children can cause brain and nervous system damage, behavioral and learning problems, slowed growth, hearing problems, headaches, mental and physical retardation, and behavioral and other health problems. Lead is also known to cause cancer and reproductive harm. Once poisoned by lead, no organ system is immune. Of particular concern is the developing brain because negative influences can have long-lasting effects and can continue well into puberty and beyond.</p><p>As we have often written, lead is considered by many experts to be one of the most important chronic environmental illnesses affecting children today. Unfortunately, despite efforts to control lead exposure, serious cases still occur. Lead effects were first discussed in Australia in 1892, said the BBC, which added that in the United Kingdom, lead has been removed from paint and petrol (gasoline). In the United States, the <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/">Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</a> (CDC), said the BBC, dropped its &ldquo;level of concern for blood&rdquo; lead levels to 10 micrograms per deciliter.</p><p>WPCVA explained that lead can be in our homes, poisoning us without our ever being aware of its presence because it cannot be seen, tasted, or smelled and it does not break down. Lead has been removed, or mostly removed, from gasoline, plumbing, paint, and a variety of other products; however, precautions should be still be taken and consumers should be aware of the adverse effects of lead exposure, said WPCVA. As part of ongoing efforts to stave lead exposure and poisoning, WPCVA suggests the following:<br /></p><ul><li>Ensure children are tested for lead levels, regardless of physical appearance since lead poisoning is not generally apparent.</li><li>Reduce dust and dirt, which are known to contain lead, and ensure, for instance, toys, hands, pacifiers, floors, window frames, bottles, sippy cups, and surfaces, are routinely washed.</li><li>Reduce lead paint exposure, particularly in homes built before 1976, by watching out for peeling or chipping paint and keeping children away from chewable, painted surfaces, such as window sills.</li><li>Never attempt to remove lead paint and always hire a professional to do so.</li><li>Eat right, especially consuming sufficient iron and calcium, which absorb less lead.</li><li>Never store food or liquid in &ldquo;lead crystal glassware or imported or old pottery,&rdquo; said WPCVA. When using or reusing plastic bags, ensure the printing is on the bag&rsquo;s exterior.</li></ul><p><br />Under the new EPA rule effective next April, contractors renovating, repairing, and painting in such a way that lead-based paint is affected &ldquo;in homes, child care facilities, and schools built before 1978&rdquo; must be certified and follow specific work practices to prevent contamination, reported WPCVA. Until then, the EPA urges adherence to lead-safe work practices: &ldquo;Contain the work area, minimize dust, and cleanup thoroughly,&rdquo; said WPCVA.<br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>New Agent Orange Policy Will Make  Disability Benefits Available to More Vets</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17114</link>		
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new proposal on Agent Orange health claims issued this week by the Department of Veterans Affairs&nbsp; will make it much easier for veterans injured by the toxin to make claims for disability payments and health care services.&nbsp; Under the proposal, three illnesses - B cell leukemias, such as hairy cell leukemia; Parkinson's disease; and ischemic heart disease - will be added to the growing list of illnesses presumed to have been caused by...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[A new proposal on Agent Orange health claims issued this week by the Department of Veterans Affairs&nbsp; will make it much easier for veterans injured by the toxin to make <a href="http://veterans-benefits-denial.com/">claims for disability payments and health care services</a>.&nbsp; Under the proposal, three illnesses - B cell leukemias, such as hairy cell leukemia; Parkinson's disease; and ischemic heart disease - will be added to the growing list of illnesses presumed to have been caused by Agent Orange.<br /><br />Agent Orange was widely used during the Vietnam War as a defoliant to remove enemy hiding places.&nbsp;&nbsp; According to The New York Times, Agent Orange was the most common herbicide used in the war.&nbsp; It contained one of the most toxic forms of dioxin, which has since been linked to some cancers.<br /><br />According to a <a href="http://www1.va.gov/opa/pressrel/pressrelease.cfm?id=1796">VA press release</a>, between January 1965 and April 1970, an estimated 2.6 million military personnel who served in Vietnam were potentially exposed to sprayed Agent Orange.&nbsp; Many of those exposed to the toxin continue to suffer health problems.<br /><br />The decision to add B cell leukemias, Parkinson's disease and ischemic heart disease to the roster of presumed Agent Orange illnesses brings the total number of ailments on the list to 15.&nbsp; Other presumed Agent Orange illnesses include:<br /><br /><ul><li>Acute and Subacute Transient Peripheral Neuropathy</li><li>AL Amyloidosis</li><li>Chloracne</li><li>Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia</li><li>Diabetes Mellitus (Type 2)</li><li>Hodgkin's Disease</li><li>Multiple Myeloma</li><li>Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma</li><li>Porphyria Cutanea Tarda</li><li>Prostate Cancer</li><li>Respiratory Cancers, and</li><li>Soft Tissue Sarcoma (other than Osteosarcoma, Chondrosarcoma, Kaposi's sarcoma, or Mesothelioma)</li></ul><br />Veterans who served in Vietnam during the war and who have a &quot;presumed&quot; illness don't have to prove an association between their illnesses and their military service.&nbsp; This &quot;presumption&quot; simplifies and speeds up the application process for benefits.&nbsp; According to the Times, it is&nbsp; estimated that about 200,000 veterans might seek benefits under the proposed change in policy.<br /><br />According to The New York Times, the new Agent Orange policy will apply to some 2.1 million veterans who set foot in Vietnam during the war, including those who came after the military stopped using Agent Orange in 1970. It will not apply to sailors on deep-water ships, though VA says it plans to study the effects of Agent Orange on the Navy.<br /><br />The decision to expand the list of presumed Agent Orange illnesses was based on&nbsp; an independent study released in July by the Institute of Medicine,&nbsp; the VA press release said. <br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Is EPA Stalling On Artificial Turf Study?</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17116</link>		
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although concerns with toxins in artificial turf continue to spark great controversy, it seems there is no federal report outlining the potential adverse health effects caused by tire crumble/ground rubber, which is used to pad turf, reported Philly.com.In June we wrote that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was looking at its earlier endorsement of shredded tire use to cushion play areas from falls. The Environmental News Service cited...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Although concerns with <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">toxins in artificial turf</a> continue to spark great controversy, it seems there is no federal report outlining the potential adverse health effects caused by tire crumble/ground rubber, which is used to pad turf, reported Philly.com.<br /><br />In June we wrote that the <a href="http://www.epa.gov/">Environmental Protection Agency</a> (EPA) was looking at its earlier endorsement of shredded tire use to cushion play areas from falls. The Environmental News Service cited EPA documents released by the environmental advocacy group Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) in which the EPA stated additional research was called for on ground rubber safety.<br /><br />A limited study was conducted by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to look into the safety of the fibers found in the artificial product, but, said Philly.com, the agency announced this summer that turf is safe. Not everyone agrees.<br /><br />Experts have long been criticizing the safety of tire crumb used nationwide in playgrounds and sports fields and its use has concerned politicians and consumer watchdog groups for some time over the potential health and environmental hazards that come from recycled tire rubber. Crumb rubber is used as artificial dirt between plastic blades of grass on many fields.<br /><br />Use of artificial turf has grown exponentially in recent years and is seen as a way to cut costs and water use. But, lead chromate pigment is sometimes used to make the grass green and maintain its color in sunlight. It remains unclear how widely the compound is used; however, the New Jersey Health Department found lead in both of the nylon fields it tested earlier this year. Both were AstroTurf brand surfaces.<br /><br />A year ago, said Philly.com, the EPA began its probe into artificial turf to determine what chemicals it releases and its impact on children. Artificial turf fields are opening at high rates in this country, about 800 annually; a concern that is forcing the federal government into announcing one way or another about turf&rsquo;s safety, noted Philly.com. Of note, the Environmental News Service previously wrote that the First Family had tire crumb installed as a playing surface for their children.<br /><br />Some believe the EPA is stalling, such as Jeff Ruch, director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), who said &quot;If safeguarding children's health is a top priority at EPA, why can't this multibillion-dollar agency afford to take a hard look at what is in our playgrounds, schoolyards, and athletic fields?&quot; quoted Philly.com. It is widely known that the substance can contain arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, and dangerous hydrocarbons, as well as particulates, latex, fibers, and even volatile organic compounds and dyes; tests confirm humans can absorb lead in turf. Still, the artificial turf industry has long denied its products are dangerous, despite that recent tests conducted by New Jersey health officials found potentially hazardous lead levels on worn nylon and nylon-blend athletic fields. Those findings forced the EPA to take a look at turf, especially when it was revealed that about 25,000 tires are used to create a typical football field, noted Philly.com.<br /><br />Some are concerned with what is being tested. Eric Wachter, an EPA official recently wrote that it was not &quot;assessing the health effects&quot; of crumble, but was &quot;monitoring methods&quot; for its testing, quoted Philly.com. Ruch expressed shock saying that, &quot;EPA misled parents and the public into believing it was actually addressing potential toxic exposure risks to kids,&quot; reported Philly.com. Retired toxicologist and a former EPA employee, Suzanne Wuerthele, said she advised the agency about the crumb issue years ago and said there are tests, which can be used to determine the product&rsquo;s safety.<br /><br />Cost is clearly a concern. There are&mdash;citing the Synthetic Turf Council&mdash;some 5,000 turf fields in this country, at a cost of from $500,000 to in excess of $1,000,000 each. No small issue if a government agency publicly confirms the dangers with turf. Organic alternatives, for instance, pulverized coconuts, are seen as more expensive, explained Philly.com.<br />&nbsp;<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>FDA Slammed Over Pace Of BPA Study</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17118</link>		
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BPA (bisphenol A), the commonly used plastic hardener and polycarbonate plastic byproduct that makes regular headlines for its links to a growing array of adverse health effects, as well as its growing ubiquity, is making news again. No surprise. This time, the Milwaukee-Wisconsin Journal Sentinel (JSOnline) is reporting that the United States government is stalling in its study of the toxin&rsquo;s effects.BPA can be found in everything from...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">BPA (bisphenol A)</a>, the commonly used plastic hardener and polycarbonate plastic byproduct that makes regular headlines for its links to a growing array of adverse health effects, as well as its growing ubiquity, is making news again. No surprise. This time, the Milwaukee-Wisconsin Journal Sentinel (JSOnline) is reporting that the United States government is stalling in its study of the toxin&rsquo;s effects.<br /><br />BPA can be found in everything from baby bottles, sippy cup, water bottles, aluminum can linings, eyeglasses, and cars, to DVD and CD cases and some dental sealants. BPA can also be found in appliances and windshields; on recyclable bottles, BPA, as a component, can be verified if the item contains recycling number 7. We recently wrote that BPA has also been found to be present in common paper receipts. With BPA turning up in carbonless copy and thermal imaging papers, its common usage has grown exponentially.<br /><br />JSOnline reported that millions of dollars are being unnecessarily dumped into more studies into the effects of BPA; given that an astounding number of studies&mdash;over 900&mdash;have been conducted and confirm the negative risks, the 33 BPA experts from the scientific community, find the multi-million dollar study redundant. Most of the scientists hail from universities and recently sent a letter to Margaret Hamburg, the commissioner of the U.S. <a href="http://www.fda.gov/">Food and Drug Administration</a> (FDA), with accusations that the agency is dragging on the issue and endangering consumer health, said JSOnline.<br /><br />BPA has long been connected to a wide variety of adverse effects, including increased risks of brain, reproductive, cardiac, and immune system diseases and disorders; problems with liver function testing; interruptions in chemotherapy treatment; and links with serious health problems. Studies have overwhelmingly found BPA to have negative effects at doses lower than current FDA standards; retention in the body longer than was previously believed; leeching into liquids being held in containers regardless of the containers&rsquo; temperature; and longer lasting damage, which can be passed to future generations.<br /><br />In urine tests, BPA is found in the overwhelming majority of Americans, more than 93 percent.<br /><br />The agency has long announced that it is reassessing its earlier opinions and has scheduled to release its opinion at the end of next month. The researchers feel this is a time-waster. &quot;FDA's plans to spend significant time and money on a very well researched chemical are disturbing,&quot; quoted JSOnline, citing the letter, which was signed by the scientists, all experts on BPA, with many having served on government teams. The FDA has been harshly criticized for ruling BPA as safe, basing its findings on two industry-sponsored studies.<br /><br />Laws are either in effect or coming into effect in coming months in a variety of states and counties in the United States in which the sale of certain products containing polycarbonate has been banned, for instance, baby bottles, food containers, and sippy cups. Canada was the first country to announce plans to ban BPA, calling it a toxin and some retailers and manufacturers have announced plans to stop making products containing the chemical. Other states, said JSOnline, are looking into similar measures and a federal ban has been proposed in Congress on all food contact material.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Man Raised at Camp Lejuene Blames Tainted Water for Cancer</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17103</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cancer seems to be everywhere, and breast cancer is certainly always making news. Now a man raised at a Marine base has advised lawmakers that his breast cancer is a result of contaminated Camp Lejeune water, said CNN. Data indicates that less than 2,000 men each year are diagnosed with breast cancer, noted CNN.Michael Partain (41) was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2007 and, speaking to the Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs, pointed out...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Cancer seems to be everywhere, and breast cancer is certainly always making news. Now a man raised at a Marine base has advised lawmakers that his breast cancer is a result of <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">contaminated Camp Lejeune water</a>, said CNN. Data indicates that less than 2,000 men each year are diagnosed with breast cancer, noted CNN.<br /><br />Michael Partain (41) was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2007 and, speaking to the <a href="http://veterans.senate.gov/">Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs</a>, pointed out that his parents were stationed at the Marine training base in North Carolina when he was born. No less than 40 more U.S. Marines or sons of Marines who lived at the Marine base have been diagnosed with the cancer that is considered relatively rare in men, said CNN.<br /><br />Partain said that when his mother was pregnant with him, his family was subjected to high levels of tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, dichloroethylene, benzene, and vinyl chloride in Camp Lejeune&rsquo;s tap water wrote CNN. &quot;I am one of about 40 men who share this unique commonality of male breast cancer and exposure to contaminated tap water [at] Camp Lejeune,&quot; he told the Senate committee, quoted CNN. Partain said his illness has been a &quot;traumatic, emotional and physical&quot; ordeal for his family, reported CNN.<br /><br />The committee hearing looked at military personnel exposure to hazardous materials in this country as well as in Japan and Iraq, reported CNN. Among areas of concern are toxic smoke from Iraqi burn pits and contaminated water, added CNN. The men diagnosed with the cancer either lived or served at the camp between the 1960s and 1980s, said CNN, which pointed out that, according to government records, Camp Lejueune&rsquo;s water was contaminated for some 30 years.<br /><br />The Marine Corps argues that no link has been made between the contaminated water and the resultant diseases, said CNN. Regardless, Richard Burr (Senator&mdash;North Carolina), the ranking Republican on the committee, along with Kay Hagan (Democratic Senator&mdash;North Carolina) are seeking legislation to mandate that the Department of Veterans Affairs pay medical costs for Marines and their families exposed to the contaminated Camp Lejeune water. To date, the provision has passed the Senate and will amend the Navy from &quot;disposing of water-contamination claims before critical scientific studies can be completed,&quot; quoted CNN.<br /><br />According to MyFoxDC, the Camp's water was contaminated from 1957 to 1987 by a TCE, which is a degreasing solvent and PCE, a component used in dry cleaning. The government describes both TCE and PCE as possible carcinogens, said MyFoxDC, which noted that the water was likely tainted by a dry cleaner located next to the camp and so-called industrial activities that took place at Camp Lejeune.<br /><br />Since it began its investigation in 2001 of the water at the Marine base, links have turned up between the chemically contaminated water and some cancers, said Fox.<br /><br />According to CNN, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, an arm of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), is conducting also tests to determine if the toxic water is linked to the health issues. Some water appears to have been toxically contaminated at significantly high concentrations, up to 280 times higher than what the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) considers safe, said CNN.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Man Raised at Camp Lejuene Blames Tainted Water for Cancer</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17104</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cancer seems to be everywhere, and breast cancer is certainly always making news. Now a man raised at a Marine base has advised lawmakers that his breast cancer is a result of contaminated Camp Lejeune water, said CNN. Data indicates that less than 2,000 men each year are diagnosed with breast cancer, noted CNN.Michael Partain (41) was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2007 and, speaking to the Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs, pointed out...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Cancer seems to be everywhere, and breast cancer is certainly always making news. Now a man raised at a Marine base has advised lawmakers that his breast cancer is a result of <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">contaminated Camp Lejeune water</a>, said CNN. Data indicates that less than 2,000 men each year are diagnosed with breast cancer, noted CNN.<br /><br />Michael Partain (41) was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2007 and, speaking to the <a href="http://veterans.senate.gov/">Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs</a>, pointed out that his parents were stationed at the Marine training base in North Carolina when he was born. No less than 40 more U.S. Marines or sons of Marines who lived at the Marine base have been diagnosed with the cancer that is considered relatively rare in men, said CNN.<br /><br />Partain said that when his mother was pregnant with him, his family was subjected to high levels of tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, dichloroethylene, benzene, and vinyl chloride in Camp Lejeune&rsquo;s tap water wrote CNN. &quot;I am one of about 40 men who share this unique commonality of male breast cancer and exposure to contaminated tap water [at] Camp Lejeune,&quot; he told the Senate committee, quoted CNN. Partain said his illness has been a &quot;traumatic, emotional and physical&quot; ordeal for his family, reported CNN.<br /><br />The committee hearing looked at military personnel exposure to hazardous materials in this country as well as in Japan and Iraq, reported CNN. Among areas of concern are toxic smoke from Iraqi burn pits and contaminated water, added CNN. The men diagnosed with the cancer either lived or served at the camp between the 1960s and 1980s, said CNN, which pointed out that, according to government records, Camp Lejueune&rsquo;s water was contaminated for some 30 years.<br /><br />The Marine Corps argues that no link has been made between the contaminated water and the resultant diseases, said CNN. Regardless, Richard Burr (Senator&mdash;North Carolina), the ranking Republican on the committee, along with Kay Hagan (Democratic Senator&mdash;North Carolina) are seeking legislation to mandate that the Department of Veterans Affairs pay medical costs for Marines and their families exposed to the contaminated Camp Lejeune water. To date, the provision has passed the Senate and will amend the Navy from &quot;disposing of water-contamination claims before critical scientific studies can be completed,&quot; quoted CNN.<br /><br />According to MyFoxDC, the Camp's water was contaminated from 1957 to 1987 by a TCE, which is a degreasing solvent and PCE, a component used in dry cleaning. The government describes both TCE and PCE as possible carcinogens, said MyFoxDC, which noted that the water was likely tainted by a dry cleaner located next to the camp and so-called industrial activities that took place at Camp Lejeune.<br /><br />Since it began its investigation in 2001 of the water at the Marine base, links have turned up between the chemically contaminated water and some cancers, said Fox.<br /><br />According to CNN, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, an arm of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), is conducting also tests to determine if the toxic water is linked to the health issues. Some water appears to have been toxically contaminated at significantly high concentrations, up to 280 times higher than what the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) considers safe, said CNN.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Man Raised at Camp Lejuene Blames Tainted Water for Cancer</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17104</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cancer seems to be everywhere, and breast cancer is certainly always making news. Now a man raised at a Marine base has advised lawmakers that his breast cancer is a result of contaminated Camp Lejeune water, said CNN. Data indicates that less than 2,000 men each year are diagnosed with breast cancer, noted CNN.Michael Partain (41) was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2007 and, speaking to the Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs, pointed out...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Cancer seems to be everywhere, and breast cancer is certainly always making news. Now a man raised at a Marine base has advised lawmakers that his breast cancer is a result of <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">contaminated Camp Lejeune water</a>, said CNN. Data indicates that less than 2,000 men each year are diagnosed with breast cancer, noted CNN.<br /><br />Michael Partain (41) was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2007 and, speaking to the <a href="http://veterans.senate.gov/">Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs</a>, pointed out that his parents were stationed at the Marine training base in North Carolina when he was born. No less than 40 more U.S. Marines or sons of Marines who lived at the Marine base have been diagnosed with the cancer that is considered relatively rare in men, said CNN.<br /><br />Partain said that when his mother was pregnant with him, his family was subjected to high levels of tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, dichloroethylene, benzene, and vinyl chloride in Camp Lejeune&rsquo;s tap water wrote CNN. &quot;I am one of about 40 men who share this unique commonality of male breast cancer and exposure to contaminated tap water [at] Camp Lejeune,&quot; he told the Senate committee, quoted CNN. Partain said his illness has been a &quot;traumatic, emotional and physical&quot; ordeal for his family, reported CNN.<br /><br />The committee hearing looked at military personnel exposure to hazardous materials in this country as well as in Japan and Iraq, reported CNN. Among areas of concern are toxic smoke from Iraqi burn pits and contaminated water, added CNN. The men diagnosed with the cancer either lived or served at the camp between the 1960s and 1980s, said CNN, which pointed out that, according to government records, Camp Lejueune&rsquo;s water was contaminated for some 30 years.<br /><br />The Marine Corps argues that no link has been made between the contaminated water and the resultant diseases, said CNN. Regardless, Richard Burr (Senator&mdash;North Carolina), the ranking Republican on the committee, along with Kay Hagan (Democratic Senator&mdash;North Carolina) are seeking legislation to mandate that the Department of Veterans Affairs pay medical costs for Marines and their families exposed to the contaminated Camp Lejeune water. To date, the provision has passed the Senate and will amend the Navy from &quot;disposing of water-contamination claims before critical scientific studies can be completed,&quot; quoted CNN.<br /><br />According to MyFoxDC, the Camp's water was contaminated from 1957 to 1987 by a TCE, which is a degreasing solvent and PCE, a component used in dry cleaning. The government describes both TCE and PCE as possible carcinogens, said MyFoxDC, which noted that the water was likely tainted by a dry cleaner located next to the camp and so-called industrial activities that took place at Camp Lejeune.<br /><br />Since it began its investigation in 2001 of the water at the Marine base, links have turned up between the chemically contaminated water and some cancers, said Fox.<br /><br />According to CNN, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, an arm of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), is conducting also tests to determine if the toxic water is linked to the health issues. Some water appears to have been toxically contaminated at significantly high concentrations, up to 280 times higher than what the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) considers safe, said CNN.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>BPA Exposure from Sales Receipts</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17106</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BPA&mdash;also known as bisphenol A&mdash;is making headlines nearly every day for its links to a growing array of adverse health effects, as well as its growing ubiquity. US News just reported that the toxin, which has been found in many consumer products, has also now been found to be present in common paper receipts.A commonly used plastic hardener and polycarbonate plastic byproduct, BPA has been found in everything from baby bottles, sippy...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">BPA&mdash;also known as bisphenol A</a>&mdash;is making headlines nearly every day for its links to a growing array of adverse health effects, as well as its growing ubiquity. US News just reported that the toxin, which has been found in many consumer products, has also now been found to be present in common paper receipts.<br /><br />A commonly used plastic hardener and polycarbonate plastic byproduct, BPA has been found in everything from baby bottles, sippy cup, water bottles, aluminum can linings, eyeglasses, and cars, to DVD and CD cases and some dental sealants. BPA can also be found in appliances and windshields; on recyclable bottles, BPA as a component can be verified if the item contains recycling number 7.<br /><br />BPA has long been connected to a wide variety of adverse effects, including increased risks of brain, reproductive, cardiac, and immune system diseases and disorders; problems with liver function testing; interruptions in chemotherapy treatment; and links with serious health problems. Studies have overwhelmingly found BPA to have negative effects at doses lower than the <a href="http://www.fda.gov/">U.S. Food and Drug Administration&rsquo;s</a> (FDA) current standards; retention in the body longer than was previously believed; leeching into liquids being held in containers regardless of the containers&rsquo; temperature; and longer lasting damage, which can be passed to future generations.<br /><br />With BPA turning up in carbonless copy and thermal imaging papers, its common usage has grown exponentially. According to Science News, said US News, John C. Warner of the Warner Babcock Institute for Green Chemistry found that the majority of receipts in use today are coated with BPA and feels exposure in this way is even greater than the exposure suffered from other products. &ldquo;When people talk about polycarbonate bottles, they talk about nanogram quantities of BPA [leaching out],&rdquo; Warner said. &ldquo;The average cash register receipt that's out there and uses the BPA technology will have 60 to 100 milligrams of free BPA,&rdquo; quoted US News. Free BPA is that BPA not &ldquo;bound&rdquo; into a polymer as it is in bottles and other products, which means it can be more easily ingested or inhaled into the body, said US News.<br /><br />Warner noted that, &ldquo;the biggest exposures, in my opinion, will be these cash register receipts,&rdquo; said US News, which explained that once we touch a BPA-contaminated receipt, it can infiltrate our food. Warner also pointed out, reported US News, that the estrogen-mimicking toxin can be delivered into the body in the same way that time-released birth control patches work.<br /><br />While not all receipt papers contained BPA, it is impossible&mdash;without testing&mdash;to determine which do and do not contain the toxin. Warner suggests, among other practices that pregnant women wash their hands after handling a receipt and that consumers opt for no receipts or sign-up for an electronic receipt service, which are also environmentally friendly, reported CNN.<br /><br />Laws are either in effect or coming into effect in coming months in a variety of states and counties in the United States in which the sale of certain products containing polycarbonate has been banned, for instance, baby bottles, food containers, and sippy cups. Canada was the first country to announce plans to ban BPA, calling it a toxin and some retailers and manufacturers have announced plans to stop making products containing the chemical.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>EPA Reviewing Weed Killer</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17093</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced that it is re-evaluating health outcomes linked to a commonly used pesticide, atrazine, that has been discovered in drinking water, said the Associated Press (AP). Atrazine is typically used on corn and other crops.The AP noted that, based on research, rainstorm runoff can contaminate streams and rivers, contaminated water systems. The EPA looked at 150 drinking water systems in...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yesterday, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced that it is re-evaluating health outcomes linked to a commonly used pesticide, <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">atrazine</a>, that has been discovered in drinking water, said the Associated Press (AP). Atrazine is typically used on corn and other crops.<br /><br />The AP noted that, based on research, rainstorm runoff can contaminate streams and rivers, contaminated water systems. The EPA looked at 150 drinking water systems in America&rsquo;s Midwest because that is where the chemical is used most frequently, said the AP. The <a href="http://www.epa.gov/">EPA</a> has not detected atrazine at the levels that would prompt adverse health problems, such as cancer; however, emerging studies indicate that even at lower levels, atrazine&rsquo;s presence in drinking water can result in &ldquo;low birth weights, birth defects and reproductive problems,&rdquo; said the AP.<br /><br />In 2003, under the Bush administration, the EPA allowed atrazine to continue to be used with few restrictions. This is not the first time the former presidential administration has allowed use of dangerous toxins in the environment. Earlier this year, we wrote about how information pointing to &ldquo;significantly higher cancer risks&rdquo; for those living near coal-fired power plant ash dumps was allegedly covered up by the recent Bush Administration, citing a report by EnvironmentalIntegrity.org.<br /><br />&quot;We are taking a hard look at the decision made by the previous administration on atrazine,&quot; said Steve Owens, an assistant administrator, in a statement released Wednesday, quoted the AP. &quot;Our examination of atrazine will ... help determine whether a change in EPA's regulatory position on this pesticide is appropriate,&quot; Owens added.<br /><br />Environmental advocates are hoping the review will enable phase-out of atrazine and drinking water system operators from a variety of states have sued manufacturers in the hope of getting the chemical out of the water systems, noted the AP. Despite emerging evidence Syngenta, considered the largest maker of atrazine, defends its safety, reported the AP.<br /><br />We have long been following links between pesticides and herbicides and adverse medical effects across various demographics. We recently wrote that another study found a link between pediatric cancer and household pesticides. That research discovered the associations occurred in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), a cancer that generally develops when children are between three and seven years of age, said ScienceDaily, previously. Prior research also pointed to links between pesticides and childhood cancers<br /><br />Earlier this year we wrote about links between pesticides and Parkinson&rsquo;s disease and prior to that we also wrote that researchers said that pesticide exposure might also be linked to an increase in Alzheimer&rsquo;s disease risks.<br /><br />Reuters also previously reported that the results of a study of 319 Parkinson&rsquo;s patients and 200 nonParkinson&rsquo;s-affected relatives found that people diagnosed with Parkinson&rsquo;s are more than two times likelier to report pesticide exposure over people not diagnosed with the disease.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Prenatal BPA Exposure Linked to Behavioral Issues</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17083</link>		
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bisphenol A&mdash;BPA&mdash;has, yet again, been linked to adverse effects, this time in young children. According to Science News, girls whose mothers were exposed to BPA in early pregnancy trimesters, were more aggressive than most, while boys exhibited more anxiety and were withdrawn. The emerging study is the first to link BPA exposure in early pregnancy with behavior issues, by gender, said Science News.The girls, said the researchers, were...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">Bisphenol A&mdash;BPA</a>&mdash;has, yet again, been linked to adverse effects, this time in young children. According to Science News, girls whose mothers were exposed to BPA in early pregnancy trimesters, were more aggressive than most, while boys exhibited more anxiety and were withdrawn. The emerging study is the first to link BPA exposure in early pregnancy with behavior issues, by gender, said Science News.<br /><br />The girls, said the researchers, were more masculinized, while the boys had a similar effect and appeared more feminized, said Science News. It is possible that &ldquo;gender-establishing hormones&rdquo; were blocked, said the study leader, which is actually a defeminization of the girls and demasculinization of the boys.<br /><br />BPA, a toxic component used in plastic manufacture that hardens the material, has long been connected to a wide variety of adverse effects, including increased risks of brain, reproductive, cardiac, and immune system diseases and disorders; problems with liver function testing; interruptions in chemotherapy treatment; and links with serious health problems. Studies have overwhelmingly found BPA to have negative effects at doses lower than the U.S. Food and Drug Administration&rsquo;s (FDA) current standards; retention in the body longer than was previously believed; leeching into liquids being held in containers regardless of the containers&rsquo; temperature; and longer lasting damage, which can be passed to future generations. Over 200 peer-reviewed studies have linked BPA to health problems.<br /><br />According to Bruce Lanphear of Simon Faser University in Burnaby, British Columbia, said Science News, it remains unclear if the behavioral effects of BPA exposure on early development are long-term or not. Lanphear, an epidemiologist and study author, expressed concern that children would not grow out of the behaviors and that such behaviors could impact a wide cross-section of children and lead to delinquency, depression, or anxiety, reported Science News. As has been mentioned on this site previously, Science Daily noted that studies on lab rodent pups suggest links between BPA and aggression and hyperactivity.<br /><br />The study, nicknamed HOME&mdash;Health Outcomes and Measures of the Environment&mdash;has been conducted by Lanphear and colleagues at the Cincinnati Children&rsquo;s Hospital Medical Center for a number of years and has been primarily concerned with neurobehavioral risks resulting from lead exposures in early childhood, said Science News. The team looked at women in early pregnancy, following them through the births and into school; the children are now between three and five years of age, according to Science Daily.<br /><br />As part of the research, Lanphear, with Joe Braun of the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, and their colleagues from Cincinnati and the <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/">Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</a> (CDC) looked for BPA impacts in a subset of 249 randomly selected mother-infant pairs. Nearly all&mdash;over 99 percent&mdash;the women tested positive for BPA exposure during no less than one of three urine tests conducted during their pregnancies, said Science News, with 90 percent containing &ldquo;detectible&rdquo; levels. One woman&rsquo;s levels spiked at a massive 1,250 for reasons that remain unclear, added Science News.<br /><br />The study also pointed to IQ drops linked to environmental childhood lead exposures in the U.S., according to Lanphear, who noted that demographically, losses are significant, according to Science News. Also, said Science News, another study suggests BPA exposure is linked to a newly discovered, and somewhat surprising source: Thermally printed cash register receipts.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Results From Water Testing in The Acreage Released</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17066</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Water in The Acreage, a Florida community that some speculate is the site of a cancer cluster, is not contaminated with toxic chemicals,&nbsp; the state's Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has announced. However, four wells had levels of alpha particles, radium-226 or radium-228,&nbsp; that exceed drinking water standards.Radium-226 and radium-228 are naturally occurring radioactive metals that could cause cancer at elevated levels....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Water in The Acreage, a Florida community that some speculate is the site of a cancer cluster, is not contaminated with <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">toxic chemicals</a>,&nbsp; the state's <a href="http://www.dep.state.fl.us/">Department of Environmental Protection</a> (DEP) has announced. However, four wells had levels of alpha particles, radium-226 or radium-228,&nbsp; that exceed drinking water standards.<br /><br />Radium-226 and radium-228 are naturally occurring radioactive metals that could cause cancer at elevated levels. According to the Palm Beach Post, the DEP noted that such radioactive contamination often occurs naturally.<br /><br />As we&rsquo;ve reported previously, residents of The Acreage have been concerned about a cancer cluster since several children living in close proximity to each other were diagnosed with brain tumors. People in the area have speculated that a nearby Pratt &amp; Whitney jet engine plant and/or citrus groves in the area, which used potentially dangerous pesticides for decades, may have tainted well water in the area. There were also concerns about soil contamination.<br /><br />Earlier this summer, residents&rsquo; concerns prompted the Florida Department of Health to begin a study of cancer rates in the area. The results of the first phase were unveiled in late August. According to the Palm Beach Post, investigators found 1,369 cases of all types of cancer among residents in The Acreage between 1995 and 2007. A similar-sized area elsewhere in Florida could be expected to have 1,055 cases in that time, the Post said. The report revealed six cases of brain cancer in children 14 and younger from 1997 to 2007. Of those, three were diagnosed in 2008, the report said.<br /><br />The Florida health department report was not clear as to whether or not the findings pointed to the existence of a &ldquo;cancer cluster&rdquo; in the community. However, the department decided to launch a second phase of its investigation of cancer rates in The Acreage. <br /><br />According to The Palm Beach Post, the DEP has now finished dozens of wells in The Acreage for 100 toxic substances, including pesticides, herbicides and metals such as lead and arsenic.&nbsp; While not all wells were tested for every substance, no evidence of such man-made pollution was found, the Post said.<br /><br />The four wells where elevated levels of radium-225 or radium-228 were detected did not appear to be near the locations where residents have reported brain cancer in children.&nbsp; The DEP said the contamination may require homeowners with affected wells to install water treatment systems. <br /><br />Only 10 private wells were tested for radium-226 and radium 228, the Post said.&nbsp; Drinking water from the Seminole Water Plant, which supplies water to most schools in The Acreage, didn't show levels of radium above drinking water standards.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>NYC Lead Poisoning Cases Drop</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17061</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although New York City is seeing some progress regarding a drop in lead poisoning cases, recent findings indicate children of color still suffer from lead poisoning at higher rates than other groups.According to 2008 data, said EMaxHealth, 85 percent of the children identified as having been diagnosed with lead poisoning were either black, Hispanic, or Asian, with Hispanic and black children comprising the bulk of new cases. Regarding Asian...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Although New York City is seeing some progress regarding a drop in <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/lead_paint_poisoning">lead poisoning</a> cases, recent findings indicate children of color still suffer from lead poisoning at higher rates than other groups.<br /><br />According to 2008 data, said EMaxHealth, 85 percent of the children identified as having been diagnosed with lead poisoning were either black, Hispanic, or Asian, with Hispanic and black children comprising the bulk of new cases. Regarding Asian children as compared to other groups, Asian children with lead poisoning tend to be older, born outside of the United States, and likely exposed to lead in other countries, said EMaxHealth.<br /><br />Meanwhile, the overall number of lead poisoning cases in children dropped by 19 percent in New York City in 2008, according to information announced by the Health Department in its' annual report to the New York City Council, reported EMaxHealth. Last year&rsquo;s figures indicate 1,572 newly identified cases of lead poisoning among children from six months and to six years of age pointed to a 92 percent decline since 1995; that year saw about 20,000 lead poisoning cases, according to EMaxHealth.<br /><br />&ldquo;The new number marks a new low for New York City,&rdquo; said Dr. Thomas Farley, New York City Health Commissioner, quoted EMaxHealth. &ldquo;But it also shows that childhood poisoning remains a serious, preventable health problem. Lead paint is the main cause of lead poisoning, and young children are most at risk. It&rsquo;s critically important that landlords safely repair peeling lead paint in homes with young children. It&rsquo;s also the law,&rdquo; Dr. Farley added.<br /><br />Exposure to lead in children can cause brain and nervous system damage, behavioral and learning problems, slowed growth, hearing problems, headaches, mental and physical retardation, and behavioral and other health problems. Lead is also known to cause cancer and reproductive harm. Once poisoned by lead, no organ system is immune. Of particular concern is the developing brain because negative influences can have long-lasting effects and can continue well into puberty and beyond.<br /><br />EMaxHealth explained that lead poisoning is defined when blood levels are measured at 10 or more micrograms of lead per deciliter of blood (ug/dl). State law mandates physicians test young children&mdash;one-to-two years of age&mdash;since patients with elevated lead levels may not always exhibit symptoms, added EMaxHealth.<br /><br />Last year, of the 536 children newly diagnosed with blood levels at or exceeding 15 ug/dl, the majority&mdash;446&mdash;were between six months and six years of age, said EMaxHealth. This level is known as the Environmental Intervention Blood Lead Level, known as the EIBLL, explained EMaxHealth, which noted that, at this level, the Health Department intervenes to determine the origin of lead paint in the patient and mandates landlords repair any such hazards safely and quickly. There has been a 14 percent decline in EIBLL cases in the past two years&mdash;2007 saw 620&mdash;and a 69 percent decline from 1709 in 1995, said EMaxHealth.<br /><br />EMaxHealth suggests parents remind doctors to test children for lead poisoning at one and two years of age, as well as older, at risk children; report peeling paint to landlords, and if no positive response is received, call 311; frequently wash floors, windowsills, hands, toys, and pacifiers; do not use food and consumer products known to contain lead; and use cold tap water, that has run for a few minutes, to make formula or cook and drink.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>EPA To Reform Toxic Chemical Regulations</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17057</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) just announced its plans to review six controversial toxic chemicals, Environmental Health News is reporting.President Obama&rsquo;s top environmental official&mdash;EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson&mdash;announced a plan to change how the United States regulates toxic chemicals that could present adverse effects to people and the environment, said Environmental Health News. Jackson said the currently...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) just announced its plans to review six controversial <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">toxic chemicals</a>, Environmental Health News is reporting.<br /><br />President Obama&rsquo;s top environmental official&mdash;<a href="http://www.epa.gov/">EPA</a> Administrator Lisa Jackson&mdash;announced a plan to change how the United States regulates toxic chemicals that could present adverse effects to people and the environment, said Environmental Health News. Jackson said the currently followed 1975 law is &ldquo;inordinately cumbersome and time-consuming&rdquo; and that the Obama administration will promote a new chemical law in Congress that geared to place the onus on industry to prove the chemicals are safe, reported Environmental Health News.<br /><br />In the interim, the agency plans on analyzing and regulating &ldquo;six high-profile, widely used chemicals&rdquo; said Environmental Health News, that have caused serious concerns among consumers and experts alike. Among the chemicals are bisphenol A&mdash;BPA&mdash;and phthalates, toxins about which we have been writing for some time. Brominated flame retardants, perfluorinated compounds, and some parafins will also be reviewed.<br /><br />BPA is known for is plastic-hardening properties while phthalates are used to make plastics more flexible. Brominated flame retardants are often used in electronics; perfluorinates are known for being used in nonstick coatings; and parafins are found in lubricants, said Environmental Health news, which noted that benzidine dyes and pigments will also be addressed.<br /><br />These chemicals, as readers of this blog are aware, are hormone mimickers that can interrupt fetal development, development in growing children, and have been linked to a wide array of serious disorders including cancer, diabetes, reproductive and genital disorders, and neurological and behavioral problems.<br /><br />The move is a long hoped-for and welcome change following the industry-friendly Bush administration. Just three years ago said Environmental Health News, key EPA leaders testified before Congress, defending the Toxic Substances Control Act as being effective in keeping Americans safe from industrial compounds. Since, consumers, advocates, and scientific experts have come out with report after report detailing the serious dangers these chemicals have and can pose to humans and the environment.<br /><br />Currently, about 7,000 chemicals are either produced or imported in amounts over 25,000 pound into this country annually, said Environmental Health News, citing industry figures. Of these, a mere five have been banned or restricted since the law was put in place over three decades ago, noted Environmental Health News. The law mandates the EPA prove a toxic substance &quot;presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment,&quot; and look at the financial implications of stemming such use and decide on &quot;the least burdensome&quot; approach to regulate industry, quoted Environmental Health News. An example of how this law has failed is best seen with asbestos, which although mostly banned, was tossed out of court when manufacturers won a 1989 court battle in 1989; &ldquo;The asbestos decision had a chilling effect&rdquo; on the EPA, Jackson said, quoted Environmental Health.<br /><br />Jackson said the agency will look at the six chemicals and develop an action plan containing strict deadlines for exposure limits, among other steps. More chemicals will be added after the initial six, said Environmental Health. About 80,000 chemicals, many commonly found, have no record of health and safety information.<br />&nbsp;<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>EPA Tells Schools Caulk May be Toxic</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17049</link>		
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) just announced that caulk found around windows and doors in hundreds of schools nationwide may contain PCBs, which are potentially cancer causing, reported the Associated Press (AP).Boston.com wrote that the EPA urges building owners, such as school building owners, to test &ldquo;brittle, aging masonry and window caulking&rdquo; for PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls), especially in older structures. The...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) just announced that caulk found around windows and doors in hundreds of schools nationwide may contain <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">PCBs</a>, which are potentially cancer causing, reported the Associated Press (AP).<br /><br />Boston.com wrote that the EPA urges building owners, such as school building owners, to test &ldquo;brittle, aging masonry and window caulking&rdquo; for PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls), especially in older structures. The recommendation involves buildings built or renovated between 1950 and 1978; PCBs were banned in 1978, said Boston.com.<br /><br />PCBs were used in electrical transformers that leaked into waterways and soil, creating pollution in a number of areas nationwide, said Boston.com. Because of their oily consistency, PCBs were combined with caulking to make it more flexible and mixed with &ldquo;industrial paints and adhesives,&rdquo; said Boston.com.<br /><br />Although the EPA said the danger to children in not yet known, it noted that &ldquo;we&rsquo;re concerned about the potential risks associated with exposure to these PCBs, and we&rsquo;re recommending practical, common-sense steps to reduce this exposure as we improve our understanding of the science,&rsquo;&rsquo; said EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson, quoted Boston.com.<br /><br />PCBs, which include about some 200 compounds, said Boston.com, can cause damage to the human &ldquo;immune, reproductive, nervous, and endocrine systems,&rdquo; said the AP. PCBs can also lead to cancer if a build up in the body occurs over time, said the AP.<br /><br />The EPA suggests removing caulk if PCB levels are found to be high, said the AP. Testing is recommended by the EPA, not required, said Boston.com; however, materials found to contain levels of about 50 parts per million must be removed.<br /><br />Jackson noted that the chemicals remain in schools and buildings build before PCBs were banned in 1978, said the AP. The EPA has said it would conduct new research into the link between airborne PCBs and the chemical in caulk, and will also conduct testing in schools, said the AP. It seems that the link between the chemical in the air and in caulk is not clear, added the AP.<br /><br />According to Boston.com, when caulking ages, it often breaks into particles and vapors that can contain PCBs. The particles can end up in a variety of places, such as on the ground, windowsills, and ventilation systems, added Boston.com. The EPA recommended the following, according to the AP and Boston.com:<br /><br /><ul><li>Clean air ducts</li><li>Open windows to enhance ventilation; use exhaust fans</li><li>Clean rooms to minimize dust; do not dry dust, use a wet or damp cloth</li><li>Vacuum using appliances with high efficiency particulate air filtration systems; do not dry boom;</li><li>Wash hands often and with soap and water, and always before eating and drinking; wash children&rsquo;s toys often</li></ul><br />Lawsuits are beginning to be reported and more are expected. According to the AP, a Bronx, New York mother sued New York City over PCBs in caulk at her daughter's public school. The lawsuit was filed earlier this month.<br /><br />The EPA has set up a PCBs in caulk hot line that can be reached toll-free at 1-888-835-5372, and a <a href="http://www.epa.gov/pcbsincaulk/">Web site</a>.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>WHO Cuts Radon Limits after Studies Find More Danger Than Once Believed</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17022</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We recently wrote about how radon gas was linked to increases in lung cancer risks based on emerging studies. This is important because radon, an odorless and colorless gas, can be found in many homes.Now, the Associated Press (AP) is reporting that the World Health Organization (WHO) has significantly reduced radon amounts derived from natural sources that are allowed to accumulate in buildings. The reduction applies worldwide, said the AP, and...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[We recently wrote about how <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">radon gas</a> was linked to increases in lung cancer risks based on emerging studies. This is important because radon, an odorless and colorless gas, can be found in many homes.<br /><br />Now, the Associated Press (AP) is reporting that the <a href="http://www.who.int/en/">World Health Organization</a> (WHO) has significantly reduced radon amounts derived from natural sources that are allowed to accumulate in buildings. The reduction applies worldwide, said the AP, and was made due to radon&rsquo;s links to deadly lung cancer.<br /><br />According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), radon is a cancer-causing radioactive gas. Radon gas from natural sources can accumulate in buildings and reportedly causes 21,000 lung cancer deaths per year in the United States alone. Radon is the second most frequent cause of lung cancer, after cigarette smoking, and radon-induced lung cancer is thought to be the sixth leading cause of cancer death overall. The AP noted that radon gas can be found in &ldquo;mines, caves and water treatment plants&rdquo; but can also be &ldquo;contained in rocks and soil&rdquo; which can easily enter buildings, such as houses, through small fractures and gaps in the structures.<br /><br />In 2005&mdash;two years after the EPA released its figures&mdash;the U.S. surgeon general issued a national health advisory warning about indoor radon, said the AP. The amount of radon in the air is measured in &ldquo;picoCuries per liter of air,&rdquo; or &ldquo;pCi/L,&rdquo; and the EPA said 4 pCi/L is the level of radon exposure that requires someone to take action. The EPA also said levels lower than that &ldquo;still pose a risk&rdquo; and &ldquo;in many cases, may be reduced.&rdquo; According to a 2008 New York Times article, 4 picoCuries is &ldquo;about the same risk for cancer as smoking a half a pack of cigarettes per day.&rdquo;<br /><br />The WHO issued a new handbook that recommends countries establish home limits on the deadly gas at 100 becquerel per cubic meter, said the AP. The WHO&rsquo;s limit, which was set in 1996, permitted radon exposure at 10 times that limit, added the AP.<br /><br />&quot;Radon is the second most important cause of lung cancer after smoking in many countries,&quot; said Dr. Maria Neira, with WHO and a specialist on health and environment, quoted the AP. &quot;Most radon-induced lung cancers occur from low and medium dose exposures in people's homes,&quot; Dr. Neira added.<br /><br />According to Wolfgang Weiss, UNSCEAR&rsquo;s vice chairman, in a news conference, reported by Reuters last year, prior radon risk estimates were taken from studies of uranium miners who had been exposed to high radon levels, not of general consumers. This, in part, led to the move to establish improved standards.<br /><br />Of concern, the WHO stated this week that, based on worldwide studies from 2005 and 2006, radon in homes is more dangerous that first believed and is a &ldquo;significant&rdquo; factor in 3-to14 percent of lung cancers globally, reported the AP.<br /><br />Test kits are available for home use to inexpensively determine radon levels, said the AP, which added that, in the United States, it is recommended that home radon levels be tested every two years.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>First Toxic  FEMA Trailer Lawsuit  Now Underway</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17009</link>		
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/17009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first trial involving the allegedly toxic trailers the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) distributed to Gulf Coast hurricane victims in 2005 got underway last week in New Orleans.&nbsp; According to the Associated Press, trailer maker Gulf Stream Coach Inc. and government contractor Fluor Enterprises Inc. are defendants in the case.&nbsp; The federal government is not a defendant, though it has been named one in thousands of other...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The first trial involving the <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/toxic_fema_trailers">allegedly toxic trailers</a> the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) distributed to Gulf Coast hurricane victims in 2005 got underway last week in New Orleans.&nbsp; According to the Associated Press, trailer maker Gulf Stream Coach Inc. and government contractor Fluor Enterprises Inc. are defendants in the case.&nbsp; The federal government is not a defendant, though it has been named one in thousands of other <a href="http://www.fema.gov/">FEMA</a> trailer lawsuits.<br /><br />At one point, as many as 143,000 families left homeless following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita were living in toxic FEMA trailers. As anyone who reads this blog knows, FEMA&rsquo;s response to the toxic trailer debacle was less than stellar. By 2006 FEMA was getting reports from field workers along the Gulf Coast that residents of FEMA trailers where getting sick from the air in the toxic trailers. The first suspect was formaldehyde, an invisible gas that is known to cause cancer. It can also cause other illnesses ranging from nose bleeds to chronic bronchitis. Commonly used in manufactured homes, formaldehyde can cause respiratory problems and has been classified as a carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer and as a probable carcinogen by the Environmental Protection Agency.<br /><br />E-mails uncovered during a congressional investigation into the toxic trailers showed that FEMA lawyers told the agency to drag its feet on air quality testing. FEMA&rsquo;s Office of General Council also advised the agency not to test the trailers because doing so &ldquo;would imply FEMA&rsquo;s ownership of the issue&rdquo;.<br /><br />In late 2007, FEMA and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) finally conducted air quality tests of 519 trailers. The CDC tests confirmed that the FEMA trailers posed a serious danger to residents still living in them. The average formaldehyde levels found in the toxic trailers measured 77ppb (parts per billions), significantly higher than the 10 to 17 ppb concentration seen in newer homes. When it announced its findings, the CDC urged FEMA to move residents from the toxic trailers as quickly as possible, with priority given to families with children, elderly people or anyone with asthma or other chronic conditions.<br /><br />Last Monday, the first &quot;bellwether&quot; trial began in federal court in New Orleans.&nbsp; According to the Associated Press, the lawsuit in this case was brought by a New Orleans woman who claims her son developed asthma because of his time living in formaldehyde-filled FEMA trailer.&nbsp; The lawsuit alleges Gulf Stream and Fluor Enterprises failed to warn about the trailers' potential risks.<br /><br />According to Court House News Service, the Chairman of the Board of Gulf Stream testified at the trial via videotape.&nbsp; When Jim Shea Jr. was asked what &quot;protocol&quot; Gulf Stream told trailer residents to follow if&nbsp; they were &quot;sensitive&quot; to formaldehyde, Shea responded, &quot;To turn on the air-conditioning full blast and open the window,' Court News Service said.&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />Shea insisted that Gulf Stream was not aware of the high levels of formaldehyde in the trailers. But according to Court House News Service, Shea&nbsp; acknowledged that his company sent a worker to New Orleans in March 2006 after the media had begun reporting on problems with the trailers.&nbsp; That employee - a Gulf Stream Vice President - complained about his eyes &quot;tearing up&quot; when he entered a FEMA trailer, Court House News Service said.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>What's in Your Household Cleaner?</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/16996</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/16996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The makers of household cleaners are facing increasing scrutiny over the chemicals contained in their products.&nbsp; According to The New York Times, the industry - which includes companies like Proctor &amp; Gamble, Colgate-Palmolive and S.C. Johnson - favors voluntary disclosure of product ingredients, but many consumer groups and lawmakers favor legislation that would require companies to come clean about the chemicals they use.According to...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The makers of household cleaners are facing increasing scrutiny over the <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/toxic_substances">chemicals</a> contained in their products.&nbsp; According to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/17/business/energy-environment/17green.html?hpw">The New York Times</a>, the industry - which includes companies like Proctor &amp; Gamble, Colgate-Palmolive and S.C. Johnson - favors voluntary disclosure of product ingredients, but many consumer groups and lawmakers favor legislation that would require companies to come clean about the chemicals they use.<br /><br />According to the Times, many of the chemicals in household cleaners have been associated with health problems, including birth defects.&nbsp; While most products contain only&nbsp; small amounts of a given chemical, the concern is that exposure to these small amounts over a lifetime could impact health&nbsp; Current government regulations only require that manufacturers disclose chemicals that pose an 'immediate' danger, The New York Times said.<br /><br />Manufacturers of household cleaners worry about keeping the details of product formulas from competitors, but know consumers are worried about potential&nbsp; toxins.&nbsp; To ease such worries, the Consumer Specialty Products Association, an industry group, has been working with consumer advocates to devise a voluntary disclosure strategy, the Times said. &nbsp;<br /><br />Starting in January, manufacturers will begin to disclose some&nbsp; ingredients through either toll-free numbers, Web sites, or product labels. Ingredients would be listed in order of highest concentration.&nbsp; But ingredients that are present in amounts of less than 1 percent would not have to be ranked.&nbsp; What's more, preservatives, fragrances and dyes would be exempt from disclosure, the Times said.<br /><br />For critics of the industry, such a voluntary program does not go far enough.&nbsp; In New York state, consumer groups have filed lawsuit aimed at forcing more complete disclosure, and in California, one state legislator has threatened&nbsp; to seek a mandatory disclosure law if the industry plan doesn't go far enough, the Times said.<br /><br />There's also movement at the federal level.&nbsp; According to The new York Times, a measure has been introduced in Congress seeking full disclosure of all product ingredients.&nbsp; Rep. Steve Israel (D-NY), who introduced that bill, told the Times that it was &quot;nonsensical that we have labels on food, but not on the cleansers on kitchen counters.&quot;<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Asbestos Mesothelioma Lawsuit Welding Rod Fumes Toxic Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_area/toxic_substances</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_area/toxic_substances</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Toxic torts involve exposure&nbsp; to harmful chemical or biological substances that can cause permanent injury or death. Exposure to asbestos, toxic mold, benzene, welding rod fumes, mercury and lead can cause life threatening injuries. The attorneys at Parker Waichman Alonso LLP have represented hundreds of victims of toxic substances with dignity and compassion. We aggressively strive for the best financial results, and we are always...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toxic torts involve exposure&nbsp; to harmful chemical or biological substances that can cause permanent injury or death. Exposure to asbestos, toxic mold, benzene, welding rod fumes, mercury and lead can cause life threatening injuries. The attorneys at Parker Waichman Alonso LLP have represented hundreds of victims of toxic substances with dignity and compassion. We aggressively strive for the best financial results, and we are always sympathetic to the needs of our clients.&nbsp; <strong>Please choose a toxic substance topic below to learn more about the legal remedies available to your family and you.<br /></strong></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
		
	</channel>
</rss>