Tysabri was taken off the market in 2005 in the U.S. after three patients in clinical trials developed PML. But the drug was reapproved in 2006, although it was subject to restrictions. Tysabri is now available only to patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) or Crohn’s disease (CD) who are enrolled in the risk minimization plan called the TOUCH Prescribing Program. Under the TOUCH Prescribing Program, every Tysabri-treated patient is closely monitored and followed for the occurrence of PML and other serious opportunistic infections.

These are the first cases of PML linked to Tysabri since the drug's maker stopped providing regular weekly PML updates in July, The Wall Street Journal said.  When the updates stopped, 11 cases of the diseases had been reported among Tysabri patients.  One of the new PML cases was reported last week in the New England Journal of Medicine.  The second was reported the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis that ended Saturday, the Journal said.

Biogen Idec has not confirmed these additional PML cases,  and according to the Journal will not confirm additional cases as long as the PML rate is consistent with the rate of one-in-1,000 patients implied by the label.

PML attacks the brain and central nervous system and is usually fatal. It is caused by a polyomavirus, called the JC virus. The JC virus is often acquired during childhood. Most adults have been infected with the JC virus but do not develop PML. The virus appears to remain inactive until something (such as a weakened immune system) allows it to be reactivated and start to multiply. Symptoms include vision problems, loss of coordination, and memory loss. Patients who survive the disease are often permanently disabled.

People with a weakened immune system or people taking drugs that suppress their immune system (immunosuppressants) are most likely to get the disease.  Over the summer, we reported that the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) was looking into a link between the lymphoma drug, Rituxan, and the disease. In April, the psoriasis drug Raptiva was voluntary withdrawn from the market after three patients died from PML.

It has been theorized that long-term treatment with Tysabri may increase PML risks, and some doctors have begun having patients take a “holiday” from the drug in an attempt to mitigate risks.

According to Elan and Biogen Idec, the makers of Tysabri, two European patients have developed the disease.  At this time, one is ambulatory and the other is hospitalized.  One patient had been taking Tysabri for 14 months and the other for 17.

The most disturbing aspect of these latest PML cases, however, is that both patients had been taking Tysabri as monotherapy - with no other drugs.  It had been theorized that patients contracting PML had done so because of exposure to multiple medications and that monotherapy with Tysabri was less risky.

In 2005, the law firm Parker Waichman Alonso LLP was retained by the estate of Anita Smith, a patient who died from a confirmed case of PML while taking Tysabri. In February 2000, Smith was diagnosed with MS. By April 2002, she was enrolled in a clinical trial involving the MS drug, Tysabri along with 1,200 other patients. In November 2004, while Anita Smith’s health was rapidly deteriorating and she was experiencing severe neurological problems, Tysabri gained a coveted “fast-track” approval from the Food & Drug Administration (FDA). Anita Smith took her last IV infusion of Tysabri in January 2005. On February 24, 2005 she died of the brain infection known as PML; the same disease that killed other Tysabri patients. Four days later, Tysabri sales were halted.

In its 2005 Annual Report, Elan Inc. informed shareholders that it had entered into settlement talks with the lawyers representing Anita Smith’s estate. When contacted, Jerry Parker, the managing partner of Parker Waichman Alonso LLP said the Anita Smith Tysabri case had been resolved, but that the case was confidential.

About 31,800 people take Tysabri, which is also used to treat Crohn's disease, a digestive condition. The company has forecast 100,000 patients would be on it by 2010, with quarterly sales hitting a $1 billion annual rate by the end of this year.  However, these new PML reports could endanger that forecast.

For now, Biogen has said it has no plans to take Tysabri off the market or restrict its use despite the renewed concerns over PML.

When the votes were tallied, the results were shocking to many but quite predictable if the FDA’s questionable track record in protecting the public was taken into consideration. The committee voted unanimously that all of the drugs significantly increased the risk of heart attack and stroke.

Despite this finding, which could not have been otherwise, Vioxx, a drug pulled from the market by its own manufacturer (Merck) only a few months before, rose from the ashes on the wings of a 17-15 vote. (Without 9 of the 10 “questionable” votes going in favor of the drug, however, the committee would have voted 14-8 to ban Vioxx).

Needless to say, the vote was met with shock and outrage by activists, medical experts, and researchers alike. Several highly reputable news agencies like CBS News, The New York Times, and Forbes, for example, also questioned whether the panel had been “stacked” in favor of the pharmaceutical companies with advisers who had significant “conflicts of interest.”

Despite the fact that every news outlet had been forecasting the end of the COX-2 era in its reports up to February 19, everything changed on February 20. Now, the very same journalists were actually writing articles about the possible “comeback” of Vioxx, Merck’s salvation with respect to the litigation against it, how Celebrex could recover its “luster,” and how the FDA vote immediately translated into stock increases of 6% for Pfizer and 12% for Merck.

"Ten of 1,000 patients would die, have a heart attack or a stroke," said lead author Steven Nissen of the Cleveland Clinic. "Those are serious irrevocable events."

"These findings are particularly concerning because the significant excess of adverse events was observed after only limited drug exposure ranging from 24 to 104 weeks," Nissen, and colleagues reported. "Real-world exposure would likely substantially amplify the risk. Taken as a whole, these data demonstrate that [Pargluva], if approved by the FDA, would constitute an unacceptable patient hazard."

One must wonder; how then did the FDA advisory committee that recommended the drug for approval by a vote of 8-1 ignore both the indisputable clinical data as well as the FDA’s own analysts who had themselves identified evidence of cardiac risk?

“Nonetheless, the agency's drug reviewers acknowledged they were unsure about Tysabri's long-term effects.

“FDA reviewers found that Tysabri had an acceptable safety profile, though they noted that health risks ‘beyond one year are not known.’

“Stanford University professor Dr. Lawrence Steinman, an MS specialist, had warned there was a clear risk of infection for patients taking such drugs, because they tend to suppress the body's immune system.

Most of all, however, there appears to have beenample evidence in the form of test data and opinions from highly qualified and credible experts that this drug posed a serious risk of the very injuries (and deaths) that ultimately occurred.

The removal of the clinical hold allows patients with MS who were previously treated with the drug under an investigational (IND) study to resume treatment “in an IND study following discussion with their physicians about the potential risks and potential benefits of treatment.”

Remarkably, the FDA stated that, “Although this treatment has been shown to have benefit in patients with relapsing-remitting MS, concern about the risk of PML associated with use of Tysabri remains.”

While the “drug is not being placed back on the market at this time,” the FDA scheduled an Advisory Committee Meeting on March 7 and 8, 2006 to discuss an application for Tysabri for use in treating patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. “Aspects for discussion include the risks associated with the drug, its efficacy in the treatment of multiple sclerosis relapses and disability, its possible return to the marketplace, and its proposed risk management plan(s).”

In a Q & A with respect to the lifting of the “clinical hold,” the FDA stated that it was taking this action because an “extensive re-examination that Biogen and Elan undertook on all patients who had received natalizumab in clinical studies” revealed, “No additional cases of PML.” In addition, “Biogen has proposed a resumption of natalizumab administration under an IND study with very specific plans for close monitoring of patients.”

In response to the question: “Will Tysabri be available to all patients?” the FDA wrote: “Biogen has not proposed to administer the drug to anyone who had not previously been receiving it under an IND study. Biogen has submitted an application to FDA to resume marketing the drug for more widespread use. That application has a due date for a decision by FDA in late March 2006.”

To further justify what many experts see as an imprudent decision by the FDA, the agency stated that, while it “remains very concerned about the potential for PML associated with natalizumab use” the currently available information is “not adequate to clearly define the level of risk or the exact circumstances when this risk occurs.”

In addition, the FDA stated that “the existing efficacy data with natalizumab indicate this is a very effective product and multiple sclerosis is a devastating neurologic disease.”

Although the logic behind further testing makes sense to some experts, there are some that believe the drug should never have been approved in the first place.

As reported in HealthDay News (2/17):“A multiple sclerosis drug pulled from the market early last year due to safety concerns was initially approved too quickly and probably should not go back on the market, at least not without more data, according to an expert writing in this week's British Medical Journal.”

The author believes Tysabri was approved too quickly in the first place. According to Dr. Abhijit Chaudhuri, a consultant neurologist for the Essex Centre for Neurological Sciences at Oldchurch Hospital, Romford, Essex, in England: "The rate at which Tysabri was first tracked is absolutely unacceptable for a condition like multiple sclerosis, which can last for 30 years. They did not even look into the side effects and this is unbelievable. It's a major failing."

Dr. Chaudhuri agrees with the need for further study: "If a study is being conducted with ethical approval and physicians and participants are well aware of the risks, I have nothing to disagree about. Any scientific study where use of new product is closely monitored should go ahead."

He was quick to point out, however, that he disapproves of the initial approval process for the drug.

“According to Chaudhuri, the FDA approved Tysabri only on the basis of short-term results from two unpublished trials, and before final data were available.” (HealthDay News 2/17)

"Based on what we've seen so far, there is no evidence to suggest that this is very effective for MS," he said. "We're talking about a condition that affects young people fairly early in life and which lasts for 30 to 40 years, so it's a lifelong disease. Before you start using that, you must have convincing and compelling evidence that long-term disability is significantly reduced, at no cost for side effects. And I don't think we have that kind of information."

While there were still significant hurdles for Tysabri to overcome before gaining approval for re-introduction to the market, critics of the FDA drug approval process and of the agency’s close ties to the pharmaceutical industry were already predicting that the drug would survive the advisory panel review and receive a favorable recommendation with respect to its being re-released on the market. They were absolutely correct.

Thus, even though the panel and the FDA itself recognized that the evidence shows the drug will kill some of the very patients it was designed to help, Tysabri stood an excellent chance of being re-marketed albeit with tighter prescribing rules, long-term monitoring, and more stringent “black box” warnings.

According to Dr. Russell Katz, director of the FDA’s Division of Neurology Products, it is possible that possibly one in every 1,000 patients will get the JC virus believed to cause PML.

“There will be additional cases of PML, and perhaps many cases, and there will likely be considerable mortality associated with use of the drug, and this is a fact that is not likely to change,” Katz told the FDA's Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs advisory committee panel.

In a letter from Anita Smith’s husband, which was read to the panel by the dead woman’s daughter Beth Ann, Walter Smith stated: “We were never told Tysabri would result in Anita’s death. If we had known that, we would have happily stayed away from the trial”

While Biogen and Elan claim that the drug can be marketed safely if carefully monitored, critics do not agree since there is doubt that doctors will be able to differentiate between MS symptoms and those of early onset PML.

The FDA reviewers themselves recognized this significant problem. Moreover, patients fearful that the drug would be pulled from the market forever might be reluctant to report symptoms and be willing to risk the JC virus and PML too.

There is also the strong incentive for Biogen to save this drug that will undoubtedly reach “blockbuster” within one to two years if returned to the market. Even conservative estimates predict annual sales for Tysabri will ultimately top $1 billion; an easy target when you consider the $23,000-plus cost for one year of treatments. Biogen can also calculate that, even without inflation and price increases, 30 years of Tysabri will cost only one MS patient almost $700,000).

When we asked several litigation attorneys familiar with pharmaceutical products to comment on the Tysabri saga, they were unanimous in their skepticism concerning the FDA’s ability to protect the public from harmful drugs given the current state of the approval process and the “rubberstamp” reputation of the independent advisory panels.

Only two weeks ago, Anita Smith’s attorney, Jerrold Parker summed it up like this: “I certainly wouldn’t bet against Tysabri making it back to the market. If the FDA’s track record over the past several years tells us anything, it tells us that, with respect to the drug approval process, the bottom line usually wins out over concerns for the health and safety of the public.”

Then, much to the surprise of Parker& Waichman (attorneys for the Smith estate) and Anita Smith’s husband Walter, who has become an outspoken critic of the drug, it was learned that MRI films (and possibly other medical records) of Anita Smith existed and were in the possession of Colorado Springs Imaging.

The MRIs (taken on March 21, 2002, April 16, 2003, and April 21, 2004) and the records and reports relating thereto were not among the materials turned over in discovery by Dr. Fodor (Smith’s treating neurologist) or any other healthcare professional that had treated Smith.

Since these reports (if any), and especially the MRI films, could be extremely significant with respect to the misdiagnosis of Smith (as having MS) and the improvident decision to enroll her in the Tysabri clinical trial, Parker & Waichman sought production of the records.

In an “emergency” motion to obtain these MRI films and any accompanying records, a number of unusual circumstances were alleged by Smith’s attorneys.

When they became aware of the existence of these important and possibly pivotal records, Smith’s attorneys contacted Colorado Springs Imaging (CSI), an independent diagnostic center, and requested a copy of the MRI films and any other materials relating to them.

Under the law of every jurisdiction in the U.S., a patient is always entitled to a copy of their own medical record and once a properly executed authorization is delivered, a medical provider must release those records as directed by the patient or the patient’s legal representative.

Here, Smith’s attorneys advised CSI that an authorization executed by Walter Smith, as administrator of the estate of Anita Smith, would be sent to them to permit the release of the records in question.

After initially agreeing to the release, CSI apparently contacted Biogen (or Biogen’s attorneys) and, as a result, reversed itself and refused to release the MRIs or any other records it had with respect to Anita Smith. CSI claimed Biogen’s consent was necessary before any exchange could take place.

Although Smith’s attorneys strongly protested to CSI and Biogen’s attorneys, Biogen remained adamant that it could deny the release because the records belonged to the drug company and not to Anita Smith or her estate.

The emergency motion to compel Biogen to authorize the release of the MRIs and other records in CSI’s possession was submitted on extensive papers from both Parker & Waichman and Robinson & Cole (local counsel on the case) and argued before Middlesex Superior Court Judge Julian T. Houston.

After a contentious hearing at which Biogen’s attorneys took a position that Judge Houston openly regarded as legally unsupportable, the court issued the following order:

“Motion # 14 allowed after hearing. Defendant Biogen- IDEC, Inc. is ordered to immediately direct the Custodian of films and medical records of the late Anita Smith, Colorado Springs Imaging is to release any and all medical records in its possession to the Plaintiff, Walter Smith, see General Laws chapter 112, section 12cc.The aforementioned records are to be released forthwith.”

Since the MRIs and any supporting records could establish the fact that Anita Smith never had MS, they may very well expose Biogen and Elan to a significant possibility of being found liable for her conscious pain and suffering and untimely death.

When reached for comment at a legal conference in Hawaii, Jerrold Parker expressed his appreciation for the prompt and definitive ruling by Judge Houston. Mr. Parker stated that it was “incredible” that any medical provider or law firm “could have taken the position that diagnostic tests like MRIs and any reports related to them could not be obtained by the patient. Anita Smith was a human being and not a laboratory animal that belonged to Biogen. Thus, her records cannot be withheld at the company’s direction. To have argued otherwise was unconscionable.”

Significantly, the critical MRI films in issue were not provided to the NEJM for its July 2005 article. As it turns out, those films would have significantly impacted on that article since they indicate Anita Smith failed to meet the “McDonald criteria.”

“In April, 2001, an international panel in association with the NMSS of America recommended revised diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis. These new criteria have become known as the McDonald criteria after their lead author. They make use of advances in MRI imaging techniques and are intended to replace the Poser Criteria and the older Schumacher Criteria.” (http://www.mult-sclerosis.org/McDonaldcriteria.html)

Moreover, Dr. Gregory Shoukimas, who reviewed Anita Smiths medical records after her death, said she had not met the definition of an MS patient. The decision to include her in a trial for a drug that led to her death raises ''serious concerns that Biogen Idec is incapable of proceeding in a safe manner with future clinical trials," he said.

A discussion with Jason Mark (an attorney with Parker & Waichman), who has been closely following the hearing before the advisory panel, indicated to us that the following matters (among other things) were discussed yesterday before the 12-0 vote (that was taken before debate – and before the non-voting member of the panel made numerous damaging remarks about the drug) to recommend the approval of Tysabri for return to the market.

• Other MS drugs don't have a fatality rate associated with them.Only Tysabri has a fatality rate, which the committee chair referred to as 1:1000, while noting that a range up to 3:1000 has been presented and that different sources suggest different statistics.Other MS drugs have side
  effects and there are statistics for infection rates, however, there are no death statistics for those drugs.
• Biogen is not seeking approval for any pediatric use of Tysabri.
• Extensive discussions were had concerning the “Tysabri registry” that will be created. Patient enrollment in the registry will be mandatory, and information will include deaths, PML, other infections, serious adverse events, and (possible) use of concomitant immunomudolators. The purpose of the registry is to track information, and learn more about, the Tysabri-PML issue. No resolution on how often the registry will be updated. The discussion revolved around once every six months, but there was no finality on that. There was also no finality as to what the basis of the information must be. There was an issue as to whether the treating physician would be able to provide information and have the registry updated based on a mere telephone with the patient, or if it would require an in-person physical examination. Biogen was proposing the more flexible option, and didn't want to define how the physician must or must not obtain patient information to send in to the registry.The committee chair was the one who raised the in-person examination. No vote taken on this. It will be something the FDA will have to decide.
• No one believed there should be anything to preclude re-entry into a Tysabri study (other than PML). The concern over hyper-sensitivity reactions can be addressed through early antibody screening.
• The majority of the committee believed that the risk of PML does exist even in monotherapy (without Avonex). There was some discussion of the Crohn's patient who was on Tysabri monotherapy for the last 8 months of his life. Prior to that, he had used other immunosuppressive agents. The proposal is only for use as a monotherapy at this point. Someone later commented
  "we're terrified" in response to the chair's statement that no one was discussing/suggesting concomitant use with other immunosuppressives.
• No studies need to be conducted prior to permitting the "re-marketing" of Tysabri. "Re-marketing" in this context means use under strict controls.
• Only people with higher levels of disability should get the drug. Only people who meet the MRI criteria for MS should get to use the drug.
• The disease needs to be substantiated before someone gets to use the drug. One of the committee members stated that, given the risk of PML, we have to be sure of the diagnosis, and this requires a diagnostic MRI. Another member stated that we should use the most stringent criteria.
• There was some discussion regarding whether Tysabri should be a first-line of treatment. At least one member noted that we're still unclear about what the risk is. Another member noted that whatever is put in place now may change based on what is learned. Another person commented that it should not be a first line of defense because of medical-legal implications. There was a vote on this 7 to 5 in favor of it being used as a first-line treatment (with the non-voting member voting no).
• No one at the hearing ever disputed the fact that people are going to die if Tysabri is re-introduced to the market.
• There was a vote on whether there should be a lower limit on the EDSS disability score in order for someone to receive the drug. The vote was 10-1 against there being a lower limit with one abstention.
• The vote was 12-0 in favor of returning Tysabri to the market for at least "some patients, taking into account the preceding discussion of specific populations." Biogen’s representatives were openly elated in their reaction to the vote.
• There was a lengthy discussion of exactly what information to track in the registry and the mechanics of how it should work.
• There was also a long discussion regarding the observational cohort study proposed by Biogen a 5- year study to evaluate the long term safety of Tysabri in the clinical practice setting and what observations/findings must be made before receiving Tysabri. One of the committee members, pre-warning that her statement was going to be met with objection, suggested that there be a baseline CSF examination to have something to compare subsequent CSF samples against if necessary. There was strong objection to that suggestion.
• The panel spent considerable time discussing what the risk management plan "checklist" should look like. Any indication of an exacerbation of symptoms will be treated as if it is PML and evaluated. The FDA will need to determine what that additional evaluation will entail.There was discussion as to submitting the checklist monthly, in advance of each patient's infusion reported to a central location and, if it doesn't arrive, a red-flag goes up for that patient. One committee member was concerned that it would be difficult, if not impossible to "recognize PML and to differentiate from MS based on a checklist.
• There was a long discussion on how frequently to monitor patients with MRI studies, and doing scans in the absence of clinical symptoms for monitoring purposes. Biogen's position was that there was no data to indicate that screening MRI's will detect PML in the absence of clinical symptoms, since all the MRI's that diagnosed PML in the three known patients were taken subsequent to the onset of clinical symptoms. One committee member noted that there may be an issue regarding insurance companies paying for the MRI in the absence of a clear
  instruction on the issue from the FDA.
• There was some discussion regarding combination therapy, which should be evaluated in clinical trials only after the risk of PML or other infections in monotherapy is better quantified.
• A question was raised concerning how many adverse events it will take to pull the drug off the market again. Another member stated that he believed the 1:1000 risk to be fairly accurate, and if it becomes higher, we may be back here.The chair openly stated that it is likely there will be cases of PML and it is likely that death will occur. What we do here today incorporates that fact.
• A committee member asked what the "emergency plan" was if someone develops PML, which someone will. What will we tell them? How will we treat them? Anti viral therapy? Biogen’s representative said that Tysabri would immediately be suspended and that they're investigating whether plasma exchange would be beneficial. Members openly conceded there is no clear
  therapy for PML.

The totality of the research, studies, testimony (emotional and scientific), articles, legal filings, and all other available information to this point regarding Tysabri boils down to a rather simple proposition and that is: A very expensive drug that works (at least in the short-run) with respect to a seriously debilitating disease will inevitably (and concededly) kill some of the very people it is supposed to help.

Does that notion satisfy the risk/benefit equation for market approval by the FDA? Many experts, researchers, and Anita Smith’s family say no. The cash register, however, says yes, and in today’s world, that makes all the difference. Expect to see Tysabri approved by the full FDA for return to the market before the end of the month; deaths to follow sometime thereafter.

(Sources: FDA Press Release and Q & A; British Medical Journal; HealthDay News; The New York Times, Los Angeles Times; Reuters; Forbes.com; Boston Herald; CNN.com; The Wall Street Journal; Associated Press; Complaint and other court filings in Smith v. Biogen, et al.; and Newsinferno.com Archives)

Keywords: Tysabri | Lawyer | Liver Failure | Lawsuit | Damage | Attorney | Injury | Victim | PML | MS | Chron's

 
Tysabri, manufactured by Biogen Idec Inc. and Elan Corp., is considered a last-resort treatment for Multiple Sclerosis (MS).  It was first pulled from the market in 2005 after being linked to a fatal brain infection, but in 2006 the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) decided the benefits in slowing MS relapses outweighed the risks. In addition to its use as a treatment for MS, Tysabri won U.S. approval as a treatment for Crohn's disease, a gastrointestinal disorder, in January 2008. Our Tysabri injury lawyers believe the FDA erred in these decisions, and it is our contention that this defective medication is too dangerous to be used to treat any condition.

Tysabri Liver Damage

The Tysabri injury lawyers at our law firm are offering free consultations to anyone who sustained liver damage as a result of Tysabri. In February 2008, Biogen sent a letter to healthcare providers warning that Tysabri had caused significant liver damage in some patients.  According to the Tysabri warning, this liver damage occurred within six days of the first dose of Tysabri.  According to the Biogen Idec letter to healthcare providers posted on the FDA website, Tysabri should be discontinued in patients with jaundice or other evidence of significant liver injury. The FDA also advised physicians to inform patients that Tysabri may cause liver injury.

 
An FDA advisory panel had apparently discussed the potential liver risks of Tysabri in late 2007  when considering whether it should be approved for Crohn's disease The liver risk was put into the drug's package insert label in January 2008 when the FDA approved Tysabri for the treatment of moderate to severe Crohn's disease.  Our Tysabri injury lawyers believe that the liver danger associated with Tysabri is just another example of the dangers posed by this drug, and another reason why it should not be on the market.

 
Tysabri and PML

Our law firm has, and is, currently representing patients who developed a fatal brain disorder known as PML as a result of Tysabri.  In 2005, Biogen Idec and Elan voluntary suspended sales of Tysabri.  The FDA said the suspension was the result of  reports from Biogen Idec of one confirmed, fatal case and one additional case of PML in patients receiving Tysabri for MS.  Both patients were enrolled in a long-term Tysabri clinical trial and had been taking Tysabri for more than two years.

PML is a rare and usually fatal viral disease that is characterized by progressive damage or inflammation  of the white matter of the brain at multiple locations. It occurs almost exclusively in people with severe immune deficiency. PML is a demylinating disease in which the myelin sheath covering the axons of nerve cells is gradually destroyed, impairing the transmission of nerve impulses. It affects the white matter, which is mostly composed of axons from the outermost parts of the brain. Symptoms include weakness or paralysis, vision loss, impaired speech, and cognitive deterioration. Most patients die within four months of onset.

Anita Smith Tysabri Case

In 2005, the Tysabri injury lawyers at our firm were retained by the estate of Anita Smith, a patient who died from a confirmed case of PML while taking Tysabri.  Our firm commenced an action against Biogen and Elan for the wrongful death of the 46-year-old wife and mother of two. In February 2000, Smith was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS). By April 2002, she was enrolled in a clinical trial involving the MS drug, Tysabri along with 1,200 other patients.

In November 2004, while Anita Smith’s health was rapidly deteriorating and she was experiencing severe neurological problems, Tysabri gained a coveted “fast-track” approval from the FDA. Anita Smith took her last IV infusion of Tysabri in January 2005. On February 24, 2005 she died of the brain infection known as PML; the same disease that killed other Tysabri patients.  Four days later, Tysabri sales were halted. 

 
Despite the death of Anita Smith and other Tysabri patients, Elan and Biogen Idec would not give up on this defective drug.  In 2006, the FDA approved a request from Biogen Idec and Elan Corp. to reintroduce Tysabri.  Since then, Tysabri has become one of the companies' best selling medications, exposing thousands to the risk of PML.

 
Tysabri and Melanoma

The Tysabri injury lawyers at our firm are also investigating a possible link between Tysabri and the onset of melanoma - a type of skin cancer.  In February 2008, just weeks after Tysabri had been approved for the treatment of Crohn's disease, a letter was published in “The New England Journal of Medicine” detailing two MS patients who developed the skin cancer shortly after starting Tysabri infusions.  The letter was written by Timothy K. Vartanian, MD, PhD, chief of the multiple sclerosis division at Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital and associate professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School, and two of his colleagues

Both of the women treated by Vartanian and colleagues had existing moles that became malignant after they started Tysabri treatment. The first patient, a 46-year-old woman, had had a mole on her shoulder for a long time.  Following her first Tysabri infusion, changes were noticed in the mole.  It was found to be malignant melanoma with metastatic spread to her regional lymph nodes.  That patient has recently experienced a relapse of her melanoma. The second patient, a 45-year-old woman, had a mole on the back of her eye. Her doctors had monitored this mole for years, as MS patients undergo regular eye exams. The mole had been stable and unchanged since 1999.  After several Tysabri infusions, the mole changed and was eventually diagnosed as ocular melanoma.

Legal Help for the Victims of Tysabri Injuries

If you or a loved one developed PML, liver damage or any other condition possibly associated with Tysabri, you have valuable legal rights.  Please contact one of our experienced Tysabri injury lawyers by filling out our online form or calling us at 1-800-LAW-INFO (1-800-529-4636).