Contact Us

American Medical Systems (AMS) Transvaginal Mesh Implant
*    Denotes required field.

   * First Name 

   * Last Name 

   * Email 

Phone 

Cell Phone 

Street Address 

Zip Code 

City 

State 

Date when device was implanted :

Please describe any problems or injuries caused by the product:

No Yes, I agree to the Parker Waichman LLP disclaimers. Click here to review.

Yes, I would like to receive the Parker Waichman LLP monthly newsletter, InjuryAlert.

please do not fill out the field below.

AMS Transvaginal Mesh

transvaginal mesh implant, warnings, side effects, organ penetration

Facebook Twitter Stumble AddThis Social Bookmark Button Pin It Email to Friend Print Page

American Medical Systems' (AMS) Transvaginal Mesh Can Lead to Serious Complications and Side Effects

American Medical Systems (AMS) Transvaginal Mesh Can Lead to Serious Complications and Side Effects

American Medical Systems (AMS) Transvaginal Mesh Can Lead to Serious Complications and Side Effects


American Medical Systems’ transvaginal mesh products are used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). These conditions, which become more common after childbirth, are often caused by weakened pelvic muscles. The mesh devices are supposed to strengthen the pelvis and provide some relief for their troublesome symptoms. Instead, however, many women are suing AMS alleging that these products actually caused much more harm than good. Lawsuits allege that the devices are not designed correctly and can lead to serious, sometimes permanent injuries.



AMS transvaginal mesh/sling products include:

  • Elevate
  • Apogee
  • Perigee
  • Spare
  • Monarch
  • Mini-Arc

Transvaginal and Pelvic Mesh Devices “May Expose Patients to Greater Risk,” Says FDA

On July 13, 2011, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said in a Safety Communication that complications associated with transvaginal mesh implants are “not rare” and that there is no conclusive evidence showing that transvaginal mesh is more effective than non-mesh repair in all patients with POP. In fact, the agency said that the mesh device “may expose patients to greater risk.”

The FDA reported that it had received 2,874 new reports of complications linked to transvaginal mesh between January 2008 and December 2010. Of these, 1,503 were associated with POP repairs and 1,371 were associated with SUI repairs. Studies reviewed by the agency show that about 10 percent of women who have transvaginal mesh experience erosion (where the mesh cuts through the tissues) within 12 months of surgery; more than half of them needed additional surgery to remove the mesh. In some cases, even multiple surgeries did not resolve complications.

AMS transvaginal mesh and pelvic mesh complications may include:

  • Erosion of the mesh through the vaginal tissue
  • Exposure or extrusion of mesh, which can require multiple surgeries
  • Feeling a lump in the vaginal opening or something protruding from the vagina
  • Painful sexual intercourse
  • Perforation or puncture of the bladder, intestines and bowels, as well as blood vessels around the vaginal wall
  • Recurrent Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)
  • Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
  • Urinary problems
  • Vaginal bleeding
  • Vaginal chronic drainage, discharge and infections
  • Vaginal pain
  • Vaginal scarring and shortening

Women who experience AMS transvaginal mesh and pelvic sling failures often undergo at least one additional surgical procedure to remove the device. However, it is not usual for victims of AMS surgical mesh complications to require repeated excision surgeries. Unfortunately, excision surgery does not guarantee the reversal of complications, and many women will continue to suffer with vaginal pain and an impaired quality of life.

Expert Advisory Panel Recommends TVM Reclassification Due to Safety Issues

One of the first critics of these products, and the FDA for approving them, was the watchdog group Public Citizen, founded by Ralph Nader. On August 25, 2011, the group stated that the FDA should recall transvaginal mesh products due to safety concerns and painful side effects. The FDA stated in an August 31, 2011 Executive Summary that it “believes that vaginal placement of surgical mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) repair inherently introduces risks of complications that are unique to the mesh itself.”

In September of that year, the FDA convened a meeting of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical Device advisory panel. A majority of the group agreed that the safety, effectiveness and benefits of transvaginal mesh devices in POP repair were not well established and warranted long-term follow up.

The agency proposed reclassification of mesh devices used in the repair of POP from Class 2 to Class 3. This meant that surgical mesh for POP repair could no longer take the FDA’s lax 510(k) approval route, and that manufacturers would actually have to perform clinical tests to prove their products were safe and effective.

Help for Women Suffering from Transvaginal Mesh Complications

If you or someone you know suffered painful injuries after being implanted with a transvaginal mesh device, you may have valuable legal rights. We’re here to answer any questions you may have. For a free case review, please fill out our online form to the right or call our office at 1(800)-YOURLAWYER.

Tags:  
AMS Transvaginal MeshRSS Feed

Parker Waichman LLP Files Lawsuit on Behalf of Oregon Woman Injured by Elevate Transvaginal Mesh Device

Feb 4, 2013
An Oregon woman has become the latest to claim she was injured by a defective transvaginal mesh surgical device. She has joined a growing number of American women who have filed a lawsuit against its manufacturer, claiming the company knowingly hid evidence of its drawbacks while promoting it as safe and effective.According to a release announcing the filing of her lawsuit, the Oregon woman was implanted with the Elevate transvaginal mesh device during a January 2011 surgery. Soon after that...

Mississippi Woman's Lawsuit Alleges Serious Injury Due to Transvaginal Mesh Products Manufactured by American Medical Systems, Johnson & Johnson

Aug 30, 2012 | Parker Waichman LLP
Parker Waichman LLP, a national law firm dedicated to protecting the rights of victims injured by defective medical devices, has filed a lawsuit on behalf of a woman who was allegedly injured by three transvaginal mesh implants. The suit was filed on July 12th in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, Charleston Division (Case 2:12-cv-03153) where it is one of many cases pending in the multidistrict litigation as part of the In Re: Ethicon, Inc. Pelvic ...

New York Woman Files Lawsuit Against Johnson & Johnson and American Medical Systems Alleging Transvaginal Mesh Implants Caused Permanent Damage

Aug 10, 2012 | Parker Waichman LLP
Parker Waichman LLP, a national law firm dedicated to protecting victims injured by defective medical devices, has filed a lawsuit alleging that American Medical Systems’ Miniarc Precise Sling and the Gynecare Prolift Total Pelvic Floor Repair System manufactured by Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon unit caused injuries in a New York woman. The suit was filed on July 12th in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, Charleston Division (Case No....

California Woman Files Lawsuit against American Medical Systems for Injuries Allegedly from Transvaginal Mesh Implants

Aug 9, 2012 | Parker Waichman LLP
Parker Waichman LLP, a national law firm dedicated to protecting the rights of victims injured by defective medical devices, has filed a lawsuit on behalf of a woman who allegedly experienced painful and disfiguring symptoms after being implanted with the Monarc Subfascial Hammock and Apogee System with Intepro. The lawsuit alleges that the transvaginal mesh products caused injuries, and holds the Defendants, American Medical Systems, Inc., responsible for failing to warn about the...

Newly Filed Lawsuit Claims Woman's Injuries Were Allegedly Caused by Boston Scientific, American Medical Systems Transvaginal Mesh Products

Jul 30, 2012 | Parker Waichman LLP
Parker Waichman LLP, a national law firm dedicated to protecting the rights of victims injured by defective medical devices, has filed a lawsuit on behalf of a woman who attributes her injuries to several transvaginal mesh implants. The suit was filed on July 12th in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, Charleston Division (Case No. 2:12-cv-03157). The case is pending alongside many others in the multidistrict litigation as part of the In Re: American...

More AMS Transvaginal Mesh News

Parker Waichman Accolades And Reviews Law Dragon Best Lawyers Find Us On Avvo Protected by Copyscape Web Copyright Protection Software php-5