Contact Us

Boston Scientific Transvaginal Mesh Implant
*    Denotes required field.

   * First Name 

   * Last Name 

   * Email 

   * Phone 

Cell Phone 

Street Address 

Zip Code 

City 

State 

Date Boston Scientific Transvaginal Mesh was implanted

Please describe any problems or injuries caused by the product:

No Yes, I agree to the Parker Waichman LLP disclaimers. Click here to review.

Yes, I would like to receive the Parker Waichman LLP monthly newsletter, InjuryAlert.

please do not fill out the field below.

Boston Scientific Transvaginal Mesh Injury

boston scientific, transvaginal mesh implant complications lawsuit

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Boston Scientific Transvaginal Pelvic Mesh and Pelvic Sling Complication Lawsuit

Boston Scientific Transvaginal Mesh Complications, Side Effects, Lawsuit | Transvaginal Mesh, Pelvic Mesh, Surgical Mesh, Pelvic Sling | Lawsuits, Lawyer, Attorney | Side Effects: Bleeding, Pelvic Pain, Infection, Surgical Mesh Infection, Vaginal Epithelium Erosion, Erosion of Vaginal Tissue, Mesh Erosion, Pain, Incontinence, Urinary Problems, Prolapse, Bowel Perforation, Bladder Perforation, Blood Vessel Perforation, Pressure or “fullness” in the lower abdomen, Dyspareunia, Painful Sexual Intercourse, Vaginal bleeding Vaginal infections, Vaginal pain not related to intercourse, Vaginal Scarring, Neuropathic Numbness Or Weakness | Impaired Healing, Complications, Revision Surgery For Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) or Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)

Boston Scientific Transvaginal Pelvic Mesh and Pelvic Sling

Boston Scientific Transvaginal Mesh and Sling Products Under Investigation.

Thousands of women have been implanted with Boston Scientific transvaginal surgical mesh implants or pelvic slings during urogynecologic procedures to repair pelvic organ proplase (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Unfortunately, many vaginal mesh and sling devices manufactured by Boston Scientific have been associated with a high rate of complications. Women throughout the country have filed Boston Scientific transvaginal or pelvic mesh lawsuits seeking compensation for serious injuries, including erosion and extrusion of mesh, perforation of organs, vaginal bleeding, chronic infection, pain and emotional distress.

Boston Scientific transvaginal mesh/sling products that have been the subject of lawsuits and adverse event reports include those sold under the names:


    • Advantage Transvaginal Mid-Urethral Sling System
    • Pinnacle Posterior Pelvic Floor Repair Kit
    • Obtryx Transobturator Mid-Urethral Sling System
    • Polyform Synthetic Mesh
    • Prefyx Mid U Mesh Sling System
    • Prefyx PPS System
    • Uphold Vaginal Support System

    These Boston Scientific surgical mesh implants are intended to act as a hammock to support prolapsed organs and improve symptoms associated with POP and SUI. Boston Scientific transvaginal surgical mesh products are implanted during POP repair to provide support for the female’s pelvic organs when they drop, fall, bulge or protrude (prolapse) into the vaginal wall due to weakened or stretched muscles that occur from childbirth, pregnancy and other causes. These surgical mesh devices can be implanted to repair prolapse of the bladder (cystocele), top of the vagina (apical prolapse), uterus (procidentia), rectum (rectocele), bowel (enterocele) and urethra.

    Boston Scientific vaginal mesh/sling products may also be used to repair SUI, which occurs as a result of weakened pelvic muscles that support the bladder and urethra. The condition is most common in women who have had multiple pregnancies and vaginal childbirths, and who suffer from pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

    Boston Scientific Transvaginal and Pelvic Mesh Adverse Events and Failures

    Adverse events associated with Boston Scientific transvaginal mesh and pelvic slings may include:

    • Erosion of the mesh through the vaginal tissue
    • Exposure or extrusion of mesh, which can require multiple surgeries
    • Feeling a lump in the vaginal opening or something protruding from vagina
    • Painful sexual intercourse
    • Perforation or puncture of the bladder, intestines and bowels, as well as blood vessels around the vaginal wall
    • Recurrent Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)
    • Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
    • Urinary problems
    • Vaginal bleeding
    • Vaginal chronic drainage, discharge and infections
    • Vaginal pain
    • Vaginal scarring and shortening

    To correct Boston Scientific vaginal mesh and pelvic sling injuries, victims must usually undergo at least one, if not several, additional surgical procedures to remove the device. Unfortunately, excision surgery does not guarantee that complications will be reversed, and many women will continue to suffer with vaginal pain and an impaired quality of life.

    Boston Scientific Transvaginal Mesh and Pelvic Sling Lawsuits

    Victims of Boston Scientific vaginal surgical mesh implant and sling failures who file a transvaginal mesh lawsuit may be able to collect damages for:

    • Additional surgery and multiple surgical revisions
    • Emotional distress
    • Loss of ability to have sexual relations
    • Loss of quality of life
    • Lost wages
    • Out-of-pocket medical, surgical and hospital expenses
    • Pain and Suffering
    • Spousal loss of consortium
    Boston Scientific Transvaginal and Pelvic Mesh Adverse Events and Failures

    Victims must usually undergo at least one, if not several, additional surgical procedures to remove the device.

    It is expected that litigation surrounding Boston Scientific transvaginal mesh and pelvic sling products will only continue to grow, especially as the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) continues to scrutinize their safety risks, complications and failures of surgical mesh implanted transvaginally to treat POP and SUI. Lawyers at our firm who specialize in defective medical device are offering free lawsuit evaluations to victims of Boston Scientific vaginal surgical mesh implant failures. To learn how you may be able to recover damages for your pelvic mesh injuries, emotional distress, and pain and suffering, we urge you to contact our transvaginal mesh failure lawyers today for your free consultation.


    News about Boston Scientific Transvaginal Mesh

    RECALL: News about Boston Scientific Transvaginal Mesh

    Vaginal Mesh Recall.

    A recall notice involving more than 500 Boston Scientific Pinnacle Pelvic Floor Repair Kits was posted on the FDA website on August 3, 2011. According to the notice, the Pinnacle kits may exhibit low tensile strength between the needle and suture and lead to needle detachment during mesh leg placement.

    According to an FDA safety communication issued on July 13, 2011, 2,874 new reports of complications - 1,503 involving POP repairs and 1,371 involving SUI repairs - associated with transvaginal surgical mesh procedures were made to the agency from January 2008 through December 2010. Studies reviewed by the FDA also indicated that roughly 10 percent of women who undergo a procedure involving transvaginal placement of surgical mesh will suffer mesh erosion within 12 months of surgery. More than half will need to undergo an additional surgery to remove the mesh, but in many of these cases, the excision procedure will not resolve their mesh failure symptoms. The FDA was unable to find conclusive evidence showing that transvaginally placed mesh in POP repair is more effective than traditional non-mesh repair in all patients with POP and that “it may expose patients to greater risk”.

    Public Citizen, the consumer advocacy group founded by Ralph Nader, petitioned the FDA on August 25, 2011 to recall transvaginal mesh products due to safety considerations and their association with painful and debilitating complications.

    In an "Executive Summary" released on August 31, 2011, the FDA said it "believes that vaginal placement of surgical mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) repair inherently introduces risks of complications that are unique to the mesh itself."

    During a meeting convened in September 2011, a majority of outside experts on the FDA's Obstetrics & Gynecology (OB/GYN) Medical Device advisory panel agreed that the safety, effectiveness and benefit of transvaginal mesh devices in POP repair has not been well established and warrants long term prospective follow-up of patients. The FDA is considering a proposal to reclassify transvaginal mesh devices used in the repair of POP to Class 3 from their current Class 2 designation, thereby making surgical mesh for POP repair ineligible for the FDA’s less-stringent 510(k) approval protocols, and require that such devices be subjected to human clinical trials in order to gain FDA approval for this use.

    Legal Help for Victims of Boston Scientific Transvaginal Mesh Complications

    Call 1 800 LAW INFO (1-529-4636) today

    Call 1 800 LAW INFO (1-529-4636) today

    If you or a loved one suffered painful injuries as a result of POP or SUI repair that involved a Boston Scientific vaginal mesh implant or pelvic sling, you may have valuable legal rights. To learn more about obtaining compensation for transvaginal mesh injuries, please fill out our online form, or call 1 800 LAW INFO (1-529-4636) today.

Tags:  
Boston Scientific Transvaginal Mesh InjuryRSS Feed

Parker Waichman LLP Files Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits in Tennessee, Arizona and Georgia

Mar 9, 2012 | Parker Waichman LLP
Parker Waichman LLP announced this week that it has filed three federal lawsuits on behalf of women allegedly injured by transvaginal mesh implants they received during surgery to repair pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI)."The injuries suffered by these three plaintiffs are typical of the kinds of complaints we're hearing every day from women who have received transvaginal mesh implants during surgeries to repair POP and SUI," Gary P. Falkowitz, a lawyer with...

West Virginia Selected as Venue for Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits

Feb 9, 2012 | Parker Waichman LLP
Three transvaginal mesh multidistrict litigations involving various devices made by Boston Scientific, American Medical Systems and Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon Inc. have been transferred to  the federal Court in Charleston West Virginia and assigned to Chief Judge Joseph R. Goodwin.   A fourth MDL, involving C.R. Bard's Avaulta mesh products, had already been transferred to Judge Goodwin.  In a Transfer Order dated February 7, the U.S. Judicial Panel on...

FDA Orders Transvaginal Mesh Studies

Jan 5, 2012 | Parker Waichman LLP
As part of its ongoing safety review of transvaginal mesh devices, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) has asked 33 manufactures of such products to conduct safety studies assessing their use in procedures to repair pelvic organ proplapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).  According to various media reports, Johnson & Johnson, C.R. Bard Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Holding Inc., Boston Scientific Corp. and other companies have been sent letters from the FDA...

More Boston Scientific Transvaginal Mesh Injury News