Request Call Back

Contact Us

DePuy Pinnacle Hip Implant Replacement
*    Denotes required field.

   * First Name 

   * Last Name 

   * Email 


Cell Phone 

Street Address 

Zip Code 



If yes, date implant replacement surgery occurred:

Please describe any complications or adverse reactions:

Were You Diagnosed With Cobalt Poisoning?

Did adverse reaction make another implant replacement necessary?

If yes, date of additional replacement surgery:

If yes, why was another implant replacement surgery necessary?

For verification purposes, please answer the below question:

No Yes, I agree to the Parker Waichman LLP disclaimers. Click here to review.

Yes, I would like to receive the Parker Waichman LLP monthly newsletter, InjuryAlert.

please do not fill out the field below.

DePuy Pinnacle Hip Implant

DePuy Pinnacle Hip Implant | Lawsuits, Lawyers | Side Effects: Revision Surgery, Severe Swelling, Disabling Pain, Loosening of Implant, Early Failure | Defective Medical Device, Metal-on-Metal Implants, Faulty Implant

The Metal-on-Metal DePuy Pinnacle Hip is Associated with Premature Failure, Often Leading to Revision Surgery and other Complications

The Metal-on-Metal  DePuy Pinnacle Hip is Associated with Premature Failure,  Often Leading to Revision Surgery and other Complications

The Metal-on-Metal DePuy Pinnacle Hip is Associated with Premature Failure, Often Leading to Revision Surgery and other Complications

People who were implanted with the metal-on-metal version of the DePuy Pinnacle hip implant were probably told that they were getting a new lease on life. Many who received this hip device were led to believe that they would be free of pain, regain mobility and be able to participate in activities they loved. Unfortunately, many patients who received the DePuy Pinnacle found their post-operative experience to be just the opposite. In fact, mounting lawsuits across the country allege that the Pinnacle caused a number of painful side effects that ultimately forced them to undergo another surgery to remove or fix the implant. Our firm is representing individuals who suffered complications allegedly due to the Pinnacle.

When the hip socket component of the DePuy Pinnacle is used with a metal liner, the implant falls into the category of metal-on-metal hip implants. Allegedly, the essential defect of this device is its all-metal design which causes early failure and the need for a revision surgery to remove or otherwise correct the problem. People who have been implanted with the Pinnacle allege that it has caused a number of complications, including:

  • Loosening of the implant
  • Necrosis (death of tissue) or soft tissue damage
  • Elevated levels of cobalt and chromium ions
  • Severe pain that spreads to the groin and/or back
  • Osteolysis, or damage to the bone cells
  • Fluid collections or pseudotumors
  • Difficulty standing or walking; limited mobility
  • Revision surgery (second surgery needed to correct or replace implant)

According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), metal particles can cause these complications because the metal parts slide against each other; this is known as articulation. The metal particles, typically cobalt and chromium ions, can seep into the bloodstream or tissue surrounding the implant. This can cause “adverse local tissue reaction” or damage to the soft tissues. It is also sometimes referred to as an “adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD).” Plaintiffs in DePuy Pinnacle lawsuits may be able to receive compensation to help pay for ongoing medical bills related to injuries from the implant.

Some of the problems that have sparked the filing of DePuy Pinnacle metal-on-metal hip implant lawsuits include:

  • Unexplained Hip Pain
  • Difficulty Standing or Walking
  • Loss of Mobility
  • Loosening of a DePuy Pinnacle Hip
  • Hip Replacement Failure
  • Additional Hip Revision Surgery

There have been numerous injury reports related to the DePuy Pinnacle. In fact, the FDA received at least 709 adverse event reports over the Pinnacle between July and September 2011 and 556 between January and June 2011 compared to 556 for all of 2010. These statistics suggest that the number of injury reports related to the Pinnacle is on the rise. In 2011 there were a total of 1,265 adverse event reports for the Pinnacle, 450 of them were confirmed to be with the metal-on-metal version.

Contact Us

If you or a loved one has been implanted with the DePuy Pinnacle, you may have valuable legal rights. Parker Waichman LLP has handled numerous medical device lawsuits and is available to answer any questions you may have. To find out more, please fill out our online form to the right or call 1-800-YOURLAWYER (1-800-968-7529).


DePuy Pinnacle Hip ImplantRSS Feed

Texas Jury Awards Over $1 Billion in DePuy Pinnacle Case

Dec 1, 2016
Texas Jury Awards More Than $1 Billion in Six-Plaintiff Consolidated DePuy Pinnacle Bellwether A trial heard in the federal district court in Dallas, Texas that was brought against Johnson & Johnson and DePuy Orthopaedics just found for the six plaintiffs for over $1 billion. All six plaintiffs had been implanted with the DePuy Pinnacle metal-on-metal device. DePuy Orthopaedics is a unit of Johnson & Johnson. Individuals who underwent hip implantation surgery with the metal-on-metal...

Scheduling Issue Pressed by Plaintiffs for 3 Trials in Vein-Filter MDL

Oct 12, 2016
The First Trial Should Be Delayed or Canceled Plaintiff have requested that an Indiana federal court set pretrial deadlines on the same schedule for the lawsuits involving Cook Medical Inc.'s Celect vein filters for the three bellwethers cases selected in Vein-Filter multidistrict litigation (MDL) Plaintiffs are arguing that if the first trial should be delayed or canceled, the other two bellwether cases should be able to move forward. The plaintiffs have urged the court to reject Cook's...

JJ Deceptively Marketed Metal-on-Metal Pinnacle Hip Implant Jurors Hear

Oct 5, 2016
The third bellwether trial involving the metal-on-metal version of DePuy's Pinnacle hip implant is underway. DePuy Orthpaedics and parent company Johnson & Johnson allegedly engaged in deception when marketing its hip implant product. On the first day of trial, attorneys for the plaintiff told jurors that J&J dodged standard regulatory review and misled physicians into thinking the device was safe. J&J sold some 150,000 metal hip implants in the 2000s, Law 360 reports. Plaintiffs...

Pinnacle Hip Implant Multidistrict Litigation Lawsuit Updates

Sep 27, 2016
Depuy Discontinued the Device. After being hit with $500 million verdict in the second Pinnacle hip bellwether trial in June 2016, Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and its DePuy Orthopaedics division will be defending against seven cases consolidated in another bellwether trial in the Northern District of Texas. U.S. District Judge Ed Kinkeade chose seven cases for a bellwether trial which began September 26, 2016. Over 8,500 federal cases are pending in Pinnacle hip multidistrict litigation...

Jury Selection Begins for DePuy Pinnacle Bellwether Trial

Sep 20, 2016
DePuy Pinnacle Hip Implant Litigation Began Jury selection for the third bellwether trial in the DePuy Pinnacle hip implant litigation began on Monday, Sept. 19 in federal court in Dallas, Texas. The multidistrict litigation (MDL) is being overseen by U.S. District Judge Ed Kinkeade. Plaintiffs in the DePuy Pinnacle hip implant MDL allege that the metal-on-metal design of the implant caused injuries such as implant loosening, pain, dislocation, inflammation, tissue death and metal...

More DePuy Pinnacle Hip Implant News

Parker Waichman Accolades And Reviews Best Lawyers Find Us On Avvo