YourLawyer.com 1-800-LAW-INFO (1-800-529-4636)

Light Cigarettes


AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Light Cigarettes

Millions of Americans smoke "low-tar," "mild," or "light" cigarettes, believing those cigarettes to be less harmful than other cigarettes. Many of these cigarettes very falsely marketed as "safe" or "harmless". However, new evidence shows that these so called "safe" cigarettes are just as dangerous as regular cigarettes. In a study by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) titled Risks Associated with Smoking Cigarettes with Low Machine-Measured Yields of Tar and Nicotine*, national scientific experts conclude that evidence does not indicate a benefit to public health from changes in cigarette design and manufacturing over the last 50 years.

"This report was made possible by the work and cooperation of scientists throughout the country," said Scott Leischow, Ph.D., chief of the NCI Tobacco Control Research Branch. "The monograph clearly demonstrates that people who switch to low-tar or light cigarettes from regular cigarettes are likely to inhale the same amount of cancer-causing toxins and they remain at high risk for developing smoking-related cancers and other diseases." This monograph is the 13th volume in NCI's Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph Series, which began in 1991.

The study describes several reasons why the levels of tar and nicotine measured by the FTC method do not reflect actual tar and nicotine delivery to the smoker. The filters in low-tar/low-nicotine cigarettes often include vent holes which, when open, allow air to enter and dilute the smoke. However, many smokers cover these holes with their lips and fingers. In contrast, when tested by a machine, the holes are unobstructed, and artificially low measurements of tar and nicotine are obtained.

Additionally, smokers who switch to light cigarettes from regular cigarettes "compensate" for the lower nicotine level by inhaling more deeply; taking larger, more rapid, or more frequent puffs; or by increasing the number of cigarettes smoked per day. As a result, smokers cancel out any potential benefit of smoking a "low-tar" cigarette.

The following brands of light cigarettes have all been inappropriately marketed:
  • Marlboro Lights
  • Camel Lights
  • Kool Lights
  • Merit Lights
  • Winston Lights
  • Salem Lights
  • Newport Lights
  • Now
  • Vantage
  • Carlton
  • Misty Lights
  • Capri Lights
  • Cambridge Lights
  • GPC Lights
  • Doral Lights
  • Virginia Slims Lights
  • Benson & Hedges Lights
  • Parliament Lights
  • Kent III Lights
  • Luck Strikes Lights
  • True Lights
If you have been diagnosed with an illness associated with smoking light "safe" cigarettes, please fill out the form at the right for a free case evaluation by a qualified attorney.
Light CigarettesRSS Feed

Big Tobacco Handed Victory by Manhattan Appeals Court

Apr 14, 2008 | Parker Waichman Alonso LLP
Tobacco giants Brown & Williamson Holdings and  Philip Morris USA won a huge victory last week when a Manhattan appeals court reversed a ruling in favor of a lung cancer victim who had argued that the cigarette makers were negligent by failing to market only "light cigarettes".  In a 3-2 decision the appellate division ruled that the plaintiff failed to prove that light cigarettes would "have been acceptable to the consumers that constitute the market for the...

FDA Tobacco Bill Gains Momentum in Congress

Apr 4, 2008 | Parker Waichman Alonso LLP
Tobacco products might soon face regulation by the Food & Drug Administration (FDA).  A bill granting the FDA jurisdiction to regulate cigarettes and other forms of tobacco was approved by the House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee Wednesday, setting up its passage by the full House.Tobacco products are among the least regulated consumer products on the market.  Yet, tobacco use is the number one preventable cause of death in America. Every year, smoking and other...

Tobacco Co. Funded Lung Cancer Study Elicits Mea Culpa from New England Journal of Medicine

Apr 4, 2008 | Parker Waichman Alonso LLP
After embarrassing disclosures of financial links between the authors of a lung-cancer study and two large companies—General Electric and Vector Group, Ltd.—the New England Journal of Medicine published a correction, a clarification, and an editorial that called for the transparent disclosure of funding sources.  The lung-cancer study, which the journal published in 2006, has been controversial and suggested an annual screening with a CT scan could reduce the death rate from...

Cigarette Company's "Blood Money" Paid for Important Lung Cancer Study, Critics Say

Mar 26, 2008 | Parker Waichman Alonso LLP
It has turned out that an important lung cancer study was actually funded by a cigarette company.  In late 2006, Dr. Claudia Henschke of Weill Cornell Medical College released a study revealing that the majority (80 percent) of lung cancer deaths could be prevented through widespread use of CT scans.  The study was published in The New England Journal of Medicine and indicated—in small print at the end of the piece—that the work was financed, in part, by the Foundation for...

Philip Morris, Wyeth Want Supreme Court to Enact Lawsuit Shield

Jan 22, 2008 | Parker Waichman Alonso LLP
Cigarette makers and drug companies could be shielded from many product liability lawsuits if the US Supreme Court decides to uphold two lower court rulings.   Cigarette maker Philip Morris, which faces 30 lawsuits around the country stemming from so-called “light” cigarettes, and drug maker Wyeth have argued in separate cases that their products should be shielded from suits if they have been approved for use by a federal agency -- such as the Food and Drug Administration...

More Light Cigarettes News

Light Cigarettes
* Denotes required field.

Title

* First Name

* Last Name

* Email Address

* Phone Number

Cell Phone Number

Office Phone Number

Street Address

Apartment/Suite

City

State

Zip Code

Please provide the best method and times to contact you:

Date of birth of person injured
(mm-dd-yyyy):

Cigarette brand:

Please describe your case:

Other Info:

No Yes, I agree to the Parker Waichman Alonso LLP disclaimers.Click here to review all.

Yes, I would like to receive the Parker Waichman Alonso LLP monthly newsletter, InjuryAlert.

please do not fill out the field below.

Home | Defective Drugs | Medical Devices | Toxic Substances | Accidents | Product Liability | Malpractice | Diseases
Nursing Home Negligence | Food Poisoning | Other Topics | Contact
Statement of Clients' Rights | Site Map | ReNu with MoistureLoc | Vioxx | Mesothelioma | Permax | Dostinex | Composix Kugel Mesh X Large Patch
Ortho Evra | Fosamax | Personal Injury Lawyer | Fusarium Keratitis | Stevens Johnson Syndrome

© 2002-2008 YourLawyer.com. All Rights Reserved.

Please note that you are not considered a client until you have signed a retainer agreement and your case has been accepted by us.
Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter.
Attorney Advertising

Parker Waichman Personal Injury News