Request Call Back

Contact Us

Wright Medical Profemur Hip Implant Replacement
*    Denotes required field.

   * First Name 

   * Last Name 

   * Email 

Phone 

Cell Phone 

Street Address 

Zip Code 

City 

State 

If yes, date implant replacement surgery occurred:

Please describe any complications or adverse reactions:

Did adverse reaction make another implant replacement necessary?

If yes, date of additional replacement surgery:

If yes, why was another implant replacement surgery necessary?

For verification purposes, please answer the below question:
+
=

No Yes, I agree to the Parker Waichman LLP disclaimers. Click here to review.

Yes, I would like to receive the Parker Waichman LLP monthly newsletter, InjuryAlert.

please do not fill out the field below.

Wright Medical Profemur Total Hip Replacement

wright medical profemur, hip implant system replacement lawsuits

Wright Medical Profemur Hip Implant May Be Causing Health Problems, Lawsuits Progressing

People who underwent a total hip replacement with the Wright Medical Profemur hip implant were probably under the impression that they would have a better quality of life after surgery. They were also possibly told that this implant would last for years. Unfortunately, this has not been the case for some patients. As it turns out, the Wright Medical Profemur hip implant has a tendency to fail early, forcing these patients to go through another surgery to remove the implant.

If you or someone you know has had surgery related to this device, our attorneys would like to hear from you. Parker Waichman LLP offers free case evaluations for anyone who has questions about their legal rights.

Problems with the Wright Medical Profemur Hip System

Wright Medical Technology manufactures a line of hip implants that fall under the Profemur Total Hip System category. Lawsuits over Wright Medical Profemur hip implants include the following products:

  • Conserve Plus Cup
  • Conserve Total Femoral Head
  • Wright Modular Femoral Neck
  • Profemur E Cementless Stem
  • Wright Profemur Z Femoral Stem

If you have undergone a hip implant, you should know that the devices implanted in these surgeries are meant to last at least 15 years. A total hip replacement surgery is a complicated, invasive operation that no one should have to undergo unless absolutely necessary. The problem with the Wright Medical Profemur systems is that they fail within just a few years, which forces patients to undergo what is known as "revision" surgery to remove the devices and replace the allegedly defective device with a different device.

Wright Medical Profemur Total Hip Replacement

In 2009, the Australian Orthopaedic Association found that one component, the Wright Profemur Z femoral stem, had a revision rate of 11.2 percent in only three years; this means that one in every nine patients had to undergo revision surgery. Other complications associated with the Wright Medical Profemur hip system include:

  • Fracture
  • Breakage
  • Degradation
  • Fretting (wear and corrosion of the implant's surfaces)

Like metal-on-metal hip implants and numerous other medical devices, the Wright Medical Profemur was approved without clinical safety tests, through a route called "510(k)" which allows manufacturers to sell devices without proving their safety or effectiveness through clinical testing; they only have to prove to federal regultors that the device is similar enough to a preceding device that has already been approved and is on the market.

Wright Conserve Metal-on-Metal Hip Implant Lawsuits

Parker Waichman notes that the Profemur is not the only metal-on-metal hip implant that has spurred personal injury lawsuits against Wright Medical. The company is also facing lawsuits alleging that the Wright Conserve metal-on-metal hip implant caused serious complications, such as metal poisoning (metallosis). As with other metal hip device lawsuits, plaintiffs in the litigation allege that the Conserve caused injuries due to its metal-on-metal design, which allegedly causes metal particles to be leeched into the body when the surfaces of the implant rub together. In addition to metallosis, plaintiffs allege that the defective design of the Conserve led to adverse events such as inflammation; difficulty walking; implant loosening; tissue death; and ultimately, the need for revision surgery to remove and replace the implant.

The Wright Conserve hip system is composed of the Conserve Femoral Surface Replacement, the Conserve Plus Total Resurfacing Hip System, the Conserve Total A-Class Advanced Metal, and the Conserve Total Hip System.

Metal-on-metal hip devices, in general, have raised safety concerns because they are associated with a higher than expected failure rate. Typically, a total hip replacement is expected to last 10 to 15 years. When a hip replacement fails, it means that it is no longer functional due to some type of injury or complication and needs to be removed. The procedure to remove the failed hip implant. Plaintiffs in the Wright Conserve litigation allege that they had to undergo an early revision surgery, a procedure that is painful, costly, and complex, due to the allegedly faulty nature of the metal-on-metal hip implant.

In 2012, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) consolidated Wright Conserve lawsuits into a federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia before U.S. District Judge William S. Duffey, Jr. This was the third MDL to be established for metal-on-metal hip implant lawsuits. MDLs centralize lawsuits with similar allegations into one court before one judge. Cases are consolidated in this manner to make litigation more efficient, because proceedings become streamlined and MDLs help avoid duplicate discovery and conserve court resources.

Bellwether cases are the first lawsuits in an MDL selected for trial. Since the outcome of bellwether trials is often taken as an indication as to how the rest of the litigation will proceed, bellwether cases are typically representative of most plaintiffs. For instance, if juries award large verdicts to the plaintiff in a bellwether trial, then device makers may be more inclined to enter into settlement discussions.

Wright Medical Settles Conserve Hip Implant Cases in MDL

Parker Waichman comments that Wright Medical has agreed to settle personal injury lawsuits alleging injuries from its metal-on-metal Conserve, Dynasty, or Lineage hip implants. Plaintiffs in the litigation similarly allege that these hip devices are defectively designed and caused injuries, and that Wright Medical failed to disclose these risks. On November 2, 2016, Wright Medical Group announced that it entered into a settlement agreement to resolve lawsuits in the Conserve MDL (In Re: Wright Medical Technology, Inc., CONSERVE® Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2329) and consolidated lawsuits in California state court (In re: Wright Hip System Cases, Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 4710). Wright also entered into a Settlement Agreement with three of its insurance carriers, the company announced.

Wright Medical agreed to pay $240 million to settle 1,292 lawsuits alleging injuries from the Conserve, Dynasty, or Lineage hip implants that meet the eligibility requirements of the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA). Of the total settlement amount, $180 million would be funded through cash and $60 million from insurance recoveries. In order to meet eligibility requirements for the Wright Medical metal-on-metal hip implant settlement, plaintiffs must have a lawsuit pending or tolled in the MDL or in the California litigation and must have undergone revision surgery within eight years of receiving the metal-on-metal hip replacement named in the lawsuit. Plaintiffs who have undergone bilateral revision surgeries, meaning they needed revision surgeries in both hips,, may be considered as two claims as long as both hip implants meet eligibility criteria separately.

In order for the $240 million Conserve metal-on-metal hip implant settlement to move forward, 95 percent of eligible plaintiffs must agree to the MDA. The final settlement amount will vary based on various factors, including how many claimants agree to opt-in and the combination of products named in the personal injury lawsuits.

Jury Orders Wright Medical to Pay $11M in 1st MDL Case

The first Wright Conserve bellwether case went to trial in November 2015. After two weeks of trial, a Georgia federal jury awarded $11 million to the plaintiff. The verdict consisted of $10 million in punitive damages. Punitive damages are awarded when a jury decides that a defendant needs pay extra as punishment, such as when the defendant is found to act with gross negligence. Punitive damages are often awarded in the hopes that other companies will avoid engaging in similar activities.

The plaintiff's Wright Conserve lawsuit was filed into the MDL in 2013. Her case was the first lawsuit chosen for bellwether trials. According to her lawsuit, she was implanted with the Conserve metal-on-metal hip implant in April 2006. The hip device lasted only six years before failing, prompting her to undergo revision surgery to replace the implant. During the Wright Conserve revision surgery, her lawsuit alleges, surgeons found fluid buildup, dead tissue, and tissue damaged by the presence of metal debris. The plaintiff was a ski instructor for over 47 years, but she alleges that her favorites activities are now severely limited due to complications from the Conserve hip implant.

The jury found that the Wright Conserve metal-on-metal hip implant was defectively designed and unreasonably dangerous. Wright made fraudulent misrepresentations that ultimately caused the plaintiff to suffer injuries, the jury found. Furthermore, Wright Medical's conduct was found to be willful and malicious. The jury found that the device maker was intentionally fraudulent and exhibited a knowing and reckless indifference toward the plaintiff and other metal hip recipients. Furthermore, the jury found that the plaintiff's injuries were caused through no fault of her own.

The lawsuit alleged design defect, fraudulent misrepresentation, fraudulent concealment, and negligent misrepresentation about the safety of the metal-on-metal design of the Conserve hip and the risk of shedding metal particles.

Parker | Waichman Logo Contact Us

If you or someone you know has been implanted with the Wright Profemur hip system and suffered alleged injuries, you may have valuable legal rights. Please fill out our online form or call 1-800-YOURLAWYER (1-800-968-7529) to find out more today.




 

Wright Medical Profemur Total Hip ReplacementRSS Feed

Court Order in Conserve Hip Device Multidistrict Litigation Sets Stage for Bellwether Trial

Sep 3, 2015
United States District Judge William S. Duffey Jr., of the Northern District of Georgia, issued a 123-page order in the first of the consolidated MDL cases alleging that the Wright Medical Conserve metal-on-metal hip replacement devices are defective. The court denied the motion for summary judgment of the plaintiff's claims of defective design, fraudulent misrepresentation and concealment and punitive damages, and also rejected Wright Medical's claim that the Medical Device Amendment to the...

National Medical Device Lawyers Warn About Risks Associated with Metal Hip Implants such as the DePuy ASR, Biomet M2a Magnum, Other Allegedly Defective Hip Replacements

Sep 24, 2012 | Parker Waichman LLP
Parker Waichman LLP, a national law firm dedicated to protecting the rights of victims injured by defective medical devices, is notifying the public about the safety concerns surrounding metal-on-metal hip implants. Following a major recall by Johnson & Johnson, the devices have been repeatedly linked to a high failure rate and various side effects associated with the release of metal particles. Metal-on-metal hip implants began raising major safety concerns after DePuy...

Feds Investigating Wright Medical' Profemur Hip Replacement System

Aug 8, 2012 | Parker Waichman LLP
Wright Medical Inc. disclosed yesterday that it has  received a federal subpoena from the U.S. Attorney's office in the Western District of Tennessee seeking information about its Profemur hip replacement line, which includes metal hip stems and total hip replacement systems.  In its latest earning statement, Wright said it was cooperating with the probe, and working to comply with a subpoena to provide “records and documentation" on Profemur hip replacement products from a...

Third Metal-on-Metal Hip Implant MDL Established, This Time for Wright Conserve Hip Replacement Devices

Mar 20, 2012 | Parker Waichman LLP
Another federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) has been established for lawsuits involving metal-on-metal hip implant devices.  Claims involving the Wright Conserve hip-replacement system have been consolidated and transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.  All of the lawsuits in that litigation revolve around the all-metal design of the Wright Conserve devices, and allege they are prone to the generation of high levels of metal debris, cause...

Canadian Victims of Defective Hip Implants Launch Lawsuits

Jan 4, 2012 | Parker Waichman LLP
More Canadians are lining up to sue the manufacturers of allegedly defective hip implants that they claim have failed and caused them pain.   At least four hip implant class action lawsuits are currently pending in Canada, and over the past five years, a dozen different hip implant recalls have been issued there.   According to a report from CBC.com, most of the problems reported in Canada involve newer versions of hip implants.  One plaintiffs' attorney attributed that...

More Wright Medical Profemur Total Hip Replacement News

Parker Waichman Accolades And Reviews Best Lawyers Find Us On Avvo