Understanding the Dangers and Legal Options for Families Harmed by Infant Neck Floats
The safety of infant neck floats, marketed as tools to keep babies afloat while playing in water, is under scrutiny after two reported deaths and over 80 close calls. These products are designed to encircle an infant’s neck and keep their head above water, with popular brands like Otteroo leading the market. However, despite claims that they are safe when used under strict supervision, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has raised concerns about the significant risks they pose.
At a recent CPSC hearing, commissioners expressed deep reservations about the safety of neck floats, with some pushing for stronger regulatory measures. Commissioner Peter Feldman, citing his experience as a lifeguard, argued that the products should be banned outright, calling the entire product category “a terrible idea.” This view is shared by safety advocates who argue that neck floats create a false sense of security for caregivers, ultimately putting babies at risk of drowning.
Parents are instructed to remain within arm’s reach of their children while using neck floats, but even close supervision has not prevented accidents. Incidents have occurred when the floats slipped or deflated, leaving babies submerged in water. The most alarming cases involved two infants who drowned after being left unattended in bathtubs. While these tragedies highlight the worst outcomes, many more children have had near-drowning experiences, even with adults present.
The design of neck floats makes them particularly dangerous. When not fully inflated or if the child moves in an unexpected way, the baby’s head can slip through the opening, causing their face to be submerged in water. The risks are heightened when these floats are used in slippery, soapy environments like bathtubs. Furthermore, infants are especially vulnerable because they lack the motor skills to lift their heads or remove themselves from dangerous situations.
With drowning being one of the leading causes of death for young children, the debate over the safety of neck floats has become increasingly urgent. While the CPSC is considering stronger design and testing standards, there is a growing call for an outright ban on these products. Until such measures are taken, families using neck floats are exposing their children to significant and preventable dangers.
How Families Are Harmed by Infant Neck Floats
The dangers posed by infant neck floats are not hypothetical—they are real and have already resulted in tragedy. Drowning is the primary risk, but even in non-fatal incidents, the potential harm is severe. Infants who experience near-drowning can suffer long-term consequences, including brain damage due to oxygen deprivation. Parents who witness these terrifying events may also endure lasting emotional trauma, knowing how close their child came to a fatal accident.
In the most devastating cases, children have lost their lives after being left unattended with neck floats. These deaths are heart-wrenching reminders of the flaws in products that promise safety but fail to deliver. Parents who have lost children or seen them harmed by neck floats face unimaginable grief and guilt, often questioning how a product marketed as safe could cause such devastation.
When products like neck floats fail to perform as expected, families may be entitled to compensation through legal action. A product liability lawsuit allows victims to hold manufacturers accountable for the harm caused by defective or dangerous products. In the case of neck floats, lawsuits may be based on claims that the product was defectively designed, that the manufacturer failed to adequately warn consumers of the risks, or that the product should never have been sold in the first place.
Filing a Product Liability Lawsuit for Neck Float Injuries
If your child has been injured or died due to an infant neck float, you may have grounds to file a product liability lawsuit against the manufacturer. Such lawsuits seek to hold companies accountable when they produce or sell products that are unsafe for consumers. In the case of infant neck floats, a lawsuit might argue that the product was defectively designed or lacked proper warnings about its risks.
The first step in pursuing a lawsuit is to consult with an attorney experienced in product liability law. Your attorney will review the details of your case, including any evidence of the product’s defect and how it contributed to your child’s injury or death. This can include medical records, incident reports, and even expert testimony regarding the risks posed by the product.
Once your attorney has built a case, they will file a formal complaint against the manufacturer. The legal process then moves into the discovery phase, where both sides exchange information and gather evidence. Your attorney will seek to prove that the neck float’s design was inherently dangerous and that the manufacturer either knew or should have known about the risks but failed to take appropriate action.
As your case progresses, your attorney may engage in negotiations with the manufacturer’s legal team. In many cases, product liability lawsuits are settled out of court, with the manufacturer agreeing to pay compensation to the injured party. If a settlement cannot be reached, the case may go to trial, where a judge or jury will determine the outcome.
Why an Attorney Is Essential to You Case
Navigating the legal system can be complex, especially in product liability cases involving large companies. Manufacturers often have significant resources and legal teams dedicated to defending against claims, which can make it challenging for individuals to secure the compensation they deserve. An attorney can level the playing field by advocating for your rights, handling the legal complexities of the case, and working to achieve the best possible outcome for you and your family.
An attorney will also help you identify the damages you may be entitled to. In product liability cases, compensation typically covers medical expenses, funeral costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering. In some cases, families may also be awarded punitive damages if it is proven that the manufacturer acted with extreme negligence or recklessness in allowing the dangerous product to remain on the market.