Parker Waichman LLP

Pelvic Mesh $13.7 Million Lawsuit Award

Chronology of the Ethicon Pelvic Mesh Lawsuit. A Pennsylvania state judge refused to deny a $13.7 million to a lawsuit verdict against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and its subsidiary, Ethicon, who immediately made it known they would appeal the award to the state Supreme Court. The judge remarked that the plaintiff’s suffering was real and chronic. […]

Pelvic Mesh Lawsuit

Chronology of the Ethicon Pelvic Mesh Lawsuit. A Pennsylvania state judge refused to deny a $13.7 million to a lawsuit verdict against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and its subsidiary, Ethicon, who immediately made it known they would appeal the award to the state Supreme Court. The judge remarked that the plaintiff’s suffering was real and chronic.

The plaintiff filed her mesh lawsuit in June 2013. The woman suffered from stress urinary incontinence and had received transvaginal tape in 2005, made by Ethicon Inc. to treat her condition. In 2007, two years later, the plaintiff began to experience a sharp pain in her vagina. Her physician found that the mesh had become exposed and surgery was required to fix the problem, according to court documents.

Three years later, the plaintiff underwent surgery a second time for exactly the same reason. In 2012, one year before the plaintiff filed her transvaginal (TVM) mesh side effects lawsuit, she began suffering from pulling sensations and additional pain caused by scarring from the prior surgeries, as well as the implant itself.

The personal injury attorneys at Parker Waichman LLP are actively reviewing potential lawsuits on behalf of women who have suffered injury from allegedly defective medical devices, including transvaginal mesh products.

FDA Changes TVM Category

In February 2016, the plaintiff was awarded a jury verdict of $13.7 million. The jury found that the transvaginal tape (TVT) sling used for the surgery was not totally safe. The verdict, coincidentally, came within a month of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) changing the classification of transvaginal mesh from Class II (moderate risk) to Class III (high risk). The FDA has since reconsidered their opinion about the use of transvaginal mesh and no longer see it as the preferred method of treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Both conditions are common to women later in life who have borne children.

The plaintiff claimed that the mesh was defective because its pores were too small and had a tendency to degrade. It was easily pulverized into tiny fibers because it was cut by a machine as opposed to a laser, and the mesh may erode damaging surrounding tissue.

In her lawsuit, the plaintiff alleged that transvaginal mesh side effect complications left her with constant pain and discomfort, along with a reduced ability to participate in sexual activity with her husband.

Ethicon attempted to have the award disqualified, maintaining that in its view, the plaintiff’s pelvic pain was intermittent, at best, and that the plaintiff’s claims concerning emotional harm were “unqualified.”

Judge’s Statement

Judge Kenneth Powell of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, did not accept that argument. “To characterize testimony in this way is to minimize her real damages to an unreasonable degree,” he said. “This is not merely ‘intermittent’ pain – it is chronic pain, pain that will be with her for the rest of her life, with no real prospect of resolution.” The judge added, “The evidence of defendant-appellant’s wanton and willful disregard for plaintiff adequately supported the jury’s award of punitive damages.”

Through a spokesperson, Ethicon expressed once more, their intent to appeal. Ethicon continued to claim that the TVT mid-urethral sling was properly designed and labeled and that the TVT was not the cause of the plaintiff’s ongoing medical problems.

Additional TVM Legal Issues

Additional TVM Pelvic Mesh LawsuitAnother medical device manufacturer, Boston Scientific noted in a report filed with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) in November 2016, that it was facing over 40,000 lawsuits. These all had to do with transvaginal mesh filed by plaintiffs alleging various transvaginal mesh complications.

A case was filed against Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon Inc., and Gynecare in November 2008, by a woman and her husband. In 2006, the plaintiff had transvaginal mesh surgery to alleviate pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Shortly after the Prolift implant, the woman experienced severe pain and numerous complications. These included nerve damage that was so serious she was unable to work in her profession as a nurse, have sex with her husband, or sit with any comfort more than 20 minutes at a time. Three surgeries were needed to remove the mesh implant.

Ten years later, in 2016, the plaintiff finally got justice and was awarded over $11 million in damages for her TVM injuries.

Need Legal Help Regarding Pelvic Mesh Lawsuit?

The personal injury attorneys at Parker Waichman LLP offer free, no-obligation case evaluations. For more information, fill out our online contact form or call 1-800-YOURLAWYER (1-800-968-7529).

What Our Clients Say About Us
We have worked with thousands of clients and we appreciate them and their positive reviews. Here are just a few recent client reviews...
5 Star Reviews 150
Everyone I have been in contact with has been very professional, helpful and friendly. I'm sure it will be the same moving forward. Thank you.
Linda Mierisch
6 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
PW WAS FANTASTIC WHILE HANDLING MY WTC CASE. SHELLEY DAVIS WAS SUPERB, SHE MANAGED THE CASE WITH VERY LITTLE INPUT FROM ME. SHE CONTACTED ME WITH UPDATES AND WAS ALWAYS AVAILABLE TO ME WHENEVER I CALLED WITH A QUESTION. IF YOU HAVE A WTC CASE, JUST CALL THEM AND THEY WILL TAKE CARE OF ALL THE COMMUNICATING. IF ALL GOES WELL THEY SHOULD HAVE AN AWARD FOR YOU WITHIN 18 MONTHS. I AM VERY HAPPY THAT I CHOSE PW.
RAUL MORALES
3 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
Tina Morace was instrumental in my effort to receive the maxium compensation for my WTC claim. I can only express my deepest appreciation for her professional guidance and constant support ! She is truly an asset to the firm.
Thomas Larner
a year ago

Why Choose Us to Help You?

We Take Care of Everything
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
No Recovery = No Legal Fees
We work on a contingency-fee basis, meaning that we only get paid from a portion of your settlement or jury award. If you don't get compensation, you owe us nothing.
Decades of Experience
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
Respected by Our Peers
Judges, insurance adjusters, and fellow attorneys all speak highly of our skills, and we've earned numerous accolades, including a flawless rating from AVVO.
We Have Many Locations To Serve You
We have the experience and the skilled litigators to win your case. Contact us and speak with a real attorney who can help you.
Long Island – Nassau
Parker Waichman LLP
6 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY 11050
Long Island – Suffolk
Parker Waichman LLP
201 Old Country Road – Suite 145
Melville, NY 11747
New York
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038
Queens
Parker Waichman LLP
118-35 Queens Boulevard, Suite 400
Forest Hills, NY 11375
Brooklyn
Parker Waichman LLP
300 Cadman Plaza West
One Pierrepont Plaza, 12th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
New Jersey
Parker Waichman LLP
80 Main Street, Suite 265
West Orange, NJ 07052
Florida
Parker Waichman LLP
27299 Riverview Center Boulevard
Suite 108
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
Nationwide Service
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038