Parker Waichman LLP

FDA Enlists External Review of Device Approval Process

FDA Commission On Approval Process The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) just announced it commissioned the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to study the pre-market notification program used to review and clear certain medical devices marketed in the United States. The study will examine the program, also called the 510(k) process, for medical devices, which […]

Device Approval Process

FDA Commission On Approval Process The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) just announced it commissioned the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to study the pre-market notification program used to review and clear certain medical devices marketed in the United States.

The study will examine the program, also called the 510(k) process, for medical devices, which can be accessed here.  The 510(k) process was established under the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 to ensure safe and effective devices are made available to consumers and to promote innovation in the medical device industry.

The FDA announced that while the study is underway, its Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) will convene an internal working group to evaluate and improve the consistency of FDA decision-making in the 510(k) process.

Established by the National Academy of Sciences, the IOM provides independent, objective, evidence-based advice to policymakers, health professionals, the private sector, and the public. As part of its study, the IOM will convene a committee to answer:

510(k) process optimally protect patients and promote innovation

  • Does the current 510(k) process optimally protect patients and promote innovation in support of public health?
  • If not, what legislative, regulatory, or administrative changes are recommended to achieve the goals of the 510(k) process?

The $1.3 million IOM review is scheduled for completion in 2011, and is one of six priorities outlined for CDRH as well as to:

  • Create an internal task force on the use of science in regulatory decision-making
  • Develop an effective compliance strategy
  • Optimally integrate pre- and post-market information
  • Increase transparency in decision-making
  • Establish clear procedures to resolve differences of opinion
  • Ensure the IOM will hold two public workshops during the next nine months as part of its review and publish a final report in March 2011 containing its conclusions and recommendations

The FDA classifies medical devices into three categories according to their risk level. Class III devices represent the highest risk level and generally require pre-market approval to support their safety and efficacy prior to marketing.

Class III devices include heart valves and intraocular lenses. Class I and II devices pose lower risks and include adhesive bandages and wheelchairs. Most Class II and some Class I devices can be marketed after submission of pre-market notifications (510(k) applications) that support their substantial equivalence to legally marketed devices that do not require pre-market approval.

Devices that present a new intended use or include new technology that presents new questions of safety or effectiveness may not be found substantially equivalent and require pre-market approval.

Need Legal Help Regarding Device Approval Process?

The personal injury attorneys at Parker Waichman offer free, no-obligation case evaluations. For more information, fill out our online form or call 1-800-YOURLAWYER (1-800-968-7529).

What Our Clients Say About Us
We have worked with thousands of clients and we appreciate them and their positive reviews. Here are just a few recent client reviews...
5 Star Reviews 150
I want to say that ever since I came to Parker Waichman LLP I was met with such professionalism. Anytime I call Jessie Salcedo to ask a question to see how the case is going she is very informative and is quick to answer any questions that I have. They have made everything very easy so far.
JuliaInPink
5 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
Positive: Professionalism , Quality , Responsiveness , Value
robert greves
3 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
Positive: Professionalism Benita Rollis was very professional and caring. She returns my calls promptly and kept me updated on my case. Parker and Waichman please keep up the good work you have great person working for your company. I have no regrets
D Ferg
3 years ago

Why Choose Us to Help You?

We Take Care of Everything
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
No Recovery = No Legal Fees
We work on a contingency-fee basis, meaning that we only get paid from a portion of your settlement or jury award. If you don't get compensation, you owe us nothing.
Decades of Experience
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
Respected by Our Peers
Judges, insurance adjusters, and fellow attorneys all speak highly of our skills, and we've earned numerous accolades, including a flawless rating from AVVO.
We Have Many Locations To Serve You
We have the experience and the skilled litigators to win your case. Contact us and speak with a real attorney who can help you.
Long Island – Nassau
Parker Waichman LLP
6 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY 11050
Long Island – Suffolk
Parker Waichman LLP
201 Old Country Road – Suite 145
Melville, NY 11747
New York
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038
Queens
Parker Waichman LLP
118-35 Queens Boulevard, Suite 400
Forest Hills, NY 11375
Brooklyn
Parker Waichman LLP
300 Cadman Plaza West
One Pierrepont Plaza, 12th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
New Jersey
Parker Waichman LLP
80 Main Street, Suite 265
West Orange, NJ 07052
Florida
Parker Waichman LLP
27299 Riverview Center Boulevard
Suite 108
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
Nationwide Service
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038