Parker Waichman LLP

ReGen’s Menaflex Knee Device Faces Scrutiny

  Menaflex Knee Device Faces Scrutiny. ReGen Biologics Inc.’s Menaflex knee device faces scrutiny tomorrow, when the Food & Drug Administration (FDA)  convenes a panel of outside experts to make a recommendation about whether Menaflex should remain on the market. Menaflex is meant to repair a torn meniscus, which basically acts as a shock absorber for […]

Menaflex Knee Device

 

Menaflex Knee Device Faces Scrutiny. ReGen Biologics Inc.’s Menaflex knee device faces scrutiny tomorrow, when the Food & Drug Administration (FDA)  convenes a panel of outside experts to make a recommendation about whether Menaflex should remain on the market.

Menaflex is meant to repair a torn meniscus, which basically acts as a shock absorber for the knee. Menaflex was approved through a process known as 510(K), which doesn’t require human clinical trials. Since its approval in December 2008, however, questioned have been raised about the way the device was brought to market.

The 510(K) process is meant for devices that are substantially similar to products already on the market. According to The Wall Street Journal, in early testing, ReGen compared Menaflex to surgical meshes used to repair injuries to other parts of the body.

The FDA is concerned about such comparisons because, for example, the weight stress on the shoulder is less than that on a person’s knee. The FDA said it also found it difficult to analyze some of ReGen’s data because it wasn’t presented according to recognized guidelines and didn’t follow certain study protocols.

In documents released Friday, the FDA said ReGen hasn’t provided adequate data to show that Menaflex is safe, and the company didn’t completely follow FDA guidelines. “Overall, the FDA believes that did not provide adequate pre-clinical mechanical testing data to clearly demonstrate safety against mechanical failure,” the agency said.

ReGen’s 510 application for Menaflex was rejected

As we’ve reported previously, ReGen’s 510(K) application for Menaflex was rejected by FDA scientists on three occasions, with the agency’s staff asserting it wasn’t eligible for the process. But several New Jersey Democrats – Sens. Frank Lautenberg and Robert Menendez, and Reps.

Steve Rothman and Frank Pallone Jr. – contacted the FDA in 2007 and 2008 to encourage it to speed its review of the ReGen device. Agency managers ultimately overruled the scientists and approved Menaflex in December 2008.

A report issued by the FDA’s Center for Devices last fall found that agency officials repeatedly deviated from procedures in approving Menaflex. According to the report, the FDA’s Congressional Liaison said the pressure put on the agency was “the most extreme he had seen, and the agency’s acquiescence to the company’s demands for access to the commissioner and other officials in the commissioner’s office as unprecedented.” The document also criticized former FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach for pressuring other FDA officials to act quickly.

Need Legal Help Regarding Menaflex Knee Device?

The personal injury attorneys at Parker Waichman offer free, no-obligation case evaluations. For more information, fill out our online form or call 1-800-YOURLAWYER (1-800-968-7529).

What Our Clients Say About Us
We have worked with thousands of clients and we appreciate them and their positive reviews. Here are just a few recent client reviews...
5 Star Reviews 150
Took on my case when my original representative became dysfunctional. Accurate, knowledgeable, totally transparent. Excellent commincation, I couldn't have expected more. I highly recommend this firm!
Bob Ballard
4 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
Josephine Burgess-Zephrine guided me with patience and respect to the process regarding the process of preparing documents, submitting motions and finally testifying. Due do Josephine's professionalism and patience, I am very comfortable with speaking to all parties regarding my case. Thank you Josephine Burgess-Zephrine.
Denice Briggs
5 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
Great work...these people do! My only suggestion would be more feedback where my case was in the process, but these people are BUSY, and they have a purpose in everything they do, so be patient, you won't be disappointed!
Thomas Blomgren
7 years ago

Why Choose Us to Help You?

We Take Care of Everything
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
No Recovery = No Legal Fees
We work on a contingency-fee basis, meaning that we only get paid from a portion of your settlement or jury award. If you don't get compensation, you owe us nothing.
Decades of Experience
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
Respected by Our Peers
Judges, insurance adjusters, and fellow attorneys all speak highly of our skills, and we've earned numerous accolades, including a flawless rating from AVVO.
We Have Many Locations To Serve You
We have the experience and the skilled litigators to win your case. Contact us and speak with a real attorney who can help you.
Long Island – Nassau
Parker Waichman LLP
6 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY 11050
Long Island – Suffolk
Parker Waichman LLP
201 Old Country Road – Suite 145
Melville, NY 11747
New York
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038
Queens
Parker Waichman LLP
118-35 Queens Boulevard, Suite 400
Forest Hills, NY 11375
Brooklyn
Parker Waichman LLP
300 Cadman Plaza West
One Pierrepont Plaza, 12th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
New Jersey
Parker Waichman LLP
80 Main Street, Suite 265
West Orange, NJ 07052
Florida
Parker Waichman LLP
27299 Riverview Center Boulevard
Suite 108
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
Nationwide Service
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038