Parker Waichman LLP

Priest Guilty of Abusing Two Brothers

The Rev. Daniel C. Clark guilty of sexually abusing two boys After deliberating five hours over two days, a Bullitt Circuit Court jury yesterday found the Rev. Daniel C. Clark guilty of sexually abusing two boys brothers who are now 12 and 13 years old but acquitted him on the more serious offense of sodomizing […]

Priest Guilty

The Rev. Daniel C. Clark guilty of sexually abusing two boys After deliberating five hours over two days, a Bullitt Circuit Court jury yesterday found the Rev. Daniel C. Clark guilty of sexually abusing two boys brothers who are now 12 and 13 years old but acquitted him on the more serious offense of sodomizing the younger boy.

The jury of seven men and five women took 10 minutes to recommend the maximum sentence of 10 years on the two counts on which it convicted Clark. If convicted of sodomy he could have faced 20 years to life in prison.

Judge Thomas Waller set sentencing for Aug. 13 and sent Clark, 55, back to jail in Bullitt County, where he has been held since his arrest last August.

Clark was convicted in 1988 of sexual abuse and sodomy for molesting two other boys when he was assistant pastor of St. Rita Catholic Church. He was the first Roman Catholic priest to be brought to trial on criminal charges since the current priest-abuse crisis began in the Roman Catholic A rchdiocese of Louisville in April 2002.

Victim advocates and people who alleged he abused them in suits they filed against the church offered mixed reactions to the verdict and sentence, which will make Clark eligible for parole in about a year, after credit for the year he will have spent in the Bullitt County Detention Center by the time he is sentenced.

“Some justice is better than none,” said Sue Archibald, president of Linkup, a national support and advocacy group for victims of clergy abuse, who monitored the three-day trial. “The most disturbing aspect is that Dan Clark will be back on the street.”

Paul Barrett, 38, one of 19 plaintiffs who alleged in civil suits against the archdiocese that Clark had abused them, said: “Bullitt County has sent a strong message that we don’t need these men in our community.” In a prepared statement, the archdiocese said: “No child should ever be abused. We hope that this verdict brings a just resolution for all of those involved in this tragic situation.”

Cecelia Price, spokeswoman for the archdiocese, said that under rules issued last year by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, Clark’s case will be turned over to the Vatican “for investigation and possible removal” from the priesthood.

Asked if the verdict showed Archbishop Thomas C. Kelly should have done more in 1988 to try to oust Clark from the priesthood, Price said that in voluntary removal from the priesthood was a long and difficult process.

In a statement issued earlier this year, Brian Reynolds, the archdiocese’s chancellor and chief administrative of ficer, said: “In hindsight, it is easy to say the church should have seen more or acted sooner.”

he pleaded guilty to molesting children in 1988

The fact that Clark re-offended after he pleaded guilty to molesting children in 1988 showed he should have been removed from the priesthood after that conviction, said Bullitt Commonwealth’s Attorney Mike Mann in responding to reporter’s questions yesterday. Kelly removed Clark from public ministry in 1988, meaning he was no longer assigned to work in parishes. Kelly then removed Clark from all ministry last summer, although he remains a priest.

Clark was whisked out of the court room yesterday before he could be questioned by reporters, and his lawyer, David Lambertus, and a sister, Jennifer Mikesell, declined to comment.

Mann, who prosecuted the case, said he feared that the jury had deadlocked and was pleased it returned convictions on the two counts. He said the acquittal on the sodomy charge was puzzling, in part because he said he thought the younger victim had been the stronger witness. “It would seem that if they found him believable that the sex abuse had occurred, they would believe him when he said he was sodomized,” Mann said.

However, he noted that the boy claimed the sodomy had happened only once. “It might have been a compromise verdict,” he said.

The jury forewoman, Leigh Anne Florence, declined to comment on the deliberations, other than to say, “We just went on the evidence we had.”

Mann said he elected not to present as witnesses any of the other plaintiffs who accused Clark in civil suits for fear that Lambertus would have attacked them as money-seekers, which was the motive Lambertus ascribed to the family of the two boys.

Mann also said he proved Clark’s history and pattern of abuse through the testimony of Michael Mudd, one of the two boys whom Clark admitted molesting when he pleaded guilty in 1988. Mudd’s credibility “could not be attacked,” Mann said.

In addition to Mudd, Mann presented three other witnesses the two boys and their mother.

The boys described how Clark who’d been a family friend all their lives gave them gifts, took them skating and drove them to football practice, but eventually began putting his hands down their pants and fondling them. The youngest boy said Clark performed oral sodomy on him in a vehicle in a parking lot.

Clark, the lone witness for the defense, denied the allegations, and Lambertus told the jury that the case was “all about money.”

The boys ‘ mother sued the archdiocese on their behalf, as did two relatives, Ralph and John Henry, and they will share in the $25.7 million settlement struck earlier this month between the archdiocese and 243 plaintiffs. The mother’s suit, and Ralph Henry’s, also named Clark personally as a defendant, and that portion of their complaints is still pending.

Mann told the jury that there was only “one reasonabl e explanation” why Clark bought the family groceries and made payments on their mobile home “to get the boys alone so he could fondle them.” Mann also forced Clark to admit on cross-examination that he violated the terms of his 1988 probation and mandatory sex-offender treatment, which required him to avoid unsupervised contact with children.

In the penalty phase of the trial, Lambertus seemed to realize that it was a foregone conclusion the jury was going to recommend the maximum sentence. “I’m not going to beg or try to get into your conscience,” said Lambertus.

Mann asked for the maximum five years on both counts of sexual abuse, to run consecutively.

After the trial, Doug Lynch, 34, another plaintiff in a civil suit who alleged Clark abused him at St. Rita, praised the prosecuting witnesses and their family.

“They can leave here knowing they did everything they could to bring Clark to justice,” Lynch said. “Those two boys were very, very brave. I look at them as heroes.”

Clark is one of three Catholic priests and two former parochial school teachers who have been charged with crimes since April 2002, when the wave of lawsuits began against the church. The Rev. Louis E. Miller, who is serving a 20-year sentence after pleading guilty to molesting 21 children in Jefferson County, could get more prison time when he is sentenced Aug. 18 for abusing 14 children in Oldham County, where he also pleaded guilty before trial.

Charges are pending in Jefferson Circuit Court against the Rev. James Hargadon and former teachers Gary Kazmarek and Joseph B. Greene III. Greene is to be tried Sept. 9, Hargadon Oct. 24 and Kazmarek Dec. 9.

Need Legal Help Regarding Priest Guilty of Abuse?

The personal injury attorneys at Parker Waichman LLP offer free, no-obligation case evaluations. For more information, fill out our online contact form or call 1-800-YOURLAWYER (1-800-968-7529).

Further sex abuse resources:

What Our Clients Say About Us
We have worked with thousands of clients and we appreciate them and their positive reviews. Here are just a few recent client reviews...
5 Star Reviews 150
I have had a very good experience working with Gina Viti and Benita Rollins. They have went above and beyond to assist me, reaching out to me in timely matters. I am very grateful to work with these wonderful ladies.
Lavette Law
10 months ago
5 Star Reviews 150
It is still early in the process for me and I have been kept abreast of matters effecting my case by Jillian, my case manager and Cathy, my paralegal. One aspect of the firm that I had not anticipated was the care and concern shown for my well being by Joanne, the nurse. PARKER WAICHMAN LLC is my law firm and I am glad I contacted them to work on my case. Update: Denny Tang, Esq., handled my case with updates to me throughout the process. He appears genuinely caring about his clients and that quality is priceless. Jillian Cantinieri, Legal Secretary, was initially my go to contact at the firm and performed her duties in a stellar manner. She is an exemplary employee and I am very pleased Jill was assigned to my case.
Jacqueline Kowitz
3 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
I have had such charming experiences when calling. Both Catherine Nunez and Jillian have been such great helps, they answer every question I may have and are always willing to help. This is my first time dealing with a law firm so was scared at first but they have both made this process so easy thus far. Great in every aspect. Also, the nurse consultant Joanne Stevens has been on top of my medical injuries & treatment making sure all that needs to get done is. They’ve all been making this process as smooth as they can for me.
Carmen Rodriguez
5 years ago

Why Choose Us to Help You?

We Take Care of Everything
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
No Recovery = No Legal Fees
We work on a contingency-fee basis, meaning that we only get paid from a portion of your settlement or jury award. If you don't get compensation, you owe us nothing.
Decades of Experience
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
Respected by Our Peers
Judges, insurance adjusters, and fellow attorneys all speak highly of our skills, and we've earned numerous accolades, including a flawless rating from AVVO.
We Have Many Locations To Serve You
We have the experience and the skilled litigators to win your case. Contact us and speak with a real attorney who can help you.
Long Island – Nassau
Parker Waichman LLP
6 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY 11050
Long Island – Suffolk
Parker Waichman LLP
201 Old Country Road – Suite 145
Melville, NY 11747
New York
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038
Queens
Parker Waichman LLP
118-35 Queens Boulevard, Suite 400
Forest Hills, NY 11375
Brooklyn
Parker Waichman LLP
300 Cadman Plaza West
One Pierrepont Plaza, 12th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
New Jersey
Parker Waichman LLP
80 Main Street, Suite 265
West Orange, NJ 07052
Florida
Parker Waichman LLP
27299 Riverview Center Boulevard
Suite 108
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
Nationwide Service
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038