Parker Waichman LLP

Boston Scientific Hit with Record Fine, Probation Over Defective Guidant Defibrillators

Boston Scientific’s Guidant unit will pay a record criminal penalty for withholding safety information about its defective implantable heart defibrillators from federal regulators. The defibrillators at the center of the U.S. Justice Department’s criminal prosecution of Guidant Corp. were linked to the deaths of 13 people. According to the Minneapolis Star Tribune, a previous $296 […]

Boston Scientific’s Guidant unit will pay a record criminal penalty for withholding safety information about its d<"https://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/guidant_defibrillators">efective implantable heart defibrillators from federal regulators. The defibrillators at the center of the U.S. Justice Department’s criminal prosecution of Guidant Corp. were linked to the deaths of 13 people.

According to the Minneapolis Star Tribune, a previous $296 million settlement between the Department of Justice and the company was rejected by U.S. District Judge Donovan Frank last April, after some doctors and patients who received implantable defibrillators complained that the company should have faced more sanctions than a fine.

Judge Frank has now approved a new settlement that leaves the $296 million fine in tact, but also called for Boston Scientific to serve three years’ probation. The $296 million penalty is believed to be the largest criminal penalty ever imposed in a medical device case.

The Department of Justice investigation that resulted in the proposed settlement centered on three Guidant devices that had the potential to short-circuit — the Ventak Prizm 2 DR (Model 1861) and the Contak Renewal (Models H135 and H155) models of implantable defibrillators. According to the charges filed in federal court, Guidant violated the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act by concealing information from the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) about catastrophic short-circuiting failures in the three models. The company discovered problems with one of the products in 2002 and became aware of problems with two others in 2004, the department said.

Three safety alerts were issued about these defibrillators in June 2005. The FDA later determined these were Class I recalls, which are the most serious type of device recall because there is a reasonable change the devices could cause serious health problems or death.

Under the terms of the new settlement, Boston Scientific is required to submit quarterly reports to the U.S. Probation Office regarding safety and compliance issues, as well as submit to regular, unannounced inspections of its records.

“I believe this serves not only the interests of the community and the interests of justice, but respect for the law and corporate responsibility,” Frank said, according to the Star Tribune.

Boston Scientific acquired Guidant in 2006. In 2007, the device maker agreed to pay $240 million to settle more than 8,000 lawsuits claiming Guidant hid defects in defibrillators, which are devices that shock the heart back into regular rhythm.

What Our Clients Say About Us
We have worked with thousands of clients and we appreciate them and their positive reviews. Here are just a few recent client reviews...
5 Star Reviews 150
Kelli Alexander is your employee, we have been dealing with her for years. Our case just concluded. Parker Waichman has been a wonderful representative. But Kelli Alexander has been your greatest asset. Our calls promptly returned. Any question answered quicky. She has been kind courteous. and professional, at all times you are lucky to have her in you employment.
Donna Giambalvo
4 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
Thank you PW for everything you've done especially to the attorney Gerard Ryan and his team for listening, understanding, and bring resolution to the case. Many thanks and God Bless!!!
Mohammed S Rahman
a year ago
5 Star Reviews 150
Tina Morace was instrumental in my effort to receive the maxium compensation for my WTC claim. I can only express my deepest appreciation for her professional guidance and constant support ! She is truly an asset to the firm.
Thomas Larner
a year ago

Why Choose Us to Help You?

We Take Care of Everything
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
No Recovery = No Legal Fees
We work on a contingency-fee basis, meaning that we only get paid from a portion of your settlement or jury award. If you don't get compensation, you owe us nothing.
Decades of Experience
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
Respected by Our Peers
Judges, insurance adjusters, and fellow attorneys all speak highly of our skills, and we've earned numerous accolades, including a flawless rating from AVVO.
We Have Many Locations To Serve You
We have the experience and the skilled litigators to win your case. Contact us and speak with a real attorney who can help you.
Long Island – Nassau
Parker Waichman LLP
6 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY 11050
Long Island – Suffolk
Parker Waichman LLP
201 Old Country Road – Suite 145
Melville, NY 11747
New York
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038
Queens
Parker Waichman LLP
118-35 Queens Boulevard, Suite 400
Forest Hills, NY 11375
Brooklyn
Parker Waichman LLP
300 Cadman Plaza West
One Pierrepont Plaza, 12th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
New Jersey
Parker Waichman LLP
80 Main Street, Suite 265
West Orange, NJ 07052
Florida
Parker Waichman LLP
27299 Riverview Center Boulevard
Suite 108
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
Nationwide Service
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038