Parker Waichman LLP

Court’s Discovery Order in C.R. Bard Litigation Expected to Streamline Litigation Process

The court overseeing the C.R. Bard transvaginal mesh litigation has put new discovery rules in place that are expected to streamline the discovery process in this litigation. The discovery procedures will specifically impact Collection and Preservation of Evidence in a multidistrict litigation (MDL) that was organized over C.R. Bard’s transvaginal mesh devices in the United […]

Court’s-Discovery-Order-in-C-R-Bard-LitigationThe court overseeing the C.R. Bard transvaginal mesh litigation has put new discovery rules in place that are expected to streamline the discovery process in this litigation. The discovery procedures will specifically impact Collection and Preservation of Evidence in a multidistrict litigation (MDL) that was organized over C.R. Bard’s transvaginal mesh devices in the United States District Court, Southern District of West Virginia.

According to the Court, the new rules will provide that “discovery in this proceeding may involve the collection, division, storage, preservation, and production of biomaterials evidence for which special handling, division, storage, and preservation would be warranted.” The Order followed a stipulation requested by the parties involved in the MDL and involved a petition to the Court to enter an “evidence preservation protocol order,” that would be applicable for existing and future actions in the litigation.

The Order’s stated intent is “that all Material that has not previously been analyzed or tested … be preserved in a manner that permits the Parties equal access to, and analysis of, the Material. The Parties will not interfere with or circumvent the analysis and preservation of Materials by the Facilities to which any of Plaintiffs’ treating physicians have sent or will send the Materials in the usual course of business.” In short, the Order is meant to streamline the discovery portion of the litigation and continue to move the cases forward.

Once the pre-trial proceedings, which are detailed in the Order, are complete, the Court will transfer directly filed cases back to their appropriate federal districts. Those lawsuits that were organized by the U.S. Judicial Panel on MDLs in the Southern District of West Virginia will be remanded to their originally filed federal districts.

Most recently, a June 30, 2014 Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) filing indicated that C.R. Bard agreed to a settlement of more than 500 Avaulta transvaginal mesh lawsuits pending against the firm. A settlement amount was not disclosed at the time of the SEC filing.

In addition to these cases, the device maker faces thousands of lawsuits nationwide. Most were consolidated as part of the federal MDL centralized before U.S. District Judge Joseph Goodwin in the Southern District of West Virginia. Nearly 60,000 more federally filed MDLs involving transvaginal mesh—this includes the more than 9,000 filed against C.R. Bard—were brought against an array of transvaginal device makers and are pending. These include actions brought against American Medical Systems, Inc. (AMS), Boston Scientific Corp., Coloplast Corp., Cook Medical, Inc., Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon, Inc., and Neomedic.

The lawsuits all similarly allege significant injuries following surgery in which vaginal mesh was utilized to repair pelvic organ prolapse (POP) or stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Lawsuits also similarly allege that the devices are defective and provide an unnecessary risk of injury.

What Our Clients Say About Us
We have worked with thousands of clients and we appreciate them and their positive reviews. Here are just a few recent client reviews...
5 Star Reviews 150
Tina Morace was instrumental in my effort to receive the maxium compensation for my WTC claim. I can only express my deepest appreciation for her professional guidance and constant support ! She is truly an asset to the firm.
Thomas Larner
a year ago
5 Star Reviews 150
I was very happy with Parker Waichman services. I want to thank Tina Morace for keeping me constantly updated on the progress of my claim. Thank you.
Barbara Feinberg
2 months ago
5 Star Reviews 150
Great work...these people do! My only suggestion would be more feedback where my case was in the process, but these people are BUSY, and they have a purpose in everything they do, so be patient, you won't be disappointed!
Thomas Blomgren
7 years ago

Why Choose Us to Help You?

We Take Care of Everything
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
No Recovery = No Legal Fees
We work on a contingency-fee basis, meaning that we only get paid from a portion of your settlement or jury award. If you don't get compensation, you owe us nothing.
Decades of Experience
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
Respected by Our Peers
Judges, insurance adjusters, and fellow attorneys all speak highly of our skills, and we've earned numerous accolades, including a flawless rating from AVVO.
We Have Many Locations To Serve You
We have the experience and the skilled litigators to win your case. Contact us and speak with a real attorney who can help you.
Long Island – Nassau
Parker Waichman LLP
6 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY 11050
Long Island – Suffolk
Parker Waichman LLP
201 Old Country Road – Suite 145
Melville, NY 11747
New York
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038
Queens
Parker Waichman LLP
118-35 Queens Boulevard, Suite 400
Forest Hills, NY 11375
Brooklyn
Parker Waichman LLP
300 Cadman Plaza West
One Pierrepont Plaza, 12th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
New Jersey
Parker Waichman LLP
80 Main Street, Suite 265
West Orange, NJ 07052
Florida
Parker Waichman LLP
27299 Riverview Center Boulevard
Suite 108
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
Nationwide Service
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038