Parker Waichman LLP

Darvon, Darvocet Lawsuits Centralized in U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky

Federal lawsuits stemming from the Darvon and Darvocet recall have been consolidated in a multidistrict litigation (MDL) and transferred to U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky (Covington Division). The Darvon and Darvocet litigation (MDL 226) will be presided over by Judge Danny C. Reeves. Darvon and Darvocet both contain the active ingredient […]

Federal lawsuits stemming from the Darvon and Darvocet recall have been consolidated in a multidistrict litigation (MDL) and transferred to U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky (Covington Division). The Darvon and Darvocet litigation (MDL 226) will be presided over by Judge Danny C. Reeves.

Darvon and Darvocet both contain the active ingredient propoxyphene. Last November, Darvon, Darvocet and other prescription painkillers containing propoxyphene were pulled from the market by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) after a study found propoxyphene could induce a potentially-fatal irregular heartbeat.

As we’ve reported previously, the dangers of Darvon and Darvocet were known long before the painkillers were recalled. According to Public Citizen, which has petitioned the FDA twice since 1978 to ban propoxyphene, the painkiller is not very effective, is toxic at doses not much higher than the recommend dose because a heart-toxic metabolite accumulates in the body, and is somewhat addictive. Propoxyphene bans were announced in the United Kingdom almost six years ago, and in Europe, almost 1½ years ago. According to Public Citizen, the FDA’s delay in recalling the drugs has likely cost thousands of lives.

Following the Darvon and Darvocet recalls in the U.S., a number of lawsuits were filed throughout the country by people who were allegedly injured by these drugs. Late last year, 11 plaintiffs petitioned the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) to consolidate the lawsuits in an MDL in one federal court. Plaintiffs had supported centralization in the Eastern District of New York, the Eastern District of Louisiana, the Western District of Louisiana, the Southern District of Ohio or the Northern District of Georgia.

Defendants in the lawsuits, including Xanodyne Pharmacueticals, the maker of Darvon and Darvocet, opposed consolidation. However, some had suggested the Eastern District of Kentucky as a venue for any consolidated litigation. Xanodyne, the primary defendant in the litigation, is based in Kentucky.

In ruling to consolidate the Darvon and Darvoct litigation, the JPML found that the lawsuits share factual issues including:

• Whether Darvocet, Darvon and other medications containing propoxyphene were defectively designed and marketed.

• Which defendants manufactured, licensed or sold propoxyphene products during various times.

• Whether defendants knew or should have known of the increased risk of cardiovascular injuries with these medications and failed to provide adequate warnings of them.

An MDL allows lawsuits associated with a particular product to be coordinated under one judge for pretrial litigation to avoid duplicative discovery, inconsistent rulings and to conserve the resources of the parties, witnesses and the court. When lawsuits are consolidated as a multidistrict litigation, each retains its own identity. If the multidistrict litigation process does not resolve the cases, they are transferred back to the court where they originated for trial.

What Our Clients Say About Us
We have worked with thousands of clients and we appreciate them and their positive reviews. Here are just a few recent client reviews...
5 Star Reviews 150
Thank you to everyone at this law firm for dealing with my case, especially Joonho Hong for closing this case out.
Constantine Kefalogiannis
6 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
Parker Waichman did a fine job with my case. In particular, my paralegal Christina Morace was fantastic, always helpful , communicative and supportive.
Jonathan Steinberg
3 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
The firm was professional, always keeping me updated on the process of the case until it was finalized. I would recommend their services.
Overta Smith
a year ago

Why Choose Us to Help You?

We Take Care of Everything
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
No Recovery = No Legal Fees
We work on a contingency-fee basis, meaning that we only get paid from a portion of your settlement or jury award. If you don't get compensation, you owe us nothing.
Decades of Experience
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
Respected by Our Peers
Judges, insurance adjusters, and fellow attorneys all speak highly of our skills, and we've earned numerous accolades, including a flawless rating from AVVO.
We Have Many Locations To Serve You
We have the experience and the skilled litigators to win your case. Contact us and speak with a real attorney who can help you.
Long Island – Nassau
Parker Waichman LLP
6 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY 11050
Long Island – Suffolk
Parker Waichman LLP
201 Old Country Road – Suite 145
Melville, NY 11747
New York
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038
Queens
Parker Waichman LLP
118-35 Queens Boulevard, Suite 400
Forest Hills, NY 11375
Brooklyn
Parker Waichman LLP
300 Cadman Plaza West
One Pierrepont Plaza, 12th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
New Jersey
Parker Waichman LLP
80 Main Street, Suite 265
West Orange, NJ 07052
Florida
Parker Waichman LLP
27299 Riverview Center Boulevard
Suite 108
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
Nationwide Service
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038