Parker Waichman LLP

Endo Health to Settle Some Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits, Pay $55 Million

Endo Health Solutions Inc.’s American Medical Systems Inc. (AMS) just agreed to a $54.5 million settlement to resolve a number of lawsuits that were brought over its vaginal mesh implant devices. The lawsuits involve allegations that the AMS vaginal mesh implants eroded in some patients, which left women incontinent and suffering from pain, according to […]

endo_health_mesh_settlementlEndo Health Solutions Inc.’s American Medical Systems Inc. (AMS) just agreed to a $54.5 million settlement to resolve a number of lawsuits that were brought over its vaginal mesh implant devices.

The lawsuits involve allegations that the AMS vaginal mesh implants eroded in some patients, which left women incontinent and suffering from pain, according to Bloomberg News. In its Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing, AMS officials stated that Endo agreed to the settlement and payment to resolve an unidentified number of lawsuits brought over its Perigee, Apogee, and Elevate vaginal mesh devices. Endo acquired AMS for $2.9 billion in 2011, according to Bloomberg News.

This settlement does not involve most of the 5,000 vaginal mesh lawsuits brought against AMS and which have been consolidated for pre-trial proceedings before a federal judge in West Virginia, according to Bloomberg News. The first of these federally filed AMS trials is scheduled for December, according to court documents.

Vaginal mesh devices were approved through a U.S. Food and Drug Administration fast-track route known as the 510(k) under which a formal clinical review for safety and efficacy is not required. The devices were approved for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI); surgery is meant to strengthen pelvic walls. Vaginal mesh is also approved for the surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in which weakened pelvic muscles cause organs to slide out of place.

Thousands of women implanted with transvaginal mesh devices allege complications related to the devices’ defects. According to a prior FDA Safety Communication, the most commonly reported adverse events related to vaginal mesh devices include:

·      Mesh erosion through the vagina (exposure, extrusion, protrusion)

·      Pain

·      Infection

·      Bleeding

·      Dyapareunia (pain during sexual intercourse)

·      Organ perforation

·      Repeat and increased urinary problems.

 

Perhaps the most devastating aspect associated with the alleged risk of erosion, which is when the mesh moves through the body’s tissues, is that the mesh can become embedded in inappropriate areas, which can lead to severe pain and the need for multiple surgeries to remove the device. Typically, erosion is often so significant and widespread that the mesh cannot ever be fully removed.

Endo officials indicated that lawsuits filed over the implants have grown from 2,900 in 2012 to about 5,100 earlier this year. Endo is one of four device makers facing about 29,000 lawsuits over allegations that their vaginal implant devices led to injuries and complications, which have been consolidated before U.S. District Judge Joseph Goodwin in Charleston, West Virginia. Device maker C.R. Bard Inc. is scheduled to face its first trial in this litigation next month, according to Bloomberg News.

In 2012, a California jury found C.R. Bard liable for $3.6 million in damages in a lawsuit brought by a woman who alleged her injuries were associated with its Avalta Plus vaginal mesh device. That case was the first Bard trial heard over its device.

According to Bloomberg News, an Atlantic City jury found Johnson & Johnson and its Ethicon unit must pay more than $11 million in damages—this also includes more than $3.3 million in punitive damages—to a woman over her allegations concerning injuries associated with the Gynecare Prolift implant. That lawsuit concluded earlier this year. Johnson & Johnson globally pulled four of its vaginal mesh device lines in 2012.

What Our Clients Say About Us
We have worked with thousands of clients and we appreciate them and their positive reviews. Here are just a few recent client reviews...
5 Star Reviews 150
I would like it known, to those concerned, what a wonderful job Benita Rollis did on my behalf concerning the 9/11 Victims Compensation Fund claim. Her skill and compassion made my experience with Parker Waichman one that I will not soon forget. From the very beginning, Benita approached this whole process with the knowledge and logic of a true professional and someone who clearly loves what she does. Every time the VCF threw me a curve ball during this process, Benita knew exactly how to handle it, alleviating all fears. Also, the fact that she made herself so accessible was a major comfort. Parker Waichman is a better law firm because of Benita Rollis. I will most definitely recommend her to all who may be in need of your service. Thank you Benita and thank you Parker Waichman for helping me realize justice and absolutely changing my life as well as restoring my faith in the legal system!
Marc Abramson
4 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
Positive: Professionalism , Responsiveness Benita, was a very helpful person, and acted very professional through our time working with her. She kept us in the loop constantly and answered any questions we had through phone calls and emails in a timely manner. If needed, I would definitely use this company again specifically working with Benita.
Lois Barrera
2 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
I have been working for the last 3 years with Tina Morace of Parker Waichman LLP to date and happy to say she handled my case from start to finish diligently. Never had any doubt about her professionalism. If i had questions i knew who to call that is Tina Morace. If i needed an answer she was prompt in delivering her reply and moreso never hesitated in getting in touch with me at all times to let me know how my case is doing. It was a pleasure working with Tina Morace. A very pleasant person to talk to and i would not hesitate to recommend any person who wishes to have their case handled by her. Tina Morace is an asset to Parker Waichman LLP and am proud of her expertise, knowledge and her responsive service of which am proud of her . Thank you Tina Morace for all your help and continued service with Parker Waichman LLP.
Monica Libert
2 years ago

Why Choose Us to Help You?

We Take Care of Everything
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
No Recovery = No Legal Fees
We work on a contingency-fee basis, meaning that we only get paid from a portion of your settlement or jury award. If you don't get compensation, you owe us nothing.
Decades of Experience
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
Respected by Our Peers
Judges, insurance adjusters, and fellow attorneys all speak highly of our skills, and we've earned numerous accolades, including a flawless rating from AVVO.
We Have Many Locations To Serve You
We have the experience and the skilled litigators to win your case. Contact us and speak with a real attorney who can help you.
Long Island – Nassau
Parker Waichman LLP
6 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY 11050
Long Island – Suffolk
Parker Waichman LLP
201 Old Country Road – Suite 145
Melville, NY 11747
New York
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038
Queens
Parker Waichman LLP
118-35 Queens Boulevard, Suite 400
Forest Hills, NY 11375
Brooklyn
Parker Waichman LLP
300 Cadman Plaza West
One Pierrepont Plaza, 12th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
New Jersey
Parker Waichman LLP
80 Main Street, Suite 265
West Orange, NJ 07052
Florida
Parker Waichman LLP
27299 Riverview Center Boulevard
Suite 108
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
Nationwide Service
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038