Parker Waichman LLP

FDA Again Criticized for Medical Device Oversight

Thousands of medical devices are approved annually in the United States with no proof of efficacy. Now, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) finds that high-risk medical devices are among those approved without appropriate proof of safety by the same regulators that are also not mandated to monitor recalls when problems arise. The U.S. Food and […]

Thousands of <"https://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/defective_medical_devices">medical devices are approved annually in the United States with no proof of efficacy. Now, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) finds that high-risk medical devices are among those approved without appropriate proof of safety by the same regulators that are also not mandated to monitor recalls when problems arise.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) defends a practice commonly known as known as 510(k) approvals, claiming it promotes innovation. According to Bloomberg.com, the FDA has given expedited reviews to nearly 70 devices, including pacemakers and hip joints since January 2009, when the GAO called for “immediate steps” to strengthen standards or reclassify risks, citing testimony by Marcia Crosse, director of health care at the GAO. The Senate Special Committee on Aging will be discussing its findings at a hearing today in Washington.

The FDA’s policy of fast-tracking medical devices contrasts greatly with its process for drug approvals in which the FDA requires new medications be studied in thousands of people to determine safety and efficacy prior to approval for market release. By contrast, medical device makers must simply demonstrate a device does what they claim, and that it poses no undue safety risks. Unlike a new drug, a device approved under 510(k) does not have to prove efficacy.

Consider the global recall of defective DePuy hip replacement devices that involved 93,000 hip devices manufactured by the Johnson & Johnson unit, which led to deeper review of the FDA review process. That review pointed to a 1976 law that is not strictly followed and that calls for high-risk devices to undergo more stringent review, said the GAO, wrote Bloomberg.com. The GAO is Congress’ investigational unit.

“Concerns persist about the effectiveness of the 510(k) process in general, including its ability to provide adequate assurance that devices are safe and effective,” Crosse said in written testimony, quoted Bloomberg.com. The 510(k) program clears some 3,800 to 4,000 products annually and is, according to senior executive vice president for the Advanced Medical Technology Association, David Nexon, “critical to a vibrant and successful device industry,” quoted Bloomberg.com, citing testimony. The program, “has an exemplary record of protecting the public from unsafe devices,” he added.

While industry, as expected, argues that fast-tracking is needed to match technology, many disagree, saying the fast-tracking process is over-used. For instance, we recently wrote that advocacy group Public Citizen revealed eight significant loopholes in how the FDA approves medical devices, allowing potentially unsafe, ineffective, dangerous products on the market.

The recalled DePuy hip joint devices are not the only fast-tracked devices found to be defective. Protegen, a synthetic sling implanted under a woman’s bladder to prevent stress incontinence was granted 510(k) approval in 1996, but was recalled three years later due to a high rate of complications. Medtronic Inc. recalled its Sprint Fidelis defibrillator lead, approved under the 510(k) process, after it was found to have a higher-than-normal facture rate and was implicated in five deaths. Sadly, notes Bloomberg.com, the FDA only mandates thorough testing for less than one-tenth of all devices

The GAO only looked at high-risk devices, such as implantable or life-sustaining device and found that 26 of 27 products mentioned in the 2009 report are undergoing “less stringent” FDA reviews, said Crosse. Of 113 withdrawn devices that were classified as high-risk recalls by the FDA from 2005 to 2009—81 percent—were fast-tracked, said Bloomberg.com. Of the recalls, one-third were cardiovascular devices, including defibrillators manufactured by Medtronic Inc., Zoll Medical Corp., and Welch Allyn Inc., wrote Bloomberg.com.

What Our Clients Say About Us
We have worked with thousands of clients and we appreciate them and their positive reviews. Here are just a few recent client reviews...
5 Star Reviews 150
I was very pleased with Parker Wakeman and the Paralegal that assisted me her name was Tina Morace she was wonderful and made this process very easy for me Thank you very much
Thomas Gruter
5 months ago
5 Star Reviews 150
Michele J has such a great personality and is very knowledgeable. She’s a great asset!!! The Long family is appreciative of her hard work on our case. I would surely recommend Parker Waichman to everyone I know.
Christipher Long
5 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
Parker Waichman was there for me when I needed them. They came through 100% x 10.. I highly recommend Parker Waichman LLP.
Even Levee
a month ago

Why Choose Us to Help You?

We Take Care of Everything
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
No Recovery = No Legal Fees
We work on a contingency-fee basis, meaning that we only get paid from a portion of your settlement or jury award. If you don't get compensation, you owe us nothing.
Decades of Experience
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
Respected by Our Peers
Judges, insurance adjusters, and fellow attorneys all speak highly of our skills, and we've earned numerous accolades, including a flawless rating from AVVO.
We Have Many Locations To Serve You
We have the experience and the skilled litigators to win your case. Contact us and speak with a real attorney who can help you.
Long Island – Nassau
Parker Waichman LLP
6 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY 11050
Long Island – Suffolk
Parker Waichman LLP
201 Old Country Road – Suite 145
Melville, NY 11747
New York
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038
Queens
Parker Waichman LLP
118-35 Queens Boulevard, Suite 400
Forest Hills, NY 11375
Brooklyn
Parker Waichman LLP
300 Cadman Plaza West
One Pierrepont Plaza, 12th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
New Jersey
Parker Waichman LLP
80 Main Street, Suite 265
West Orange, NJ 07052
Florida
Parker Waichman LLP
27299 Riverview Center Boulevard
Suite 108
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
Nationwide Service
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038