Parker Waichman LLP

FDA Strengthens Authority to Keep Unsafe Food from Reaching Consumers

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) just announced a final rule strengthening its authority to use administrative detention to prevent potentially unsafe food from reaching the marketplace. This action makes the criteria for administrative detention consistent with changes to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act under the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), which […]

fda-strengthens-authroityThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) just announced a final rule strengthening its authority to use administrative detention to prevent potentially unsafe food from reaching the marketplace.

This action makes the criteria for administrative detention consistent with changes to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act under the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), which was signed by President Obama in January 2011. The final rule adopts, without change, the interim final rule “Criteria Used to Order Administrative Detention of Food for Human or Animal Consumption,” published in May 2011. The interim final rule amended the criteria for ordering administrative detention to permit FDA to administratively detain food it believes is adulterated or misbranded.

Before the passage of FSMA, the FDA was able to detain a food product only when it had credible evidence that a food product presented a threat of serious adverse health consequences or death to humans or animals. If the FDA believes a food is adulterated or misbranded, the agency can keep the product out of the marketplace for a maximum of 30 days while determining whether to take further enforcement action, such as seizure.

The final rule was published in the Federal Register yesterday.  The FDA noted that it had received a number of comments asking that the agency clarify exactly what “reason to believe” that food is adulterated or misbranded means. The agency said that it would consider “individual facts in each particular situation,” to inform its decision that an article of food is adulterated or misbranded. Because such decisions are fact specific, the FDA reports that it has not amended the regulation to provide additional explanation of the criteria for ordering administrative detention of foods.

In announcing the New Inspection and Compliance Mandates under the Food Safety Modernization Act, the FDA says that it anticipates using the mandatory recall authority in rare instances; instead, it will attempt to achieve voluntary corrective action. “Companies will be provided with an opportunity for an informal hearing before an order to require recall is made.”

What Our Clients Say About Us
We have worked with thousands of clients and we appreciate them and their positive reviews. Here are just a few recent client reviews...
5 Star Reviews 150
The law firm worked with me on a victim compensation fund. Christina Morace was the paralegal and through the long process she called me to keep me up to date. She let me know what paperwork was coming and what it meant. She also called to explain the time table for each part. I did not have to wonder about what was happening. I really appreciate her work and the others at Parker Waichman.
Shauna N
2 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
My sister was exposed to 9/11 toxins and developed several types of cancer. She chose Parker Waichman to engage the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund and was assigned Tina Morace as her paralegal. Tina was helpful, professional and compassionate in helping us gather medical records and other important information required for the case. Tina was clear and concise in followup queries from the Fund and was quick to respond to our questions. When my sister's condition deteriorated and she passed, Tina was so thoughtful, patient and helpful when I had to address continued Fund followup questions. I will always be thankful for having Tina in our lives. She helped make my sister's last years easier in this aspect. And she was a knowledgeable friend to me, assisting in information gathering and consoling me in my loss. Thank you Parker Waichman. Thank you Tina Morace. Thank you Tina Morace.
Karen Carr
a year ago
5 Star Reviews 150
Positive: Professionalism , Responsiveness What I appreciated best was Benita Rollis's follow up for me on my issue and taking ownership of my case
William Hirsch
2 years ago

Why Choose Us to Help You?

We Take Care of Everything
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
No Recovery = No Legal Fees
We work on a contingency-fee basis, meaning that we only get paid from a portion of your settlement or jury award. If you don't get compensation, you owe us nothing.
Decades of Experience
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
Respected by Our Peers
Judges, insurance adjusters, and fellow attorneys all speak highly of our skills, and we've earned numerous accolades, including a flawless rating from AVVO.
We Have Many Locations To Serve You
We have the experience and the skilled litigators to win your case. Contact us and speak with a real attorney who can help you.
Long Island – Nassau
Parker Waichman LLP
6 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY 11050
Long Island – Suffolk
Parker Waichman LLP
201 Old Country Road – Suite 145
Melville, NY 11747
New York
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038
Queens
Parker Waichman LLP
118-35 Queens Boulevard, Suite 400
Forest Hills, NY 11375
Brooklyn
Parker Waichman LLP
300 Cadman Plaza West
One Pierrepont Plaza, 12th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
New Jersey
Parker Waichman LLP
80 Main Street, Suite 265
West Orange, NJ 07052
Florida
Parker Waichman LLP
27299 Riverview Center Boulevard
Suite 108
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
Nationwide Service
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038