Parker Waichman LLP

Federal Panel Hears Oral Arguments on Proposed Biomet M2A Magnum Metal-on-Metal Hip Implant Lawsuit Consolidation

The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) heard oral arguments last week regarding the proposed consolidation of all Biomet M2A Magnum metal-on-metal hip implant lawsuits as a multidistrict litigation.  Plaintiffs pushing for the Biomet M2A Magnum hip implant consolidation point to the fact that multidistrict litigations have been established for metal-on-metal hip implant lawsuits […]

The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) heard oral arguments last week regarding the proposed consolidation of all Biomet M2A Magnum metal-on-metal hip implant lawsuits as a multidistrict litigation.  Plaintiffs pushing for the Biomet M2A Magnum hip implant consolidation point to the fact that multidistrict litigations have been established for metal-on-metal hip implant lawsuits involving DePuy ASR hip implants, DePuy Pinnacle hip implants, and the Zimmer Durom Cup implants have all been.   However, Biomet contends that the M2A Magnum lawsuits now pending in federal courts around the country are too different from one another to benefit from coordinated proceedings.

Metal-on-Metal hip implants, including the Biomet M2A Magnum hip replacement, have been named in a growing number of lawsuits amid concerns that the devices can shed dangerous amounts of metal debris in patients, leading to premature implant failure, adverse local tissue reactions, metallosis, pseudotumor formation and other long-term health problems.  Last May, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) ordered 21 manufacturers of metal-on-metal hip replacements, including Biomet, to conduct post-market studies of their products to determine if they were putting patients at risk.  

In June, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) revealed that it had received 16,800 negative event reports involving metal hips between 2000 and 2011. Over the summer, a panel of FDA determined that there existed few good reasons for the continuing use of metal-on-metal hip implants. In 2011, the Australian National Joint Registry reported that patients implanted with the Biomet M2A Magnum had an unacceptably high yearly revision rate of 7.2 percent.

Plaintiffs who have filed Biomet M2A Magnum hip replacement lawsuits petitioned the JPML for consolidation in June.  At the time the petition was filed, more than three dozen Biomet M2A Magnum hip implant lawsuits were pending in various federal courts throughout the country.  All of the complaints involve similar allegations that Biomet failed to warn patients about the risks associated with the microscopic metal debris that is released from the artificial hip replacement as the metal parts rub against each other.  Plaintiffs have proposed the Northern District of California as the most appropriate jurisdiction, with the Southern District of New York as an alternate proposal. While Biomet opposes any consolidation, it has suggested the District of New Jersey or Southern District of New York if a multidistrict litigation is established.

A number of metal-on-metal hip implant manufacturers are already facing massive litigations over their devices. DePuy Orthopeadics, which in August 2010 recalled its ASR Hip Resurfacing System and ASR Acetabular System, has been named in thousands of such lawsuits, most of which are pending in a multidistrict litigation in U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio.  DePuy also faces a large multidistrict litigation over an all-metal version of its Pinnacle hip implant in U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas.  Just this past February, a multidistrict litigation was established in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia for lawsuits involving the all-metal Wright Conserve Hip Replacement System.  Lawsuits involving Zimmer’s Durom Cup are pending in U.S. District Court in New Jersey.

A multidistrict litigation allows lawsuits associated with a particular product to be coordinated under one judge for pretrial litigation to avoid duplicative discovery, inconsistent rulings and to conserve the resources of the parties, witnesses and the court. When lawsuits are consolidated as a multidistrict litigation, each retains its own identity. If the multidistrict litigation process does not resolve the cases, they are transferred back to the court where they originated for trial.

What Our Clients Say About Us
We have worked with thousands of clients and we appreciate them and their positive reviews. Here are just a few recent client reviews...
5 Star Reviews 150
I would highly recommend Parker Waichman for legal services. As part of the 9/11 Victims Compensation Fund, I had some concerns about the process for applying for an award. This firm and especially Tina Morace made it quite easy. Tina handled all the detail professionally, sensitively and with compassion. I cannot overstate the confidence I had in her and this firm. They made a difficult situation much more comfortable.
Craig Evans
3 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
I would love to thank the law firm of Parker and Waichman LLP and Especially Shelly Davis who were very kind and helpful to my mother Maria. My mom can't stop speaking enough positive things about Ms. Davis the legal assistant and how comforting and helpful she was, Thank you once again for all you have done to help my elderly mother resolve her legal affairs
Avi Gringuz
2 months ago
5 Star Reviews 150
Charles Lewis
3 years ago

Why Choose Us to Help You?

We Take Care of Everything
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
No Recovery = No Legal Fees
We work on a contingency-fee basis, meaning that we only get paid from a portion of your settlement or jury award. If you don't get compensation, you owe us nothing.
Decades of Experience
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
Respected by Our Peers
Judges, insurance adjusters, and fellow attorneys all speak highly of our skills, and we've earned numerous accolades, including a flawless rating from AVVO.
We Have Many Locations To Serve You
We have the experience and the skilled litigators to win your case. Contact us and speak with a real attorney who can help you.
Long Island – Nassau
Parker Waichman LLP
6 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY 11050
Long Island – Suffolk
Parker Waichman LLP
201 Old Country Road – Suite 145
Melville, NY 11747
New York
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038
Queens
Parker Waichman LLP
118-35 Queens Boulevard, Suite 400
Forest Hills, NY 11375
Brooklyn
Parker Waichman LLP
300 Cadman Plaza West
One Pierrepont Plaza, 12th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
New Jersey
Parker Waichman LLP
80 Main Street, Suite 265
West Orange, NJ 07052
Florida
Parker Waichman LLP
27299 Riverview Center Boulevard
Suite 108
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
Nationwide Service
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038