Parker Waichman LLP

Hernia Mesh Litigation Moves Forward

Hernia Mesh Lawsuits over Atrium Medical C-Qur Atrium Medical is being sued over its C-Qur (pronounced “secure”) hernia mesh. The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML), who decides whether to consolidate cases into a multidistrict litigation (MDL), will hear Oral Arguments regarding the litigation on Dec. 1 in Charlotte, North Carolina, court records show. […]

Hernia Mesh Lawsuits over Atrium Medical C-Qur

Hernia mesh litigation moves forward

Hernia Mesh Lawsuits

Atrium Medical is being sued over its C-Qur (pronounced “secure”) hernia mesh. The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML), who decides whether to consolidate cases into a multidistrict litigation (MDL), will hear Oral Arguments regarding the litigation on Dec. 1 in Charlotte, North Carolina, court records show. Plaintiffs filed a motion to transfer these claims to the U.S. District Court, District of New Hampshire on Oct. 10.

MDLs are a type of mass tort where many lawsuits with the same allegations are transferred to one court before one judge. The JPML creates this type of group litigation in order to speed up the legal process for complex cases. Gathering cases together in one court eliminates duplicate discovery and streamlines proceedings. In this case, lawsuits allege that the C-Qur caused injuries and Atrium Medical failed to disclose the risks. Court documents show that at least 15 such lawsuits have been filed.

Alleged injuries associated with the C-Qur include infection, rejection, organ perforation, inflammation, chronic pain, additional surgery, rash, neurological changes, dental problems, bowel obstruction and abnormal liver function.

Roughly 1,500 C-Qur Edge mesh devices were recalled in August 2012 because the Omega-3 fatty acid coating on the mesh could adhere to the inner packaging liner due to high humidity. Atrium notified physicians of the issue and instructed them to inspect the mesh before implanting it in patients. However, the company did not pull the product from the shelves. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) designated the recall as Class II, meaning it is a situation where the recalled product can cause temporary or medically reversible adverse events, or the probability of serious adverse events is remote.

The C-Qur was introduced in 2006. Plaintiffs allege that the mesh was cleared through 510(k), which allows devices to be approved without clinical testing so long as they are deemed “substantially equivalent” to a previously approved device. Unlike products that are cleared through premarket approval (PMA), manufacturers do not have to submit clinical data to prove their products are safe and effective. 510(k) has come under scrutiny in light of safety concerns with certain medical devices, including transvaginal mesh and metal-on-metal hip implants.

Transvaginal Mesh Litigation

Parker Waichman comments that Ethicon has also faced litigation over other mesh products, specifically transvaginal mesh implants used for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Thousands of women sued Ethicon and other pelvic mesh manufacturers alleging that the devices are defectively designed and led to injuries, including mesh erosion where the mesh goes through the vaginal tissues and damages other organs.

Women have filed lawsuits over the Ethicon Gynecare TVT, Prolift and other transvaginal mesh products. In January, the company agreed to pay $120 million to settle 2,000 to 3,000 lawsuits. The company is still facing an additional 42,000 vaginal mesh lawsuits. The largest number of transvaginal mesh products are filed against J&J, court documents show.

The J&J vaginal mesh litigation has resulted in some verdicts. In September 2014, jurors awarded $3.27 million to the plaintiff. Verdicts of $11 million and $1.2 million were handed down in 2013 and 2014, respectively.
Transvaginal mesh lawsuits have also been filed against C.R. Bard, American Medical Systems, Boston Scientific and Coloplast.

The FDA has warned that transvaginal mesh complications are “not rare”. The agency said in 2008 that the most common injuries associated with transvaginal mesh include:

• Mesh erosion
• Infection
• Pain
• Urinary problems
• Recurrence of prolapse
• Incontinence

There have also been reports perforation in the bowels, bladder and blood vessels.

Filing a Hernia Mesh or Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit

If you or someone you know suffered injuries related to the use of a hernia mesh or a transvaginal mesh product, you may have valuable legal rights. Our personal injury lawyers offer free, no-obligation case evaluations. For more information, fill out our online form or call 1-800-YOUR-LAWYER (1-800-968-7529).

What Our Clients Say About Us
We have worked with thousands of clients and we appreciate them and their positive reviews. Here are just a few recent client reviews...
5 Star Reviews 150
Parker Waichman LLP- Paralegal, Jessie Salcedo, she is professional and has been very helpful. I am a new mom and a newlywed so my life is very chaotic at times. Sometimes it's hard todo anything else but my basic day to day stuff. They have made this process very easy for me. All I've really had todo is provide some information and they have handled everything else. I greatly appreciate their services and would refer them to anyone. Also, they remembered my birthday this past September. They sent me a card. Most of my friends don't remember my birthday. To me, that was going out of their way just to brighten my day and I really appreciated it.
GunRivGen
5 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
This is a quality organization. My paralegal, Tina Morace ,has shown incredible expertise in the handling of my VCF claim. She has kept me jinformed every step of the way and has offered her expert advice as appropriate. She has made a real difference during this trying time.
Nicholas Mannarino
6 months ago
5 Star Reviews 150
Great work...these people do! My only suggestion would be more feedback where my case was in the process, but these people are BUSY, and they have a purpose in everything they do, so be patient, you won't be disappointed!
Thomas Blomgren
7 years ago

Why Choose Us to Help You?

We Take Care of Everything
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
No Recovery = No Legal Fees
We work on a contingency-fee basis, meaning that we only get paid from a portion of your settlement or jury award. If you don't get compensation, you owe us nothing.
Decades of Experience
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
Respected by Our Peers
Judges, insurance adjusters, and fellow attorneys all speak highly of our skills, and we've earned numerous accolades, including a flawless rating from AVVO.
We Have Many Locations To Serve You
We have the experience and the skilled litigators to win your case. Contact us and speak with a real attorney who can help you.
Long Island – Nassau
Parker Waichman LLP
6 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY 11050
Long Island – Suffolk
Parker Waichman LLP
201 Old Country Road – Suite 145
Melville, NY 11747
New York
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038
Queens
Parker Waichman LLP
118-35 Queens Boulevard, Suite 400
Forest Hills, NY 11375
Brooklyn
Parker Waichman LLP
300 Cadman Plaza West
One Pierrepont Plaza, 12th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
New Jersey
Parker Waichman LLP
80 Main Street, Suite 265
West Orange, NJ 07052
Florida
Parker Waichman LLP
27299 Riverview Center Boulevard
Suite 108
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
Nationwide Service
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038