Parker Waichman LLP

Preemption Ruling Reversed by Judge in Paxil Case

Father Rick Tucker, an Indiana Catholic priest for over 26 years committed suicide after having taken the antidepressant Paxil in August 2000 for 22 days; he shot himself in the head with a .25 caliber pistol at age 55.  Tucker was prescribed <“https://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/paxil”>Paxil by his family doctor.  The case, which was originally brought by Tucker’s […]

Father Rick Tucker, an Indiana Catholic priest for over 26 years committed suicide after having taken the antidepressant Paxil in August 2000 for 22 days; he shot himself in the head with a .25 caliber pistol at age 55.  Tucker was prescribed <“https://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/paxil”>Paxil by his family doctor.  The case, which was originally brought by Tucker’s sister, Debra Tucker, is now re-opened following a move by US District Court Judge David Hamilton who has reversed his prior opinion in which he had dismissed the Paxil suicide case based on preemption.   Preemption says Food & Drug Administration (FDA) approval supercedes state law claims challenging safety, efficacy, or labeling. The FDA and drug makers argue preemption exists because FDA actions are the last word on safety and effectiveness.

In his opinion, Hamilton wrote that, in his prior ruling, he “failed to appreciate the significance of the fact that the ongoing ability, authority, and responsibility to strengthen a label still rest squarely with the drug manufacturer.”  Hamilton also stated that Glaxo “has acknowledged that the regulations give it the responsibility for proper labeling of Paxil, and that it had the ability to make changes to Paxil’s label when there was “reasonable association” between a serious hazard and a patient’s ingestion of the drug … the FDA’s current position on preemption is not ‘long standing’ but is, in fact, a ‘180-degree reversal’ from its earlier stance … the court, on reconsideration, gives relatively little weight to the FDA’s opinion on the preemptive effects of its regulations….  Drug manufacturers have the authority to strengthen warnings without the advance permission of the FDA.

This coming fall, the US Supreme Court will also hear a preemption case involving Wyeth and a Vermont woman, Diana Levine who successfully argued before the Vermont Supreme Court that, even though labeling for Wyeth’s Phenergan complied with FDA requirements, the adequacy of the warning had not been established.  Levine lost an arm and was awarded $6 million.  Levine’s attorneys maintain that Wyeth was neither prevented from adding nor strengthening the warning on the label, despite that the FDA rejected a proposed change.  Because of this, the Supreme Court ruling could determine if patients can sue a drug maker through state law even when a product has received FDA approval.

Glaxo disagrees and one of its spokeswoman recently stated, “The decision in this case would allow a jury to determine whether an FDA-approved label adequately informs physicians about a medication’s risks and benefits, as the label generally has to be found to be inadequate before the manufacturer can be held liable.”  Glaxo maintains, “The scientific evidence does not establish that paroxetine causes suicide, suicide attempts, self-harm or suicidal thinking.”

Paxil has long been liked to suicide and violence in children and teenagers.  A report issued by Britain’s Department of Health said evidence provided by Glaxo from nine studies based on over 1,000 youngsters showed an increase in the rate of self harm and potentially suicidal behavior in those under 18 taking Paxil.  Following their British counterparts, Irish health officials issued a warning for Paxil in Ireland, and the FDA continues to investigate the suicide risk associated with Paxil and other antidepressants.

What Our Clients Say About Us
We have worked with thousands of clients and we appreciate them and their positive reviews. Here are just a few recent client reviews...
5 Star Reviews 150
Positive: Professionalism , Quality , Responsiveness , Value MY CONTACT PARALEGAL WAS TINA MORACE, SHE WAS WAY BEYOND FANTASTIC IN ALWAYS KEEPING ME UPDATED WITH THE STATUS OF MY 911 VICTIMS RELIEF FUND CASE STATUS.
TONY P
6 months ago
5 Star Reviews 150
Hi. my name is Ramona Reynoso. I’m very happy I picked Parker and Waichman to fight for me! They made me feel like part of their family! Julie, Maryann and Jorge Peniche were only a phone call away! They answered all my questions and kept me inform of the progress of my case. They were very friendly and profesional!! I would definitely use Parker and Waichman in the future and I would definitely recommend them to family and friends! Jorge Peniche, Julie and Mariann you guys are the best!!!!
edwin acosta
5 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
I've worked with Josephine and Nurse Joan, I've found them to be very helpful and professional with my case. A special thank you to you both. I highly recommend this firm to everyone.
Darryl Lewis
5 years ago

Why Choose Us to Help You?

We Take Care of Everything
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
No Recovery = No Legal Fees
We work on a contingency-fee basis, meaning that we only get paid from a portion of your settlement or jury award. If you don't get compensation, you owe us nothing.
Decades of Experience
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
Respected by Our Peers
Judges, insurance adjusters, and fellow attorneys all speak highly of our skills, and we've earned numerous accolades, including a flawless rating from AVVO.
We Have Many Locations To Serve You
We have the experience and the skilled litigators to win your case. Contact us and speak with a real attorney who can help you.
Long Island – Nassau
Parker Waichman LLP
6 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY 11050
Long Island – Suffolk
Parker Waichman LLP
201 Old Country Road – Suite 145
Melville, NY 11747
New York
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038
Queens
Parker Waichman LLP
118-35 Queens Boulevard, Suite 400
Forest Hills, NY 11375
Brooklyn
Parker Waichman LLP
300 Cadman Plaza West
One Pierrepont Plaza, 12th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
New Jersey
Parker Waichman LLP
80 Main Street, Suite 265
West Orange, NJ 07052
Florida
Parker Waichman LLP
27299 Riverview Center Boulevard
Suite 108
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
Nationwide Service
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038