Parker Waichman LLP

Moms File Zoloft Birth Defect Lawsuit in St. Louis

A class action lawsuit has been filed in St. Louis by a group of mothers who took the antidepressant Zoloft while pregnant, and gave birth to a child with birth defects. The lawsuit alleges Pfizer knew the dangers of Zoloft but hid information that showed all of the risks associated with taking the antidepressant during […]

A class action lawsuit has been filed in St. Louis by a group of mothers who took the antidepressant Zoloft while pregnant, and gave birth to a child with birth defects. The lawsuit alleges Pfizer knew the dangers of Zoloft but hid information that showed all of the risks associated with taking the antidepressant during pregnancy.

Zoloft is known as a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant (SSRI), a class of drugs that a growing body of research has linked to birth defects. Approved by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) in 1991, Zoloft is used to treat major depression (MDD), social anxiety disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), panic disorder, premenstrual dysphonic disorder (PMDD), and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in adults and children 6 to 17 years old.

The Zoloft class action was filed in St. Louis Circuit Court, and names Shainyah Lancaster as the lead plaintiff. According to the Madison-St. Clair Record, all of the plaintiffs claim they were prescribed Zoloft during their pregnancy, and that their children were born with severe medical defects, including damage to their hearts. The group accuses Pfizer of negligence, fraud, failing to warn the public and unjust enrichment. They are asking for more than $200,000 in actual damages, along with punitive damages and court costs.

The St. Louis lawsuit is one of dozens filed throughout the company by people who claim Zoloft caused birth defects. Last month, Pfizer filed a motion with the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to have 59 Zoloft birth defect lawsuits consolidated in a multidistrict litigation (MDL) and transferred to the Southern District of New York, where Pfizer is headquartered. Pfizer also suggested that, as an alternative, the Northern District of Mississippi, the Southern District of Mississippi, or the Northern District of Ohio could also be suitable for the proposed Zoloft birth defect litigation.

However, lawyers representing several families in Zoloft birth defect lawsuits have filed motions opposing Pfizer’s request for consolidation. They claim Pfizer is attempting to move the lawsuits to a venue that it considers more favorable by improperly removing dozens of cases from state courts, creating the false impression that there are more cases than there really are in the federal court system. The filings assert that all but 10 of the Zoloft birth defect lawsuits identified by Pfizer should be remanded back to state courts where they were originally filed.

Many of the state cases are pending in Common Pleas Court in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and name Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc., a Pennsylvania-based company that was allegedly responsible for the patient education monograph (PEM) that was included with Zoloft prescriptions, as a defendant. In their motions, plaintiffs also proposed that if the Zoloft lawsuits are consolidated in an MDL, the litigation be transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. They also asked that all cases involving Wolters Kluwer Health be excluded from the MDL pending a resolution of motions to remand cases back to state court.

The Panel is expected to hear oral arguments on the motion to consolidate the Zoloft cases on March 29, in San Diego, California.

What Our Clients Say About Us
We have worked with thousands of clients and we appreciate them and their positive reviews. Here are just a few recent client reviews...
5 Star Reviews 150
Positive: Professionalism , Quality , Responsiveness , Value The staff was compassionate and on point! Love my experience with them!
Millette Dukes
2 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
Positive: Professionalism , Quality , Responsiveness , Value
Diane Volpe
3 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
I am so grateful to Julie Trinidad and Maryann who have been amazing every step of the way. They are quick to respond, kept me updated throughout this process and eased my mind by answering all my questions. Thank you again for all your hard work and support.
Allyson Paige
2 months ago

Why Choose Us to Help You?

We Take Care of Everything
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
No Recovery = No Legal Fees
We work on a contingency-fee basis, meaning that we only get paid from a portion of your settlement or jury award. If you don't get compensation, you owe us nothing.
Decades of Experience
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
Respected by Our Peers
Judges, insurance adjusters, and fellow attorneys all speak highly of our skills, and we've earned numerous accolades, including a flawless rating from AVVO.
We Have Many Locations To Serve You
We have the experience and the skilled litigators to win your case. Contact us and speak with a real attorney who can help you.
Long Island – Nassau
Parker Waichman LLP
6 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY 11050
Long Island – Suffolk
Parker Waichman LLP
201 Old Country Road – Suite 145
Melville, NY 11747
New York
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038
Queens
Parker Waichman LLP
118-35 Queens Boulevard, Suite 400
Forest Hills, NY 11375
Brooklyn
Parker Waichman LLP
300 Cadman Plaza West
One Pierrepont Plaza, 12th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
New Jersey
Parker Waichman LLP
80 Main Street, Suite 265
West Orange, NJ 07052
Florida
Parker Waichman LLP
27299 Riverview Center Boulevard
Suite 108
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
Nationwide Service
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038