Ortho Evra manufacturer, Johnson & Johnson, recently settled a lawsuit with the family of a 14-year-old girl killed by the defective birth control patch. The case is just one of many <"https://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/Ortho_Evra_Patch">Ortho Evra lawsuits settled by Johnson & Johnson prior to going trial. It likely hints at the companyâ€™s desire to avoid trials where its actions â€“or lack thereof â€“ regarding safety problems with the defective Ortho Evra birth control patch could be called into question.
When Ortho Evra was introduced in 2002, Johnson and Johnson touted the once-weekly patch as a convenient alternative to daily oral contraceptive pills. The drugâ€™s original safety label stated that the patch’s health risks were similar to those related to oral contraceptives. But in 2005, the Food & Drug Administration warned that women using Ortho Evra were exposed to approximately 60 percent more estrogen than those who used oral contraceptive pills. High levels of estrogen can greatly increase the risk of developing blood clots, heart attacks, strokes and other serious injuries. As of November 2005, the FDA had received twenty-one reports of life-threatening blood clots and other ailments associated with the use of Ortho Evra. Then in 2006, a study was published that showed women using Ortho Evra were twice as likely to suffer blood clots as those taking oral birth control pills. That study prompted the FDA to request a change on the Ortho Evra label to include a stronger safety warning.
Since then, Ortho Evra has been named in well over 2,000 lawsuits, and the suit filed by 14-year-old Alycia Brownâ€™s family is one of them. According to Bloomberg News, Alycia died in May 2004 from two blood clots in her lungs that developed after she had been using the Ortho Evra birth control patch for several weeks. According to court records obtained by Bloomberg, Johnson & Johnson settled with her family for $1.25 million. The court records said that Johnson & Johnson did not admit that Ortho Evra had caused Alyciaâ€™s death, and that the company settled in order to avoid litigation. Neither Johnson & Johnson nor Alyciaâ€™s family would comment to Bloomberg, as both sides had signed a confidentiality agreement.
Johnson & Johnson is likely desperate to keep such agreements secret because it has been accused of ignoring warning signs that Ortho Evra was dangerous. There is evidence that such accusations are true, including the testimony of Joe Lippman, a former employee of and a plaintiff in a whistle blower lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson. Lippman raised concerns over â€œdangerously high levels of estrogenâ€ that users of the patch were exposed to in the late 1990s. Lippman, who was fired in 2006, claims his concerns were ignored.