Parker Waichman LLP

Paint Makers Seek to Quash Lead Hazard Court Ruling

Paint makers are fighting against a court ruling mandating them to spend up to $2.5 billion to remove lead paint from hundreds of thousands of homes in the state of California. Paint makers have long succeeded in skirting litigation that blames them for health problems in people who have suffered health problems associated with lead […]

lead_paint_removal_hazard_judgementPaint makers are fighting against a court ruling mandating them to spend up to $2.5 billion to remove lead paint from hundreds of thousands of homes in the state of California.

Paint makers have long succeeded in skirting litigation that blames them for health problems in people who have suffered health problems associated with lead exposure from paint, according to The Wall Street Journal. Since 1978, lead has been banned from residential paint in the United States. Lawsuits have failed in a number of states including Rhode Island, Missouri, Illinois, New Jersey, and Wisconsin, typically because plaintiffs were unable to prove lead to be a public nuisance, the legal standard that requires proof that the lead-containing item interferes with public health and safety.

The legal battle has been ongoing in California for 13 years and made it to trial in mid-July in state Superior Court in San Jose. Judge James Kleinberg is presiding over the case without a jury and will likely issue a ruling before the end of the year, according to the Journal. While plaintiffs involved in lead paint lawsuits continue to work toward proving that lead is a public nuisance, in California, courts have allowed the lawsuit to continue as a public nuisance case; proof of paint company liability is still required.

The lawsuit was filed by 10 city and county governments in California against Sherwin-Williams Co.; NL Industries Inc.; ConAgra Grocery Products Co.; DuPont Co.; and Atlantic-Richfield Co., which is owned by BP PLC. The court order requires that the defendants—current or prior makers or distributors of pigments and paints—pay for lead paint hazard removal from homes and other buildings in Los Angeles County and other places where local governments have joined the legal action, the Journal reported. Cleanup efforts could cost $1-$2 billion, according to expert witnesses.

According to the lawsuit, the defendants promoted lead paint use while being aware of lead’s risks. The lawsuit also quotes an internal 1904 Sherwin-Williams publication that describes lead in paint as “poisonous in a large degree, both for the workmen and for the inhabitants of a house painted with lead colors.” A Sherwin-Williams attorney argued that the statement was part of an article about a study that was later “disproven,” according to the Journal.

Complete removal of lead paint from all homes is not sought; rather, the lawsuit seeks that lead paint be replaced or sealed on “friction surfaces,” including doors, windows, and floors in which continuous activity could release the leaded paint, the Journal explained. For their part, the defendants argue that there was no way they could know 50 years ago about the risks associated with lead exposure. The lawsuit argues that action is required “before children are harmed,” not after lead exposure.

Lead exposure has been linked to myriad health reactions, including, for instance, hearing loss, violence in youths, reproductive damage, cancer, and nervous system damage in adults. Lead accumulates in the body over time and pregnant women, infants, and young children are especially vulnerable and should avoid exposure to lead. Lead exposure in children and unborn children can lead to brain and nervous system damage; slowed growth; headaches; mental and physical retardation; and behavioral, learning, hearing, and other health problems. The developing brain is of significant concern because lead exposure may lead to long lasting effects that may continue into puberty and beyond.

Once the body is poisoned by lead, none of its organ systems is immune. Lead’s longer-term effects are not immediately manifested and many experts have long believe that no amount of lead exposure is safe. Classic lead poisoning is also known to lead to anemia, nerve and kidney damage, and, in severe cases, convulsions and death, according to a prior Scientific American report.

What Our Clients Say About Us
We have worked with thousands of clients and we appreciate them and their positive reviews. Here are just a few recent client reviews...
5 Star Reviews 150
On the Christmas Eve of 2015 I had a car accident I felt lost and confused. I had no idea what I was going to do or how I was going to get my car fixed. My supervisor referred me Jorge Peniche who works for Parker Waichman. He came to meet me at my house the same day I spoke to him and helped me till the end of my case. I was very pleased with the lawyers and Jillian was very helpful in the process, her and Jorge were ready to answer any of my questions. Thank you Parker and Waichman!!
Fanta Jondot
5 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
I couldn’t say more good things about Daniel Burke. He was there every moment that I needed him. Thank you so very much for all that you did.
Edgar Poole
7 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
I would like to give a special shout out to Jorge, Mary-Ann, and Julie for helping me out so much.
Altagracia Reyes
3 days ago

Why Choose Us to Help You?

We Take Care of Everything
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
No Recovery = No Legal Fees
We work on a contingency-fee basis, meaning that we only get paid from a portion of your settlement or jury award. If you don't get compensation, you owe us nothing.
Decades of Experience
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
Respected by Our Peers
Judges, insurance adjusters, and fellow attorneys all speak highly of our skills, and we've earned numerous accolades, including a flawless rating from AVVO.
We Have Many Locations To Serve You
We have the experience and the skilled litigators to win your case. Contact us and speak with a real attorney who can help you.
Long Island – Nassau
Parker Waichman LLP
6 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY 11050
Long Island – Suffolk
Parker Waichman LLP
201 Old Country Road – Suite 145
Melville, NY 11747
New York
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038
Queens
Parker Waichman LLP
118-35 Queens Boulevard, Suite 400
Forest Hills, NY 11375
Brooklyn
Parker Waichman LLP
300 Cadman Plaza West
One Pierrepont Plaza, 12th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
New Jersey
Parker Waichman LLP
80 Main Street, Suite 265
West Orange, NJ 07052
Florida
Parker Waichman LLP
27299 Riverview Center Boulevard
Suite 108
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
Nationwide Service
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038