Parker Waichman LLP

Study: Many New Medical Practices Found to Be Ineffective

A new study has found that new medical practices—surgical techniques, screening processes—are often found to be ineffective based on follow-up research. The study involved a review of articles published in Mayo Clinic Proceedings over a 10-year period and revealed that newer medical practices, regardless of how broad their usage, were reversed on evidence-based research in […]

new_medical_pratices_ineffectiveA new study has found that new medical practices—surgical techniques, screening processes—are often found to be ineffective based on follow-up research.

The study involved a review of articles published in Mayo Clinic Proceedings over a 10-year period and revealed that newer medical practices, regardless of how broad their usage, were reversed on evidence-based research in many cases, according to MinnPost. The findings appear in this month’s issue of the journal.

Many have long believed that newer screening technologies, surgical procedures, and medicines represent an improvement on patient care; however, this research presents a different perspective. In fact, in a video that accompanied the publication, the study’s lead author, Dr. Vinay Prasad, a medical oncologist at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), said that “of all those things we’re during currently that lack good evidence, probably about half of them are incorrect,” according to MinnPost.

For the study, the team reviewed 1,344 original articles that had been published in the New England Journal of Medicine between 2001 and 2010. Each published piece assessed a new or established medical practice. The team found that just 27 percent—or 363—of the studies actually tested an established medical practice, while most (73 percent or 981) studies looked at a new practice, MinnPost reported.

“While the net breakthrough is surely worth pursing, knowing whether what we are currently doing is right or wrong is equally crucial for sound patient care,” Prasad indicated in a press statement. The team also noted that articles on new practices were likelier to deem them more beneficial than articles testing existing practices. This finding, noted MinnPost, adds to mounting evidence that a positive bias exists in studies of new drugs, devices, or procedures.

Of the 363 articles that looked at existing medical practices, 146 (40.2 percent) revealed that the practices were not effective, 138 (38 percent) endorsed the practices, and 79 (21.8 percent) were inconclusive, according to MinnPost. The 146 reversals “weren’t just practices that once worked and have now been improved upon,” Prasad said “Rather, they never worked. They were instituted in error, never helped patients, and have eroded trust in medicine.” Examples include:

  • Use of stents to treat stable coronary artery disease.
  • Use of hormone therapy to protect post-menopausal women against heart disease
  • Use of pulmonary artery catheters in patients suffering from shock
  • Use of the drug aprotinin in heart surgery
  • Use of COX-2 inhibitors such Celebrex and Vioxx for inflammation and pain
  • Urging patients diagnosed with diabetes to maintain strict blood sugar targets
  • Use of arthroscopic surgery to treat osteoarthritis of the knee
  • Use of the prostate specific antigen test (PSA) in routine prostate cancer screening in older men
  • Advising patients diagnosed with dust-mite allergies to purchase impermeable mattress covers

Using the mattress-cover recommendation as an example, Prasad points out in the video that this medical practice seemed to make sense on the surface, and actually prompted a $26 million-a-year industry. A set of New England Journal of Medicine papers eventually deflated the practice, according to MinnPost.

“Although there is a weak evidence based for some practice, it gains acceptance largely through vocal support from prominent advocates and faith that the mechanism of action is sound,” the team wrote. “Later, future trials undermine the therapy, but removing the contradicted practice often proves challenging.” Worse, the team noted, the practices cause people harm while they are being touted and may continue to cause harm well after being found ineffective, MinnPost noted.

“The take-away message of our paper is that a large proportion of the medical practices which are based on little to no evidence are probably incorrect,” concludes Prasad. “Their continued use jeopardizes patient health and wastes limited health care resources,” he added, according to MinnPost.

What Our Clients Say About Us
We have worked with thousands of clients and we appreciate them and their positive reviews. Here are just a few recent client reviews...
5 Star Reviews 150
Positive: Professionalism , Quality , Responsiveness , Value Extremely professional, and honest , I highly recommend your law firm....
John Hillenbrand
2 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
This law firm is awesome. Alex and Cathy did there thing. As long as I been with them I still don't know Cathy's name. They were NEVER to busy. The young ladies in the front lobby very nice. When they would see me they knew my name. That's how I knew I had the right law firm. Thank you for easing my mind.
yolanda keitt
a year ago
5 Star Reviews 150
I couldn’t say more good things about Daniel Burke. He was there every moment that I needed him. Thank you so very much for all that you did.
Edgar Poole
7 years ago

Why Choose Us to Help You?

We Take Care of Everything
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
No Recovery = No Legal Fees
We work on a contingency-fee basis, meaning that we only get paid from a portion of your settlement or jury award. If you don't get compensation, you owe us nothing.
Decades of Experience
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
Respected by Our Peers
Judges, insurance adjusters, and fellow attorneys all speak highly of our skills, and we've earned numerous accolades, including a flawless rating from AVVO.
We Have Many Locations To Serve You
We have the experience and the skilled litigators to win your case. Contact us and speak with a real attorney who can help you.
Long Island – Nassau
Parker Waichman LLP
6 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY 11050
Long Island – Suffolk
Parker Waichman LLP
201 Old Country Road – Suite 145
Melville, NY 11747
New York
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038
Queens
Parker Waichman LLP
118-35 Queens Boulevard, Suite 400
Forest Hills, NY 11375
Brooklyn
Parker Waichman LLP
300 Cadman Plaza West
One Pierrepont Plaza, 12th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
New Jersey
Parker Waichman LLP
80 Main Street, Suite 265
West Orange, NJ 07052
Florida
Parker Waichman LLP
27299 Riverview Center Boulevard
Suite 108
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
Nationwide Service
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038