Defective Medical Devices

Defective Medical Device Lawyers Fighting For Your Health And Safety More than a decade ago, the defective medical device lawyers at Parker Waichman LLP called for increased governmental oversight of medical devices and diagnostic machines. We observed that numerous medical devices, such as two different versions of Stryker’s hip implants, heart defibrillators manufactured by Medtronic, and […]

Defective Medical Device Lawyers Fighting For Your Health And Safety

More than a decade ago, the defective medical device lawyers at Parker Waichman LLP called for increased governmental oversight of medical devices and diagnostic machines. We observed that numerous medical devices, such as two different versions of Stryker’s hip implants, heart defibrillators manufactured by Medtronic, and certain Composix Kugel Mesh patches, manufactured by C.R. Bard subsidiary Davol Inc., had caused thousands of people to suffer serious and even life-threatening injuries.

Since then, many other medical devices and treatments have failed, causing numerous people to suffer. Medical devices such as DePuy’s metal-on-metal hip implants, Bayer’s Essure birth control device, and Medtronic’s Infusion insulin pump have been linked to severe complications.  Many of such devices have been recalled by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Today, new FDA regulations should help to address these issues, but that won’t protect those who have already suffered injuries due to defective medical devices. If you have been harmed by a device that was supposed to help improve your health, call us.  We can provide a free case evaluation to determine if you should pursue a legal claim for compensation.

The Call For A More Rigorous Regulatory Scheme

In 2008, researchers from the University of California at San Francisco argued that medical devices did not have sufficiently stringent regulations to guarantee patient safety. These researchers found that new medications went through more rigorous testing and analysis before receiving FDA approval when contrasted with medical devices. (For clarity, a medical device is an implement that can be implanted, such as a knee or hip, or a machine that somehow assists the body to perform its natural functions.)

Medical device manufacturers can rely on expedited approval for their latest device when the item functions similarly to a device previously approved by the FDA.  The FDA dispenses with rigorous review in these cases and permits the items to go to market. The researchers proposed that the FDA approval should be the first step toward the lawful use of medical devices, not the last step.

The next step, they suggested, should be a review of the device’s technology by an independent body of researchers and scientists. Further evaluation after the FDA’s initial approval would allow physicians to learn about potential limitations of the device and have a thorough understanding of the possible side effects from use of the device.  It would also determine how long the device will last before replacement is required.

The FDA has been working on changes to its processes in recent years, but it still has a ways to go to update how it approves these potentially life-saving or life-destroying devices.

Global Compliance Requirements Pick Up Where The FDA Leaves Off

In 2019, new global compliance requirements took effect that added risk management to every element of a medical device manufacturer’s quality assessment systems according to ISO 13485. The International Organization for Standardization’s guidelines are used worldwide as a uniform set of standards governing the use of many manufacturing industries, including the making of medical devices.

ISO 13485 was updated to incorporate the latest technological advances as well as regulatory mandates and quality management obligations. The upgrades to ISO 13485 will require medical device manufacturers to incorporate risk-management best practices into every aspect of the manufacturing process as well as the overall supply chain.

While adherence to ISO compliance regulations is voluntary, compliance with FDA and European manufacturing regulations is not. More stringent requirements imposed by amended FDA regulations focus on device companies showing that their new product not only is safe for use by patients, but can efficiently treat the condition for which the manufacturer designed the product.

One challenge to this move is that some device manufacturers maintain antiquated systems that make it more difficult to expose their documentation to public oversight. There is a growing need to increase the visibility of documents, results of clinical trials, and follow-up analyses, and companies will need to invest in newer technologies so that they can comply with regulatory mandates.

Whether the new regulations will make medical devices safer and help patients combat the physical ailments from which they suffer remains to be seen, but it would appear to at least be a step in the right direction.

Free Consultation
Parker Waichman LLP
Are you inquiring about a new matter?
What type of accident did you have?
Please share a few details about your inquiry so we can connect you with the best person to assist you.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
4.8 from 549 Reviews

Client Reviews

Our law firm is ready to represent you in your injury case. We’ve helped many New York residents as well as those needing help nationwide. Contact our team for a free case consultation today.

Mr. Silverstein and Ms.Michelle Josama were excellent! Both were very knowledgeable about the case that we brought to them. We were very comfortable throughout this process and would retain their services in the future.” Positive Professionalism
Jason Bivens
Unfortunately, this is the second " 911 victims fund " claim that I've had to process with PW. While my family and I were dealing with life altering news, one thing I did not have to divert my attention to, was my claim. Ms. Shelly Davis was there, once again, and handled ALL the details with almost NO input from me because of the continuity in care that PW provides. Shelly remembered me the minute she answered the phone although it has been at least 5 years since we last spoke. She worked off of my last file and I spoke with her once more before I was made aware that my award was made available. She contacted me to let me know the progress of the claim at that time. then again when the award was received by PW and being mailed to me. I'm very happy I chose PW to handle my 911 case and feel very lucky I was assigned to Ms. Davis.
RAUL MORALES
They are so friendly is crazy there so into there work they made me feel like family and I live in the mid-west I would recommend them to anybody thanks Parker waichman
Chris Jabouin
i want to thank Parker Waichman for taking care of my case. I especially want to thank Kathy Senedacor for her time care and professionalism. Parker Waichman is very fortunate to have her representing them.
nicholas cardascia

Contact Us Today

If you or a loved one has been injured in an accident or have been injured by another party in some other way, we are here to stand up for your rights. Our personal injury attorneys have been representing injury victims and their families in Long Island and throughout the nation since the early 1980s.