Contact Us

*    Denotes required field.

   * First Name 

   * Last Name 

   * Email 


Cell Phone 

Street Address 

Zip Code 



Which Bisphosphante drug did you take?

Date you started taking this drug:

Date you stopped taking this drug:

Were you diagnosed with Osteonecrosis of the Jawbone (ONJ)?

Did you suffer a femur fracture:

Please describe your injuries:

Please further describe side effects:

For verification purposes, please answer the below question:

No Yes, I agree to the Parker Waichman LLP disclaimers. Click here to review.

Yes, I would like to receive the Parker Waichman LLP monthly newsletter, InjuryAlert.

please do not fill out the field below.

In Fosamax Trial Opening Statements Merck Charged with Overlooking Problems Linked to the Drug

Apr 10, 2013

Opening statements were made yesterday in a New Jersey courtroom during a new trial over claims that Merck & Co.’s osteoporosis drug Fosamax makes patients more susceptible to thigh fractures.

This case is one of over 3,300 pending cases alleging that Merck’s Fosamax caused so-called atypical femur fractures. The plaintiff, Bernadette Glynn, 59, took Fosamax for more than six years before suffering a femur fracture while bending over to pick something up. These so-called atypical femur fractures are often the result of traumatic events, such as high falls, car accidents, or skiing mishaps. Glynn alleges that use of Fosamax alone makes patients susceptible to these kinds of injuries.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Fosamax in 1995 to treat and prevent postmenopausal osteoporosis and to treat other bone loss-related issues, including weakened bones following some cancer treatments. In 2010, the FDA updated the safety information on Fosamax to warn of the risk of atypical femur fractures. The agency published a review in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2012 suggesting there is little benefit from taking bisphosphonates, the class of drugs that includes Fosamax, for longer than five years.

Plaintiffs’ counsel Paul Pennock alleged that Merck violated federal regulations by not warning doctors and patients of the problems associated with Fosamax. “Doing so is not optional—warning Fosamax users of the risks is their obligation.” Pennock told the jurors that Merck’s own documents would show that five years before FDA approval, “the company was concerned about femur fractures, yet never warned about these dangers.”

Matthew J. McCauley, senior litigation counsel at Parker Waichman LLP, which has filed approximately 200 femur-fracture cases, said “the jury will see the extent of what Merck knew about the potential damaging side effects related to Fosamax.”

Parker Waichman Accolades And Reviews Best Lawyers Find Us On Avvo