Parker Waichman LLP

Essure Lawsuit Continues After Summary Judgement Motion Fails

Many women may one day choose to undergo permanent birth control procedures. Designed to safely and effectively prevent pregnancies, procedures should provide few complications. Unfortunately, some products don’t maintain these high standards of ethics and safety,  such as Essure. Currently the subject of a major lawsuit against its manufacturer, the Essure lawsuit was levied by […]

Essure lawsuit continues after summary judgement motion failsMany women may one day choose to undergo permanent birth control procedures. Designed to safely and effectively prevent pregnancies, procedures should provide few complications. Unfortunately, some products don’t maintain these high standards of ethics and safety,  such as Essure. Currently the subject of a major lawsuit against its manufacturer, the Essure lawsuit was levied by a number of women who have experienced a variety of negative effects as a result of using Essure. The proceedings took a positive turn for the plaintiffs last week as a judge denied a motion for summary judgment by opposing lawyers.

Justifying The Essure Lawsuit

Essure is a permanent birth control product that is advertised as a “non-hormonal” method with a low recovery time. According to its website, of women who undergo the Essure procedure, “75% return to normal activities within 2 days.” From its advertisement, Essure seems to be no more than a root canal, temporarily inconvenient, but no more than a weekend lost.

The method used for Essure’s birth control process is similarly appealing. Flexible inserts are surgically placed into the fallopian tubes and over time, these inserts will create a barrier using scar tissue. While the procedure is simple to explain, there are some risks and the Essure does mention the following potential side effects:

  • Perforation of the uterus
  • Perforation of the fallopian tubes
  • Identification of inserts in the abdominal or pelvic cavity
  • Persistent pain
  • Allergic or hypersensitivity reactions

While these side effects are not insignificant, they again seem to downplay the true dangers. Members of the Essure lawsuit have reported more severe side effects. Some of these include internal bleeding, autoimmune problems, and pregnancy.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) seems to agree with at least some claims in the Essure lawsuit. On April 9, 2018, the FDA released a Press Announcement restricting the sale and use of Essure in the United States. The reasoning for this decision, according to FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D., was that

“based on our review of a growing body of evidence, we believe this product requires additional, meaningful safeguards to ensure women are able to make informed decisions about risk when considering this option.”

After the decision to restrict the use of Essure, the FDA released a series of legally-binding requirements to Bayer to update their warnings and labels on Essure within the U.S. Instead, in December of 2018, Essure was removed from American markets. While no claims can be made to the goings on behind closed doors, it is likely that the withdrawal was due to irreconcilable differences between Bayer and the FDA about the proper warnings and notifications for Essure.

For more information about Essure, and potential class-action lawsuits against Bayer, visit our full Essure topic page here.

The Essure Lawsuit Motion Dismissal

On March 28, 2019, a Philadelphia judge denied a motion by Bayer’s legal team for summary judgment of 12 class action lawsuit members who were part of the Essure lawsuit. The argument that the Bayer legal team presented was that the women in question were not eligible to file suit against Bayer because they had filed after the statute of limitations allowed them too. The plaintiffs argued that the statute of limitations clock began not when they received the Essure implant, but at the time that a medical professional determined the Essure implant to be the cause of their complications.

After deliberation, the judge agreed with the plaintiffs and denied Bayer’s motion for summary judgment. Included in the 12 plaintiffs were 6 personal injury plaintiffs for issues of persistent pain, bleeding, and autoimmune complications, 3 breach-of-warranty plaintiffs, and 1 fraud plaintiff who argues that Bayer did not inform her that Essure was not guaranteed to prevent pregnancy. With this determination, the Essure lawsuit will continue to move forward with class-action proceedings.

How The Essure Lawsuit Affects Consumers

This Philadelphia judge’s determination that the statute of limitations clock began when the women’s doctored determined Essure was to blame for their complications and not from the time of implantation, is a very generous advantage for other potential plaintiffs that may wish to join in the Essure lawsuit following this judgment. If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, complications, or unexpected pregnancies following the implantation of the Essure birth control device, Parker Waichman LLP is here to help. With teams of experienced trial lawyers who have argued numerous medical device defect cases, Parker Waichman can get you the compensation that you and your family deserve. Contact Parker Waichman today for a free consultation.

What Our Clients Say About Us
We have worked with thousands of clients and we appreciate them and their positive reviews. Here are just a few recent client reviews...
5 Star Reviews 150
I had a great experience with Tina and Gina working relentlessly on my fathers 911 case. They were attentive to my questions and concerns will making sure all documentation was submitted correctly in a timely manner. It has been a pleasure having them lead my family and I to victory in the precious memory of my father. May God continue to bless them!!
Robin Holland
2 weeks ago
5 Star Reviews 150
I stumbled across Parker Waichman by a fluke and I took a chance on them handling my claim. I received regular updates, quick call backs, and the team that represented my case were smart, methodical and treated me like a human being, not just another number, thank you.
Joey Cook
8 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
I wanted to give huuuuugeee props to my Medical Coordinator, Joanne. She is professional, sweet, dedicated and committed to listening, comforting, and guiding me through this journey.
SooSweet NY
6 months ago

Why Choose Us to Help You?

We Take Care of Everything
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
No Recovery = No Legal Fees
We work on a contingency-fee basis, meaning that we only get paid from a portion of your settlement or jury award. If you don't get compensation, you owe us nothing.
Decades of Experience
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
Respected by Our Peers
Judges, insurance adjusters, and fellow attorneys all speak highly of our skills, and we've earned numerous accolades, including a flawless rating from AVVO.
We Have Many Locations To Serve You
We have the experience and the skilled litigators to win your case. Contact us and speak with a real attorney who can help you.
Long Island – Nassau
Parker Waichman LLP
6 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY 11050
Long Island – Suffolk
Parker Waichman LLP
201 Old Country Road – Suite 145
Melville, NY 11747
New York
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038
Queens
Parker Waichman LLP
118-35 Queens Boulevard, Suite 400
Forest Hills, NY 11375
Brooklyn
Parker Waichman LLP
300 Cadman Plaza West
One Pierrepont Plaza, 12th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
New Jersey
Parker Waichman LLP
80 Main Street, Suite 265
West Orange, NJ 07052
Florida
Parker Waichman LLP
27299 Riverview Center Boulevard
Suite 108
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
Nationwide Service
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038