Parker Waichman LLP

Stryker Hip Implant Device Failure Leads to Pennsylvania Lawsuit

A lawsuit concerning the failure of a medical device. Stryker Hip Implant Lawsuit Overview. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation and Stryker Corporation faced a lawsuit concerning the failure of a medical device. A federal judge, ruling on Pennsylvania law, allowed a strict liability manufacturing defect claim to proceed against the manufacturers for the allegations of complete failure […]

A lawsuit concerning the failure of a medical device.

Stryker Hip Implant Lawsuit Overview. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation and Stryker Corporation faced a lawsuit concerning the failure of a medical device. A federal judge, ruling on Pennsylvania law, allowed a strict liability manufacturing defect claim to proceed against the manufacturers for the allegations of complete failure of their hip and leg prosthetic device.

The plaintiff was implanted with the Stryker Gamma 3 Nail System on March 2, 2015. On September 30, 2015, an X-ray revealed that the Stryker nail had broken. On April 26, 2016, the plaintiff had to undergo a left total hip replacement which became infected leading to additional medical injury.

The plaintiff filed strict liability, negligence, breach of implied warranty claims under Pennsylvania law, in the U.S. District Court for Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

“In the absence of a controlling decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, a federal court applying that state’s substantive law must predict how Pennsylvania’s highest court would decide this case,” Judge Wendy Beetlestone wrote.

A strict liability claim requires proof that: “the product was defective; that the defect existed when it left the hands of the defendant; that the defect caused the harm.”

The court dismissed the plaintiffs’ claims for: strict liability claims asserting a design defect against medical device manufacturers; negligent failure to warn and to recall against medical device manufacturers; and breach of implied warranty of merchantability.

“Here, the plaintiffs have plausibly alleged a manufacturing defect strict liability claim. The existence of a manufacturing defect is satisfied by the allegation that the Stryker Gamma 3 Nail System broke down after it was implanted into [the plaintiff], where it was subjected to normal and anticipated use, and that there were no reasonable secondary causes,” the Judge said.

“That it existed at the time it left Defendants’ control is plausibly suggested by the allegation that the product was manufactured and shipped by Defendants to Grand View Hospital, where it was ultimately implanted into [the plaintiff].”

“And causation follows from the allegation that the failure of the Stryker Gamma 3 Nail System necessitated a subsequent surgery to remove it, as well as a total hip replacement, which gave rise to a secondary infection. Therefore, the motion to dismiss the strict liability claim insofar as it asserts a manufacturing defect will be denied,” the Judge said.

National law firm Parker Waichman LLP has extensive experience and success in medical device litigation, including allegedly defective hip implants. The firm’s attorneys are available to answer legal questions from individuals seeking information for a potential lawsuit.

Additional Litigation and Complications Involving Stryker

U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston is overseeing eight claims in Massachusetts federal court in an MDL concerning Stryker LFIT V40 Femoral Head Products Liability Litigation.

Senior District Judge Donovan W. Frank oversees 1,806 claims in Minnesota federal court MDL involving Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG ll Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation.

In 2012, Stryker recalled its Rejuvenate and ABG ll modular-neck hip stems. The metal-on-metal hip devices were recalled because patients experienced “fretting and corrosion” at the modular-neck junction. This may cause injuries such as adverse local tissue reaction, pain and swelling at or around the hip joint. Stryker faced a deluge of lawsuits following the recall. Plaintiffs in the litigation maintain that the metal hip device caused complications and that Stryker neglected to warn of the risks.

Stryker agreed to pay $1.4 billion in November 2014, to settle lawsuits over the ABG ll and Rejuvenate. The settlement agreement includes plaintiffs who had revision surgery to replace their failed hip implant before December 19, 2016. When metal-on-metal hip implants fail and cause complications, a revision surgery is performed. Metal-on-metal hip implant lawsuits have triggered lawsuits because patents have been suffering an increased rate of early failure.

In August 2016, Howmedica recalled 42,519 defective hips. The manufacturer also issued a letter to orthopedic surgeons alerting them of a “higher than expected” incidence of taper lock failure for certain sizes of its LFIT Anatomic CoCr V40 Femoral Heads.

Listed in the recall notice were potential hazards that included excessive metal debris, disassociation of the stem/failure, trunnion (pin or pivot) fracture, and corrosion at the femoral head and stem junction.

Despite the belief that hip implants are expected to be long-term devices lasting a decade or more, plaintiffs’ litigations commonly allege that the hip devices fail much sooner, forcing recipients to undergo additional surgery.

Have You Been Injured by a Stryker Hip Implant Device?

If you or someone you know has sustained injury involving a Stryker hip device, you may be eligible for valuable compensation. Parker Waichman personal injury law firm offers free, no-obligation case evaluations. We urge you to contact us at 1-800-YOURLAWYER (1-800-968-7529).

What Our Clients Say About Us
We have worked with thousands of clients and we appreciate them and their positive reviews. Here are just a few recent client reviews...
5 Star Reviews 150
Working with Nicole Copertino made them process so easy, As a retire Police officer and veteran she very professional and at the same time made me feel human not just broke client or a “PAY DAY” for her. Keep up the excellent work
Jerry Joly
10 months ago
5 Star Reviews 150
Had a great experience with Ashley and Gina. Would recommend them in a heart beat!
Maria Rivera
4 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
Mom died as a result of nursing home negligence.The general consensus was that she was old and near death anyway...so,not worth much monetarily!!!The people at Parker Waichman felt otherwise.They handled the case and treated my sister and myself as though we were their ONLY clients.We were most fortunate to meet the AMAZING Cybele Louis and her team....Stephanie San Filippo and Cindy Custodio.They were sensitive to the needs of our family but also tough with our awful opponents!!!! They accomplished more in a few short months than had been done in six years!!!! I also thank the reception crew who took my endless calls!!!!(Special thanks to Stephanie for putting up with my rants!!!!)
Gail Ratigan
4 years ago

Why Choose Us to Help You?

We Take Care of Everything
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
No Recovery = No Legal Fees
We work on a contingency-fee basis, meaning that we only get paid from a portion of your settlement or jury award. If you don't get compensation, you owe us nothing.
Decades of Experience
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
Respected by Our Peers
Judges, insurance adjusters, and fellow attorneys all speak highly of our skills, and we've earned numerous accolades, including a flawless rating from AVVO.
We Have Many Locations To Serve You
We have the experience and the skilled litigators to win your case. Contact us and speak with a real attorney who can help you.
Long Island – Nassau
Parker Waichman LLP
6 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY 11050
Long Island – Suffolk
Parker Waichman LLP
201 Old Country Road – Suite 145
Melville, NY 11747
New York
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038
Queens
Parker Waichman LLP
118-35 Queens Boulevard, Suite 400
Forest Hills, NY 11375
Brooklyn
Parker Waichman LLP
300 Cadman Plaza West
One Pierrepont Plaza, 12th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
New Jersey
Parker Waichman LLP
80 Main Street, Suite 265
West Orange, NJ 07052
Florida
Parker Waichman LLP
27299 Riverview Center Boulevard
Suite 108
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
Nationwide Service
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038