Parker Waichman LLP

FDA to Discuss Changes to 510(k) Medical Device Approvals

The Medical Device Approval program, known as the 510(k), which quickens US approvals of some medical devices, might be experiencing a change, says Reuters. Tomorrow, a meeting at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will be looking at the program. Many consider the program controversial and moving beyond its original intent, which has led […]

The Medical Device Approval program, known as the 510(k), which quickens US approvals of some <"https://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/defective_medical_devices">medical devices, might be experiencing a change, says Reuters. Tomorrow, a meeting at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will be looking at the program.

Many consider the program controversial and moving beyond its original intent, which has led to problems with approved medical devices, noted Reuters. Tomorrow’s meeting will discuss key challenges related to pre-market notification, or the 510(k) process, used to review and clear certain medical devices marketed in the US. The FDA receives more than
3,000 510(k) submissions annually.

As we have previously written and the Associated Press (AP) noted last year, scientists under former medical device head, Daniel Schultz, claimed, “they were pressured to approve certain products” against their best judgment. It was a nine-scientist letter that added to the call for reform at the agency. Following the letter, a number of lawmakers called on the FDA to investigate the alleged corruption, reported the AP. Schultz who managed the division for five years, ultimately resigned.

Earlier last year we wrote that many critics of the FDA had long complained of safety problems, corruption, conflicts of interest, and budgeting and system problems that appeared to be routine at the agency under the former administration. With the Obama administration, new leaders were put in place and safety became an issue of importance at the FDA.

The FDA convened an internal working group to evaluate and improve the quality and consistency of its decision-making in the 510(k) process as well as its program administration. “It’s been more than 30 years since the establishment of the pre-market notification process for medical devices,” said Jeffrey Shuren, M.D., J.D., director of FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health. “We are looking forward to hearing from the public on issues related to this program to help us improve it.”

At the meeting, FDA staff will present a brief overview of the challenges the
agency has faced, in four categories: Issues related to predicate devices, which are previously cleared devices that may support a manufacturer’s claim of substantial equivalence; issues related to new technologies and scientific evidence; issues related to practices the FDA adopted in response to a high volume of submissions; and issues related to post-market surveillance and new information about marketed devices.

Reuters explained that the FDA classifies medical devices into three categories, which are determined by risk and with Class III representing the highest risk level. These devices, said the FDA, usually need pre-market approval and include heart valves and intraocular lenses. Class I and II devices present lower risks and include devices such as adhesive bandages and wheelchairs.

Jeffrey Shuren, new head of FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health, said it was seeking input on the accelerated approval process, wrote Reuters. Meanwhile, Diana Zuckerman, president of the advocacy group National Research Center for Women & Families, stated that current standards for determining if a new device is equivalent to an approved device are “too loose to assure safety or effectiveness…. Our center regularly hears from patients and consumers who were harmed by LASIK, surgical mesh, bladder slings and other products that were not adequately tested prior to being sold,” quoted Reuters.

What Our Clients Say About Us
We have worked with thousands of clients and we appreciate them and their positive reviews. Here are just a few recent client reviews...
5 Star Reviews 150
Thank you for reaching out to the public through your tv ad! Your staff was always available and very helpful during the entire process of being eligible for the 9/11 compensation fund. The fund continues to assist us with my husbands illness. Without you, our eyes would have never been open to his eligibility. We can never thank you enough! Martha-jean Rosiello xox
martha-jean rosiello
2 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
Although this process has been long, I have been very fortunate to have Christina Morace assigned to my claim. From the beginning, she has been able to answer all of my questions and lead me along through the process of submitting documents. She answers all questions whether by phone or email in a timely manner. Tina is extremely professional and has a very personal manner in dealing with the complicated aspects of the WTC Victims Compensation Fund claim. I feel totally comfortable with her and highly recommend her to any other claimants who may be going through this process.
T-J Fleming
2 years ago
5 Star Reviews 150
Positive: Professionalism , Quality , Responsiveness , Value Parker Waichman is an excellent law firm. Thank you Christina Morace my Paralegal, assigned to the case for guiding me through the process of filing the necessary paperwork for the 9/11 victims compensation fund. Your knowledge and ability to communicate it to me made the entire process much easier..
allan doyno
3 years ago

Why Choose Us to Help You?

We Take Care of Everything
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
No Recovery = No Legal Fees
We work on a contingency-fee basis, meaning that we only get paid from a portion of your settlement or jury award. If you don't get compensation, you owe us nothing.
Decades of Experience
Your situation is stressful enough: Let us take on the deadlines, paperwork, investigation, and litigation. We'll handle every detail so you don't have to worry.
Respected by Our Peers
Judges, insurance adjusters, and fellow attorneys all speak highly of our skills, and we've earned numerous accolades, including a flawless rating from AVVO.
We Have Many Locations To Serve You
We have the experience and the skilled litigators to win your case. Contact us and speak with a real attorney who can help you.
Long Island – Nassau
Parker Waichman LLP
6 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY 11050
Long Island – Suffolk
Parker Waichman LLP
201 Old Country Road – Suite 145
Melville, NY 11747
New York
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038
Queens
Parker Waichman LLP
118-35 Queens Boulevard, Suite 400
Forest Hills, NY 11375
Brooklyn
Parker Waichman LLP
300 Cadman Plaza West
One Pierrepont Plaza, 12th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
New Jersey
Parker Waichman LLP
80 Main Street, Suite 265
West Orange, NJ 07052
Florida
Parker Waichman LLP
27299 Riverview Center Boulevard
Suite 108
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
Nationwide Service
Parker Waichman LLP
59 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10038