Medical Device Tracking System Now Being Made. Nearly three years ago, Congress called for medical devices to be marked and tracked with unique identifiers and data on the tracked devices is now being made available to the public. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) launched the online Global Unique Device Identification Database, AccessGUDID, […]
Medical Device Tracking System Now Being Made. Nearly three years ago, Congress called for medical devices to be marked and tracked with unique identifiers and data on the tracked devices is now being made available to the public.
Recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) launched the online Global Unique Device Identification Database, AccessGUDID, where the public can look up device information submitted by manufacturers, Modern Healthcare reports. The goal of UDI is to provide a better means for consumers, health care providers and product manufacturers to identify and report adverse events associated with a device and more quickly manage a recall when warranted. The FDA estimates about 50,000 serious adverse events related to medical devices are reported each year. Such adverse events result in about 3,000 deaths annually.
The identification system was established under a provision of the 2012 Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act. The FDA issued its final rule in 2013, providing for an implementation in phases, beginning with requiring manufacturers of Class 3 devices such as implanted pacemakers and heart valves to include a unique device identification (UDI) on their products. By 2020, all medical devices will be required to have one. Under FDA definitions, Class III is the most stringent regulatory category for devices. Class III devices are usually those that “support or sustain human life, are of substantial importance in preventing impairment of human health, or which present a potential, unreasonable risk of illness or injury.”
But the system’s implementation has come under criticism by some, including the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), which says including device identifiers in payment claims would be costly for providers who already face heavy administrative challenges associated with adopting electronic health records systems, according to Modern Healthcare. The FDA counters that including UDIs in claims would provide a much more comprehensive means of tracking devices and address the problem of sharing data across various systems. In 2012 and 2013 the FDA undertook an 18-month demonstration project with the Mercy Health Care System to identify the challenges and opportunities of implementing UDI in a large hospital system.
The FDA says that, when fully implemented, the UDI system will offer a range of benefits to the device industry, the FDA, consumers, health care providers and health care systems by:
The personal injury attorneys at Parker Waichman LLP offer free, no-obligation case evaluations. For more information, fill out our online contact form or call 1-800-YOURLAWYER (1-800-968-7529).