The associates I dealt with, Shelly Davis & Christina Morace were extremely helpful and very pleasant to work with. They responded to my inquires in a timely fashion. They secured very favorable settlement.
John Ilardi
2 years ago
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a heightened alert, stating that the long-lasting chemicals known as PFAS, suspected of contaminating water supplies at hundreds of military locations, are even more hazardous than previously understood. The agency’s latest findings indicate that these chemicals could be detrimental at incredibly low concentrations, virtually undetectable by current […]
PFAS Exposure on Military Bases
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a heightened alert, stating that the long-lasting chemicals known as PFAS, suspected of contaminating water supplies at hundreds of military locations, are even more hazardous than previously understood. The agency’s latest findings indicate that these chemicals could be detrimental at incredibly low concentrations, virtually undetectable by current methods.
This alert amplifies the significance of the ongoing issue that the Department of Defense faces, affecting around 700 active military bases, National Guard centers, decommissioned sites, and other government properties. Despite congressional mandates for the EPA to address this urgent matter last December, comprehensive testing and eradication of PFAS in military areas will likely take a considerable amount of time.
Adam Smith, Chair of the House Armed Services Committee, emphasized the severity of the situation, saying, “This new guidance underlines the dire risk PFAS pose to local communities, including our military personnel, civilians, and their families. Immediate and effective action from the Pentagon is crucial.”
Health complications linked to PFAS include a range of concerns like birth anomalies, heart conditions, weakened immune systems, and multiple types of cancer. These chemicals are notoriously persistent, neither breaking down in nature nor in the human body—hence their nickname, “forever chemicals.”
The EPA’s revised health guidelines indicate that PFOA and PFOS, the two most prevalent forms of PFAS, could pose health risks at concentrations as low as 0.004 and 0.02 parts per trillion. Earlier, the agency had set the threshold at 70 parts per trillion.
As of an April report to Congress, the Pentagon is scrutinizing contamination at 337 Army facilities, 204 Air Force sites, 148 Navy locations, seven Defense Logistics Agency properties, and four inactive defense installations. These chemicals have historically been a component of the firefighting foam—known technically as aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF)—and have leaked into the surrounding environment over years of use and accidents. Now, multiple levels of government are grappling with cleanup procedures and funding mechanisms.
Notable military locations undergoing examination or planning for remediation include Fort Benning in Georgia, Fort Campbell in Kentucky, Fort Bragg, Fort Hood, Fort Bliss, and Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington State.
A previous assessment had led the Department of Defense to conclude that 80 sites required no further actions, but this was based on outdated EPA guidelines. The newer findings could prompt reassessments.
In a statement to Congress earlier this year, the Pentagon disclosed partnerships with local regulatory bodies to address the PFAS contamination affecting community water supplies. By last December, over $1.5 billion had already been allocated for research and cleanup.
The military has committed to phasing out the use of AFFF and is actively looking for alternatives. The EPA’s new advisory aims to encourage local governments to inform residents of potential contamination and take preventive measures like water filtration, though it stops short of setting legally enforceable limits for PFAS in water. The EPA had previously announced plans to regulate these chemicals in drinking water by 2023.
For years, lawmakers have been urging the Department of Defense to better comprehend the scope of PFAS pollution, eliminate the use of such foam, and clean up affected sites. Legislative efforts include mandates for preventative measures against foam spills, mandatory testing for PFAS substances at all National Guard sites, and public disclosure of Defense Department water test results for PFAS.
Additional legislative action is underway, including a proposal to require periodic updates from the Pentagon on the phasing out of PFAS-based products and justifications for any continued usage deemed essential.
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen expressed her determination to extend an ongoing PFAS health study, stating, that the damaging effects of PFAS contamination in water supplies, as many households in New Hampshire can attest, are alarming and completely unacceptable. Every family should be able to trust the water that flows from their faucets.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are man-made chemicals that have been used in a variety of consumer and industrial consumer products since the 1940s. They are used in a wide range of applications, such as non-stick cookware, water-repellent clothing, stain-resistant fabrics, and firefighting foams. However, PFAS has come under increasing scrutiny for their potential adverse health effects and their persistence in the environment.
Here are some of the types of harm that PFAS chemicals are believed to potentially cause to humans:
Hormonal Disruption
Some studies suggest that PFAS chemicals can act as endocrine disruptors, affecting the hormonal balance in the body. This could have implications for development, reproduction, and other bodily functions that are regulated by hormones.
Immune System Effects
Certain PFAS chemicals have been associated with a weakened immune response, potentially reducing the effectiveness of vaccines and increasing susceptibility to infectious diseases.
Reproductive and Developmental Issues
Exposure to PFAS chemicals has been linked to lower fertility rates, reduced birth weights, and developmental problems in children.
Carcinogenic Effects
Some types of PFAS are suspected to be carcinogenic, potentially increasing the risk of certain types of cancer, such as testicular and kidney cancers.
Liver Damage
Animal studies have indicated that high levels of PFAS can lead to liver toxicity, though the implications for human health are not yet fully understood.
High Cholesterol
Elevated levels of certain types of PFAS have been associated with increased cholesterol levels, a known risk factor for heart disease.
Bioaccumulation
PFAS chemicals are highly persistent, not only in the environment but also in human and animal tissues. This means they can accumulate over time, leading to long-term exposure that may have chronic health effects.
Other Effects
Other reported health issues include changes in liver enzymes, preeclampsia in pregnant women, increased risk of high blood pressure, and increased uric acid levels, which could potentially affect kidney function.
It is worth noting that the evidence for many of these effects is still being studied, and more research is needed to definitively establish the risks associated with PFAS exposure. Nonetheless, the potential for harm has led to increasing regulatory scrutiny and efforts to limit the use and release of these chemicals.
Filing a PFAS (Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) lawsuit can be a course of action for individuals or communities who believe they have been harmed due to exposure to these chemicals. Here are some reasons why people might consider filing a PFAS lawsuit:
Compensation for Health Problems: If exposure to PFAS chemicals has led to medical conditions such as cancer, liver issues, high cholesterol, or other health problems, a lawsuit may provide compensation for medical bills, loss of earnings, and other costs.
Holding Companies Accountable: Companies that have manufactured or used PFAS chemicals may have been aware of their potential risks and yet failed to adequately warn the public or take preventative measures. A lawsuit can hold these companies accountable for negligence or willful misconduct.
Cleanup and Remediation Costs: PFAS chemicals are persistent and can contaminate water supplies, soil, and air. Cleanup can be extremely expensive. A lawsuit may help affected communities or governmental bodies recover the costs associated with remediation efforts.
Public Awareness: A high-profile lawsuit can draw attention to the issue of PFAS contamination, which may lead to increased regulation, safer industrial practices, and greater public awareness of the risks associated with these chemicals.
Scientific Research: Legal action can sometimes prompt more comprehensive studies into the effects of PFAS, adding to the body of knowledge about their safety and health implications.
Regulatory Change: Successful lawsuits can sometimes lead to regulatory changes, compelling government agencies to set stricter guidelines on the use and disposal of PFAS chemicals to better protect public health.
Emotional and Psychological Benefits: For some, taking legal action serves as a form of empowerment, allowing them to fight back against perceived injustices and take control over a situation that has caused them harm.
Protect Future Generations: Given that PFAS chemicals are persistent and accumulate over time, taking legal action now might protect future generations from exposure and its associated risks.
It’s important to consult with a qualified attorney who specializes in environmental law or toxic torts to evaluate the merits of a case, as legal action can be costly, time-consuming, and emotionally taxing. Evidence such as medical records, water and soil tests, and internal company documents can play a crucial role in the success of a PFAS lawsuit.
Note that I don’t have specific information on Parker Waichman LLP as of my last update in September 2021. However, based on general qualities that clients may look for in a law firm when considering filing a lawsuit, particularly in complex fields like environmental law or toxic torts, you might consider the following:
Experienced Legal Team: Parker Waichman LLP may offer an experienced team of lawyers specialized in environmental law, toxic torts, or related fields. A dedicated team with experience in toxic substance cases could be invaluable for navigating the complexities involved in such litigation.
Track Record of Success: A strong track record in similar cases would offer you confidence that the firm can successfully handle your case as well. This could include substantial settlements, favorable court decisions, or effective remediation efforts.
Comprehensive Investigation: Look for a firm that commits to conducting a thorough investigation to support your case. This may include gathering medical records, environmental tests, and other evidence, as well as consulting with experts to build a strong argument on your behalf.
Client-Focused Approach: A firm that prioritizes your needs and keeps you informed throughout the process can relieve some of the stress involved in litigation. You may want to choose a firm that provides regular updates, explains your options clearly, and is responsive to your questions and concerns.
Contingency Fee Structure: Many firms offer a contingency fee structure, meaning you don’t have to pay unless you win the case. This can make it financially easier to pursue legal action.
Credibility and Reputation: A firm with a strong reputation for ethical conduct and legal prowess can lend credibility to your case, potentially influencing the proceedings in your favor.
Resources: Lawsuits, particularly those involving complex environmental issues like PFAS, can be lengthy and resource-intensive. Choose a firm that has the resources and willingness to commit to a potentially prolonged legal battle.
Before making any decisions, it’s essential to consult directly with Parker Waichman LLP or any other law firm to discuss your specific circumstances, evaluate their expertise, and understand their fee structure.
Parker Waichman LLP helps families recover monetary compensation for harm caused by dangerous products like this defective product. For your free consultation, contact our national PFAS law firm today by using our live chat or calling 1-800-YOUR-LAWYER (1-800-968-7529).