Dursban Side Effects May Lead To Respiratory Failure Lawsuits
Dursban | Lawsuits, Lawyers | Side Effects: Paralysis, Death, Respiratory Failure, Cardiac Arrest | Chlorpyrifos, Highly Toxic
Dursban, also known as chlorpyrifos, is a highly toxic pesticide that was once widely used in the U.S. A nerve toxin, Dursban has been linked to birth defects, neurological injuries in children, and other ailments. It was used in homes, schools, daycare centers and many other places frequented by children. Dursban was also widely used in agriculture, on many of the fruits and vegetables most popular with children.
Dursban is so dangerous that many of its uses were banned by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2000. Up until that point, the Dow Chemical Company marketed Dursban as a safe household pesticide, despite a mountain of evidence to the contrary. As a result, millions of children were needlessly exposed to its toxic effects.
Our Dursban lawyers are working right now to hold Dow Chemical accountable for the unethical way it marketed this pesticide. If a member of your family was poisoned by Dursban, you may be entitled to compensation for your medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. We offer a free lawsuit consultation to families whose lives have been shattered because of Dursban. If someone you love was poisoned by this pesticide, we urge you to contact our Dursban lawyers today to protect your legal rights.
Dursban Health Risks
Dursban is an organophosphate pesticide that kills by attacking the nervous system. Such chemicals were first developed in the 1930s by the Nazi regime as chemical weapons. Prior to the EPA ban, Dursban was the most popular household pesticide in the U.S., and could be found in over 800 products. In one sampling of American children, more than 90 percent of the study group had chlorpyrifos present in their urine.
Dow Chemical has faced allegations that it withheld information about Dursban's risks, and marketed it as a safe pesticide, despite knowing the opposite was true. In 1995, for instance, Dow was fined $732,000 for not sending the EPA its reports on 249 Dursban poisoning incidents.
In 2003, Dow agreed to pay $2 million - the largest penalty ever in a pesticide case - to the state of New York. The state had filed suit against Dow for repeatedly violating a 1994 agreement that prohibited advertising that touted the safety of its pesticide products. However, an investigation found that almost immediately after the company entered into the agreement, it once again began to make misleading safety claims in its print, video and internet advertising.
Exposure to Dursban from inhalation, skin contact or ingestion impacts the central nervous system, the cardiovascular system and the respiratory system. Severe poisoning will affect the central nervous system, producing lack of coordination, slurred speech, loss of reflexes, weakness, fatigue, muscle contractions, twitching, tremors of the tongue or eyelids, and eventually paralysis of the body extremities and respiratory muscles. Death may be caused by respiratory failure or cardiac arrest.
Studies of pregnant migrant workers and their children have shown that exposure to Dursban caused, among other things, low birth weights, severe and unusual birth defects (primarily to the size and circumference of infants' heads), motor and cognitive delays, attention deficit disorder, and an increased risk of neural tube defects.
In June 2000, after a lengthy review, the EPA reached an agreement with Dow Chemical to ban most home and garden uses of Dursban, citing health risks to children. The EPA directive also restricted its application in agriculture. The agency required that Dursban use be phased out in areas where children would be most likely to be exposed – schools, daycare centers, parks and recreation areas, stores and malls.
Unfortunately, under the phase out, all stocks of the pesticide were permitted to remain on store shelves until they were used up. As a result, people continued buying Dursban products, often ignorant of their health risks. It’s impossible to know how many children were poisoned by Dursban during this time.
Dursban continues to pose a danger today, as it is still widely used in agriculture. The crops with the most intense chlorpyrifos use are cotton, corn, almonds, and fruit trees including oranges and apples
Legal Help for Victims of Dursban Injuries
If Dursban poisoning has ruined the health of someone in your family, you have valuable legal rights. Filing a Dursban lawsuit is one way you can hold Dow Chemical accountable for the misery this poisonous chemical has brought to your family and so many others. To find out how our Dursban lawyers can help you, please fill out our online form or call 1 800 LAW INFO (1-800-529-4636) today.