YourLawyer.com® 1-800-LAW-INFO (1-800-529-4636)

Medtronic Defibrillators Leads


AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Medtronic Defibrillator Defective Sprint Fidelis Lead

Keywords:  Medtronic | Lawyer | Defibrillator |Attorney | Lead | Fidelis | Lawsuit

On October 15, 2007, Medtronic announced that it was suspending sales of the Sprint Fidelis lead, a vital component in its implantable defibrillators.   According to Medtronic, the Sprint Fidelis lead, a wire that connects the Medtronic defibrillator to the heart, could fracture inside a patient’s blood vessel, delivering a massive electrical jolt.   This malfunction can cause extreme pain, or in the worse case scenario, it can be fatal.   At least 5 deaths have already been linked to a malfunctioning Sprint Fidelis lead used with an implantable Medtronic defibrillator.

The Sprint Fidelis lead have been used in implantable Medtronic defibrillators since 2004, and most patients who received the devices since then have the faulty leads.   Sprint Fidelis leads were used only in cardiac defibrillators -- or complex devices with defibrillation capacity -- and not in conventional pacemakers. Some patients with congestive heart failure use devices that included this defibrillation ability, and those were among the machines that use the Sprint Fidelis lead.

Medtronic Defibrillator Lead Recall
Medtronic decided to suspend sales of the Sprint Fidelis lead after a company review of 30 months of data showed that the defibrillator lead had a continuing fracture problem.   According to the company’s own estimate, approximately 2.3%, or 4,000 to 5,000 people with a Sprint Fidelis lead will experience fracture within 30 months of having a Medtronic defibrillator implanted.   Those patients whose Sprint Fidelis lead fractures will require a dangerous surgical procedure to have the wire replaced.

For the unlucky patients who experience a fracture of a Sprint Fidelis lead, three things can happen.  If they are fortunate, the implantable defibrillator will beep, alerting the patient to seek immediate medical attention.  Or, the fracture can create a massive electrical shock that causes the patient extreme and sudden chest pain.  But most disturbingly, the fracture of a Sprint Fidelis lead can deplete the Medtronic defibrillator’s battery.  If this happens, the Medtronic defibrillator can fail to deliver a necessary, life-saving shock to the heart. 

In addition to suspending sales of the Sprint Fidelis lead, Medtronic also recalled all unused leads on the market.  The company also advised patients with Medtronic implantable defibrillators that may have used the defective Sprint Fidelis lead to see their doctors.  Replacing leads on an implantable defibrillator is far more risky than replacing the device itself, so the company was not advising that patients with a Sprint Fidelis lead have those replaced.  Rather, it urged physicians to reprogram the defibrillators to minimize the problem.  Medtronic said the new programming would allow the implantable defibrillators to better monitor and warn of problems with the Sprint Fidelis leads.

Medtronic Defibrillator Charging Problem

On April 16, 2004 Medtronic announced that it was recalling two heart defibrillators because they have been linked to at least four deaths and one injury. Medtronic said that some of these defibrillators have failed to charge properly which can result in the late delivery or no delivery of cardiac shock therapy.

The charging problem involves the Medtronic Micro Jewel II Model 7223Cx and the Medtronic GEM DR Model 7271 implanted cardioverter-defibrillators. Medtronic said that most of these devices were implanted in 1997 and 1998. About 1,800 are thought to be still in use.

These devices are used to shock the heart into normal rhythm after patients suffer irregular heartbeat or fibrillation, which are rapid, life-threatening arrhythmia's, originating in the lower chambers of the heart. The defibrillators are implanted surgically in the chest. When a cardiac arrhythmia occurs, the capacitor is charged and the device delivers the appropriate shock.

Medtronic said that with the suspect defibrillators, the capacitors may take longer than normal to charge near the end of the battery service life and could cause a delay in delivery or no delivery of shock therapy. A delay or no delivery of shock therapy can be life threatening.

Medtronic Defibrillator Lawsuit Lawyers
If you or a loved one suffered injuries from a Medtronic Defibrillator, please fill out the form at the right for a free lawsuit case evaluation by a qualified defective medical device attorney.
Medtronic Defibrillators LeadsRSS Feed

Medtronic Questioned on Sprint Fidelis Lead Fracture Rates

Feb 4, 2010 | Parker Waichman Alonso LLP
How often does Medtronic Inc.'s  recalled Sprint Fidelis defibrillator lead  fracture?  According to some major hospitals, more often than what Medtronic has stated. According to The Wall Street Journal, Medtronic says its own research shows the Sprint Fidelis leads survive for three years at least 95.4% of the time, for a failure rate of 4.6%. But a report from the University of Rochester published in the January issue of the American Journal of Cardiology said the three-year...

Sprint Fidelis Problems Weigh On Medtronic

Dec 31, 2009 | Parker Waichman Alonso LLP
We have long been writing about the dangerous, sometimes deadly, issue regarding defective cardiac device leads. Now, a report out by UBS Investment Research announced that, “lead failures could accelerate over time,” said Med City News.Lead wires are placed into a major vein and attached to interior heart muscle for the purpose of monitoring heart rhythm and transmitting electric shocks should an irregularity occur. If a lead breaks, the implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) can...

Medtronic Says California Seeking Info on Heart Rhythm Devices

Dec 10, 2009 | Parker Waichman Alonso LLP
Medtronic Inc. is being investigated in California over its heart rhythm devices.  According to The Wall Street Journal, Medtronic recently disclosed that it had received a subpoena from the Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Inspector General in California.Medtronic reported the subpoena in a quarterly filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) it had made on Wednesday.  The disclosure read as follows:"On September 16, 2009, the Company received a...

Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm Disease Management Site Gets FDA Warning Letter

Nov 19, 2009 | Parker Waichman Alonso LLP
Device maker giant, Medtronic, Inc., just announced that it received a warning letter from the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA).According to the Twin Cities Business Journal, the letter came after an inspection of Medtronic’s Mounds View Cardiac Rhythm Disease Management site and concerned: “Corrective and preventative action and field-action timeliness, review and documentation of field action recommendations, supplier qualification and controls, and medical-device...

More Claims Filed over Medtronic Sprint Fidelis Leads

Nov 5, 2009 | Parker Waichman Alonso LLP
Three more lawsuits have been filed against Medtronic, Medtronic USA, Medtronic International Technology, and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations, reports the Madison Record. The three individuals, residents of Illinois, allege in their 60-count suit, that they suffer sudden shocks after being implanted with defective defibrillators made by the device maker, according to the Madison Record.The complaints state that Lillian Tengstrand, Effie Thomas, and Marcus Williams received the implantable...

More Medtronic Defibrillators Leads News

Medtronic Defibrillators
* Denotes required field.

Title

* First Name

* Last Name

* Email Address

* Phone Number

Cell Phone Number

Office Phone Number

Street Address

Apartment/Suite

City

State

Zip Code

Please provide the best method and times to contact you:

Date of birth of person injured
(mm-dd-yyyy):

Which Medtronic Defibrillator was implanted?

If other, what is the name of the defibrillator that was implanted?

Date the device was implanted:

Is the device still implanted?


What medical condition prompted the use of the device?

Please describe any problems or injuries caused by the device:

Other Info:

No Yes, I agree to the Parker Waichman Alonso LLP disclaimers.Click here to review all.

Yes, I would like to receive the Parker Waichman Alonso LLP monthly newsletter, InjuryAlert.

please do not fill out the field below.

Home | Defective Drugs | Medical Devices | Toxic Substances | Accidents | Product Liability | Malpractice | Diseases
Nursing Home Negligence | Food Poisoning | Other Topics | Contact
Statement of Clients' Rights | Site Map | Vioxx | Mesothelioma | Permax | Dostinex | Composix Kugel Mesh X Large Patch
Ortho Evra | Fosamax | Fusarium Keratitis | Stevens Johnson Syndrome

© 2002-2010 YourLawyer.com®. All Rights Reserved.

Please note that you are not considered a client until you have signed a retainer agreement and your case has been accepted by us.
Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter.
Attorney Advertising